All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xensource.com>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@suse.de>
Cc: Xen devel list <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Keir Fraser <keir@xensource.com>,
	Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: 32-on-64: pvfb issue
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:48:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <C1DA7F58.801A%keir@xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45B4C3C0.1030406@suse.de>

On 22/1/07 14:01, "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@suse.de> wrote:

> Here we go.  Compile-tested on 32bit, more tests coming, full rebuild
> still in progress ...

Yeah, I like these. They can go in as soon as you're happy with them. One
exception is blkback -- I'm not keen on the v1/v2 thing as it is. I think we
should continue to include public/io/blkif.h and use the struct definition
there when protocol==XEN_IO_PROTO_ABI_NATIVE. The exceptions can be
XEN_IO_PROTO_ABI_X86_32 and XEN_IO_PROTO_ABI_X86_64 which can use the v1/v2
definitions (but I suggest renamed to include x86_32/x86_64 in the names).
We can generalise the names if they turn out to be useful in future for
other architectures (or provide typedef/#define equivalents). So for now we
end up with three useful enumerations for blk protocols: native, x86_32,
x86_64.

 -- Keir

  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-22 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-18 13:57 32-on-64: pvfb issue Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-18 14:07 ` Keir Fraser
2007-01-18 15:00 ` Markus Armbruster
2007-01-18 15:35   ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-18 15:53     ` Daniel P. Berrange
2007-01-18 16:34       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-18 16:55         ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-18 17:05         ` Daniel P. Berrange
2007-01-18 18:31     ` Keir Fraser
2007-01-19  9:46       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-19  9:54       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-19 10:31         ` Markus Armbruster
2007-01-19 10:46           ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-19 11:53             ` Markus Armbruster
2007-01-19 11:10         ` Keir Fraser
2007-01-19 11:43           ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-19 12:01             ` Keir Fraser
2007-01-19 12:59               ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-19 13:45                 ` Keir Fraser
2007-01-19 15:08                   ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-19 15:22                     ` Keir Fraser
2007-01-19 15:31                       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-19 16:05                         ` Keir Fraser
2007-01-20  0:09                           ` [Patch] [VTPM_TOOLS] Add HVM support to vtpm_manager Scarlata, Vincent R
2007-01-22  7:50                           ` 32-on-64: pvfb issue Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-22 14:01                             ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-22 14:48                               ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2007-01-23 12:53                                 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-23 15:07                                   ` Keir Fraser
2007-01-23 15:56                                     ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-24 11:23                                   ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-24 12:02                                     ` Keir Fraser
2007-01-24 12:24                                     ` Markus Armbruster
2007-01-24 12:38                                       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-24 14:24                                         ` Markus Armbruster
2007-01-24 15:25                                           ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-25 13:16                                   ` 32-on-64 broken in unstable Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-25 13:25                                     ` Keir Fraser
2007-01-25 13:34                                       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-22 15:22                               ` 32-on-64: pvfb issue Markus Armbruster
2007-01-22 15:33                                 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-22 15:40                                   ` Keir Fraser
2007-01-19 16:06                         ` Markus Armbruster
2007-01-22  7:56                           ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-19 10:43       ` Ian Campbell
2007-01-19 12:03         ` Markus Armbruster
2007-01-22 18:32       ` Does vt-x itself have perf. impact on Hypervisor w/o considering HVM? Liang Yang
2007-01-23 10:05         ` [Xen-users] " Petersson, Mats
2007-01-23 16:15           ` Liang Yang
2007-01-23 16:33             ` Petersson, Mats

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=C1DA7F58.801A%keir@xensource.com \
    --to=keir@xensource.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=kraxel@suse.de \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.