* [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] armv8/ls1043a: fixup GIC offset according to SVR and SCFG_GIC400_ALIGN[GIC_ADDR_BIT]
@ 2016-10-24 7:38 Wenbin song
2016-10-24 7:38 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/2] armv8/fsl-layerscape: fdt: fixup LS1043A rev1 MSI node Wenbin song
2016-10-25 20:35 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] armv8/ls1043a: fixup GIC offset according to SVR and SCFG_GIC400_ALIGN[GIC_ADDR_BIT] york sun
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Wenbin song @ 2016-10-24 7:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
The LS1043A rev1.1 silicon supports two types of GIC offset: 4K alignment
and 64K alignment. The bit SCFG_GIC400_ALIGN[GIC_ADDR_BIT] is used to choose
which offset will be used.
The LS1043A rev1.0 silicon only supports the CIG offset with 4K alignment.
If GIC_ADDR_BIT bit is set, 4K alignment is used, or else 64K alignment is used.
64K alignment is the default setting.
Overriding the weekly smp_kick_all_cpus, the new impletment is able to detect
GIC offset.
The default GIC offset in kernel device tree is using 64K alignment, it
need to be fixed if 4K alignment is detected.
Signed-off-by: Wenbin Song <wenbin.song@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>
---
Changes in v4:
Squash [patch 2/3 v3] with this patch.
Add comments on fix_gic_offest.
Add the descriptions of rev1.0 GIC offset.
Use macros to define the offset and size of GIC components.
Changes in v3:
Add descriptions about smp_kick_all_cpus on commit message.
Rename the macros on commit message to match with them used in the change.
Replace CONFIG_LS1043A with HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN.
Changes in v2:
None
---
arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/Kconfig | 4 ++
arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/lowlevel.S | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/config.h | 20 +++++++-
.../include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/immap_lsch2.h | 3 +-
5 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/Kconfig b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/Kconfig
index 94ec8d5..c66c497 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/Kconfig
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ config ARCH_LS1043A
select SYS_FSL_DDR_VER_50
select SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A010315
select SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A010539
+ select HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
config ARCH_LS1046A
bool
@@ -135,4 +136,7 @@ config SYS_FSL_DDR4
help
Enable Freescale DDR4 controller.
+config HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
+ bool
+
endmenu
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c
index 1a8321b..ebc7863 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c
@@ -126,6 +126,52 @@ void fsl_fdt_disable_usb(void *blob)
}
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
+/* Fixup gic node align with 4K */
+static void fdt_fixup_gic(void *blob)
+{
+ int offset, err;
+ u64 reg[8];
+ struct ccsr_gur __iomem *gur = (void *)(CONFIG_SYS_FSL_GUTS_ADDR);
+ unsigned int val;
+ struct ccsr_scfg __iomem *scfg = (void *)CONFIG_SYS_FSL_SCFG_ADDR;
+
+ val = gur_in32(&gur->svr) & 0xff;
+
+ if (val == REV1_1) {
+ val = scfg_in32(&scfg->gic_align) & (0x01 << GIC_ADDR_BIT);
+ if (!val)
+ return;
+ }
+
+ offset = fdt_subnode_offset(blob, 0, "interrupt-controller at 1400000");
+ if (offset < 0) {
+ printf("WARNING: fdt_subnode_offset can't find node %s: %s\n",
+ "interrupt-controller at 1400000", fdt_strerror(offset));
+ return;
+ }
+
+ reg[0] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICD_BASE_4K);
+ reg[1] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICD_SIZE_4K);
+ reg[2] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICC_BASE_4K);
+ reg[3] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICC_SIZE_4K);
+ reg[4] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICH_BASE_4K);
+ reg[5] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICH_SIZE_4K);
+ reg[6] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICV_BASE_4K);
+ reg[7] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICV_SIZE_4K);
+
+ err = fdt_setprop(blob, offset, "reg", reg, sizeof(reg));
+ if (err < 0) {
+ printf("WARNING: fdt_setprop can't set %s from node %s: %s\n",
+ "reg", "interrupt-controller@1400000",
+ fdt_strerror(err));
+ return;
+ }
+
+ return;
+}
+#endif
+
void ft_cpu_setup(void *blob, bd_t *bd)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_LSCH2
@@ -170,4 +216,7 @@ void ft_cpu_setup(void *blob, bd_t *bd)
#endif
fsl_fdt_disable_usb(blob);
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
+ fdt_fixup_gic(blob);
+#endif
}
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/lowlevel.S b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/lowlevel.S
index 5d0b7a4..e2b8698 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/lowlevel.S
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/lowlevel.S
@@ -14,6 +14,48 @@
#include <asm/arch/mp.h>
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
+
+/* fixup GIC offset
+* For LS1043a rev1.0, GIC base address align with 4k.
