Re: [patch] x86, tsc: fix SMI induced variation in quick_pit_calibrate()

[Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 388 bytes --]

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Hmm. I get the feeling that we should remove that line entirely.

Yeah, I really cannot come up with a single good reason to keep that
line, and suspect that I was a bit loopy when I wrote it.

So here's the suggested trivially updated patch. Does this work for people?

                    Linus

[-- Attachment #2: patch.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1294 bytes --]

 arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c |   10 ++++------
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
index c0dd5b603749..b2abd647d233 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
@@ -290,14 +290,15 @@ static inline int pit_verify_msb(unsigned char val)
 static inline int pit_expect_msb(unsigned char val, u64 *tscp, unsigned long *deltap)
 {
 	int count;
-	u64 tsc = 0;
+	u64 tsc = 0, prev_tsc = 0;
 
 	for (count = 0; count < 50000; count++) {
 		if (!pit_verify_msb(val))
 			break;
+		prev_tsc = tsc;
 		tsc = get_cycles();
 	}
-	*deltap = get_cycles() - tsc;
+	*deltap = get_cycles() - prev_tsc;
 	*tscp = tsc;
 
 	/*
@@ -383,15 +384,12 @@ success:
 	 *
 	 * As a result, we can depend on there not being
 	 * any odd delays anywhere, and the TSC reads are
-	 * reliable (within the error). We also adjust the
-	 * delta to the middle of the error bars, just
-	 * because it looks nicer.
+	 * reliable (within the error).
 	 *
 	 * kHz = ticks / time-in-seconds / 1000;
 	 * kHz = (t2 - t1) / (I * 256 / PIT_TICK_RATE) / 1000
 	 * kHz = ((t2 - t1) * PIT_TICK_RATE) / (I * 256 * 1000)
 	 */
-	delta += (long)(d2 - d1)/2;
 	delta *= PIT_TICK_RATE;
 	do_div(delta, i*256*1000);
 	printk("Fast TSC calibration using PIT\n");