[RFC PATCH 0/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: support DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR

[RFC PATCH 0/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: support DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

An RFC (or rather RFT, Request-for-Testing) series adding support for
DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR. Note, it was compile-tested only.  This
bridge is the last one used on the Qualcomm platforms (in
upstream-supported devices) and thus it is the only bridge that prevents
us from removing support for bridge-created connectors from MSM DSI
code.

Dmitry Baryshkov (3):
  drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: switch to atomic ops
  drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: fetch bpc using drm_atomic_state
  drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: support DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR

 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 55 +++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

-- 
2.35.1

[RFC PATCH 0/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: support DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

An RFC (or rather RFT, Request-for-Testing) series adding support for
DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR. Note, it was compile-tested only.  This
bridge is the last one used on the Qualcomm platforms (in
upstream-supported devices) and thus it is the only bridge that prevents
us from removing support for bridge-created connectors from MSM DSI
code.

Dmitry Baryshkov (3):
  drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: switch to atomic ops
  drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: fetch bpc using drm_atomic_state
  drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: support DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR

 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 55 +++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

-- 
2.35.1

[RFC PATCH 1/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: switch to atomic ops

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

Make ti-sn65dsi86 use atomic_enable / atomic_disable / atomic_pre_enable
/ atomic_post_disable rather than their non-atomic versions.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
index 8cad662de9bb..01171547f638 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
@@ -752,7 +752,8 @@ ti_sn_bridge_mode_valid(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
 	return MODE_OK;
 }
 
-static void ti_sn_bridge_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
+static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
+					struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
 {
 	struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
 
@@ -1011,7 +1012,8 @@ static int ti_sn_link_training(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata, int dp_rate_idx,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void ti_sn_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
+static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
+				       struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
 {
 	struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
 	const char *last_err_str = "No supported DP rate";
@@ -1080,7 +1082,8 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
 			   VSTREAM_ENABLE);
 }
 
-static void ti_sn_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
+static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
+					   struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
 {
 	struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
 
@@ -1093,7 +1096,8 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
 	usleep_range(100, 110);
 }
 
-static void ti_sn_bridge_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
+static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
+					     struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
 {
 	struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
 
@@ -1114,10 +1118,10 @@ static const struct drm_bridge_funcs ti_sn_bridge_funcs = {
 	.attach = ti_sn_bridge_attach,
 	.detach = ti_sn_bridge_detach,
 	.mode_valid = ti_sn_bridge_mode_valid,
-	.pre_enable = ti_sn_bridge_pre_enable,
-	.enable = ti_sn_bridge_enable,
-	.disable = ti_sn_bridge_disable,
-	.post_disable = ti_sn_bridge_post_disable,
+	.atomic_pre_enable = ti_sn_bridge_atomic_pre_enable,
+	.atomic_enable = ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable,
+	.atomic_disable = ti_sn_bridge_atomic_disable,
+	.atomic_post_disable = ti_sn_bridge_atomic_post_disable,
 };
 
 static void ti_sn_bridge_parse_lanes(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata,
-- 
2.35.1

[RFC PATCH 1/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: switch to atomic ops

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

Make ti-sn65dsi86 use atomic_enable / atomic_disable / atomic_pre_enable
/ atomic_post_disable rather than their non-atomic versions.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
index 8cad662de9bb..01171547f638 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
@@ -752,7 +752,8 @@ ti_sn_bridge_mode_valid(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
 	return MODE_OK;
 }
 
-static void ti_sn_bridge_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
+static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
+					struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
 {
 	struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
 
@@ -1011,7 +1012,8 @@ static int ti_sn_link_training(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata, int dp_rate_idx,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void ti_sn_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
+static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
+				       struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
 {
 	struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
 	const char *last_err_str = "No supported DP rate";
@@ -1080,7 +1082,8 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
 			   VSTREAM_ENABLE);
 }
 
