* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/81] 5.10.73-rc3 review
2021-10-12 9:37 [PATCH 5.10 00/81] 5.10.73-rc3 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2021-10-12 12:42 ` Jon Hunter
2021-10-12 13:56 ` Pavel Machek
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2021-10-12 12:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable, linux-tegra
On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 11:37:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.73 release.
> There are 81 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 14 Oct 2021 09:33:32 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.73-rc3.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
75 tests: 75 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.73-rc3-g29e0360ee4fc
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/81] 5.10.73-rc3 review
2021-10-12 9:37 [PATCH 5.10 00/81] 5.10.73-rc3 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-10-12 12:42 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2021-10-12 13:56 ` Pavel Machek
2021-10-12 18:02 ` Shuah Khan
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2021-10-12 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 660 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.73 release.
> There are 81 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/81] 5.10.73-rc3 review
2021-10-12 9:37 [PATCH 5.10 00/81] 5.10.73-rc3 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-10-12 12:42 ` Jon Hunter
2021-10-12 13:56 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2021-10-12 18:02 ` Shuah Khan
2021-10-12 18:05 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2021-10-12 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable, Shuah Khan
On 10/12/21 3:37 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.73 release.
> There are 81 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 14 Oct 2021 09:33:32 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.73-rc3.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/81] 5.10.73-rc3 review
2021-10-12 9:37 [PATCH 5.10 00/81] 5.10.73-rc3 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-10-12 18:02 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2021-10-12 18:05 ` Naresh Kamboju
2021-10-12 21:17 ` Guenter Roeck
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2021-10-12 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: open list, Shuah Khan, Florian Fainelli, patches, lkft-triage,
Jon Hunter, linux-stable, Pavel Machek, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Guenter Roeck
On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 at 15:07, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.73 release.
> There are 81 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 14 Oct 2021 09:33:32 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.73-rc3.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 5.10.73-rc3
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: 29e0360ee4fccd2090a04f1a772a23a9ab01326b
* git describe: v5.10.72-82-g29e0360ee4fc
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.72-82-g29e0360ee4fc
## No regressions (compared to v5.10.72-83-g0d59553e5bda)
## No fixes (compared to v5.10.72-83-g0d59553e5bda)
## Test result summary
total: 85643, pass: 72733, fail: 511, skip: 11583, xfail: 816
## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 289 total, 289 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 39 total, 39 passed, 0 failed
* dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 38 total, 38 passed, 0 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 39 total, 39 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 30 total, 30 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 39 total, 39 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* fwts
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/81] 5.10.73-rc3 review
2021-10-12 9:37 [PATCH 5.10 00/81] 5.10.73-rc3 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-10-12 18:05 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2021-10-12 21:17 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-10-12 22:34 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-10-13 10:28 ` Sudip Mukherjee
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2021-10-12 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 11:37:11AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.73 release.
> There are 81 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 14 Oct 2021 09:33:32 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 472 pass: 472 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/81] 5.10.73-rc3 review
2021-10-12 9:37 [PATCH 5.10 00/81] 5.10.73-rc3 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2021-10-12 21:17 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2021-10-12 22:34 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-10-13 10:28 ` Sudip Mukherjee
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2021-10-12 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
jonathanh, stable
On 10/12/21 2:37 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.73 release.
> There are 81 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 14 Oct 2021 09:33:32 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.73-rc3.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB, using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/81] 5.10.73-rc3 review
2021-10-12 9:37 [PATCH 5.10 00/81] 5.10.73-rc3 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2021-10-12 22:34 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2021-10-13 10:28 ` Sudip Mukherjee
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee @ 2021-10-13 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable
Hi Greg,
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 11:37:11AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.73 release.
> There are 81 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 14 Oct 2021 09:33:32 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20211012): 63 configs -> no new failure
arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20211012): 105 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211012): 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/254
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/257
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread