* Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/117] 5.15.90-rc2 review
2023-01-23 9:52 [PATCH 5.15 000/117] 5.15.90-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2023-01-23 20:01 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-01-23 23:33 ` Ron Economos
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2023-01-23 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On 1/23/23 01:52, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.90 release.
> There are 117 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Jan 2023 09:48:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.90-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit, build tested on BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/117] 5.15.90-rc2 review
2023-01-23 9:52 [PATCH 5.15 000/117] 5.15.90-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-01-23 20:01 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2023-01-23 23:33 ` Ron Economos
2023-01-24 0:13 ` Kelsey Steele
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2023-01-23 23:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
On 1/23/23 1:52 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.90 release.
> There are 117 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Jan 2023 09:48:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.90-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/117] 5.15.90-rc2 review
2023-01-23 9:52 [PATCH 5.15 000/117] 5.15.90-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-01-23 20:01 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-01-23 23:33 ` Ron Economos
@ 2023-01-24 0:13 ` Kelsey Steele
2023-01-24 1:05 ` Shuah Khan
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Kelsey Steele @ 2023-01-24 0:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:52:31AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.90 release.
> There are 117 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Jan 2023 09:48:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
No regressions found on WSL x86_64 or WSL arm64
Built, booted, and reviewed dmesg.
Thank you.
Tested-by: Kelsey Steele <kelseysteele@linux.microsoft.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/117] 5.15.90-rc2 review
2023-01-23 9:52 [PATCH 5.15 000/117] 5.15.90-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-24 0:13 ` Kelsey Steele
@ 2023-01-24 1:05 ` Shuah Khan
2023-01-24 2:49 ` Guenter Roeck
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2023-01-24 1:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, Shuah Khan
On 1/23/23 02:52, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.90 release.
> There are 117 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Jan 2023 09:48:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.90-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/117] 5.15.90-rc2 review
2023-01-23 9:52 [PATCH 5.15 000/117] 5.15.90-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-24 1:05 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2023-01-24 2:49 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-01-24 2:58 ` Bagas Sanjaya
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2023-01-24 2:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:52:31AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.90 release.
> There are 117 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Jan 2023 09:48:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 160 pass: 160 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 492 pass: 492 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/117] 5.15.90-rc2 review
2023-01-23 9:52 [PATCH 5.15 000/117] 5.15.90-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-24 2:49 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2023-01-24 2:58 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-01-24 6:39 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Bagas Sanjaya @ 2023-01-24 2:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 539 bytes --]
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:52:31AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.90 release.
> There are 117 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 10.2.0) and
powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.2.0).
Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/117] 5.15.90-rc2 review
2023-01-23 9:52 [PATCH 5.15 000/117] 5.15.90-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-24 2:58 ` Bagas Sanjaya
@ 2023-01-24 6:39 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-01-24 9:52 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-01-24 19:07 ` Allen Pais
8 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2023-01-24 6:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 at 15:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.90 release.
> There are 117 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Jan 2023 09:48:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.90-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 5.15.90-rc2
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.15.y
* git commit: 60931c95bb6db9ce421e75a907a245f828c11243
* git describe: v5.15.87-219-g60931c95bb6d
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.87-219-g60931c95bb6d
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.15.87-101-gbe338c42efd1)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.15.87-101-gbe338c42efd1)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.15.87-101-gbe338c42efd1)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.15.87-101-gbe338c42efd1)
## Test result summary
total: 160151, pass: 129328, fail: 4546, skip: 25944, xfail: 333
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 151 total, 150 passed, 1 failed
* arm64: 49 total, 47 passed, 2 failed
* i386: 39 total, 35 passed, 4 failed
* mips: 31 total, 29 passed, 2 failed
* parisc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 34 total, 32 passed, 2 failed
* riscv: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 16 total, 14 passed, 2 failed
* sh: 14 total, 12 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 42 total, 40 passed, 2 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* fwts
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/117] 5.15.90-rc2 review
2023-01-23 9:52 [PATCH 5.15 000/117] 5.15.90-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-24 6:39 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2023-01-24 9:52 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-01-24 12:58 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-01-25 0:27 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-01-24 19:07 ` Allen Pais
8 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2023-01-24 9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 at 15:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.90 release.