-static void ti_sn_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
+static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
+					   struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
 {
 	struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
 
@@ -1093,7 +1096,8 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
 	usleep_range(100, 110);
 }
 
-static void ti_sn_bridge_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
+static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
+					     struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
 {
 	struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
 
@@ -1114,10 +1118,10 @@ static const struct drm_bridge_funcs ti_sn_bridge_funcs = {
 	.attach = ti_sn_bridge_attach,
 	.detach = ti_sn_bridge_detach,
 	.mode_valid = ti_sn_bridge_mode_valid,
-	.pre_enable = ti_sn_bridge_pre_enable,
-	.enable = ti_sn_bridge_enable,
-	.disable = ti_sn_bridge_disable,
-	.post_disable = ti_sn_bridge_post_disable,
+	.atomic_pre_enable = ti_sn_bridge_atomic_pre_enable,
+	.atomic_enable = ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable,
+	.atomic_disable = ti_sn_bridge_atomic_disable,
+	.atomic_post_disable = ti_sn_bridge_atomic_post_disable,
 };
 
 static void ti_sn_bridge_parse_lanes(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata,
-- 
2.35.1

[RFC PATCH 2/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: fetch bpc using drm_atomic_state

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

Rather than reading the pdata->connector directly, fetch the connector
using drm_atomic_state. This allows us to make pdata->connector optional
(and thus supporting DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR).

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
index 01171547f638..df08207d6223 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
@@ -779,9 +779,9 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_set_dsi_rate(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
 	regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_DSIA_CLK_FREQ_REG, val);
 }
 
-static unsigned int ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
+static unsigned int ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(struct drm_connector *connector)
 {
-	if (pdata->connector->display_info.bpc <= 6)
+	if (connector->display_info.bpc <= 6)
 		return 18;
 	else
 		return 24;
@@ -796,7 +796,7 @@ static const unsigned int ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut[] = {
 	0, 1620, 2160, 2430, 2700, 3240, 4320, 5400
 };
 
-static int ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
+static int ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata, unsigned int bpp)
 {
 	unsigned int bit_rate_khz, dp_rate_mhz;
 	unsigned int i;
@@ -804,7 +804,7 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
 		&pdata->bridge.encoder->crtc->state->adjusted_mode;
 
 	/* Calculate minimum bit rate based on our pixel clock. */
-	bit_rate_khz = mode->clock * ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(pdata);
+	bit_rate_khz = mode->clock * bpp;
 
 	/* Calculate minimum DP data rate, taking 80% as per DP spec */
 	dp_rate_mhz = DIV_ROUND_UP(bit_rate_khz * DP_CLK_FUDGE_NUM,
@@ -1016,12 +1016,19 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
 				       struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
 {
 	struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
+	struct drm_connector *connector;
 	const char *last_err_str = "No supported DP rate";
 	unsigned int valid_rates;
 	int dp_rate_idx;
 	unsigned int val;
 	int ret = -EINVAL;
 	int max_dp_lanes;
+	unsigned int bpp;
+
+	connector = drm_atomic_get_new_connector_for_encoder(old_bridge_state->base.state,
+							     bridge->encoder);
+	if (!connector)
+		return;
 
 	max_dp_lanes = ti_sn_get_max_lanes(pdata);
 	pdata->dp_lanes = min(pdata->dp_lanes, max_dp_lanes);
@@ -1047,8 +1054,9 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
 	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&pdata->aux, DP_EDP_CONFIGURATION_SET,
 			   DP_ALTERNATE_SCRAMBLER_RESET_ENABLE);
 
+	bpp = ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(connector);
 	/* Set the DP output format (18 bpp or 24 bpp) */
-	val = (ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(pdata) == 18) ? BPP_18_RGB : 0;
+	val = (bpp == 18) ? BPP_18_RGB : 0;
 	regmap_update_bits(pdata->regmap, SN_DATA_FORMAT_REG, BPP_18_RGB, val);
 
