All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
To: shuah@kernel.org
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	sboyd@codeaurora.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, patrice.chotard@st.com,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com,
	Linaro Kernel Mailman List <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] rtc: make st-lpc robust against y2038/2106 bug
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 13:51:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+M3ks7ybavMZHxJ_sx_H7S6jis+F2Ye0Zi8eE4okY-W-ysbZg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cea926b2-5d84-18a9-9713-52d1495d550f@kernel.org>

2017-06-24 0:34 GMT+02:00 Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>:
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> On 06/23/2017 04:09 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>> On 23/06/2017 at 13:40:41 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>> On 06/19/2017 03:36 AM, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
>>>> On 32bits platforms "struct timeval" or "time_t" are using u32 to code the
>>>> date, this cause tools like "date" or "hwclock" failed even before setting
>>>> the RTC device if the date is superior to year 2038 (or 2106).
>>>>
>>>> To avoid this problem I add one RTC test file which directly use RTC ioctl
>>>> to set and read RTC time and alarm values.
>>>> rtctest_setdate allow to set any date/time given in the command line.
>>>>
>>>> On this version 2 I add check of problematics years in rtctest like suggest
>>>> by Alexandre.
>>>>
>>>> Finally that had allowed me to test and fix rtc-st-lpc driver.
>>>>
>>>> Benjamin Gaignard (3):
>>>>   tools: timer: add rtctest_setdate
>>>>   tool: timer: rtctest add check for problematic dates
>>>>   rtc: st-lpc: make it robust against y2038/2106 bug
>>>>
>>>>  drivers/rtc/rtc-st-lpc.c                         |  19 ++--
>>>>  tools/testing/selftests/timers/Makefile          |   2 +-
>>>>  tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest.c         | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>  tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest_setdate.c |  86 ++++++++++++++++
>>>>  4 files changed, 212 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest_setdate.c
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Thomas/John,
>>>
>>> I can take the first two patches in this series through linux-kselftest
>>> with your or John's Ack. Please review and let me know one way or the
>>> other.
>>>>
>> Well, I'm the maintainer for rtctest.c and I'll make sure to also be the
>> one for rtctest_setdate.c>
>>> The third one is a rtc driver patch. Please let me know how do you want
>>> to handle this series soon we can get this into 4.13-rc1.
>>>
>>
>> I'll take the three patches but I still have comment I didn't have time
>> to give yet.

Alexandre, may you had time to give me feedback on this ?

Regards,
Benjamin

>>
>>
>
> Okay. I will drop this off my radar then :)
>
> thanks,
> -- Shuah
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
To: shuah@kernel.org
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	sboyd@codeaurora.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, patrice.chotard@st.com,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com,
	Linaro Kernel Mailman List <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>
Subject: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] rtc: make st-lpc robust against y2038/2106 bug
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 13:51:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+M3ks7ybavMZHxJ_sx_H7S6jis+F2Ye0Zi8eE4okY-W-ysbZg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cea926b2-5d84-18a9-9713-52d1495d550f@kernel.org>

2017-06-24 0:34 GMT+02:00 Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>:
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> On 06/23/2017 04:09 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>> On 23/06/2017 at 13:40:41 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>> On 06/19/2017 03:36 AM, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
>>>> On 32bits platforms "struct timeval" or "time_t" are using u32 to code the
>>>> date, this cause tools like "date" or "hwclock" failed even before setting
>>>> the RTC device if the date is superior to year 2038 (or 2106).
>>>>
>>>> To avoid this problem I add one RTC test file which directly use RTC ioctl
>>>> to set and read RTC time and alarm values.
>>>> rtctest_setdate allow to set any date/time given in the command line.
>>>>
>>>> On this version 2 I add check of problematics years in rtctest like suggest
>>>> by Alexandre.
>>>>
>>>> Finally that had allowed me to test and fix rtc-st-lpc driver.
>>>>
>>>> Benjamin Gaignard (3):
>>>>   tools: timer: add rtctest_setdate
>>>>   tool: timer: rtctest add check for problematic dates
>>>>   rtc: st-lpc: make it robust against y2038/2106 bug
>>>>
>>>>  drivers/rtc/rtc-st-lpc.c                         |  19 ++--
>>>>  tools/testing/selftests/timers/Makefile          |   2 +-
>>>>  tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest.c         | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>  tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest_setdate.c |  86 ++++++++++++++++
>>>>  4 files changed, 212 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest_setdate.c
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Thomas/John,
>>>
>>> I can take the first two patches in this series through linux-kselftest
>>> with your or John's Ack. Please review and let me know one way or the
>>> other.
>>>>
>> Well, I'm the maintainer for rtctest.c and I'll make sure to also be the
>> one for rtctest_setdate.c>
>>> The third one is a rtc driver patch. Please let me know how do you want
>>> to handle this series soon we can get this into 4.13-rc1.
>>>
>>
>> I'll take the three patches but I still have comment I didn't have time
>> to give yet.

