All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lazar, Lijo" <Lijo.Lazar@amd.com>
To: "Quan, Evan" <Evan.Quan@amd.com>,
	"amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] drm/amd/pm: restore user customized OD settings properly for NV1x
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 07:39:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BL1PR12MB534990905ACF749947BF81FA97E59@BL1PR12MB5349.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR12MB2619A913DFA1F73B8FE32532E4E59@DM6PR12MB2619.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>

[Public]

Hi Evan,

In that case, using "od_edit" table for the intermediate table

During commit command, what if it's done like
	1) Copy and update table if od_edit table is different than user_od table
	2) Set the flag to false if od_edit table and boot_od table are different

Then current od settings may always be picked from user_od table and the flag may be used to distinguish if it's boot od settings or custom settings (for restore or other purposes).

Thanks,
Lijo

-----Original Message-----
From: Quan, Evan <Evan.Quan@amd.com> 
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2021 12:51 PM
To: Lazar, Lijo <Lijo.Lazar@amd.com>; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] drm/amd/pm: restore user customized OD settings properly for NV1x

[AMD Official Use Only]

Hi Lijo,

Sorry, I doubled checked. The implementation of Navi1x is right. 
The original design for "restores to default settings" is a two-step process.
That means for "case PP_OD_COMMIT_DPM_TABLE:" we must distinguish whether it's an usual customized od setting update or just restoring to defaults.
And my current implementation for that is as below. Any comments?

+               if (memcmp(table_context->overdrive_table, table_context->boot_overdrive_table,
+                       sizeof(OverDriveTable_t))) {
+                       smu->user_dpm_profile.committed_od = true;
+                       memcpy(table_context->committed_overdrive_table, table_context->overdrive_table,
+                                       sizeof(OverDriveTable_t));
+               } else {
+                       smu->user_dpm_profile.committed_od = false;
+               }

BR
Evan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Quan, Evan
> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2021 2:48 PM
> To: Lazar, Lijo <Lijo.Lazar@amd.com>; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] drm/amd/pm: restore user customized OD 
> settings properly for NV1x
> 
> [AMD Official Use Only]
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lazar, Lijo <Lijo.Lazar@amd.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2021 5:03 PM
> > To: Quan, Evan <Evan.Quan@amd.com>; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/amd/pm: restore user customized OD 
> > settings properly for NV1x
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7/22/2021 2:03 PM, Quan, Evan wrote:
> > > [AMD Official Use Only]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Lazar, Lijo <Lijo.Lazar@amd.com>
> > >> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2021 4:10 PM
> > >> To: Quan, Evan <Evan.Quan@amd.com>; amd-
> gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > >> Cc: Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>
> > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/amd/pm: restore user customized OD 
> > >> settings properly for NV1x
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 7/22/2021 8:50 AM, Evan Quan wrote:
> > >>> The customized OD settings can be divided into two parts: those 
> > >>> committed ones and non-committed ones.
> > >>>     - For those changes which had been fed to SMU before
> S3/S4/Runpm
> > >>>       suspend kicked, they are committed changes. They should be
> > properly
> > >>>       restored and fed to SMU on S3/S4/Runpm resume.
> > >>>     - For those non-committed changes, they are restored only 
> > >>> without
> > >> feeding
> > >>>       to SMU.
> > >>>
> > >>> Change-Id: Iea7cf7908dfcd919a4d0205e10bff91b1149a440
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
> > >>> ---
> > >>>    drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/inc/amdgpu_smu.h       |  8 +++
> > >>>    drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c     |  9 ++++
> > >>>    .../gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/navi10_ppt.c   | 52
> > >> ++++++++++++++-----
> > >>>    .../gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/smu_v11_0.c    | 12 +++++
> > >>>    4 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > >>>
> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/inc/amdgpu_smu.h
> > >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/inc/amdgpu_smu.h
> > >>> index 3e89852e4820..8ba53f16d2d9 100644
> > >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/inc/amdgpu_smu.h
> > >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/inc/amdgpu_smu.h
> > >>> @@ -231,6 +231,7 @@ struct smu_user_dpm_profile {
> > >>>    	uint32_t power_limit;
> > >>>    	uint32_t fan_speed_percent;
> > >>>    	uint32_t flags;
> > >>> +	uint32_t committed_od;
> > >>>
> > >>>    	/* user clock state information */
> > >>>    	uint32_t clk_mask[SMU_CLK_COUNT]; @@ -352,6 +353,7
> @@ struct
> > >>> smu_table_context
> > >>>
> > >>>    	void				*overdrive_table;
> > >>>    	void                            *boot_overdrive_table;
> > >>> +	void				*committed_overdrive_table;
> > >>
> > >> May be rename it to user_overdrive_table - OD table with user settings?
> > > [Quan, Evan] Actually "overdrive_table " is  the 
> > > user_overdrive_table. It
> > contains all the modification including those not committed( the 
> > commit is performed by echo "c" >
> /sys/class/drm/card1/device/pp_od_clk_voltage).
> > > The new member added refers to those user customized but committed
> > only settings. That's why it was named as " committed_overdrive_table".
> > Any good suggestion for the naming?
> >
> > As far as I understand, the problem is overdrive_table can have 
> > intemediary settings as the edit/commit is a two-step process. At 
> > any point we can have user_od_table keep the latest user mode settings.
> > That is true when user restores to default settings also; that time 
> > we can just copy the boot settings back to user_od table and keep 
> > the flag as false indicating that there is no custom settings.
> [Quan, Evan] For now, on Navi1x the "restores to default settings" is 
> also a two-step process. That will make "copy the boot settings back 
> to user_od table and keep the flag as false" tricky. However, it seems 
> that does not fit original design. As per original design, the "restores to default settings"
> should be a one-step process. Let me correct them with new patch 
> series and proceed further discussion then.
> 
> BR
> Evan
> >
> > >>
> > >>>    	uint32_t			gpu_metrics_table_size;
> > >>>    	void				*gpu_metrics_table;
> > >>> @@ -623,6 +625,12 @@ struct pptable_funcs {
> > >>>    				 enum
> PP_OD_DPM_TABLE_COMMAND
> > >> type,
> > >>>    				 long *input, uint32_t size);
> > >>>
> > >>> +	/**
> > >>> +	 * @restore_committed_od_settings: Restore the customized and
> > >> committed
> > >>> +	 *                                 OD settings on S3/S4/Runpm resume.
> > >>> +	 */
> > >>> +	int (*restore_committed_od_settings)(struct smu_context *smu);
> > >>> +
> > >>>    	/**
> > >>>    	 * @get_clock_by_type_with_latency: Get the speed and
> latency
> > >>> of
> > >> a clock
> > >>>    	 *                                  domain.
> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
> > >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
> > >>> index ebe672142808..5f7d98e99f76 100644
> > >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
> > >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
> > >>> @@ -416,6 +416,15 @@ static void
> > smu_restore_dpm_user_profile(struct
> > >> smu_context *smu)
> > >>>    		}
> > >>>    	}
> > >>>
> > >>> +	/* Restore customized and committed OD settings */
> > >>> +	if (smu->user_dpm_profile.committed_od) {
> > >>> +		if (smu->ppt_funcs->restore_committed_od_settings) {
> > >>> +			ret = smu->ppt_funcs-
> > >>> restore_committed_od_settings(smu);
> > >>> +			if (ret)
> > >>> +				dev_err(smu->adev->dev, "Failed to upload
> > >> customized OD settings\n");
> > >>> +		}
> > >>> +	}
> > >>> +
> > >>
> > >> Just thinking if there is a need to handle it ASIC specific. The 
> > >> flags and table pointer are maintained in common structure. So 
> > >> can't we do the restore of user OD settings directly in this 
> > >> common flow instead of having each ASIC to implement the callback?
> > > [Quan, Evan] The OD settings restoring is ASIC specific as it 
> > > performed on
> > OD table and that(OD table) is ASIC specific.
> >
> > I was thinking in terms of final logic that is being done. The below 
> > structures are available in common table context and we have a 
> > common logic to update the table. If there is no custom OD settings 
> > available, we could handle it with the flag.
> >
> > +	struct smu_table_context *table_context = &smu->smu_table;
> > +	void *od_table = table_context->committed_overdrive_table;
> > +	int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +	ret = smu_cmn_update_table(smu, SMU_TABLE_OVERDRIVE, 0,
> > (void *)od_table, true);
> >
> > >>
> > >>>    	/* Disable restore flag */
> > >>>    	smu->user_dpm_profile.flags &=
> > >> ~SMU_DPM_USER_PROFILE_RESTORE;
> > >>>    }
> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/navi10_ppt.c
> > >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/navi10_ppt.c
> > >>> index 59ea59acfb00..4752299d7f91 100644
> > >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/navi10_ppt.c
> > >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/navi10_ppt.c
> > >>> @@ -2296,39 +2296,45 @@ static int
> > >> navi10_set_default_od_settings(struct smu_context *smu)
> > >>>    		(OverDriveTable_t *)smu-
> >smu_table.boot_overdrive_table;
> > >>>    	int ret = 0;
> > >>>
> > >>> -	ret = smu_cmn_update_table(smu, SMU_TABLE_OVERDRIVE, 0,
> > >> (void *)od_table, false);
> > >>> +	ret = smu_cmn_update_table(smu, SMU_TABLE_OVERDRIVE, 0,
> > >> (void
> > >>> +*)boot_od_table, false);
> > >>>    	if (ret) {
> > >>>    		dev_err(smu->adev->dev, "Failed to get overdrive
> table!\n");
> > >>>    		return ret;
> > >>>    	}
> > >>>
> > >>> -	if (!od_table->GfxclkVolt1) {
> > >>> +	if (!boot_od_table->GfxclkVolt1) {
> > >>>    		ret =
> navi10_overdrive_get_gfx_clk_base_voltage(smu,
> > >>> -								&od_table-
> > >>> GfxclkVolt1,
> > >>> -								od_table-
