All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nieto, David M" <David.Nieto@amd.com>
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	"Koenig, Christian" <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Maling list - DRI developers <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Per client engine busyness
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 07:22:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BYAPR12MB2840AA68BCAEBD9279C6184FF4509@BYAPR12MB2840.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADnq5_N03pz6GmptzhRnCRQH=qkd4eWuAbuUysHp-A9NZHQMHg@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8384 bytes --]

[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]

We had entertained the idea of exposing the processes as sysfs nodes as you proposed, but we had concerns about exposing process info in there, especially since /proc already exists for that purpose.

I think if you were to follow that approach, we could have tools like top that support exposing GPU engine usage.
________________________________
From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2021 10:58 PM
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>; Nieto, David M <David.Nieto@amd.com>; Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Maling list - DRI developers <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>; Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Per client engine busyness

+ David, Christian

On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:41 PM Tvrtko Ursulin
<tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> On 13/05/2021 16:48, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 7:00 AM Tvrtko Ursulin
> > <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> >>
> >> Resurrect of the previosuly merged per client engine busyness patches. In a
> >> nutshell it enables intel_gpu_top to be more top(1) like useful and show not
> >> only physical GPU engine usage but per process view as well.
> >>
> >> Example screen capture:
> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> intel-gpu-top -  906/ 955 MHz;    0% RC6;  5.30 Watts;      933 irqs/s
> >>
> >>        IMC reads:     4414 MiB/s
> >>       IMC writes:     3805 MiB/s
> >>
> >>            ENGINE      BUSY                                      MI_SEMA MI_WAIT
> >>       Render/3D/0   93.46% |████████████████████████████████▋  |      0%      0%
> >>         Blitter/0    0.00% |                                   |      0%      0%
> >>           Video/0    0.00% |                                   |      0%      0%
> >>    VideoEnhance/0    0.00% |                                   |      0%      0%
> >>
> >>    PID            NAME  Render/3D      Blitter        Video      VideoEnhance
> >>   2733       neverball |██████▌     ||            ||            ||            |
> >>   2047            Xorg |███▊        ||            ||            ||            |
> >>   2737        glxgears |█▍          ||            ||            ||            |
> >>   2128           xfwm4 |            ||            ||            ||            |
> >>   2047            Xorg |            ||            ||            ||            |
> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>
> >> Internally we track time spent on engines for each struct intel_context, both
> >> for current and past contexts belonging to each open DRM file.
> >>
> >> This can serve as a building block for several features from the wanted list:
> >> smarter scheduler decisions, getrusage(2)-like per-GEM-context functionality
> >> wanted by some customers, setrlimit(2) like controls, cgroups controller,
> >> dynamic SSEU tuning, ...
> >>
> >> To enable userspace access to the tracked data, we expose time spent on GPU per
> >> client and per engine class in sysfs with a hierarchy like the below:
> >>
> >>          # cd /sys/class/drm/card0/clients/
> >>          # tree
> >>          .
> >>          ├── 7
> >>          │   ├── busy
> >>          │   │   ├── 0
> >>          │   │   ├── 1
> >>          │   │   ├── 2
> >>          │   │   └── 3
> >>          │   ├── name
> >>          │   └── pid
> >>          ├── 8
> >>          │   ├── busy
> >>          │   │   ├── 0
> >>          │   │   ├── 1
> >>          │   │   ├── 2
> >>          │   │   └── 3
> >>          │   ├── name
> >>          │   └── pid
> >>          └── 9
> >>              ├── busy
> >>              │   ├── 0
> >>              │   ├── 1
> >>              │   ├── 2
> >>              │   └── 3
> >>              ├── name
> >>              └── pid
> >>
> >> Files in 'busy' directories are numbered using the engine class ABI values and
> >> they contain accumulated nanoseconds each client spent on engines of a
> >> respective class.
> >
> > We did something similar in amdgpu using the gpu scheduler.  We then
> > expose the data via fdinfo.  See
> > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcgit.freedesktop.org%2Fdrm%2Fdrm-misc%2Fcommit%2F%3Fid%3D1774baa64f9395fa884ea9ed494bcb043f3b83f5&amp;data=04%7C01%7CDavid.Nieto%40amd.com%7C5e3c05578ef14be3692508d9169d55bf%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637565687273144615%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=mt1EIL%2Fc9pHCXR%2FYSd%2BTr1e64XHoeYcdQ2cYufJ%2FcYQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcgit.freedesktop.org%2Fdrm%2Fdrm-misc%2Fcommit%2F%3Fid%3D874442541133f78c78b6880b8cc495bab5c61704&amp;data=04%7C01%7CDavid.Nieto%40amd.com%7C5e3c05578ef14be3692508d9169d55bf%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637565687273144615%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=%2F3zMGw0LPTC1kG4NebTwUPTx7QCtEyw%2B4JToXDK5QXI%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
> Interesting!
>
> Is yours wall time or actual GPU time taking preemption and such into
> account? Do you have some userspace tools parsing this data and how to
> do you client discovery? Presumably there has to be a better way that
> going through all open file descriptors?

Wall time.  It uses the fences in the scheduler to calculate engine
time.  We have some python scripts to make it look pretty, but mainly
just reading the files directly.  If you know the process, you can
look it up in procfs.

>
> Our implementation was merged in January but Daniel took it out recently
> because he wanted to have discussion about a common vendor framework for
> this whole story on dri-devel. I think. +Daniel to comment.
>
> I couldn't find the patch you pasted on the mailing list to see if there
> was any such discussion around your version.

It was on the amd-gfx mailing list.

Alex

>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko
>
> >
> > Alex
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Tvrtko Ursulin (7):
> >>    drm/i915: Expose list of clients in sysfs
> >>    drm/i915: Update client name on context create
> >>    drm/i915: Make GEM contexts track DRM clients
> >>    drm/i915: Track runtime spent in closed and unreachable GEM contexts
> >>    drm/i915: Track all user contexts per client
> >>    drm/i915: Track context current active time
> >>    drm/i915: Expose per-engine client busyness
> >>
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile                 |   5 +-
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c   |  61 ++-
> >>   .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h |  16 +-
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c       |  27 +-
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h       |  15 +-
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h |  24 +-
> >>   .../drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c  |  23 +-
> >>   .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_clock_utils.c    |   4 +
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c           |  27 +-
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.h           |  24 ++
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c        |  10 +-
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.c        | 365 ++++++++++++++++++
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.h        | 123 ++++++
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c               |   6 +
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h               |   5 +
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c               |  21 +-
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c         |  31 +-
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.h         |   2 +-
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c             |   8 +
> >>   19 files changed, 716 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
> >>   create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.c
> >>   create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.h
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.30.2
> >>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 17957 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Nieto, David M" <David.Nieto@amd.com>
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	"Koenig, Christian" <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Maling list - DRI developers <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] Per client engine busyness
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 07:22:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BYAPR12MB2840AA68BCAEBD9279C6184FF4509@BYAPR12MB2840.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADnq5_N03pz6GmptzhRnCRQH=qkd4eWuAbuUysHp-A9NZHQMHg@mail.gmail.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8384 bytes --]

[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]

We had entertained the idea of exposing the processes as sysfs nodes as you proposed, but we had concerns about exposing process info in there, especially since /proc already exists for that purpose.

I think if you were to follow that approach, we could have tools like top that support exposing GPU engine usage.
________________________________
From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2021 10:58 PM
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>; Nieto, David M <David.Nieto@amd.com>; Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Maling list - DRI developers <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>; Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Per client engine busyness