+* For LS1043a rev1.1, if DCFG_GIC400_ALIGN[GIC_ADDR_BIT]
+* is set, GIC base address align with 4K, or else align
+* with 64k.
+* output:
+* x0: the base address of GICD
+* x1: the base address of GICC
+*/
+ENTRY(fix_gic_offset)
+ ldr x0, =GICD_BASE
+ ldr x1, =GICC_BASE
+ ldr x3, =DCFG_CCSR_SVR
+ ldr w3, [x3]
+ rev w3, w3
+ ands w3, w3, #0xff
+ cmp w3, #REV1_0
+ b.eq 1f
+ ldr x3, =SCFG_GIC400_ALIGN
+ ldr w3, [x3]
+ rev w3, w3
+ tbnz w3, #GIC_ADDR_BIT, 1f
+ ret
+1:
+ ldr x0, =GICD_BASE_4K
+ ldr x1, =GICC_BASE_4K
+ ret
+ENDPROC(fix_gic_offset)
+
+ENTRY(smp_kick_all_cpus)
+ /* Kick secondary cpus up by SGI 0 interrupt */
+ mov x29, lr /* Save LR */
+ bl fix_gic_offset
+ bl gic_kick_secondary_cpus
+ mov lr, x29 /* Restore LR */
+ ret
+ENDPROC(smp_kick_all_cpus)
+
+#endif
+
ENTRY(lowlevel_init)
mov x29, lr /* Save LR */
@@ -105,15 +147,23 @@ ENTRY(lowlevel_init)
/* Initialize GIC Secure Bank Status */
#if defined(CONFIG_GICV2) || defined(CONFIG_GICV3)
branch_if_slave x0, 1f
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
+ bl fix_gic_offset
+#else
ldr x0, =GICD_BASE
+#endif
bl gic_init_secure
1:
#ifdef CONFIG_GICV3
ldr x0, =GICR_BASE
bl gic_init_secure_percpu
#elif defined(CONFIG_GICV2)
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
+ bl fix_gic_offset
+#else
ldr x0, =GICD_BASE
ldr x1, =GICC_BASE
+#endif
bl gic_init_secure_percpu
#endif
#endif
@@ -335,7 +385,12 @@ ENTRY(secondary_boot_func)
#if defined(CONFIG_GICV3)
gic_wait_for_interrupt_m x0
#elif defined(CONFIG_GICV2)
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
+ bl fix_gic_offset
+ mov x0, x1
+#else
ldr x0, =GICC_BASE
+#endif
gic_wait_for_interrupt_m x0, w1
#endif
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/config.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/config.h
index 4201e0f..47e21c5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/config.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/config.h
@@ -172,8 +172,24 @@
#define SMMU_BASE 0x09000000
/* Generic Interrupt Controller Definitions */
-#define GICD_BASE 0x01401000
-#define GICC_BASE 0x01402000
+#define GICD_BASE 0x01410000
+#define GICC_BASE 0x01420000
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
+#define GICD_BASE_4K 0x01401000
+#define GICC_BASE_4K 0x01402000
+#define GICH_BASE_4K 0x01404000
+#define GICV_BASE_4K 0x01406000
+#define GICD_SIZE_4K 0x1000
+#define GICC_SIZE_4K 0x2000
+#define GICH_SIZE_4K 0x2000
+#define GICV_SIZE_4K 0x2000
+#endif
+
+#define DCFG_CCSR_SVR 0x1ee00a4
+#define REV1_0 0x10
+#define REV1_1 0x11
+#define GIC_ADDR_BIT 31
+#define SCFG_GIC400_ALIGN 0x1570188
#define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A008850
#define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A009663
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/immap_lsch2.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/immap_lsch2.h
index d88543d..1dfef53 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/immap_lsch2.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/immap_lsch2.h
@@ -359,7 +359,8 @@ struct ccsr_scfg {
u32 qspi_cfg;
u8 res_160[0x180-0x160];
u32 dmamcr;
- u8 res_184[0x18c-0x184];
+ u8 res_184[0x188-0x184];
+ u32 gic_align;
u32 debug_icid;
u8 res_190[0x1a4-0x190];
u32 snpcnfgcr;
--
2.1.0.27.g96db324
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/2] armv8/fsl-layerscape: fdt: fixup LS1043A rev1 MSI node
2016-10-24 7:38 [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] armv8/ls1043a: fixup GIC offset according to SVR and SCFG_GIC400_ALIGN[GIC_ADDR_BIT] Wenbin song
@ 2016-10-24 7:38 ` Wenbin song
2016-10-25 20:35 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] armv8/ls1043a: fixup GIC offset according to SVR and SCFG_GIC400_ALIGN[GIC_ADDR_BIT] york sun
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Wenbin song @ 2016-10-24 7:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
The default MSI node in kernel tree is for LS1043A rev1.1 silicon,
if rev1.0 silicon used, need to fixup the MSI node to match it.