 	/* DP lane config */
@@ -1059,7 +1067,7 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
 	valid_rates = ti_sn_bridge_read_valid_rates(pdata);
 
 	/* Train until we run out of rates */
-	for (dp_rate_idx = ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(pdata);
+	for (dp_rate_idx = ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(pdata, bpp);
 	     dp_rate_idx < ARRAY_SIZE(ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut);
 	     dp_rate_idx++) {
 		if (!(valid_rates & BIT(dp_rate_idx)))
-- 
2.35.1

[RFC PATCH 2/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: fetch bpc using drm_atomic_state

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

Rather than reading the pdata->connector directly, fetch the connector
using drm_atomic_state. This allows us to make pdata->connector optional
(and thus supporting DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR).

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
index 01171547f638..df08207d6223 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
@@ -779,9 +779,9 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_set_dsi_rate(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
 	regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_DSIA_CLK_FREQ_REG, val);
 }
 
-static unsigned int ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
+static unsigned int ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(struct drm_connector *connector)
 {
-	if (pdata->connector->display_info.bpc <= 6)
+	if (connector->display_info.bpc <= 6)
 		return 18;
 	else
 		return 24;
@@ -796,7 +796,7 @@ static const unsigned int ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut[] = {
 	0, 1620, 2160, 2430, 2700, 3240, 4320, 5400
 };
 
-static int ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
+static int ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata, unsigned int bpp)
 {
 	unsigned int bit_rate_khz, dp_rate_mhz;
 	unsigned int i;
@@ -804,7 +804,7 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
 		&pdata->bridge.encoder->crtc->state->adjusted_mode;
 
 	/* Calculate minimum bit rate based on our pixel clock. */
-	bit_rate_khz = mode->clock * ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(pdata);
+	bit_rate_khz = mode->clock * bpp;
 
 	/* Calculate minimum DP data rate, taking 80% as per DP spec */
 	dp_rate_mhz = DIV_ROUND_UP(bit_rate_khz * DP_CLK_FUDGE_NUM,
@@ -1016,12 +1016,19 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
 				       struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
 {
 	struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
+	struct drm_connector *connector;
 	const char *last_err_str = "No supported DP rate";
 	unsigned int valid_rates;
 	int dp_rate_idx;
 	unsigned int val;
 	int ret = -EINVAL;
 	int max_dp_lanes;
+	unsigned int bpp;
+
+	connector = drm_atomic_get_new_connector_for_encoder(old_bridge_state->base.state,
+							     bridge->encoder);
+	if (!connector)
+		return;
 
 	max_dp_lanes = ti_sn_get_max_lanes(pdata);
 	pdata->dp_lanes = min(pdata->dp_lanes, max_dp_lanes);
@@ -1047,8 +1054,9 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
 	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&pdata->aux, DP_EDP_CONFIGURATION_SET,
 			   DP_ALTERNATE_SCRAMBLER_RESET_ENABLE);
 
+	bpp = ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(connector);
 	/* Set the DP output format (18 bpp or 24 bpp) */
-	val = (ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(pdata) == 18) ? BPP_18_RGB : 0;
+	val = (bpp == 18) ? BPP_18_RGB : 0;
 	regmap_update_bits(pdata->regmap, SN_DATA_FORMAT_REG, BPP_18_RGB, val);
 
 	/* DP lane config */
@@ -1059,7 +1067,7 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
 	valid_rates = ti_sn_bridge_read_valid_rates(pdata);
 
 	/* Train until we run out of rates */
-	for (dp_rate_idx = ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(pdata);
+	for (dp_rate_idx = ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(pdata, bpp);
 	     dp_rate_idx < ARRAY_SIZE(ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut);
 	     dp_rate_idx++) {
 		if (!(valid_rates & BIT(dp_rate_idx)))
-- 
2.35.1

[RFC PATCH 3/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: support DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

