All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/32: sstep: Move variable `rc` within CONFIG_PPC64 sentinels
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 17:52:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+7wUswLP5cffrYZuEZ9bJeq1-FNNq6LFurMrOM1bmnDDN7E-g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d0k2q025.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 1:40 PM Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>
> Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org> writes:
>
> > Fix warnings treated as errors with W=1:
> >
> >   arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c:1172:31: error: variable 'rc' set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
> >
> > Suggested-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
> > ---
> > v2: as suggested prefer CONFIG_PPC64 sentinel instead of unused keyword
>
> I'd rather avoid adding more ifdefs if we can.
>
> I think this works?

It does ! ;)

Reviewed-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>

> cheers
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c
> index 3d33fb509ef4..600b036ddfda 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c
> @@ -1169,7 +1169,7 @@ static nokprobe_inline int trap_compare(long v1, long v2)
>  int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
>                   unsigned int instr)
>  {
> -       unsigned int opcode, ra, rb, rc, rd, spr, u;
> +       unsigned int opcode, ra, rb, rd, spr, u;
>         unsigned long int imm;
>         unsigned long int val, val2;
>         unsigned int mb, me, sh;
> @@ -1292,7 +1292,6 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
>         rd = (instr >> 21) & 0x1f;
>         ra = (instr >> 16) & 0x1f;
>         rb = (instr >> 11) & 0x1f;
> -       rc = (instr >> 6) & 0x1f;
>
>         switch (opcode) {
>  #ifdef __powerpc64__
> @@ -1307,10 +1306,14 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
>                 return 1;
>
>  #ifdef __powerpc64__
> -       case 4:
> +       case 4: {
> +               unsigned int rc;
> +
>                 if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
>                         return -1;
>
> +               rc = (instr >> 6) & 0x1f;
> +
>                 switch (instr & 0x3f) {
>                 case 48:        /* maddhd */
>                         asm volatile(PPC_MADDHD(%0, %1, %2, %3) :
> @@ -1336,6 +1339,7 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
>                  * primary opcode which do not have emulation support yet.
>                  */
>                 return -1;
> +       }
>  #endif
>
>         case 7:         /* mulli */

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/32: sstep: Move variable `rc` within CONFIG_PPC64 sentinels
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 17:52:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+7wUswLP5cffrYZuEZ9bJeq1-FNNq6LFurMrOM1bmnDDN7E-g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d0k2q025.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 1:40 PM Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>
> Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org> writes:
>
> > Fix warnings treated as errors with W=1:
> >
> >   arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c:1172:31: error: variable 'rc' set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
> >
> > Suggested-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
> > ---
> > v2: as suggested prefer CONFIG_PPC64 sentinel instead of unused keyword
>
> I'd rather avoid adding more ifdefs if we can.
>
> I think this works?

It does ! ;)

Reviewed-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>

> cheers
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c
> index 3d33fb509ef4..600b036ddfda 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c
> @@ -1169,7 +1169,7 @@ static nokprobe_inline int trap_compare(long v1, long v2)
>  int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
>                   unsigned int instr)
>  {
> -       unsigned int opcode, ra, rb, rc, rd, spr, u;
> +       unsigned int opcode, ra, rb, rd, spr, u;
>         unsigned long int imm;
>         unsigned long int val, val2;
>         unsigned int mb, me, sh;
> @@ -1292,7 +1292,6 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
>         rd = (instr >> 21) & 0x1f;
>         ra = (instr >> 16) & 0x1f;
>         rb = (instr >> 11) & 0x1f;
> -       rc = (instr >> 6) & 0x1f;
>
>         switch (opcode) {
>  #ifdef __powerpc64__
> @@ -1307,10 +1306,14 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
>                 return 1;
>
>  #ifdef __powerpc64__
> -       case 4:
> +       case 4: {
> +               unsigned int rc;
> +
>                 if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
>                         return -1;
>
> +               rc = (instr >> 6) & 0x1f;
> +
>                 switch (instr & 0x3f) {
>                 case 48:        /* maddhd */
>                         asm volatile(PPC_MADDHD(%0, %1, %2, %3) :
> @@ -1336,6 +1339,7 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
>                  * primary opcode which do not have emulation support yet.
>                  */
>                 return -1;
> +       }
>  #endif
>
>         case 7:         /* mulli */

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-28 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-12 20:20 [PATCH] powerpc: sstep: Mark variable `rc` as unused in function 'analyse_instr' Mathieu Malaterre
2019-03-12 20:20 ` Mathieu Malaterre
2019-03-12 20:56 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-03-12 20:56   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-03-12 21:12   ` Mathieu Malaterre
2019-03-12 21:12     ` Mathieu Malaterre
2019-03-12 21:25     ` Christophe Leroy
2019-03-12 21:25       ` Christophe Leroy
2019-03-13 20:12       ` Mathieu Malaterre
2019-03-13 20:12         ` Mathieu Malaterre
2019-03-12 21:23 ` [PATCH v2] powerpc/32: sstep: Move variable `rc` within CONFIG_PPC64 sentinels Mathieu Malaterre
2019-03-12 21:23   ` Mathieu Malaterre
2019-05-23 11:49   ` Mathieu Malaterre
2019-05-23 11:49     ` Mathieu Malaterre
2019-05-28 11:40   ` Michael Ellerman
2019-05-28 11:40     ` Michael Ellerman
2019-05-28 15:52     ` Mathieu Malaterre [this message]
2019-05-28 15:52       ` Mathieu Malaterre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+7wUswLP5cffrYZuEZ9bJeq1-FNNq6LFurMrOM1bmnDDN7E-g@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=malat@debian.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.