Signed-off-by: Wenbin Song <wenbin.song@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>
---
Changes in v4:
None
Changes in v3:
Replace CONFIG_LS1043A with HAS_FEATURE_ENHACED_MSI.
Changes in v2:
None
---
arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/Kconfig | 3 +
arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 97 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/Kconfig b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/Kconfig
index c66c497..d2537bb 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/Kconfig
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ config ARCH_LS1043A
select SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A010315
select SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A010539
select HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
+ select HAS_FEATURE_ENHANCED_MSI
config ARCH_LS1046A
bool
@@ -138,5 +139,7 @@ config SYS_FSL_DDR4
config HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
bool
+config HAS_FEATURE_ENHANCED_MSI
+ bool
endmenu
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c
index ebc7863..90114b2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c
@@ -171,6 +171,97 @@ static void fdt_fixup_gic(void *blob)
return;
}
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_FEATURE_ENHANCED_MSI
+static int _fdt_fixup_msi_subnode(void *blob, int parentoffset,
+ const char *name, int irq_no)
+{
+ int err, offset;
+ u32 tmp[3];
+
+ offset = fdt_subnode_offset(blob, parentoffset, name);
+ if (offset < 0) {
+ printf("WARNING: fdt_subnode_offset can't find %s: %s\n",
+ name, fdt_strerror(offset));
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ tmp[0] = cpu_to_fdt32(0x0);
+ tmp[1] = cpu_to_fdt32(irq_no);
+ tmp[2] = cpu_to_fdt32(0x4);
+
+ err = fdt_setprop(blob, offset, "interrupts", tmp, sizeof(tmp));
+ if (err < 0) {
+ printf("WARNING: fdt_setprop can't set %s from node %s: %s\n",
+ "interrupts", name, fdt_strerror(err));
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
+static int _fdt_fixup_pci_msi(void *blob, const char *name)
+{
+ int offset, len, err;
+ void *p;
+ int val;
+ u32 tmp[4][8];
+
+ offset = fdt_path_offset(blob, name);
+ if (offset < 0) {
+ printf("WARNING: fdt_path_offset can't find path %s: %s\n",
+ name, fdt_strerror(offset));
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ p = (char *)fdt_getprop(blob, offset, "interrupt-map", &len);
+ if (!p || len != sizeof(tmp)) {
+ printf("WARNING: fdt_getprop can't get %s from node %s\n",
+ "interrupt-map", name);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ memcpy((char *)tmp, p, len);
+ val = fdt32_to_cpu(tmp[0][6]);
+ tmp[1][6] = cpu_to_fdt32(val + 1);
+ tmp[2][6] = cpu_to_fdt32(val + 2);
+ tmp[3][6] = cpu_to_fdt32(val + 3);
+
+ err = fdt_setprop(blob, offset, "interrupt-map", tmp, sizeof(tmp));
+ if (err < 0) {
+ printf("WARNING: fdt_setprop can't set %s from node %s: %s.\n",
+ "interrupt-map", name, fdt_strerror(err));
+ return 0;
+ }
+ return 1;
+}
+
+/* Fixup msi to v1_0*/
+
+static void fdt_fixup_msi(void *blob)
+{
+ int nodeoffset;
+ struct ccsr_gur __iomem *gur = (void *)(CONFIG_SYS_FSL_GUTS_ADDR);
+ unsigned int val;
+
+ val = gur_in32(&gur->svr) & 0xff;
+ if (val == REV1_1)
+ return;
+
+ nodeoffset = fdt_path_offset(blob, "/soc/msi-controller");
+ if (nodeoffset < 0) {
+ printf("WARNING: fdt_path_offset can't find path %s: %s\n",
+ "/soc/msi-controller", fdt_strerror(nodeoffset));
+ return;
+ }
+ _fdt_fixup_msi_subnode(blob, nodeoffset, "msi0 at 1571000", 116);
+ _fdt_fixup_msi_subnode(blob, nodeoffset, "msi1 at 1572000", 126);
+ _fdt_fixup_msi_subnode(blob, nodeoffset, "msi2 at 1573000", 160);
+
+ _fdt_fixup_pci_msi(blob, "/soc/pcie at 3400000");
+ _fdt_fixup_pci_msi(blob, "/soc/pcie at 3500000");
+ _fdt_fixup_pci_msi(blob, "/soc/pcie@3600000");
+}
+#endif
void ft_cpu_setup(void *blob, bd_t *bd)
{
@@ -219,4 +310,7 @@ void ft_cpu_setup(void *blob, bd_t *bd)
#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
fdt_fixup_gic(blob);
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_FEATURE_ENHANCED_MSI
+ fdt_fixup_msi(blob);
+#endif
}
--
2.1.0.27.g96db324
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] armv8/ls1043a: fixup GIC offset according to SVR and SCFG_GIC400_ALIGN[GIC_ADDR_BIT]
2016-10-24 7:38 [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] armv8/ls1043a: fixup GIC offset according to SVR and SCFG_GIC400_ALIGN[GIC_ADDR_BIT] Wenbin song
2016-10-24 7:38 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/2] armv8/fsl-layerscape: fdt: fixup LS1043A rev1 MSI node Wenbin song
@ 2016-10-25 20:35 ` york sun
2016-10-26 10:39 ` Wenbin Song
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: york sun @ 2016-10-25 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 10/24/2016 12:51 AM, Wenbin song wrote:
> The LS1043A rev1.1 silicon supports two types of GIC offset: 4K alignment
> and 64K alignment. The bit SCFG_GIC400_ALIGN[GIC_ADDR_BIT] is used to choose
> which offset will be used.
>
> The LS1043A rev1.0 silicon only supports the CIG offset with 4K alignment.
>
> If GIC_ADDR_BIT bit is set, 4K alignment is used, or else 64K alignment is used.
> 64K alignment is the default setting.
>
> Overriding the weekly smp_kick_all_cpus, the new impletment is able to detect
> GIC offset.
I think you meant "weak" here. :)
>
> The default GIC offset in kernel device tree is using 64K alignment, it
> need to be fixed if 4K alignment is detected.
The "default" offset in device tree is also created by us, isn't it? I
am not against you fixing it. Don't you want to check the alignment
first? If the device tree has 4K alignment but you run on rev 1.1, do
you want to use 64K alignment?
>
> Signed-off-by: Wenbin Song <wenbin.song@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> Squash [patch 2/3 v3] with this patch.
> Add comments on fix_gic_offest.
> Add the descriptions of rev1.0 GIC offset.
> Use macros to define the offset and size of GIC components.
> Changes in v3:
> Add descriptions about smp_kick_all_cpus on commit message.
> Rename the macros on commit message to match with them used in the change.
> Replace CONFIG_LS1043A with HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN.
> Changes in v2:
> None
> ---
> arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/Kconfig | 4 ++
> arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/lowlevel.S | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/config.h | 20 +++++++-
> .../include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/immap_lsch2.h | 3 +-
> 5 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/Kconfig b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/Kconfig
> index 94ec8d5..c66c497 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/Kconfig
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ config ARCH_LS1043A
> select SYS_FSL_DDR_VER_50
> select SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A010315
> select SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A010539
> + select HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
>
> config ARCH_LS1046A
> bool
> @@ -135,4 +136,7 @@ config SYS_FSL_DDR4
> help
> Enable Freescale DDR4 controller.
>
> +config HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
> + bool
> +
> endmenu
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c
> index 1a8321b..ebc7863 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c
> @@ -126,6 +126,52 @@ void fsl_fdt_disable_usb(void *blob)
> }
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
> +/* Fixup gic node align with 4K */
> +static void fdt_fixup_gic(void *blob)
> +{
> + int offset, err;
> + u64 reg[8];
> + struct ccsr_gur __iomem *gur = (void *)(CONFIG_SYS_FSL_GUTS_ADDR);
> + unsigned int val;
> + struct ccsr_scfg __iomem *scfg = (void *)CONFIG_SYS_FSL_SCFG_ADDR;
> +
> + val = gur_in32(&gur->svr) & 0xff;
> +
> + if (val == REV1_1) {
This is problematic. How about for future SoCs, or other than LS1043A?
Can we just check GIC_ADDR_BIT?
> + val = scfg_in32(&scfg->gic_align) & (0x01 << GIC_ADDR_BIT);
> + if (!val)
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + offset = fdt_subnode_offset(blob, 0, "interrupt-controller at 1400000");
> + if (offset < 0) {
> + printf("WARNING: fdt_subnode_offset can't find node %s: %s\n",
> + "interrupt-controller at 1400000", fdt_strerror(offset));
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + reg[0] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICD_BASE_4K);
> + reg[1] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICD_SIZE_4K);
> + reg[2] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICC_BASE_4K);
> + reg[3] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICC_SIZE_4K);
> + reg[4] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICH_BASE_4K);
> + reg[5] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICH_SIZE_4K);
> + reg[6] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICV_BASE_4K);
> + reg[7] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICV_SIZE_4K);
> +
> + err = fdt_setprop(blob, offset, "reg", reg, sizeof(reg));
> + if (err < 0) {
> + printf("WARNING: fdt_setprop can't set %s from node %s: %s\n",
> + "reg", "interrupt-controller at 1400000",
> + fdt_strerror(err));
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + return;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> void ft_cpu_setup(void *blob, bd_t *bd)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_FSL_LSCH2
> @@ -170,4 +216,7 @@ void ft_cpu_setup(void *blob, bd_t *bd)
> #endif
> fsl_fdt_disable_usb(blob);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
> + fdt_fixup_gic(blob);
> +#endif
> }
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/lowlevel.S b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/lowlevel.S
> index 5d0b7a4..e2b8698 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/lowlevel.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/lowlevel.S
> @@ -14,6 +14,48 @@
> #include <asm/arch/mp.h>
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
> +
> +/* fixup GIC offset
> +* For LS1043a rev1.0, GIC base address align with 4k.
> +* For LS1043a rev1.1, if DCFG_GIC400_ALIGN[GIC_ADDR_BIT]
> +* is set, GIC base address align with 4K, or else align
> +* with 64k.
> +* output:
> +* x0: the base address of GICD
> +* x1: the base address of GICC
> +*/
> +ENTRY(fix_gic_offset)
> + ldr x0, =GICD_BASE
> + ldr x1, =GICC_BASE
> + ldr x3, =DCFG_CCSR_SVR
> + ldr w3, [x3]
> + rev w3, w3
> + ands w3, w3, #0xff
> + cmp w3, #REV1_0
> + b.eq 1f
> + ldr x3, =SCFG_GIC400_ALIGN
> + ldr w3, [x3]
> + rev w3, w3
> + tbnz w3, #GIC_ADDR_BIT, 1f
> + ret
> +1:
> + ldr x0, =GICD_BASE_4K
> + ldr x1, =GICC_BASE_4K
> + ret
> +ENDPROC(fix_gic_offset)
The more I read it, the more I think the function name should be called
get_gic_offset. You are not fixing it, the return value is the correct
gic offset.
> +
> +ENTRY(smp_kick_all_cpus)
> + /* Kick secondary cpus up by SGI 0 interrupt */
> + mov x29, lr /* Save LR */
> + bl fix_gic_offset
> + bl gic_kick_secondary_cpus
> + mov lr, x29 /* Restore LR */
> + ret
> +ENDPROC(smp_kick_all_cpus)
Another way to do this is to implement a weak get_gic_offset function in
start.S to return GICD_BASE. You can implement another function here to
return correct offset. If you want to replace smp_kick_all_cpus, you may
want to keep the #if condition to check CONFIG_GICV2 or CONFIG_GICV3, in
case we need to debug without GIC.
> +
> +#endif
> +
> ENTRY(lowlevel_init)
> mov x29, lr /* Save LR */
>
> @@ -105,15 +147,23 @@ ENTRY(lowlevel_init)
> /* Initialize GIC Secure Bank Status */
> #if defined(CONFIG_GICV2) || defined(CONFIG_GICV3)
> branch_if_slave x0, 1f
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
> + bl fix_gic_offset
> +#else
> ldr x0, =GICD_BASE
> +#endif
If you use get_gic_offset, you can get rid of this #ifdef.
