All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Ghiti <alexandre.ghiti@canonical.com>
To: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com>
Cc: Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@diasemi.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	"linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: mfd: da9063: Add restart notifier implementation
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 11:55:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+zEjCv8tExoZx309qRMe6KCZ=-AC+nCOV7qivJWE5gCqrd2MA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DB9PR10MB46523AE6EF51D6C801B4A9BF80A99@DB9PR10MB4652.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

Hi Adam,

Thank you for your answer.

On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 3:33 PM Adam Thomson
<Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com> wrote:
>
> On 24 September 2021 17:17, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
>
> > > > +static int da9063_restart_notify(struct notifier_block *this,
> > > > +                              unsigned long mode, void *cmd)
> > > > +{
> > > > +     struct da9063 *da9063 = container_of(this, struct da9063,
> > > > restart_handler);
> > > > +
> > > > +     regmap_write(da9063->regmap, DA9063_REG_PAGE_CON, 0x00);
> > > > +     regmap_write(da9063->regmap, DA9063_REG_CONTROL_F, 0x04);
> > > > +     regmap_write(da9063->regmap, DA9063_REG_CONTROL_A, 0x68);
> > > > +
> > > > +     return NOTIFY_DONE;
> > > > +}
> > >
> > > I will talk with our HW team to clarify, but this sequence looks to be very
> > > specific to the needs of the platform in question which doesn't feel right to
> > > me. As was mentioned on another thread as well, the watchdog driver already
> > has
> > > a restart function to reset the device (and thus the system), so I don't believe
> > > we should have multiple of these.
> >
> > From the discussion that happened here
> > https://www.dialog-semiconductor.com/products/pmics?post_id=10052#tab-
> > support_tab_content,
> > it does not seem possible to use the watchdog on a chip whose OTP does
> > not set AUTOBOOT. But anyway, I'm looking forward to hearing from the
> > HW team :)
>
> So I've discussed this internally and so far it's not completely clear how the
> sequence you provided actually performs the reset as you suggest. It certainly
> doesn't look like it should, so maybe this relates to an external pin somehow
> triggering the restart in this particular scenario? I'd be interested to
> understand which event bits are set when the board does restart to understand
> what did actually trigger the boot-up.

After clearing all those registers and a reset as done in this patch,
I get the following values:

FAULT_LOG: 0x00
EVENT_A: 0x10 => As per the datasheet, "Sequencer reached final
position caused event" ?
EVENT_B: 0x00
EVENT_C: 0x00
EVENT_D: 0x00

Do you need any other info?

>
> Regardless of this though, the consensus right now would be to use the RTC as a
> wake event to restart the platform. An alarm can be set for a couple of seconds
> into the future (or longer if required) and that would provide the event
> required to come up from powerdown/shutdown, in the absence of AUTOBOOT being
> set in OTP. I believe this would be the safest route to take in this case. You
> can then just use the SHUTDOWN bit on CONTROL_F to take down the board.
>
> To reiterate, I believe this should be made a board specific quirk, rather than
> as part of the generic MFD core of DA9063, as the timings may vary for other
> platforms.

Alex

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandre Ghiti <alexandre.ghiti@canonical.com>
To: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com>
Cc: Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@diasemi.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	 "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	 "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: mfd: da9063: Add restart notifier implementation
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 11:55:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+zEjCv8tExoZx309qRMe6KCZ=-AC+nCOV7qivJWE5gCqrd2MA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DB9PR10MB46523AE6EF51D6C801B4A9BF80A99@DB9PR10MB4652.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

Hi Adam,

Thank you for your answer.

