From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm: numa: Slow PTE scan rate if migration failures occur
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:20:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFx=81BGnQFNhnAGu6CetL7yifPsnD-+v7Y6QRqwgH47gQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150312131045.GE3406@suse.de>
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote:
>
> I believe you're correct and it matches what was observed. I'm still
> travelling and wireless is dirt but managed to queue a test using pmd_dirty
Ok, thanks.
I'm not entirely happy with that change, and I suspect the whole
heuristic should be looked at much more (maybe it should also look at
whether it's executable, for example), but it's a step in the right
direction.
So I committed it and added a comment, and wrote a commit log about
it. I suspect any further work is post-4.0-release, unless somebody
comes up with something small and simple and obviously better.
Linus
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm: numa: Slow PTE scan rate if migration failures occur
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:20:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFx=81BGnQFNhnAGu6CetL7yifPsnD-+v7Y6QRqwgH47gQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150312131045.GE3406@suse.de>
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote:
>
> I believe you're correct and it matches what was observed. I'm still
> travelling and wireless is dirt but managed to queue a test using pmd_dirty
Ok, thanks.
I'm not entirely happy with that change, and I suspect the whole
heuristic should be looked at much more (maybe it should also look at
whether it's executable, for example), but it's a step in the right
direction.
So I committed it and added a comment, and wrote a commit log about
it. I suspect any further work is post-4.0-release, unless somebody
comes up with something small and simple and obviously better.
Linus
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm: numa: Slow PTE scan rate if migration failures occur
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:20:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFx=81BGnQFNhnAGu6CetL7yifPsnD-+v7Y6QRqwgH47gQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150312131045.GE3406@suse.de>
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote:
>
> I believe you're correct and it matches what was observed. I'm still
> travelling and wireless is dirt but managed to queue a test using pmd_dirty
Ok, thanks.
I'm not entirely happy with that change, and I suspect the whole
heuristic should be looked at much more (maybe it should also look at
whether it's executable, for example), but it's a step in the right
direction.
So I committed it and added a comment, and wrote a commit log about
it. I suspect any further work is post-4.0-release, unless somebody
comes up with something small and simple and obviously better.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm: numa: Slow PTE scan rate if migration failures occur
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:20:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFx=81BGnQFNhnAGu6CetL7yifPsnD-+v7Y6QRqwgH47gQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150312131045.GE3406@suse.de>
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote:
>
> I believe you're correct and it matches what was observed. I'm still
> travelling and wireless is dirt but managed to queue a test using pmd_dirty
Ok, thanks.
I'm not entirely happy with that change, and I suspect the whole
heuristic should be looked at much more (maybe it should also look at
whether it's executable, for example), but it's a step in the right
direction.
So I committed it and added a comment, and wrote a commit log about
it. I suspect any further work is post-4.0-release, unless somebody
comes up with something small and simple and obviously better.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-12 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 195+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-07 15:20 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Automatic NUMA balancing and PROT_NONE handling followup v2r8 Mel Gorman
2015-03-07 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-07 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-07 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-07 15:20 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm: thp: Return the correct value for change_huge_pmd Mel Gorman
2015-03-07 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-07 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-07 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-07 20:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-07 20:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-07 20:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-07 20:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-07 20:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-07 20:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-07 20:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-07 20:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-07 20:56 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-07 20:56 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-07 20:56 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-07 20:56 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-07 15:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm: numa: Remove migrate_ratelimited Mel Gorman
2015-03-07 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-07 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-07 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-07 15:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm: numa: Mark huge PTEs young when clearing NUMA hinting faults Mel Gorman
2015-03-07 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-07 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-07 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-07 18:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-07 18:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-07 18:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-07 18:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-07 18:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-07 18:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-07 18:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-07 18:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-07 15:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm: numa: Slow PTE scan rate if migration failures occur Mel Gorman
2015-03-07 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-07 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-07 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-07 16:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-07 16:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-07 16:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-07 16:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-07 17:37 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-07 17:37 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-07 17:37 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-07 17:37 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-08 9:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-08 9:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-08 9:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-08 9:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-07 19:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-07 19:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-07 19:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-07 19:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-08 10:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-08 10:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-08 10:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-08 10:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-08 18:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-08 18:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-08 18:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-08 18:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-08 18:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-08 18:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-08 18:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-08 18:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-09 11:29 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-09 11:29 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-09 11:29 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-09 11:29 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-09 16:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-09 16:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-09 16:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-09 16:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-09 19:19 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-09 19:19 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-09 19:19 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-10 23:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-10 23:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-10 23:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-10 23:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-12 13:10 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-12 13:10 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-12 13:10 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-12 13:10 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-12 16:20 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2015-03-12 16:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-12 16:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-12 16:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-12 18:49 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-12 18:49 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-12 18:49 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-12 18:49 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-17 7:06 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-17 7:06 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-17 7:06 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-17 7:06 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-17 16:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-17 16:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-17 16:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-17 16:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-17 20:51 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-17 20:51 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-17 20:51 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-17 20:51 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-17 21:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-17 21:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-17 21:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-17 21:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-17 22:08 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-17 22:08 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-17 22:08 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-17 22:08 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-18 16:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-18 16:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-18 16:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-18 16:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-18 17:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-18 17:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-18 17:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-18 17:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-18 22:23 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-18 22:23 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-18 22:23 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-18 22:23 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-19 14:10 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-19 14:10 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-19 14:10 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-19 14:10 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-19 18:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-19 18:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-19 18:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-19 18:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-19 21:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-19 21:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-19 21:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-19 21:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-19 22:41 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-19 22:41 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-19 22:41 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-19 22:41 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-19 23:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-19 23:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-19 23:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-19 23:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-19 23:23 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-19 23:23 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-19 23:23 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-19 23:23 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-20 0:23 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-20 0:23 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-20 0:23 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-20 0:23 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-20 1:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-20 1:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-20 1:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-20 1:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-20 4:13 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-20 4:13 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-20 4:13 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-20 4:13 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-20 17:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-20 17:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-20 17:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-20 17:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-23 12:01 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-23 12:01 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-23 12:01 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-23 12:01 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-20 10:12 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-20 10:12 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-20 10:12 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-20 10:12 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-20 9:56 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-20 9:56 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-20 9:56 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-20 9:56 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-08 20:40 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-08 20:40 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-08 20:40 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-08 20:40 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-09 21:02 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-09 21:02 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-09 21:02 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-09 21:02 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-10 13:08 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-10 13:08 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-10 13:08 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-10 13:08 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-08 9:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-08 9:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-08 9:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-08 9:41 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+55aFx=81BGnQFNhnAGu6CetL7yifPsnD-+v7Y6QRqwgH47gQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.