All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amit Kale <akale@stec-inc.com>
To: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
	linux-bcache <linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org>,
	device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jason Warr <jason@warr.net>,
	"thornber@redhat.com" <thornber@redhat.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC] [DONOTAPPLY] [PATCH] enhanceio: STEC EnhanceIO SSD caching software for Linux kernel
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 09:39:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <C4B5704C6FEB5244B2A1BCC8CF83B86B0A624D6474@MYMBX.MY.STEC-INC.AD> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH+dOxKUdxF1Ds9ogncBF1K-A979j46SqGq1rVeqii8LtgHxQw@mail.gmail.com>

End user documentation is on our github. I think it should go with the user level utilities, rather than the kernel driver.
-Amit

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kent Overstreet [mailto:koverstreet@google.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 5:25 PM
> To: Michel Lespinasse
> Cc: Darrick J. Wong; Amit Kale; linux-bcache; device-mapper
> development; Kent Overstreet; Mike Snitzer; LKML; Jason Warr;
> thornber@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [RFC] [DONOTAPPLY] [PATCH] enhanceio: STEC EnhanceIO SSD
> caching software for Linux kernel
> 
> Also, where's the end user documentation?
> 
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Kent Overstreet
> <koverstreet@google.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
> wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Darrick J. Wong
> <darrick.wong@oracle.com> wrote:
> >>> This is a patch to migrate STEC's enhanceio driver out of their
> >>> github repository and into the staging tree.  From their README:
> >>>
> >>> "EnhanceIO driver is based on EnhanceIO SSD caching software
> product
> >>> developed by STEC Inc. EnhanceIO was derived from Facebook's open
> >>> source Flashcache project. EnhanceIO uses SSDs as cache devices for
> >>> traditional rotating hard disk drives (referred to as source
> volumes throughout this document).
> >>> EnhanceIO can work with any block device, be it an entire physical
> >>> disk, an individual disk partition,  a RAIDed DAS device, a SAN
> >>> volume, a device mapper volume or a software RAID (md) device."
> >>
> >> What's your take on the benefits of this vs bcache ?
> >
> > I've been trying to review it it for cache coherency and consistency
> > wrt. power failures, but the complete lack of high level
> documentation
> > is making that difficult.
> >
> > I saw some benchmarks the other day where on writes EIO was faster
> > than the raw device, which was... suspicious.

PROPRIETARY-CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INCLUDED



This electronic transmission, and any documents attached hereto, may contain confidential, proprietary and/or legally privileged information. The information is intended only for use by the recipient named above. If you received this electronic message in error, please notify the sender and delete the electronic message. Any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of information received in error is strictly prohibited, and violators will be pursued legally.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Amit Kale <akale-FZ1t8LVTR2ZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
To: Kent Overstreet
	<koverstreet-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Michel Lespinasse
	<walken-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong"
	<darrick.wong-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-bcache
	<linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	device-mapper development
	<dm-devel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Kent Overstreet
	<kent.overstreet-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Jason Warr <jason-/cow75dQlsI@public.gmane.org>,
	"thornber-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org"
	<thornber-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC] [DONOTAPPLY] [PATCH] enhanceio: STEC EnhanceIO SSD caching software for Linux kernel
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 09:39:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <C4B5704C6FEB5244B2A1BCC8CF83B86B0A624D6474@MYMBX.MY.STEC-INC.AD> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH+dOxKUdxF1Ds9ogncBF1K-A979j46SqGq1rVeqii8LtgHxQw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>

End user documentation is on our github. I think it should go with the user level utilities, rather than the kernel driver.
-Amit

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kent Overstreet [mailto:koverstreet-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 5:25 PM
> To: Michel Lespinasse
> Cc: Darrick J. Wong; Amit Kale; linux-bcache; device-mapper
> development; Kent Overstreet; Mike Snitzer; LKML; Jason Warr;
> thornber-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC] [DONOTAPPLY] [PATCH] enhanceio: STEC EnhanceIO SSD
> caching software for Linux kernel
> 
> Also, where's the end user documentation?
> 
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Kent Overstreet
> <koverstreet-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Michel Lespinasse <walken-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Darrick J. Wong
> <darrick.wong-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >>> This is a patch to migrate STEC's enhanceio driver out of their
> >>> github repository and into the staging tree.  From their README:
> >>>
> >>> "EnhanceIO driver is based on EnhanceIO SSD caching software
> product
> >>> developed by STEC Inc. EnhanceIO was derived from Facebook's open
> >>> source Flashcache project. EnhanceIO uses SSDs as cache devices for
> >>> traditional rotating hard disk drives (referred to as source
> volumes throughout this document).
> >>> EnhanceIO can work with any block device, be it an entire physical
> >>> disk, an individual disk partition,  a RAIDed DAS device, a SAN
> >>> volume, a device mapper volume or a software RAID (md) device."
> >>
> >> What's your take on the benefits of this vs bcache ?
> >
> > I've been trying to review it it for cache coherency and consistency
> > wrt. power failures, but the complete lack of high level
> documentation
> > is making that difficult.
> >
> > I saw some benchmarks the other day where on writes EIO was faster
> > than the raw device, which was... suspicious.

PROPRIETARY-CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INCLUDED



This electronic transmission, and any documents attached hereto, may contain confidential, proprietary and/or legally privileged information. The information is intended only for use by the recipient named above. If you received this electronic message in error, please notify the sender and delete the electronic message. Any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of information received in error is strictly prohibited, and violators will be pursued legally.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-02  2:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-02  0:44 [RFC] [DONOTAPPLY] [PATCH] enhanceio: STEC EnhanceIO SSD caching software for Linux kernel Darrick J. Wong
2013-02-02  0:57 ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-02-02  1:23   ` Kent Overstreet
2013-02-02  1:23     ` Kent Overstreet
2013-02-02  1:25     ` Kent Overstreet
2013-02-02  1:25       ` Kent Overstreet
2013-02-02  1:39       ` Amit Kale [this message]
2013-02-02  1:39         ` Amit Kale
2013-02-02  1:49       ` Darrick J. Wong
2013-02-06 22:57   ` Amit Kale
2013-02-07  0:00     ` Kent Overstreet
2013-02-07  0:00       ` Kent Overstreet
2013-02-07  1:54       ` Amit Kale
2013-02-07  1:54         ` Amit Kale
2013-02-09  9:09         ` Joseph Glanville
2013-02-11  7:04           ` Amit Kale
2013-02-11  7:04             ` Amit Kale
2013-02-04 14:40 ` thornber
2013-02-04 14:40   ` thornber-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA
2013-02-04 16:30   ` Amit Kale
2013-02-04 16:30     ` Amit Kale
2013-02-04 20:53   ` Darrick J. Wong
2013-02-04 20:53     ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=C4B5704C6FEB5244B2A1BCC8CF83B86B0A624D6474@MYMBX.MY.STEC-INC.AD \
    --to=akale@stec-inc.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=jason@warr.net \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
    --cc=koverstreet@google.com \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=thornber@redhat.com \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.