> > >>> GfxclkFreq1);
> > >>> +
> > >> 	&boot_od_table->GfxclkVolt1,
> > >>> +
> > >> 	boot_od_table->GfxclkFreq1);
> > >>>    		if (ret)
> > >>>    			return ret;
> > >>>    	}
> > >>>
> > >>> -	if (!od_table->GfxclkVolt2) {
> > >>> +	if (!boot_od_table->GfxclkVolt2) {
> > >>>    		ret =
> navi10_overdrive_get_gfx_clk_base_voltage(smu,
> > >>> -								&od_table-
> > >>> GfxclkVolt2,
> > >>> -								od_table-
> > >>> GfxclkFreq2);
> > >>> +
> > >> 	&boot_od_table->GfxclkVolt2,
> > >>> +
> > >> 	boot_od_table->GfxclkFreq2);
> > >>>    		if (ret)
> > >>>    			return ret;
> > >>>    	}
> > >>>
> > >>> -	if (!od_table->GfxclkVolt3) {
> > >>> +	if (!boot_od_table->GfxclkVolt3) {
> > >>>    		ret =
> navi10_overdrive_get_gfx_clk_base_voltage(smu,
> > >>> -								&od_table-
> > >>> GfxclkVolt3,
> > >>> -								od_table-
> > >>> GfxclkFreq3);
> > >>> +
> > >> 	&boot_od_table->GfxclkVolt3,
> > >>> +
> > >> 	boot_od_table->GfxclkFreq3);
> > >>>    		if (ret)
> > >>>    			return ret;
> > >>>    	}
> > >>>
> > >>> -	memcpy(boot_od_table, od_table, sizeof(OverDriveTable_t));
> > >>> +	navi10_dump_od_table(smu, boot_od_table);
> > >>>
> > >>> -	navi10_dump_od_table(smu, od_table);
> > >>> +	/*
> > >>> +	 * For S3/S4/Runpm, no need to install boot od table to
> > >> overdrive_table as
> > >>> +	 *   - either they already share the same OD settings on bootup
> > >>> +	 *   - or they have user customized OD settings
> > >>> +	 */
> > >>> +	if (!smu->adev->in_suspend)
> > >>> +		memcpy(od_table, boot_od_table,
> > >> sizeof(OverDriveTable_t));
> > >>>
> > >>>    	return 0;
> > >>>    }
> > >>> @@ -2435,6 +2441,14 @@ static int 
> > >>> navi10_od_edit_dpm_table(struct
> > >> smu_context *smu, enum PP_OD_DPM_TABL
> > >>>    			dev_err(smu->adev->dev, "Failed to import
> > >> overdrive table!\n");
> > >>>    			return ret;
> > >>>    		}
> > >>> +		if (memcmp(table_context->overdrive_table, table_context-
> > >>> boot_overdrive_table,
> > >>> +			sizeof(OverDriveTable_t))) {
> > >>
> > >> Shouldn't this be - compare against the edited settings and last 
> > >> committed settings, overdrive_table vs committed_overdrive_table?
> > >>
> > >> Basically, user_od_table can be initialized with boot_od settings 
> > >> and the flag gives the indication that user_od table is being used or not.
> > >> Before updating, check if the edited table (overdrive_table) and 
> > >> the current user_od table are different, then commit the new table.
> > > [Quan, Evan] Yes, I also considered that. But that cannot handle 
> > > the case
> > below:
> > > 1 user made some customizations  -> 2 the customizations were 
> > > committed -> 3 user restored to default(boot) OD settings(by "echo
> > > 'r'")
> > and committed Although there were some changes between 2 and 3,
> there
> > is actually no real customized changes compared to default(boot) OD
> settings.
> >
> > On restore to default, just copy the boot_table settings to user_od 
> > and keep the flag as false. We are using user_od as the latest user 
> > preferred settings and overdrive_table is only used for intermediate
> updates.
> >
> > The flag decides whether to restore or not, but at any point we can 
> > refer the user_od table to look upon the latest preferred user 
> > settings (default or custom).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Lijo
> >
> > >>
> > >>> +			smu->user_dpm_profile.committed_od = true;
> > >>> +			memcpy(table_context-
> > >>> committed_overdrive_table, table_context->overdrive_table,
> > >>> +					sizeof(OverDriveTable_t));
> > >>> +		} else {
> > >>> +			smu->user_dpm_profile.committed_od = false;
> > >>> +		}
> > >>>    		break;
> > >>>    	case PP_OD_EDIT_VDDC_CURVE:
> > >>>    		if (!navi10_od_feature_is_supported(od_settings,
> > >>> SMU_11_0_ODCAP_GFXCLK_CURVE)) { @@ -2499,6 +2513,19 @@
> static
> > int
> > >> navi10_od_edit_dpm_table(struct smu_context *smu, enum
> > PP_OD_DPM_TABL
> > >>>    	return ret;
> > >>>    }
> > >>>
> > >>> +static int navi10_restore_committed_od_settings(struct
> > >>> +smu_context
> > >>> +*smu) {
> > >>> +	struct smu_table_context *table_context = &smu->smu_table;
> > >>> +	void *od_table = table_context->committed_overdrive_table;
