All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] ipv6: RTA_PREFSRC dumping was somewhat incorrect.
@ 2015-05-04 11:46 Markus Stenberg
  2015-05-05 20:56 ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Markus Stenberg @ 2015-05-04 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: davem, netdev; +Cc: Markus Stenberg

Avoid dumping RTA_PREFSRC twice if iif is not set, but dst is.

Note that the change also dumps RTA_PREFSRC even if iif RTA_IIF is
sent. As scopes are not that rare in IPv6, I believe that to be
correct behavior.

Signed-off-by: Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>

diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index 5c48293..442fa29 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -2607,6 +2607,7 @@ static int rt6_fill_node(struct net *net,
 	struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
 	long expires;
 	u32 table;
+	struct in6_addr saddr_buf;
 
 	if (prefix) {	/* user wants prefix routes only */
 		if (!(rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_PREFIX_RT)) {
@@ -2702,15 +2703,13 @@ static int rt6_fill_node(struct net *net,
 #endif
 			if (nla_put_u32(skb, RTA_IIF, iif))
 				goto nla_put_failure;
-	} else if (dst) {
-		struct in6_addr saddr_buf;
+	}
+
+	if (dst) {
 		if (ip6_route_get_saddr(net, rt, dst, 0, &saddr_buf) == 0 &&
 		    nla_put_in6_addr(skb, RTA_PREFSRC, &saddr_buf))
 			goto nla_put_failure;
-	}
-
-	if (rt->rt6i_prefsrc.plen) {
-		struct in6_addr saddr_buf;
+	} else if (rt->rt6i_prefsrc.plen) {
 		saddr_buf = rt->rt6i_prefsrc.addr;
 		if (nla_put_in6_addr(skb, RTA_PREFSRC, &saddr_buf))
 			goto nla_put_failure;

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ipv6: RTA_PREFSRC dumping was somewhat incorrect.
  2015-05-04 11:46 [PATCH] ipv6: RTA_PREFSRC dumping was somewhat incorrect Markus Stenberg
@ 2015-05-05 20:56 ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2015-05-05 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: markus.stenberg; +Cc: netdev

From: Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 14:46:02 +0300

> Avoid dumping RTA_PREFSRC twice if iif is not set, but dst is.
> 
> Note that the change also dumps RTA_PREFSRC even if iif RTA_IIF is
> sent. As scopes are not that rare in IPv6, I believe that to be
> correct behavior.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>

The distinguishing characteristic that should decide whether we
provide a PREFSRC or not is whether this route is an output route
or not.

Neither the current logic, nor your patch, implements this.

But that's what this code needs to do.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-05-05 20:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-05-04 11:46 [PATCH] ipv6: RTA_PREFSRC dumping was somewhat incorrect Markus Stenberg
2015-05-05 20:56 ` David Miller

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.