On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 3:33 PM Adam Thomson
<Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com> wrote:
>
> On 24 September 2021 17:17, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
>
> > > > +static int da9063_restart_notify(struct notifier_block *this,
> > > > +                              unsigned long mode, void *cmd)
> > > > +{
> > > > +     struct da9063 *da9063 = container_of(this, struct da9063,
> > > > restart_handler);
> > > > +
> > > > +     regmap_write(da9063->regmap, DA9063_REG_PAGE_CON, 0x00);
> > > > +     regmap_write(da9063->regmap, DA9063_REG_CONTROL_F, 0x04);
> > > > +     regmap_write(da9063->regmap, DA9063_REG_CONTROL_A, 0x68);
> > > > +
> > > > +     return NOTIFY_DONE;
> > > > +}
> > >
> > > I will talk with our HW team to clarify, but this sequence looks to be very
> > > specific to the needs of the platform in question which doesn't feel right to
> > > me. As was mentioned on another thread as well, the watchdog driver already
> > has
> > > a restart function to reset the device (and thus the system), so I don't believe
> > > we should have multiple of these.
> >
> > From the discussion that happened here
> > https://www.dialog-semiconductor.com/products/pmics?post_id=10052#tab-
> > support_tab_content,
> > it does not seem possible to use the watchdog on a chip whose OTP does
> > not set AUTOBOOT. But anyway, I'm looking forward to hearing from the
> > HW team :)
>
> So I've discussed this internally and so far it's not completely clear how the
> sequence you provided actually performs the reset as you suggest. It certainly
> doesn't look like it should, so maybe this relates to an external pin somehow
> triggering the restart in this particular scenario? I'd be interested to
> understand which event bits are set when the board does restart to understand
> what did actually trigger the boot-up.

After clearing all those registers and a reset as done in this patch,
I get the following values:

FAULT_LOG: 0x00
EVENT_A: 0x10 => As per the datasheet, "Sequencer reached final
position caused event" ?
EVENT_B: 0x00
EVENT_C: 0x00
EVENT_D: 0x00

Do you need any other info?

>
> Regardless of this though, the consensus right now would be to use the RTC as a
> wake event to restart the platform. An alarm can be set for a couple of seconds
> into the future (or longer if required) and that would provide the event
> required to come up from powerdown/shutdown, in the absence of AUTOBOOT being
> set in OTP. I believe this would be the safest route to take in this case. You
> can then just use the SHUTDOWN bit on CONTROL_F to take down the board.
>
> To reiterate, I believe this should be made a board specific quirk, rather than
> as part of the generic MFD core of DA9063, as the timings may vary for other
> platforms.

Alex

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-30  9:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-21  5:33 [PATCH] drivers: mfd: da9063: Add restart notifier implementation Alexandre Ghiti
2021-09-21  5:33 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-09-21 10:16 ` Anup Patel
2021-09-21 10:16   ` Anup Patel
2021-09-21 11:20   ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-09-21 11:20     ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-09-21 10:25 ` Ben Dooks
2021-09-21 10:25   ` Ben Dooks
2021-09-21 11:33   ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-09-21 11:33     ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-09-23 13:16     ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-09-23 13:16       ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-09-24 15:04 ` Adam Thomson
2021-09-24 15:04   ` Adam Thomson
2021-09-24 16:17   ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-09-24 16:17     ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-09-29 13:33     ` Adam Thomson
2021-09-29 13:33       ` Adam Thomson
2021-09-30  7:51       ` David Abdurachmanov
2021-09-30  7:51         ` David Abdurachmanov
2021-09-30  9:28         ` Adam Thomson
2021-09-30  9:28           ` Adam Thomson
2021-09-30 10:25         ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-09-30 10:25           ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-10-04 12:05           ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-10-04 12:05             ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-10-04 15:11             ` Adam Thomson
2021-10-04 15:11               ` Adam Thomson
2021-10-05 13:43               ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-10-05 13:43                 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-10-06  9:30                 ` Adam Thomson
2021-10-06  9:30                   ` Adam Thomson
2021-10-06 11:35                   ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-10-06 11:35                     ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-10-08  9:46                     ` Adam Thomson
2021-10-08  9:46                       ` Adam Thomson
2021-10-12 10:32                       ` Adam Thomson
2021-10-12 10:32                         ` Adam Thomson
2021-10-14 15:51                         ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-10-14 15:51                           ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-10-15  8:47                           ` Adam Thomson
2021-10-15  8:47                             ` Adam Thomson
2021-09-30  9:37       ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-09-30  9:37         ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-09-30 10:47         ` Adam Thomson
2021-09-30 10:47           ` Adam Thomson
2021-09-30  9:55       ` Alexandre Ghiti [this message]
2021-09-30  9:55         ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-10-04 15:29         ` Adam Thomson
2021-10-04 15:29           ` Adam Thomson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+zEjCv8tExoZx309qRMe6KCZ=-AC+nCOV7qivJWE5gCqrd2MA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=alexandre.ghiti@canonical.com \
    --cc=Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com \
    --cc=Support.Opensource@diasemi.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.