+ David, Christian

On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:41 PM Tvrtko Ursulin
<tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> On 13/05/2021 16:48, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 7:00 AM Tvrtko Ursulin
> > <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> >>
> >> Resurrect of the previosuly merged per client engine busyness patches. In a
> >> nutshell it enables intel_gpu_top to be more top(1) like useful and show not
> >> only physical GPU engine usage but per process view as well.
> >>
> >> Example screen capture:
> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> intel-gpu-top -  906/ 955 MHz;    0% RC6;  5.30 Watts;      933 irqs/s
> >>
> >>        IMC reads:     4414 MiB/s
> >>       IMC writes:     3805 MiB/s
> >>
> >>            ENGINE      BUSY                                      MI_SEMA MI_WAIT
> >>       Render/3D/0   93.46% |████████████████████████████████▋  |      0%      0%
> >>         Blitter/0    0.00% |                                   |      0%      0%
> >>           Video/0    0.00% |                                   |      0%      0%
> >>    VideoEnhance/0    0.00% |                                   |      0%      0%
> >>
> >>    PID            NAME  Render/3D      Blitter        Video      VideoEnhance
> >>   2733       neverball |██████▌     ||            ||            ||            |
> >>   2047            Xorg |███▊        ||            ||            ||            |
> >>   2737        glxgears |█▍          ||            ||            ||            |
> >>   2128           xfwm4 |            ||            ||            ||            |
> >>   2047            Xorg |            ||            ||            ||            |
> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>
> >> Internally we track time spent on engines for each struct intel_context, both
> >> for current and past contexts belonging to each open DRM file.
> >>
> >> This can serve as a building block for several features from the wanted list:
> >> smarter scheduler decisions, getrusage(2)-like per-GEM-context functionality
> >> wanted by some customers, setrlimit(2) like controls, cgroups controller,
> >> dynamic SSEU tuning, ...
> >>
> >> To enable userspace access to the tracked data, we expose time spent on GPU per
> >> client and per engine class in sysfs with a hierarchy like the below:
> >>
> >>          # cd /sys/class/drm/card0/clients/
> >>          # tree
> >>          .
> >>          ├── 7
> >>          │   ├── busy
> >>          │   │   ├── 0
> >>          │   │   ├── 1
> >>          │   │   ├── 2
> >>          │   │   └── 3
> >>          │   ├── name
> >>          │   └── pid
> >>          ├── 8
> >>          │   ├── busy
> >>          │   │   ├── 0
> >>          │   │   ├── 1
> >>          │   │   ├── 2
> >>          │   │   └── 3
> >>          │   ├── name
> >>          │   └── pid
> >>          └── 9
> >>              ├── busy
> >>              │   ├── 0
> >>              │   ├── 1
> >>              │   ├── 2
> >>              │   └── 3
> >>              ├── name
> >>              └── pid
> >>
> >> Files in 'busy' directories are numbered using the engine class ABI values and
> >> they contain accumulated nanoseconds each client spent on engines of a
> >> respective class.
> >
> > We did something similar in amdgpu using the gpu scheduler.  We then
> > expose the data via fdinfo.  See
> > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcgit.freedesktop.org%2Fdrm%2Fdrm-misc%2Fcommit%2F%3Fid%3D1774baa64f9395fa884ea9ed494bcb043f3b83f5&amp;data=04%7C01%7CDavid.Nieto%40amd.com%7C5e3c05578ef14be3692508d9169d55bf%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637565687273144615%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=mt1EIL%2Fc9pHCXR%2FYSd%2BTr1e64XHoeYcdQ2cYufJ%2FcYQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcgit.freedesktop.org%2Fdrm%2Fdrm-misc%2Fcommit%2F%3Fid%3D874442541133f78c78b6880b8cc495bab5c61704&amp;data=04%7C01%7CDavid.Nieto%40amd.com%7C5e3c05578ef14be3692508d9169d55bf%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637565687273144615%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=%2F3zMGw0LPTC1kG4NebTwUPTx7QCtEyw%2B4JToXDK5QXI%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
> Interesting!
>
> Is yours wall time or actual GPU time taking preemption and such into
> account? Do you have some userspace tools parsing this data and how to
> do you client discovery? Presumably there has to be a better way that
> going through all open file descriptors?

Wall time.  It uses the fences in the scheduler to calculate engine
time.  We have some python scripts to make it look pretty, but mainly
just reading the files directly.  If you know the process, you can
look it up in procfs.

>
> Our implementation was merged in January but Daniel took it out recently
> because he wanted to have discussion about a common vendor framework for
> this whole story on dri-devel. I think. +Daniel to comment.
>
> I couldn't find the patch you pasted on the mailing list to see if there
> was any such discussion around your version.

It was on the amd-gfx mailing list.

Alex

>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko
>
> >
> > Alex
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Tvrtko Ursulin (7):
> >>    drm/i915: Expose list of clients in sysfs
> >>    drm/i915: Update client name on context create
> >>    drm/i915: Make GEM contexts track DRM clients
> >>    drm/i915: Track runtime spent in closed and unreachable GEM contexts
> >>    drm/i915: Track all user contexts per client
> >>    drm/i915: Track context current active time
> >>    drm/i915: Expose per-engine client busyness
> >>
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile                 |   5 +-
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c   |  61 ++-
> >>   .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h |  16 +-
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c       |  27 +-
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h       |  15 +-
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h |  24 +-
> >>   .../drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c  |  23 +-
> >>   .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_clock_utils.c    |   4 +
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c           |  27 +-
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.h           |  24 ++
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c        |  10 +-
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.c        | 365 ++++++++++++++++++
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.h        | 123 ++++++
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c               |   6 +
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h               |   5 +
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c               |  21 +-
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c         |  31 +-
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.h         |   2 +-
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c             |   8 +
> >>   19 files changed, 716 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
> >>   create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.c
> >>   create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.h
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.30.2
> >>