Alexandre, may you had time to give me feedback on this ?

Regards,
Benjamin

>>
>>
>
> Okay. I will drop this off my radar then :)
>
> thanks,
> -- Shuah
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org (Benjamin Gaignard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] rtc: make st-lpc robust against y2038/2106 bug
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 13:51:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+M3ks7ybavMZHxJ_sx_H7S6jis+F2Ye0Zi8eE4okY-W-ysbZg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cea926b2-5d84-18a9-9713-52d1495d550f@kernel.org>

2017-06-24 0:34 GMT+02:00 Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>:
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> On 06/23/2017 04:09 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>> On 23/06/2017 at 13:40:41 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>> On 06/19/2017 03:36 AM, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
>>>> On 32bits platforms "struct timeval" or "time_t" are using u32 to code the
>>>> date, this cause tools like "date" or "hwclock" failed even before setting
>>>> the RTC device if the date is superior to year 2038 (or 2106).
>>>>
>>>> To avoid this problem I add one RTC test file which directly use RTC ioctl
>>>> to set and read RTC time and alarm values.
>>>> rtctest_setdate allow to set any date/time given in the command line.
>>>>
>>>> On this version 2 I add check of problematics years in rtctest like suggest
>>>> by Alexandre.
>>>>
>>>> Finally that had allowed me to test and fix rtc-st-lpc driver.
>>>>
>>>> Benjamin Gaignard (3):
>>>>   tools: timer: add rtctest_setdate
>>>>   tool: timer: rtctest add check for problematic dates
>>>>   rtc: st-lpc: make it robust against y2038/2106 bug
>>>>
>>>>  drivers/rtc/rtc-st-lpc.c                         |  19 ++--
>>>>  tools/testing/selftests/timers/Makefile          |   2 +-
>>>>  tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest.c         | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>  tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest_setdate.c |  86 ++++++++++++++++
>>>>  4 files changed, 212 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest_setdate.c
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Thomas/John,
>>>
>>> I can take the first two patches in this series through linux-kselftest
>>> with your or John's Ack. Please review and let me know one way or the
>>> other.
>>>>
>> Well, I'm the maintainer for rtctest.c and I'll make sure to also be the
>> one for rtctest_setdate.c>
>>> The third one is a rtc driver patch. Please let me know how do you want
>>> to handle this series soon we can get this into 4.13-rc1.
>>>
>>
>> I'll take the three patches but I still have comment I didn't have time
>> to give yet.

Alexandre, may you had time to give me feedback on this ?

Regards,
Benjamin

>>
>>
>
> Okay. I will drop this off my radar then :)
>
> thanks,
> -- Shuah
>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-04 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-19  9:36 [PATCH v2 0/3] rtc: make st-lpc robust against y2038/2106 bug Benjamin Gaignard
2017-06-19  9:36 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2017-06-19  9:36 ` [rtc-linux] " Benjamin Gaignard
2017-06-19  9:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] tools: timer: add rtctest_setdate Benjamin Gaignard
2017-06-19  9:36   ` Benjamin Gaignard
2017-06-19  9:36   ` [rtc-linux] " Benjamin Gaignard
2017-06-19  9:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] tool: timer: rtctest add check for problematic dates Benjamin Gaignard
2017-06-19  9:36   ` Benjamin Gaignard
2017-06-19  9:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] rtc: st-lpc: make it robust against y2038/2106 bug Benjamin Gaignard
2017-06-19  9:36   ` Benjamin Gaignard
2017-06-23 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] rtc: make st-lpc " Shuah Khan
2017-06-23 19:40   ` Shuah Khan
2017-06-23 19:40   ` [rtc-linux] " Shuah Khan
2017-06-23 22:09   ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-23 22:09     ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-23 22:09     ` [rtc-linux] " Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-23 22:34     ` Shuah Khan
2017-06-23 22:34       ` Shuah Khan
2017-06-23 22:34       ` [rtc-linux] " Shuah Khan
2017-07-04 11:51       ` Benjamin Gaignard [this message]
2017-07-04 11:51         ` Benjamin Gaignard
2017-07-04 11:51         ` [rtc-linux] " Benjamin Gaignard
2017-07-09 20:33 ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-07-09 20:33   ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-07-09 20:33   ` [rtc-linux] " Alexandre Belloni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+M3ks7ybavMZHxJ_sx_H7S6jis+F2Ye0Zi8eE4okY-W-ysbZg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org \
    --cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patrice.chotard@st.com \
    --cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.