> bl gic_init_secure
> 1:
> #ifdef CONFIG_GICV3
> ldr x0, =GICR_BASE
> bl gic_init_secure_percpu
> #elif defined(CONFIG_GICV2)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
> + bl fix_gic_offset
> +#else
> ldr x0, =GICD_BASE
> ldr x1, =GICC_BASE
> +#endif
> bl gic_init_secure_percpu
> #endif
> #endif
> @@ -335,7 +385,12 @@ ENTRY(secondary_boot_func)
> #if defined(CONFIG_GICV3)
> gic_wait_for_interrupt_m x0
> #elif defined(CONFIG_GICV2)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
> + bl fix_gic_offset
> + mov x0, x1
> +#else
> ldr x0, =GICC_BASE
> +#endif
> gic_wait_for_interrupt_m x0, w1
> #endif
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/config.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/config.h
> index 4201e0f..47e21c5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/config.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/config.h
> @@ -172,8 +172,24 @@
> #define SMMU_BASE 0x09000000
>
> /* Generic Interrupt Controller Definitions */
> -#define GICD_BASE 0x01401000
> -#define GICC_BASE 0x01402000
> +#define GICD_BASE 0x01410000
> +#define GICC_BASE 0x01420000
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
> +#define GICD_BASE_4K 0x01401000
> +#define GICC_BASE_4K 0x01402000
> +#define GICH_BASE_4K 0x01404000
> +#define GICV_BASE_4K 0x01406000
Are you using space instead of tab here?
> +#define GICD_SIZE_4K 0x1000
> +#define GICC_SIZE_4K 0x2000
> +#define GICH_SIZE_4K 0x2000
> +#define GICV_SIZE_4K 0x2000
> +#endif
This is a bit odd. You have rev 1.0 first, which uses 4K alignment. Yet
you have kernel device tree using 64K alignment. How did it work before?
Now you have rev 1.1, you make 64K as default, and replace it with 4K if
a bit is set, or rev 1.0 SoC is detected. You are not changing anything
actually, but to return the correct offset for the three situations,
i.e. rev 1.0 SoC, rev 1.1 SoC with the bit cleared, rev 1.1 SoC with bit
set.
The only "fix" part in this patch is to fixup device tree. I suggest you
read the device tree to determine which alignment you have there, and
update accordingly, for both 4K and 64K alignment. I don't think you
presumption of 64K will stand.
If GIC_ADDR_BIT is always set for SoCs with 4K alignment, you can get
rid of the Kconfig option.
York
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] armv8/ls1043a: fixup GIC offset according to SVR and SCFG_GIC400_ALIGN[GIC_ADDR_BIT]
2016-10-25 20:35 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] armv8/ls1043a: fixup GIC offset according to SVR and SCFG_GIC400_ALIGN[GIC_ADDR_BIT] york sun
@ 2016-10-26 10:39 ` Wenbin Song
2016-10-26 15:59 ` york sun
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Wenbin Song @ 2016-10-26 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi: york
Best Regards
Wenbin Song
> -----Original Message-----
> From: york sun
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 4:35 AM
> To: Wenbin Song <wenbin.song@nxp.com>; albert.u.boot at aribaud.net;
> Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>; u-boot at lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] armv8/ls1043a: fixup GIC offset according to SVR
> and SCFG_GIC400_ALIGN[GIC_ADDR_BIT]
>
> >
> > Overriding the weekly smp_kick_all_cpus, the new impletment is able to
> > detect GIC offset.
>
> I think you meant "weak" here. :)
[wenbin] sorry, this is my carelessness.
>
> >
> > The default GIC offset in kernel device tree is using 64K alignment,
> > it need to be fixed if 4K alignment is detected.
>
> The "default" offset in device tree is also created by us, isn't it? I am not against
> you fixing it. Don't you want to check the alignment first? If the device tree has
> 4K alignment but you run on rev 1.1, do you want to use 64K alignment?
[wenbin] Yes, I will modify them.
>
> >
> > +
> > + if (val == REV1_1) {
>
> This is problematic. How about for future SoCs, or other than LS1043A?
> Can we just check GIC_ADDR_BIT?
>
[wenbin] it is not clear about the future revise ,including whether has the new revise, whether the new revise supports GIC 4K alignment and how to detect it.
So I could only suppose the future revise is as same as rev1.1.
Therefore, I will modify it to " if (val != REV1_0) {" in next version.
