Bug report: git status does not report unmerged entries with copies

* Bug report: git status does not report unmerged entries with copies
@ 2011-04-07  0:34 Mark Lodato
  2011-04-07 13:53 ` Martin von Zweigbergk
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Lodato @ 2011-04-07  0:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: git list, Junio C Hamano

Commit 4d4d572, "status: show worktree status of conflicted paths
separately" introduced the following bug:  If one tries to merge two
branches with a conflict, where the conflicting file was also copied
in one of the branches, "git status" (but not "git status -sb" or
git-gui) fails to report the unmerged status.  You can use the below
test file to see the error.  A similar test should probably be
integrated into one of the existing git-status test files, though you
may need to get rid of the "sed -i" command.

$ git status
# On branch master
# Changes to be committed:
#
#       renamed:    file -> copy
#
$ git status -sb
## master
R  file -> copy
 U file

In the above, "git status" should have reported "file" being in an
unmerged state.  It probably should also mark "copy" as a copy, not a
rename.

-------- 8< --------
#!/bin/sh
#
# Copyright (c) 2011 Mark Lodato
#

test_description='git status on merge with copy'

. ./test-lib.sh

test_expect_success 'setup' '
        echo first > file &&
        echo second >> file &&
        echo third >> file &&
        echo fourth >> file &&
        git add file &&
        git commit -m initial &&
        git checkout -b branch &&
        cp file copy &&
        git add copy &&
        git commit -m copy &&
        sed -i -e "s/second/fifth/" file &&
        git add file &&
        git commit -m fifth &&
        git checkout master &&
        sed -i -e "s/second/sixth/" file &&
        git add file &&
        git commit -m sixth
'

test_expect_success 'merge' '
        ! git merge branch
'

test_expect_success 'status' '
        git status | grep unmerged
'

test_done

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread