Re: [kernelci] KernelCI API Auth Token

From: "Anibal Limon" <anibal.limon@linaro.org>
To: Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@gmail.com>
Cc: kernelci@groups.io, info@kernelci.org, milo@milo.name,
	Nicolas Dechesne <nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org>,
	Anmar Oueja <anmar.oueja@linaro.org>,
	Fathi Boudra <fathi.boudra@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [kernelci] KernelCI API Auth Token
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 11:57:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+_AqiuThDqJSU_NGu3e9EVzyrJ1w_LC=0KOBsfpvUR2KVV2Vw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH1_8nD_V18h5R29xb0pU4Ku73WDqJ_MrBnAGmi4rrjeadjbRQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2624 bytes --]

On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 11:01, Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Anibal,
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 4:45 PM Anibal Limon <anibal.limon@linaro.org>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 15:31, Anibal Limon <anibal.limon@linaro.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 15:29, Guillaume Tucker <
>>> guillaume.tucker@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> FYI I've sent an API token to Anibal with only HTTP GET permissions.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Right, I tested it for my personal usage and works, thanks Guillaume.
>>>
>>> I requested a token for read/write over qcom-lt/jobs.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Guillaume,
>>
>> Any update on get a token for r/w on qcom-lt/jobs?
>>
>
> Could you please explain what you and the Qualcomm Landing Team
> intend to do with this token?
>

I explained before but may be I wasn't clear.

We run a LAVA testjob [1] generated by LinaroCI [2], the LinaroCI job get
the latest KernelCI qcom-lt/integration [3] binaries and
build an Android boot image with our own ramdisk and test scripts like
bootrr (boot regression tests) for QC boards.

We need a KernelCI token to push back the test results via /test API into
qcom-lt/integration [3].

Regards,
Anibal

[1] https://validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/1895654
[2] https://ci.linaro.org/job/lt-qcom-linux-integration/
[3] https://kernelci.org/job/qcom-lt/branch/integration-linux-qcomlt/

> In principle it seems fine to have a non-LAVA lab provide some
> KernelCI test results, but it would be good to have it explained
> on this mailing list so we're all aware of what this involves.
>
> Best wishes,
> Guillaume
>
>
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Anibal
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 5:16 PM Anibal Limon <anibal.limon@linaro.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> + Milo
>>>>> + info at kernelci.org
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 at 03:13, Milosz Wasilewski <
>>>>> milosz.wasilewski@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 at 01:37, Anibal Limon <anibal.limon@linaro.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Hi,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I want to access the KernelCI API to get information about the
>>>>>> QCOMLT builds, I have a couple of questions,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > What is the process to get a KernelCI API  auth token?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I guess asking the ML is a good start. Back in the days when Milo was
>>>>>> working on the code I got one directly from him. I'm not sure who is
>>>>>> generating tokens these days.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> milosz
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Fathi, Anmar,
>>>>>> > Do we have a KernelCI auth token available on LinaroCI?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Regards,
>>>>>> > Anibal
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 
>>>>
>>>>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5768 bytes --]