Now as the driver does not depend on pdata->connector, add support for
attaching the bridge with DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 15 +++++----------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
index df08207d6223..9bca4615f71b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
@@ -698,11 +698,6 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
 	struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
 	int ret;
 
-	if (flags & DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR) {
-		DRM_ERROR("Fix bridge driver to make connector optional!");
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	pdata->aux.drm_dev = bridge->dev;
 	ret = drm_dp_aux_register(&pdata->aux);
 	if (ret < 0) {
@@ -710,15 +705,15 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	/* We never want the next bridge to *also* create a connector: */
-	flags |= DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR;
-
-	/* Attach the next bridge */
+	/* Attach the next bridge, We never want the next bridge to *also* create a connector. */
 	ret = drm_bridge_attach(bridge->encoder, pdata->next_bridge,
-				&pdata->bridge, flags);
+				&pdata->bridge, flags | DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto err_initted_aux;
 
+	if (flags & DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR)
+		return 0;
+
 	pdata->connector = drm_bridge_connector_init(pdata->bridge.dev,
 						     pdata->bridge.encoder);
 	if (IS_ERR(pdata->connector)) {
-- 
2.35.1

[RFC PATCH 3/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: support DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

Now as the driver does not depend on pdata->connector, add support for
attaching the bridge with DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 15 +++++----------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
index df08207d6223..9bca4615f71b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
@@ -698,11 +698,6 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
 	struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
 	int ret;
 
-	if (flags & DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR) {
-		DRM_ERROR("Fix bridge driver to make connector optional!");
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	pdata->aux.drm_dev = bridge->dev;
 	ret = drm_dp_aux_register(&pdata->aux);
 	if (ret < 0) {
@@ -710,15 +705,15 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	/* We never want the next bridge to *also* create a connector: */
-	flags |= DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR;
-
-	/* Attach the next bridge */
+	/* Attach the next bridge, We never want the next bridge to *also* create a connector. */
 	ret = drm_bridge_attach(bridge->encoder, pdata->next_bridge,
-				&pdata->bridge, flags);
+				&pdata->bridge, flags | DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto err_initted_aux;
 
+	if (flags & DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR)
+		return 0;
+
 	pdata->connector = drm_bridge_connector_init(pdata->bridge.dev,
 						     pdata->bridge.encoder);
 	if (IS_ERR(pdata->connector)) {
-- 
2.35.1

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: switch to atomic ops

[Sam Ravnborg]

Hi Dmitry,

On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 09:45:34PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Make ti-sn65dsi86 use atomic_enable / atomic_disable / atomic_pre_enable
> / atomic_post_disable rather than their non-atomic versions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>

a more or less identical patch was applied to drm-misc-next
the other day.
See d8b599bf625d1d818fdbb322a272fd2a5ea32e38.

	Sam

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> index 8cad662de9bb..01171547f638 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> @@ -752,7 +752,8 @@ ti_sn_bridge_mode_valid(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>  	return MODE_OK;
>  }
>  
> -static void ti_sn_bridge_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> +					struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
>  {
>  	struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
>  
> @@ -1011,7 +1012,8 @@ static int ti_sn_link_training(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata, int dp_rate_idx,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static void ti_sn_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> +				       struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
>  {
>  	struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
>  	const char *last_err_str = "No supported DP rate";
> @@ -1080,7 +1082,8 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
>  			   VSTREAM_ENABLE);
>  }
>  
> -static void ti_sn_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> +					   struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
>  {
>  	struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
>  
> @@ -1093,7 +1096,8 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
>  	usleep_range(100, 110);
>  }
>  
> -static void ti_sn_bridge_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> +					     struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
>  {
>  	struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
>  
> @@ -1114,10 +1118,10 @@ static const struct drm_bridge_funcs ti_sn_bridge_funcs = {
>  	.attach = ti_sn_bridge_attach,
>  	.detach = ti_sn_bridge_detach,
>  	.mode_valid = ti_sn_bridge_mode_valid,
> -	.pre_enable = ti_sn_bridge_pre_enable,
> -	.enable = ti_sn_bridge_enable,
> -	.disable = ti_sn_bridge_disable,
> -	.post_disable = ti_sn_bridge_post_disable,
> +	.atomic_pre_enable = ti_sn_bridge_atomic_pre_enable,
> +	.atomic_enable = ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable,
> +	.atomic_disable = ti_sn_bridge_atomic_disable,
> +	.atomic_post_disable = ti_sn_bridge_atomic_post_disable,
>  };
>  
>  static void ti_sn_bridge_parse_lanes(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata,
> -- 
> 2.35.1

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: switch to atomic ops

[Sam Ravnborg]

Hi Dmitry,

On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 09:45:34PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Make ti-sn65dsi86 use atomic_enable / atomic_disable / atomic_pre_enable
> / atomic_post_disable rather than their non-atomic versions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>

a more or less identical patch was applied to drm-misc-next
the other day.
See d8b599bf625d1d818fdbb322a272fd2a5ea32e38.

	Sam

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> index 8cad662de9bb..01171547f638 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> @@ -752,7 +752,8 @@ ti_sn_bridge_mode_valid(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>  	return MODE_OK;
>  }
>  
> -static void ti_sn_bridge_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> +					struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
>  {
>  	struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
>  
> @@ -1011,7 +1012,8 @@ static int ti_sn_link_training(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata, int dp_rate_idx,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static void ti_sn_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> +				       struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
>  {
>  	struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
>  	const char *last_err_str = "No supported DP rate";
> @@ -1080,7 +1082,8 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
>  			   VSTREAM_ENABLE);
>  }
>  
> -static void ti_sn_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> +					   struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
>  {
>  	struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
>  
> @@ -1093,7 +1096,8 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
>  	usleep_range(100, 110);
>  }
>  
> -static void ti_sn_bridge_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> +					     struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
>  {
>  	struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
>  
> @@ -1114,10 +1118,10 @@ static const struct drm_bridge_funcs ti_sn_bridge_funcs = {
>  	.attach = ti_sn_bridge_attach,
>  	.detach = ti_sn_bridge_detach,
>  	.mode_valid = ti_sn_bridge_mode_valid,
> -	.pre_enable = ti_sn_bridge_pre_enable,
> -	.enable = ti_sn_bridge_enable,
> -	.disable = ti_sn_bridge_disable,
> -	.post_disable = ti_sn_bridge_post_disable,
> +	.atomic_pre_enable = ti_sn_bridge_atomic_pre_enable,
> +	.atomic_enable = ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable,
> +	.atomic_disable = ti_sn_bridge_atomic_disable,
> +	.atomic_post_disable = ti_sn_bridge_atomic_post_disable,
>  };
>  
>  static void ti_sn_bridge_parse_lanes(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata,
> -- 
> 2.35.1

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: fetch bpc using drm_atomic_state

[Sam Ravnborg]

