Warrior uninative

Warrior uninative

[Anders Montonen]

Hi,

The checksum of <https://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/uninative/2.7/x86_64-nativesdk-libc.tar.xz> doesn’t match what’s specified in yocto-uninative.inc. The actual checksum seems to match an older commit, so at least there’s nothing untowards going on.

I realize that the Warrior branch is officially EOL, but I still think this should be fixed.

Regards,
Anders Montonen

Re: [yocto] Warrior uninative

[Khem Raj]

latest warrior seems to be using 2.9 release of uninative not 2.7

see

https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta/conf/distro/include/yocto-uninative.inc?h=warrior

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 3:25 AM Anders Montonen <Anders.Montonen@iki.fi> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The checksum of <https://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/uninative/2.7/x86_64-nativesdk-libc.tar.xz> doesn’t match what’s specified in yocto-uninative.inc. The actual checksum seems to match an older commit, so at least there’s nothing untowards going on.
>
> I realize that the Warrior branch is officially EOL, but I still think this should be fixed.
>
> Regards,
> Anders Montonen
> 
>

Re: [yocto] Warrior uninative

[Anders Montonen]

Hi,

> On 1 Oct 2020, at 0:52, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> latest warrior seems to be using 2.9 release of uninative not 2.7

This turned out to be operator error. For Thud, we had to manually update a bunch of mirror variables, including for uninative, which I had completely forgotten about. After cleaning out the config files, the problem went away. Sorry for the noise.

Regards,
Anders Montonen