Re: routing table doesn't report wireguard routes

Re: routing table doesn't report wireguard routes

[Lane Russell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 265 bytes --]

Turns out, I didn't understand quite how the routing table works in Linux.
Here is a good high-level description of how this works: (thanks to wurtel
over at stackexhange:
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/188584/which-order-is-the-route-table-analyzed-in
)

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 490 bytes --]

routing table doesn't report wireguard routes

[Lane Russell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 367 bytes --]

Ubuntu 16.04.4 LTS

Currently, WireGuard's routes don't seem to show up in the routing table,
at least as viewed via "route -n" and "netstat -rn".

Is this an issue, or am I misunderstanding the mechanism WireGuard uses to
route traffic?

In my case, the client config has "AllowedIPs = 0.0.0.0/0", and this is
working fine, it's just that the routes aren't visible.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 836 bytes --]