From: richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org,
linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: Consolidate DEBUG_STACK_USAGE option
Date: Sat, 07 May 2011 09:34:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=h-151_cMPpii6O+kowvc=0WxKjQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1304747831-2098-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Most arches define CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE exactly the same way.
> Move it to lib/Kconfig.debug so each arch doesn't have to define
> it. This obviously makes the option generic, but that's fine
> because the config is already used in generic code.
>
> It's not obvious to me that sysrq-P actually does anything
> different with this option enabled, but I erred on the side of
> caution by keeping the most inclusive wording.
>
> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org
> Cc: linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org
> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
> Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: x86@kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> ---
Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
--
Thanks,
//richard
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org,
linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: Consolidate DEBUG_STACK_USAGE option
Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 11:34:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=h-151_cMPpii6O+kowvc=0WxKjQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1304747831-2098-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Most arches define CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE exactly the same way.
> Move it to lib/Kconfig.debug so each arch doesn't have to define
> it. This obviously makes the option generic, but that's fine
> because the config is already used in generic code.
>
> It's not obvious to me that sysrq-P actually does anything
> different with this option enabled, but I erred on the side of
> caution by keeping the most inclusive wording.
>
> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org
> Cc: linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org
> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
> Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: x86@kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> ---
Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
--
Thanks,
//richard
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: Consolidate DEBUG_STACK_USAGE option
Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 11:34:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=h-151_cMPpii6O+kowvc=0WxKjQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1304747831-2098-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Most arches define CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE exactly the same way.
> Move it to lib/Kconfig.debug so each arch doesn't have to define
> it. This obviously makes the option generic, but that's fine
> because the config is already used in generic code.
>
> It's not obvious to me that sysrq-P actually does anything
> different with this option enabled, but I erred on the side of
> caution by keeping the most inclusive wording.
>
> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org
> Cc: linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org
> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
> Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: x86@kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> ---
Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
--
Thanks,
//richard
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: richard.weinberger@gmail.com (richard -rw- weinberger)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] lib: Consolidate DEBUG_STACK_USAGE option
Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 11:34:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=h-151_cMPpii6O+kowvc=0WxKjQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1304747831-2098-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Most arches define CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE exactly the same way.
> Move it to lib/Kconfig.debug so each arch doesn't have to define
> it. This obviously makes the option generic, but that's fine
> because the config is already used in generic code.
>
> It's not obvious to me that sysrq-P actually does anything
> different with this option enabled, but I erred on the side of
> caution by keeping the most inclusive wording.
>
> Cc: linux-arch at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Cc: uclinux-dist-devel at blackfin.uclinux.org
> Cc: linux-m32r at ml.linux-m32r.org
> Cc: linux-mips at linux-mips.org
> Cc: linuxppc-dev at lists.ozlabs.org
> Cc: linux-sh at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: sparclinux at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
> Cc: user-mode-linux-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: x86 at kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> ---
Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
--
Thanks,
//richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-07 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-07 5:57 [PATCH] lib: Consolidate DEBUG_STACK_USAGE option Stephen Boyd
2011-05-07 5:57 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-05-07 5:57 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-05-07 5:57 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-05-07 7:58 ` David Miller
2011-05-07 7:58 ` David Miller
2011-05-07 7:58 ` David Miller
2011-05-07 7:58 ` David Miller
2011-05-07 9:34 ` richard -rw- weinberger [this message]
2011-05-07 9:34 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-05-07 9:34 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-05-07 9:34 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-05-07 13:57 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-05-07 13:57 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-05-07 13:57 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-05-07 13:57 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-05-07 13:57 ` Mike Frysinger
[not found] ` <1304747831-2098-1-git-send-email-sboyd-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-05-10 15:44 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-05-10 15:44 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-05-10 15:44 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-05-10 15:44 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-05-10 15:44 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-05-19 3:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-19 3:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-19 3:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-19 3:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-19 3:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-19 3:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTi=h-151_cMPpii6O+kowvc=0WxKjQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=richard.weinberger@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.