> There are 117 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Jan 2023 09:48:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.90-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
Regressions found on arm64 for both 5.15.90-rc2 and 5.10.165-rc2.
* qemu-arm64-mte, kselftest-arm64
- arm64_check_buffer_fill
- arm64_check_child_memory
- arm64_check_ksm_options
- arm64_check_mmap_options
- arm64_check_tags_inclusion
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
We are in a process to bisecting this problem and there are updates coming
from kselftest rootfs.
Test logs,
# selftests: arm64: check_buffer_fill
# 1..20
# ok 1 Check buffer correctness by byte with sync err mode and mmap memory
# ok 2 Check buffer correctness by byte with async err mode and mmap memory
# ok 3 Check buffer correctness by byte with sync err mode and
mmap/mprotect memory
# ok 4 Check buffer correctness by byte with async err mode and
mmap/mprotect memory
# not ok 5 Check buffer write underflow by byte with sync mode and mmap memory
# not ok 6 Check buffer write underflow by byte with async mode and mmap memory
# ok 7 Check buffer write underflow by byte with tag check fault
ignore and mmap memory
# ok 8 Check buffer write underflow by byte with sync mode and mmap memory
# ok 9 Check buffer write underflow by byte with async mode and mmap memory
# ok 10 Check buffer write underflow by byte with tag check fault
ignore and mmap memory
# not ok 11 Check buffer write overflow by byte with sync mode and mmap memory
# not ok 12 Check buffer write overflow by byte with async mode and mmap memory
# ok 13 Check buffer write overflow by byte with tag fault ignore mode
and mmap memory
# not ok 14 Check buffer write correctness by block with sync mode and
mmap memory
# not ok 15 Check buffer write correctness by block with async mode
and mmap memory
# ok 16 Check buffer write correctness by block with tag fault ignore
and mmap memory
# ok 17 Check initial tags with private mapping, sync error mode and mmap memory
# ok 18 Check initial tags with private mapping, sync error mode and
mmap/mprotect memory
# ok 19 Check initial tags with shared mapping, sync error mode and mmap memory
# ok 20 Check initial tags with shared mapping, sync error mode and
mmap/mprotect memory
# # Totals: pass:14 fail:6 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
not ok 34 selftests: arm64: check_buffer_fill # exit=1
# selftests: arm64: check_child_memory
# 1..12
# not ok 1 Check child anonymous memory with private mapping, precise
mode and mmap memory
# not ok 2 Check child anonymous memory with shared mapping, precise
mode and mmap memory
# not ok 3 Check child anonymous memory with private mapping,
imprecise mode and mmap memory
# not ok 4 Check child anonymous memory with shared mapping, imprecise
mode and mmap memory
# not ok 5 Check child anonymous memory with private mapping, precise
mode and mmap/mprotect memory
# not ok 6 Check child anonymous memory with shared mapping, precise
mode and mmap/mprotect memory
# not ok 7 Check child file memory with private mapping, precise mode
and mmap memory
# not ok 8 Check child file memory with shared mapping, precise mode
and mmap memory
# not ok 9 Check child file memory with private mapping, imprecise
mode and mmap memory
# not ok 10 Check child file memory with shared mapping, imprecise
mode and mmap memory
# not ok 11 Check child file memory with private mapping, precise mode
and mmap/mprotect memory
# not ok 12 Check child file memory with shared mapping, precise mode
and mmap/mprotect memory
# # Totals: pass:0 fail:12 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
not ok 35 selftests: arm64: check_child_memory # exit=1
# selftests: arm64: check_ksm_options
# 1..4
# # Invalid MTE synchronous exception caught!
not ok 37 selftests: arm64: check_ksm_options # exit=1
# selftests: arm64: check_mmap_options
# 1..22
# ok 1 Check anonymous memory with private mapping, sync error mode,
mmap memory and tag check off
# ok 2 Check file memory with private mapping, sync error mode,
mmap/mprotect memory and tag check off
# ok 3 Check anonymous memory with private mapping, no error mode,
mmap memory and tag check off
# ok 4 Check file memory with private mapping, no error mode,
mmap/mprotect memory and tag check off
# not ok 5 Check anonymous memory with private mapping, sync error
mode, mmap memory and tag check on
# not ok 6 Check anonymous memory with private mapping, sync error
mode, mmap/mprotect memory and tag check on
# not ok 7 Check anonymous memory with shared mapping, sync error
mode, mmap memory and tag check on
# not ok 8 Check anonymous memory with shared mapping, sync error
mode, mmap/mprotect memory and tag check on
# not ok 9 Check anonymous memory with private mapping, async error
mode, mmap memory and tag check on
# not ok 10 Check anonymous memory with private mapping, async error
mode, mmap/mprotect memory and tag check on
# not ok 11 Check anonymous memory with shared mapping, async error
mode, mmap memory and tag check on
# not ok 12 Check anonymous memory with shared mapping, async error
mode, mmap/mprotect memory and tag check on
# not ok 13 Check file memory with private mapping, sync error mode,
mmap memory and tag check on
# not ok 14 Check file memory with private mapping, sync error mode,
mmap/mprotect memory and tag check on
# not ok 15 Check file memory with shared mapping, sync error mode,
mmap memory and tag check on
# not ok 16 Check file memory with shared mapping, sync error mode,
mmap/mprotect memory and tag check on
# not ok 17 Check file memory with private mapping, async error mode,
mmap memory and tag check on
# not ok 18 Check file memory with private mapping, async error mode,
mmap/mprotect memory and tag check on
# not ok 19 Check file memory with shared mapping, async error mode,
mmap memory and tag check on
# not ok 20 Check file memory with shared mapping, async error mode,
mmap/mprotect memory and tag check on
# not ok 21 Check clear PROT_MTE flags with private mapping, sync
error mode and mmap memory
# not ok 22 Check clear PROT_MTE flags with private mapping and sync
error mode and mmap/mprotect memory
# # Totals: pass:4 fail:18 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
not ok 38 selftests: arm64: check_mmap_options # exit=1
# selftests: arm64: check_tags_inclusion
# 1..4
# # No valid fault recorded for 0x500ffffb8b27000 in mode 1
# not ok 1 Check an included tag value with sync mode
# # No valid fault recorded for 0x400ffffb8b27000 in mode 1
# not ok 2 Check different included tags value with sync mode
# ok 3 Check none included tags value with sync mode
# # No valid fault recorded for 0xa00ffffb8b27000 in mode 1
# not ok 4 Check all included tags value with sync mode
# # Totals: pass:1 fail:3 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
not ok 40 selftests: arm64: check_tags_inclusion # exit=1
Test logs,
https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/6087664#L4865
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.162-951-g9096aabfe9e0/testrun/14329777/suite/kselftest-arm64/test/arm64_check_tags_inclusion/log
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.162-951-g9096aabfe9e0/testrun/14329777/suite/kselftest-arm64/tests/
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.87-219-g60931c95bb6d/testrun/14329656/suite/kselftest-arm64/tests/
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/117] 5.15.90-rc2 review
2023-01-24 9:52 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2023-01-24 12:58 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-01-24 14:59 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-01-25 0:27 ` Naresh Kamboju
1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2023-01-24 12:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Naresh Kamboju, Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
On 1/24/23 01:52, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 at 15:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.90 release.
>> There are 117 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Jan 2023 09:48:53 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.90-rc2.gz
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
>
>
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> Regressions found on arm64 for both 5.15.90-rc2 and 5.10.165-rc2.
>
Didn't you send an earlier e-mail suggesting no regressions ?
Guenter
> * qemu-arm64-mte, kselftest-arm64
> - arm64_check_buffer_fill
> - arm64_check_child_memory
> - arm64_check_ksm_options
> - arm64_check_mmap_options
> - arm64_check_tags_inclusion
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
>
> We are in a process to bisecting this problem and there are updates coming
> from kselftest rootfs.
>
> Test logs,
> # selftests: arm64: check_buffer_fill
> # 1..20
> # ok 1 Check buffer correctness by byte with sync err mode and mmap memory
> # ok 2 Check buffer correctness by byte with async err mode and mmap memory
> # ok 3 Check buffer correctness by byte with sync err mode and
> mmap/mprotect memory
> # ok 4 Check buffer correctness by byte with async err mode and
> mmap/mprotect memory
> # not ok 5 Check buffer write underflow by byte with sync mode and mmap memory
> # not ok 6 Check buffer write underflow by byte with async mode and mmap memory
> # ok 7 Check buffer write underflow by byte with tag check fault
> ignore and mmap memory
> # ok 8 Check buffer write underflow by byte with sync mode and mmap memory
> # ok 9 Check buffer write underflow by byte with async mode and mmap memory
> # ok 10 Check buffer write underflow by byte with tag check fault
> ignore and mmap memory
> # not ok 11 Check buffer write overflow by byte with sync mode and mmap memory
> # not ok 12 Check buffer write overflow by byte with async mode and mmap memory
> # ok 13 Check buffer write overflow by byte with tag fault ignore mode
> and mmap memory
> # not ok 14 Check buffer write correctness by block with sync mode and
> mmap memory
> # not ok 15 Check buffer write correctness by block with async mode
> and mmap memory
> # ok 16 Check buffer write correctness by block with tag fault ignore
> and mmap memory
> # ok 17 Check initial tags with private mapping, sync error mode and mmap memory
> # ok 18 Check initial tags with private mapping, sync error mode and
> mmap/mprotect memory
> # ok 19 Check initial tags with shared mapping, sync error mode and mmap memory
> # ok 20 Check initial tags with shared mapping, sync error mode and
> mmap/mprotect memory
> # # Totals: pass:14 fail:6 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
> not ok 34 selftests: arm64: check_buffer_fill # exit=1
>
>
> # selftests: arm64: check_child_memory
> # 1..12
> # not ok 1 Check child anonymous memory with private mapping, precise
> mode and mmap memory
> # not ok 2 Check child anonymous memory with shared mapping, precise
> mode and mmap memory
> # not ok 3 Check child anonymous memory with private mapping,
> imprecise mode and mmap memory
> # not ok 4 Check child anonymous memory with shared mapping, imprecise
> mode and mmap memory
> # not ok 5 Check child anonymous memory with private mapping, precise
> mode and mmap/mprotect memory
> # not ok 6 Check child anonymous memory with shared mapping, precise
> mode and mmap/mprotect memory
> # not ok 7 Check child file memory with private mapping, precise mode
> and mmap memory
> # not ok 8 Check child file memory with shared mapping, precise mode
> and mmap memory
> # not ok 9 Check child file memory with private mapping, imprecise
> mode and mmap memory
> # not ok 10 Check child file memory with shared mapping, imprecise
> mode and mmap memory
> # not ok 11 Check child file memory with private mapping, precise mode
> and mmap/mprotect memory
> # not ok 12 Check child file memory with shared mapping, precise mode
> and mmap/mprotect memory
> # # Totals: pass:0 fail:12 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
> not ok 35 selftests: arm64: check_child_memory # exit=1
>
> # selftests: arm64: check_ksm_options
> # 1..4
> # # Invalid MTE synchronous exception caught!
> not ok 37 selftests: arm64: check_ksm_options # exit=1
>
>
> # selftests: arm64: check_mmap_options
> # 1..22
> # ok 1 Check anonymous memory with private mapping, sync error mode,
> mmap memory and tag check off
> # ok 2 Check file memory with private mapping, sync error mode,
> mmap/mprotect memory and tag check off
> # ok 3 Check anonymous memory with private mapping, no error mode,
> mmap memory and tag check off
> # ok 4 Check file memory with private mapping, no error mode,
> mmap/mprotect memory and tag check off
> # not ok 5 Check anonymous memory with private mapping, sync error
> mode, mmap memory and tag check on
> # not ok 6 Check anonymous memory with private mapping, sync error
> mode, mmap/mprotect memory and tag check on
> # not ok 7 Check anonymous memory with shared mapping, sync error
> mode, mmap memory and tag check on
> # not ok 8 Check anonymous memory with shared mapping, sync error
> mode, mmap/mprotect memory and tag check on
> # not ok 9 Check anonymous memory with private mapping, async error
> mode, mmap memory and tag check on
> # not ok 10 Check anonymous memory with private mapping, async error
> mode, mmap/mprotect memory and tag check on
> # not ok 11 Check anonymous memory with shared mapping, async error
> mode, mmap memory and tag check on
> # not ok 12 Check anonymous memory with shared mapping, async error
> mode, mmap/mprotect memory and tag check on
> # not ok 13 Check file memory with private mapping, sync error mode,
> mmap memory and tag check on
> # not ok 14 Check file memory with private mapping, sync error mode,
> mmap/mprotect memory and tag check on
> # not ok 15 Check file memory with shared mapping, sync error mode,
> mmap memory and tag check on
> # not ok 16 Check file memory with shared mapping, sync error mode,
> mmap/mprotect memory and tag check on
> # not ok 17 Check file memory with private mapping, async error mode,
> mmap memory and tag check on
> # not ok 18 Check file memory with private mapping, async error mode,
> mmap/mprotect memory and tag check on
> # not ok 19 Check file memory with shared mapping, async error mode,
> mmap memory and tag check on
> # not ok 20 Check file memory with shared mapping, async error mode,
> mmap/mprotect memory and tag check on
> # not ok 21 Check clear PROT_MTE flags with private mapping, sync
> error mode and mmap memory
> # not ok 22 Check clear PROT_MTE flags with private mapping and sync
> error mode and mmap/mprotect memory
> # # Totals: pass:4 fail:18 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
> not ok 38 selftests: arm64: check_mmap_options # exit=1
>
>
> # selftests: arm64: check_tags_inclusion
> # 1..4
> # # No valid fault recorded for 0x500ffffb8b27000 in mode 1
> # not ok 1 Check an included tag value with sync mode
> # # No valid fault recorded for 0x400ffffb8b27000 in mode 1
> # not ok 2 Check different included tags value with sync mode
> # ok 3 Check none included tags value with sync mode
> # # No valid fault recorded for 0xa00ffffb8b27000 in mode 1
> # not ok 4 Check all included tags value with sync mode
> # # Totals: pass:1 fail:3 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
> not ok 40 selftests: arm64: check_tags_inclusion # exit=1
>
> Test logs,
> https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/6087664#L4865
> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.162-951-g9096aabfe9e0/testrun/14329777/suite/kselftest-arm64/test/arm64_check_tags_inclusion/log
> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.162-951-g9096aabfe9e0/testrun/14329777/suite/kselftest-arm64/tests/
> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.87-219-g60931c95bb6d/testrun/14329656/suite/kselftest-arm64/tests/
>
> --
> Linaro LKFT
> https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/117] 5.15.90-rc2 review
2023-01-24 12:58 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2023-01-24 14:59 ` Naresh Kamboju
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2023-01-24 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guenter Roeck
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds,
akpm, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 18:28, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>
> On 1/24/23 01:52, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 at 15:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.90 release.
> >> There are 117 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >> let me know.
> >>
> >> Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Jan 2023 09:48:53 +0000.
> >> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >>
> >> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.90-rc2.gz
> >> or in the git tree and branch at:
> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> >> and the diffstat can be found below.
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >>
> >> greg k-h
> >
> >
> > Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> > Regressions found on arm64 for both 5.15.90-rc2 and 5.10.165-rc2.
> >
>
> Didn't you send an earlier e-mail suggesting no regressions ?
It took a while for me to generate a report and find this
selftest: arm64 regressions.
> > * qemu-arm64-mte, kselftest-arm64
> > - arm64_check_buffer_fill
> > - arm64_check_child_memory
> > - arm64_check_ksm_options
> > - arm64_check_mmap_options
> > - arm64_check_tags_inclusion
> >
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
> >
> > We are in a process to bisecting this problem and there are updates coming
> > from kselftest rootfs.
> >
> > Test logs,
> > # selftests: arm64: check_buffer_fill
> > # 1..20
> > # ok 1 Check buffer correctness by byte with sync err mode and mmap memory
> > # ok 2 Check buffer correctness by byte with async err mode and mmap memory
> > # ok 3 Check buffer correctness by byte with sync err mode and
> > mmap/mprotect memory
> > # ok 4 Check buffer correctness by byte with async err mode and
> > mmap/mprotect memory
> > # not ok 5 Check buffer write underflow by byte with sync mode and mmap memory
> > # not ok 6 Check buffer write underflow by byte with async mode and mmap memory
> > # ok 7 Check buffer write underflow by byte with tag check fault
> > ignore and mmap memory
> > # ok 8 Check buffer write underflow by byte with sync mode and mmap memory
> > # ok 9 Check buffer write underflow by byte with async mode and mmap memory
> > # ok 10 Check buffer write underflow by byte with tag check fault
> > ignore and mmap memory
> > # not ok 11 Check buffer write overflow by byte with sync mode and mmap memory
> > # not ok 12 Check buffer write overflow by byte with async mode and mmap memory
> > # ok 13 Check buffer write overflow by byte with tag fault ignore mode
> > and mmap memory
> > # not ok 14 Check buffer write correctness by block with sync mode and
> > mmap memory
> > # not ok 15 Check buffer write correctness by block with async mode
> > and mmap memory
> > # ok 16 Check buffer write correctness by block with tag fault ignore
> > and mmap memory
> > # ok 17 Check initial tags with private mapping, sync error mode and mmap memory
> > # ok 18 Check initial tags with private mapping, sync error mode and
> > mmap/mprotect memory
> > # ok 19 Check initial tags with shared mapping, sync error mode and mmap memory
> > # ok 20 Check initial tags with shared mapping, sync error mode and
> > mmap/mprotect memory
> > # # Totals: pass:14 fail:6 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
> > not ok 34 selftests: arm64: check_buffer_fill # exit=1
> >
> >
> > # selftests: arm64: check_child_memory
> > # 1..12
> > # not ok 1 Check child anonymous memory with private mapping, precise
> > mode and mmap memory
> > # not ok 2 Check child anonymous memory with shared mapping, precise
> > mode and mmap memory
> > # not ok 3 Check child anonymous memory with private mapping,
> > imprecise mode and mmap memory
> > # not ok 4 Check child anonymous memory with shared mapping, imprecise
> > mode and mmap memory
> > # not ok 5 Check child anonymous memory with private mapping, precise
> > mode and mmap/mprotect memory
> > # not ok 6 Check child anonymous memory with shared mapping, precise
> > mode and mmap/mprotect memory
> > # not ok 7 Check child file memory with private mapping, precise mode
> > and mmap memory
> > # not ok 8 Check child file memory with shared mapping, precise mode
> > and mmap memory
> > # not ok 9 Check child file memory with private mapping, imprecise
> > mode and mmap memory
> > # not ok 10 Check child file memory with shared mapping, imprecise
> > mode and mmap memory
> > # not ok 11 Check child file memory with private mapping, precise mode
> > and mmap/mprotect memory
> > # not ok 12 Check child file memory with shared mapping, precise mode
> > and mmap/mprotect memory
> > # # Totals: pass:0 fail:12 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
> > not ok 35 selftests: arm64: check_child_memory # exit=1
> >
> > # selftests: arm64: check_ksm_options
> > # 1..4
> > # # Invalid MTE synchronous exception caught!