> > >>> +	int ret = 0;
> > >>> +
> > >>> +	ret = smu_cmn_update_table(smu, SMU_TABLE_OVERDRIVE, 0,
> > >> (void *)od_table, true);
> > >>> +	if (ret)
> > >>> +		dev_err(smu->adev->dev, "Failed to import overdrive
> > >> table!\n");
> > >>> +
> > >>> +	return ret;
> > >>> +}
> > >>
> > >> As mentioned before, not sure if this is needed as callback. Even 
> > >> if, this can be something common for smuv11, there is nothing 
> > >> ASIC specific in this logic, right?
> > > [Quan, Evan] Yes, in patch2 of the series, it was made as a SMUV11
> > common API.
> > >
> > > BR
> > > Evan
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Lijo
> > >>
> > >>>    static int navi10_run_btc(struct smu_context *smu)
> > >>>    {
> > >>>    	int ret = 0;
> > >>> @@ -3262,6 +3289,7 @@ static const struct pptable_funcs
> > >> navi10_ppt_funcs = {
> > >>>    	.set_soft_freq_limited_range =
> > >> smu_v11_0_set_soft_freq_limited_range,
> > >>>    	.set_default_od_settings = navi10_set_default_od_settings,
> > >>>    	.od_edit_dpm_table = navi10_od_edit_dpm_table,
> > >>> +	.restore_committed_od_settings = 
> > >>> +navi10_restore_committed_od_settings,
> > >>>    	.run_btc = navi10_run_btc,
> > >>>    	.set_power_source = smu_v11_0_set_power_source,
> > >>>    	.get_pp_feature_mask = smu_cmn_get_pp_feature_mask,
> diff --git
> > >>> a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/smu_v11_0.c
> > >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/smu_v11_0.c
> > >>> index 0a5d46ac9ccd..28fc3f17c1b1 100644
> > >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/smu_v11_0.c
> > >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/smu_v11_0.c
> > >>> @@ -422,10 +422,20 @@ int smu_v11_0_init_smc_tables(struct
> > >> smu_context *smu)
> > >>>    			ret = -ENOMEM;
> > >>>    			goto err3_out;
> > >>>    		}
> > >>> +
> > >>> +		smu_table->committed_overdrive_table =
> > >>> +			kzalloc(tables[SMU_TABLE_OVERDRIVE].size,
> > >> GFP_KERNEL);
> > >>> +		if (!smu_table->committed_overdrive_table) {
> > >>> +			ret = -ENOMEM;
> > >>> +			goto err4_out;
> > >>> +		}
> > >>> +
> > >>>    	}
> > >>>
> > >>>    	return 0;
> > >>>
> > >>> +err4_out:
> > >>> +	kfree(smu_table->boot_overdrive_table);
> > >>>    err3_out:
> > >>>    	kfree(smu_table->overdrive_table);
> > >>>    err2_out:
> > >>> @@ -442,12 +452,14 @@ int smu_v11_0_fini_smc_tables(struct
> > >> smu_context *smu)
> > >>>    	struct smu_dpm_context *smu_dpm = &smu->smu_dpm;
> > >>>
> > >>>    	kfree(smu_table->gpu_metrics_table);
> > >>> +	kfree(smu_table->committed_overdrive_table);
> > >>>    	kfree(smu_table->boot_overdrive_table);
> > >>>    	kfree(smu_table->overdrive_table);
> > >>>    	kfree(smu_table->max_sustainable_clocks);
> > >>>    	kfree(smu_table->driver_pptable);
> > >>>    	kfree(smu_table->clocks_table);
> > >>>    	smu_table->gpu_metrics_table = NULL;
> > >>> +	smu_table->committed_overdrive_table = NULL;
> > >>>    	smu_table->boot_overdrive_table = NULL;
> > >>>    	smu_table->overdrive_table = NULL;
> > >>>    	smu_table->max_sustainable_clocks = NULL;
> > >>>
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-23  7:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-22  3:20 [PATCH 1/2] drm/amd/pm: restore user customized OD settings properly for NV1x Evan Quan
2021-07-22  3:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/amd/pm: restore user customized OD settings properly for Sienna Cichlid Evan Quan
2021-07-22  8:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/amd/pm: restore user customized OD settings properly for NV1x Lazar, Lijo
2021-07-22  8:33   ` Quan, Evan
2021-07-22  9:03     ` Lazar, Lijo
2021-07-23  6:47       ` Quan, Evan
2021-07-23  7:20         ` Quan, Evan
2021-07-23  7:39           ` Lazar, Lijo [this message]
2021-07-23  9:11             ` Quan, Evan
2021-07-23 19:59 ` Matt Coffin
2021-07-26  4:12   ` Quan, Evan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BL1PR12MB534990905ACF749947BF81FA97E59@BL1PR12MB5349.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=lijo.lazar@amd.com \
    --cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=Evan.Quan@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.