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 17957 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-14  7:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 103+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-13 10:59 [PATCH 0/7] Per client engine busyness Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-13 10:59 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-13 10:59 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: Expose list of clients in sysfs Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-13 10:59   ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-13 10:59 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Update client name on context create Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-13 10:59   ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-13 10:59 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: Make GEM contexts track DRM clients Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-13 10:59   ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-13 10:59 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Track runtime spent in closed and unreachable GEM contexts Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-13 10:59   ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-13 11:00 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: Track all user contexts per client Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-13 11:00   ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-13 11:00 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: Track context current active time Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-13 11:00   ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-13 11:00 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: Expose per-engine client busyness Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-13 11:00   ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-13 11:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Per client engine busyness Patchwork
2021-05-13 11:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-05-13 11:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-05-13 15:48 ` [PATCH 0/7] " Alex Deucher
2021-05-13 15:48   ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Deucher
2021-05-13 16:40   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-13 16:40     ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-14  5:58     ` Alex Deucher
2021-05-14  5:58       ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Deucher
2021-05-14  7:22       ` Nieto, David M [this message]
2021-05-14  7:22         ` Nieto, David M
2021-05-14  8:04         ` Christian König
2021-05-14  8:04           ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-05-14 13:42           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-14 13:42             ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-14 13:53             ` Christian König
2021-05-14 13:53               ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-05-14 14:47               ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-14 14:47                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-14 14:56                 ` Christian König
2021-05-14 14:56                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-05-14 15:03                   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-14 15:03                     ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-14 15:10                     ` Christian König
2021-05-14 15:10                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-05-17 14:30                       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-17 14:30                         ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-05-17 14:39                         ` Nieto, David M
2021-05-17 14:39                           ` [Intel-gfx] " Nieto, David M
2021-05-17 16:00                           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-17 16:00                             ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-17 18:02                             ` Nieto, David M
2021-05-17 18:02                               ` [Intel-gfx] " Nieto, David M
2021-05-17 18:16                               ` [Nouveau] " Nieto, David M
2021-05-17 18:16                                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nieto, David M
2021-05-17 18:16                                 ` Nieto, David M
2021-05-17 19:03                                 ` [Nouveau] " Simon Ser
2021-05-17 19:03                                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Simon Ser
2021-05-17 19:03                                   ` Simon Ser
2021-05-18  9:08                                   ` [Nouveau] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-18  9:08                                     ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-18  9:08                                     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-18  9:16                                     ` [Nouveau] " Daniel Stone
2021-05-18  9:16                                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Stone
2021-05-18  9:16                                       ` Daniel Stone
2021-05-18  9:40                                       ` [Nouveau] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-18  9:40                                         ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-18  9:40                                         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-19 16:16                                         ` [Nouveau] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-19 16:16                                           ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-19 16:16                                           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-19 18:23                                           ` [Nouveau] [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-05-19 18:23                                             ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-19 18:23                                             ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-19 23:17                                             ` [Nouveau] " Nieto, David M
2021-05-19 23:17                                               ` Nieto, David M
2021-05-19 23:17                                               ` Nieto, David M
2021-05-20 14:11                                               ` [Nouveau] " Daniel Vetter
2021-05-20 14:11                                                 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-20 14:11                                                 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-20 14:12                                                 ` [Nouveau] " Christian König
2021-05-20 14:12                                                   ` Christian König
2021-05-20 14:12                                                   ` Christian König
2021-05-20 14:17                                                   ` [Nouveau] " arabek
2021-05-20 14:17                                                     ` [Intel-gfx] [Nouveau] " arabek
2021-05-20 14:17                                                     ` [Nouveau] [Intel-gfx] " arabek
2021-05-20  8:35                                             ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-20  8:35                                               ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-20  8:35                                               ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-24 10:48                                               ` [Nouveau] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-24 10:48                                                 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-24 10:48                                                 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-18  9:35                               ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-18  9:35                                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-18 12:06                                 ` Christian König
2021-05-18 12:06                                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-05-17 19:16                         ` Christian König
2021-05-17 19:16                           ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-06-28 10:16                       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-28 10:16                         ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-28 14:37                         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-28 14:37                           ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-05-15 10:40                     ` Maxime Schmitt
2021-05-17 16:13                       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-17 14:20   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-17 14:20     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-05-13 16:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BYAPR12MB2840AA68BCAEBD9279C6184FF4509@BYAPR12MB2840.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=david.nieto@amd.com \
    --cc=Christian.Koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=alexdeucher@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.