> > + val = scfg_in32(&scfg->gic_align) & (0x01 << GIC_ADDR_BIT);
> > + if (!val)
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + offset = fdt_subnode_offset(blob, 0, "interrupt-controller at 1400000");
> > + if (offset < 0) {
> > + printf("WARNING: fdt_subnode_offset can't find
> node %s: %s\n",
> > + "interrupt-controller at 1400000", fdt_strerror(offset));
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + reg[0] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICD_BASE_4K);
> > + reg[1] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICD_SIZE_4K);
> > + reg[2] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICC_BASE_4K);
> > + reg[3] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICC_SIZE_4K);
> > + reg[4] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICH_BASE_4K);
> > + reg[5] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICH_SIZE_4K);
> > + reg[6] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICV_BASE_4K);
> > + reg[7] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICV_SIZE_4K);
> > +
> > + err = fdt_setprop(blob, offset, "reg", reg, sizeof(reg));
> > + if (err < 0) {
> > + printf("WARNING: fdt_setprop can't set %s from
> node %s: %s\n",
> > + "reg", "interrupt-controller at 1400000",
> > + fdt_strerror(err));
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return;
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > +
> > void ft_cpu_setup(void *blob, bd_t *bd) { #ifdef CONFIG_FSL_LSCH2
> > @@ -170,4 +216,7 @@ void ft_cpu_setup(void *blob, bd_t *bd) #endif
> > fsl_fdt_disable_usb(blob);
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
> > + fdt_fixup_gic(blob);
> > +#endif
> > }
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/lowlevel.S
> > b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/lowlevel.S
> > index 5d0b7a4..e2b8698 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/lowlevel.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/lowlevel.S
> > @@ -14,6 +14,48 @@
> > #include <asm/arch/mp.h>
> > #endif
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
> > +
> > +/* fixup GIC offset
> > +* For LS1043a rev1.0, GIC base address align with 4k.
> > +* For LS1043a rev1.1, if DCFG_GIC400_ALIGN[GIC_ADDR_BIT]
> > +* is set, GIC base address align with 4K, or else align
> > +* with 64k.
> > +* output:
> > +* x0: the base address of GICD
> > +* x1: the base address of GICC
> > +*/
> > +ENTRY(fix_gic_offset)
> > + ldr x0, =GICD_BASE
> > + ldr x1, =GICC_BASE
> > + ldr x3, =DCFG_CCSR_SVR
> > + ldr w3, [x3]
> > + rev w3, w3
> > + ands w3, w3, #0xff
> > + cmp w3, #REV1_0
> > + b.eq 1f
> > + ldr x3, =SCFG_GIC400_ALIGN
> > + ldr w3, [x3]
> > + rev w3, w3
> > + tbnz w3, #GIC_ADDR_BIT, 1f
> > + ret
> > +1:
> > + ldr x0, =GICD_BASE_4K
> > + ldr x1, =GICC_BASE_4K
> > + ret
> > +ENDPROC(fix_gic_offset)
>
> The more I read it, the more I think the function name should be called
> get_gic_offset. You are not fixing it, the return value is the correct gic offset.
[wenbin] ok, it will be modified
>
> > +
> > +ENTRY(smp_kick_all_cpus)
> > + /* Kick secondary cpus up by SGI 0 interrupt */
> > + mov x29, lr /* Save LR */
> > + bl fix_gic_offset
> > + bl gic_kick_secondary_cpus
> > + mov lr, x29 /* Restore LR */
> > + ret
> > +ENDPROC(smp_kick_all_cpus)
>
> Another way to do this is to implement a weak get_gic_offset function in
> start.S to return GICD_BASE. You can implement another function here to
> return correct offset. If you want to replace smp_kick_all_cpus, you may want
> to keep the #if condition to check CONFIG_GICV2 or CONFIG_GICV3, in case
> we need to debug without GIC.
[wenbin] hi, Could you explain what's the mean of "debug without GIC" ?
The HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN is a feature(or, to be more exact, it is a bug for ls1043a rev1.0 silicon ) only belonging to ls1043a.
So if ARCH_LS1043A is selected , the CONFIG_GICV2 will be selected, too.
>
> > +
> > +#endif
> > +
> > ENTRY(lowlevel_init)
> > mov x29, lr /* Save LR */
> >
> > @@ -105,15 +147,23 @@ ENTRY(lowlevel_init)
> > /* Initialize GIC Secure Bank Status */
> > #if defined(CONFIG_GICV2) || defined(CONFIG_GICV3)
> > branch_if_slave x0, 1f
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
> > + bl fix_gic_offset
> > +#else
> > ldr x0, =GICD_BASE
> > +#endif
>
> If you use get_gic_offset, you can get rid of this #ifdef.
[Wenbin] I will modify the get_gic_offset as a general function for fsl-layerscape.