> > not ok 37 selftests: arm64: check_ksm_options # exit=1
> >
> >
> > # selftests: arm64: check_mmap_options
> > # 1..22
> > # ok 1 Check anonymous memory with private mapping, sync error mode,
> > mmap memory and tag check off
> > # ok 2 Check file memory with private mapping, sync error mode,
> > mmap/mprotect memory and tag check off
> > # ok 3 Check anonymous memory with private mapping, no error mode,
> > mmap memory and tag check off
> > # ok 4 Check file memory with private mapping, no error mode,
> > mmap/mprotect memory and tag check off
> > # not ok 5 Check anonymous memory with private mapping, sync error
> > mode, mmap memory and tag check on
> > # not ok 6 Check anonymous memory with private mapping, sync error
> > mode, mmap/mprotect memory and tag check on
> > # not ok 7 Check anonymous memory with shared mapping, sync error
> > mode, mmap memory and tag check on
> > # not ok 8 Check anonymous memory with shared mapping, sync error
> > mode, mmap/mprotect memory and tag check on
> > # not ok 9 Check anonymous memory with private mapping, async error
> > mode, mmap memory and tag check on
> > # not ok 10 Check anonymous memory with private mapping, async error
> > mode, mmap/mprotect memory and tag check on
> > # not ok 11 Check anonymous memory with shared mapping, async error
> > mode, mmap memory and tag check on
> > # not ok 12 Check anonymous memory with shared mapping, async error
> > mode, mmap/mprotect memory and tag check on
> > # not ok 13 Check file memory with private mapping, sync error mode,
> > mmap memory and tag check on
> > # not ok 14 Check file memory with private mapping, sync error mode,
> > mmap/mprotect memory and tag check on
> > # not ok 15 Check file memory with shared mapping, sync error mode,
> > mmap memory and tag check on
> > # not ok 16 Check file memory with shared mapping, sync error mode,
> > mmap/mprotect memory and tag check on
> > # not ok 17 Check file memory with private mapping, async error mode,
> > mmap memory and tag check on
> > # not ok 18 Check file memory with private mapping, async error mode,
> > mmap/mprotect memory and tag check on
> > # not ok 19 Check file memory with shared mapping, async error mode,
> > mmap memory and tag check on
> > # not ok 20 Check file memory with shared mapping, async error mode,
> > mmap/mprotect memory and tag check on
> > # not ok 21 Check clear PROT_MTE flags with private mapping, sync
> > error mode and mmap memory
> > # not ok 22 Check clear PROT_MTE flags with private mapping and sync
> > error mode and mmap/mprotect memory
> > # # Totals: pass:4 fail:18 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
> > not ok 38 selftests: arm64: check_mmap_options # exit=1
> >
> >
> > # selftests: arm64: check_tags_inclusion
> > # 1..4
> > # # No valid fault recorded for 0x500ffffb8b27000 in mode 1
> > # not ok 1 Check an included tag value with sync mode
> > # # No valid fault recorded for 0x400ffffb8b27000 in mode 1
> > # not ok 2 Check different included tags value with sync mode
> > # ok 3 Check none included tags value with sync mode
> > # # No valid fault recorded for 0xa00ffffb8b27000 in mode 1
> > # not ok 4 Check all included tags value with sync mode
> > # # Totals: pass:1 fail:3 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
> > not ok 40 selftests: arm64: check_tags_inclusion # exit=1
> >
> > Test logs,
> > https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/6087664#L4865
> > https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.162-951-g9096aabfe9e0/testrun/14329777/suite/kselftest-arm64/test/arm64_check_tags_inclusion/log
> > https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.162-951-g9096aabfe9e0/testrun/14329777/suite/kselftest-arm64/tests/
> > https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.87-219-g60931c95bb6d/testrun/14329656/suite/kselftest-arm64/tests/
> >
> > --
> > Linaro LKFT
> > https://lkft.linaro.org
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/117] 5.15.90-rc2 review
2023-01-24 9:52 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-01-24 12:58 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2023-01-25 0:27 ` Naresh Kamboju
1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2023-01-25 0:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 15:22, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 at 15:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.90 release.
> > There are 117 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Jan 2023 09:48:53 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.90-rc2.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
>
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> Regressions found on arm64 for both 5.15.90-rc2 and 5.10.165-rc2.
>
> * qemu-arm64-mte, kselftest-arm64
> - arm64_check_buffer_fill
> - arm64_check_child_memory
> - arm64_check_ksm_options
> - arm64_check_mmap_options
> - arm64_check_tags_inclusion
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
>
> We are in a process to bisecting this problem and there are updates coming
> from kselftest rootfs.
The above said regressions are due to the Qemu version upgrade to 7.2.
With reference to my previous emails,
This is not a kernel regression on stable-rc 6.1, 5.15, and 5.10.
- Naresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/117] 5.15.90-rc2 review
2023-01-23 9:52 [PATCH 5.15 000/117] 5.15.90-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-24 9:52 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2023-01-24 19:07 ` Allen Pais
8 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Allen Pais @ 2023-01-24 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.90 release.
> There are 117 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Jan 2023 09:48:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.90-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my x86_64 and ARM64 test systems. No errors or
regressions.
Tested-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com>
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread