[PATCH v4 1/4] fu540: prci: add request and free clock handlers

[Sagar Kadam <sagar.kadam@sifive.com>]

Hi Bin,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2020 4:51 AM
> To: Sagar Kadam <sagar.kadam@sifive.com>
> Cc: U-Boot Mailing List <u-boot@lists.denx.de>; Rick Chen
> <rick@andestech.com>; Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>; Jagan Teki
> <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>; Pragnesh Patel
> <pragnesh.patel@sifive.com>; Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com>; Simon
> Glass <sjg@chromium.org>; Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] fu540: prci: add request and free clock handlers
> 
> [External Email] Do not click links or attachments unless you recognize the
> sender and know the content is safe
> 
> Hi Sagar,
> 
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 6:58 PM Sagar Kadam <sagar.kadam@sifive.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Bin,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2020 6:50 AM
> > > To: Sagar Kadam <sagar.kadam@sifive.com>
> > > Cc: U-Boot Mailing List <u-boot@lists.denx.de>; Rick Chen
> > > <rick@andestech.com>; Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>; Jagan Teki
> > > <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>; Pragnesh Patel
> > > <pragnesh.patel@sifive.com>; Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com>;
> Simon
> > > Glass <sjg@chromium.org>; Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] fu540: prci: add request and free clock
> handlers
> > >
> > > [External Email] Do not click links or attachments unless you recognize
> the
> > > sender and know the content is safe
> > >
> > > Hi Sagar,
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 9:10 PM Sagar Shrikant Kadam
> > > <sagar.kadam@sifive.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Add clk_request handler to check if a valid clock is requested.
> > > > Here clk_free handler is added for debug purpose which will display
> > > > details of clock passed to clk_free.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sagar Shrikant Kadam <sagar.kadam@sifive.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Pragnesh Patel <Pragnesh.patel@sifive.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/clk/sifive/fu540-prci.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/sifive/fu540-prci.c
> > > > b/drivers/clk/sifive/fu540-prci.c index fe6e0d4..9a9ff6b 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/clk/sifive/fu540-prci.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/clk/sifive/fu540-prci.c
> > > > @@ -686,6 +686,25 @@ static ulong sifive_fu540_prci_set_rate(struct
> clk
> > > *clk, ulong rate)
> > > >         return rate;
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > +static int sifive_fu540_prci_clk_request(struct clk *clk) {
> > > > +       debug("%s(clk=%p) (dev=%p, id=%lu)\n", __func__, clk, clk->dev,
> > > > +             clk->id);
> > > > +
> > > > +       if (clk->id >= ARRAY_SIZE(__prci_init_clocks))
> > > > +               return -EINVAL;
> > > > +
> > > > +       return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int sifive_fu540_prci_clk_free(struct clk *clk) {
> > > > +       debug("%s(clk=%p) (dev=%p, id=%lu)\n", __func__, clk, clk->dev,
> > > > +             clk->id);
> > > > +
> > > > +       return 0;
> > > > +}
> > >
> > > It seems these 2 routines do not actually do anything? Is this for
> debugging
> > > purposes?
> > >
> > The sifive_fu540_prci_clk_request will check if the clock requested is valid
> or not.
> > While the sifive_fu540_prci_clk_free function is just for debug.
> > Is it ok if I retain these in V5 or you have some other thought here.
> >
> 
> OK, but I suspect the parameter check in
> sifive_fu540_prci_clk_request() is not necessary too as currently the
> codes work well.
> 

Ok. In that case I will than drop the check in sifive_fu540_prci_clk_request()
and just keep the debug info.

Thanks & BR,
Sagar

> Regards,
> Bin