>
> > bl gic_init_secure
> > 1:
> > #ifdef CONFIG_GICV3
> > ldr x0, =GICR_BASE
> > bl gic_init_secure_percpu
> > #elif defined(CONFIG_GICV2)
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
> > +#define GICD_BASE_4K 0x01401000
> > +#define GICC_BASE_4K 0x01402000
> > +#define GICH_BASE_4K 0x01404000
> > +#define GICV_BASE_4K 0x01406000
>
> Are you using space instead of tab here?
[wenbin] ok, it will be modified.
>
> > +#define GICD_SIZE_4K 0x1000
> > +#define GICC_SIZE_4K 0x2000
> > +#define GICH_SIZE_4K 0x2000
> > +#define GICV_SIZE_4K 0x2000
> > +#endif
>
> This is a bit odd. You have rev 1.0 first, which uses 4K alignment. Yet
> you have kernel device tree using 64K alignment. How did it work before?
>
> Now you have rev 1.1, you make 64K as default, and replace it with 4K if
> a bit is set, or rev 1.0 SoC is detected. You are not changing anything
> actually, but to return the correct offset for the three situations,
> i.e. rev 1.0 SoC, rev 1.1 SoC with the bit cleared, rev 1.1 SoC with bit
> set.
>
> The only "fix" part in this patch is to fixup device tree. I suggest you
> read the device tree to determine which alignment you have there, and
> update accordingly, for both 4K and 64K alignment. I don't think you
> presumption of 64K will stand.
>
[Wenbin]
Yes, I will modify them.
> If GIC_ADDR_BIT is always set for SoCs with 4K alignment, you can get
> rid of the Kconfig option.
[Wenbin]
The GIC_ADDR_BIT is set or cleaned by PBI command. It is added on rev1.1 silicon.
> York
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] armv8/ls1043a: fixup GIC offset according to SVR and SCFG_GIC400_ALIGN[GIC_ADDR_BIT]
2016-10-26 10:39 ` Wenbin Song
@ 2016-10-26 15:59 ` york sun
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: york sun @ 2016-10-26 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 10/26/2016 03:39 AM, Wenbin Song wrote:
>>> +
>>> +ENTRY(smp_kick_all_cpus)
>>> + /* Kick secondary cpus up by SGI 0 interrupt */
>>> + mov x29, lr /* Save LR */
>>> + bl fix_gic_offset
>>> + bl gic_kick_secondary_cpus
>>> + mov lr, x29 /* Restore LR */
>>> + ret
>>> +ENDPROC(smp_kick_all_cpus)
>>
>> Another way to do this is to implement a weak get_gic_offset function in
>> start.S to return GICD_BASE. You can implement another function here to
>> return correct offset. If you want to replace smp_kick_all_cpus, you may want
>> to keep the #if condition to check CONFIG_GICV2 or CONFIG_GICV3, in case
>> we need to debug without GIC.
>
> [wenbin] hi, Could you explain what's the mean of "debug without GIC" ?
> The HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN is a feature(or, to be more exact, it is a bug for ls1043a rev1.0 silicon ) only belonging to ls1043a.
> So if ARCH_LS1043A is selected , the CONFIG_GICV2 will be selected, too.
>
>
The weak function smp_kick_all_cpus has #if to gate the code, so it
won't run unless either GICv2 or GICv3 is enabled. You made change to
this function but dropped the #if condition. My concern is future SoC or
debugging on am emulator where we disable GIC intentionally, this code
will cause trouble. I suggest you keep the #if condition.
<snip>
>> If GIC_ADDR_BIT is always set for SoCs with 4K alignment, you can get
>> rid of the Kconfig option.
>
> [Wenbin]
>
> The GIC_ADDR_BIT is set or cleaned by PBI command. It is added on rev1.1 silicon.
>
OK, so this bit is not set by hardware. Please work with design team to
conform if you can revert the logic for backward compatibility, i.e. use
the same bit value for rev 1.0 and rev 1.1 for 4K alignment, and a
non-default value for 64K alignment.
York
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-10-26 15:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-10-24 7:38 [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] armv8/ls1043a: fixup GIC offset according to SVR and SCFG_GIC400_ALIGN[GIC_ADDR_BIT] Wenbin song
2016-10-24 7:38 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/2] armv8/fsl-layerscape: fdt: fixup LS1043A rev1 MSI node Wenbin song
2016-10-25 20:35 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] armv8/ls1043a: fixup GIC offset according to SVR and SCFG_GIC400_ALIGN[GIC_ADDR_BIT] york sun
2016-10-26 10:39 ` Wenbin Song
2016-10-26 15:59 ` york sun
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.