Hi Dmitry,

On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 09:45:35PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Rather than reading the pdata->connector directly, fetch the connector
> using drm_atomic_state. This allows us to make pdata->connector optional
> (and thus supporting DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> index 01171547f638..df08207d6223 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> @@ -779,9 +779,9 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_set_dsi_rate(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
>  	regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_DSIA_CLK_FREQ_REG, val);
>  }
>  
> -static unsigned int ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
> +static unsigned int ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(struct drm_connector *connector)
>  {
> -	if (pdata->connector->display_info.bpc <= 6)
> +	if (connector->display_info.bpc <= 6)
>  		return 18;
>  	else
>  		return 24;
> @@ -796,7 +796,7 @@ static const unsigned int ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut[] = {
>  	0, 1620, 2160, 2430, 2700, 3240, 4320, 5400
>  };
>  
> -static int ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
> +static int ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata, unsigned int bpp)
>  {
>  	unsigned int bit_rate_khz, dp_rate_mhz;
>  	unsigned int i;
> @@ -804,7 +804,7 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
>  		&pdata->bridge.encoder->crtc->state->adjusted_mode;
>  
>  	/* Calculate minimum bit rate based on our pixel clock. */
> -	bit_rate_khz = mode->clock * ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(pdata);
> +	bit_rate_khz = mode->clock * bpp;
>  
>  	/* Calculate minimum DP data rate, taking 80% as per DP spec */
>  	dp_rate_mhz = DIV_ROUND_UP(bit_rate_khz * DP_CLK_FUDGE_NUM,
> @@ -1016,12 +1016,19 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>  				       struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
>  {
>  	struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
> +	struct drm_connector *connector;
>  	const char *last_err_str = "No supported DP rate";
>  	unsigned int valid_rates;
>  	int dp_rate_idx;
>  	unsigned int val;
>  	int ret = -EINVAL;
>  	int max_dp_lanes;
> +	unsigned int bpp;
> +
> +	connector = drm_atomic_get_new_connector_for_encoder(old_bridge_state->base.state,
> +							     bridge->encoder);
> +	if (!connector)
> +		return;
It would be prudent with a dev_err() logging here as we do not expect to
fail.
I looked into something similar, but with a less elegant solution, and
could not convince myself that the display driver would create the
connector before ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable() was called.

This is another reason why a dev_err would be nice - so tester could see
if this fails or not.

With the dev_err added:
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>

>  
>  	max_dp_lanes = ti_sn_get_max_lanes(pdata);
>  	pdata->dp_lanes = min(pdata->dp_lanes, max_dp_lanes);
> @@ -1047,8 +1054,9 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>  	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&pdata->aux, DP_EDP_CONFIGURATION_SET,
>  			   DP_ALTERNATE_SCRAMBLER_RESET_ENABLE);
>  
> +	bpp = ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(connector);
>  	/* Set the DP output format (18 bpp or 24 bpp) */
> -	val = (ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(pdata) == 18) ? BPP_18_RGB : 0;
> +	val = (bpp == 18) ? BPP_18_RGB : 0;
>  	regmap_update_bits(pdata->regmap, SN_DATA_FORMAT_REG, BPP_18_RGB, val);
>  
>  	/* DP lane config */
> @@ -1059,7 +1067,7 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>  	valid_rates = ti_sn_bridge_read_valid_rates(pdata);
>  
>  	/* Train until we run out of rates */
> -	for (dp_rate_idx = ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(pdata);
> +	for (dp_rate_idx = ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(pdata, bpp);
>  	     dp_rate_idx < ARRAY_SIZE(ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut);
>  	     dp_rate_idx++) {
>  		if (!(valid_rates & BIT(dp_rate_idx)))
> -- 
> 2.35.1

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: fetch bpc using drm_atomic_state

[Sam Ravnborg]

Hi Dmitry,

On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 09:45:35PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Rather than reading the pdata->connector directly, fetch the connector
> using drm_atomic_state. This allows us to make pdata->connector optional
> (and thus supporting DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> index 01171547f638..df08207d6223 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> @@ -779,9 +779,9 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_set_dsi_rate(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
>  	regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_DSIA_CLK_FREQ_REG, val);
>  }
>  
> -static unsigned int ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
> +static unsigned int ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(struct drm_connector *connector)
>  {
> -	if (pdata->connector->display_info.bpc <= 6)
> +	if (connector->display_info.bpc <= 6)
>  		return 18;
>  	else
>  		return 24;
> @@ -796,7 +796,7 @@ static const unsigned int ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut[] = {
>  	0, 1620, 2160, 2430, 2700, 3240, 4320, 5400
>  };
>  
> -static int ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
> +static int ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata, unsigned int bpp)
>  {
>  	unsigned int bit_rate_khz, dp_rate_mhz;
>  	unsigned int i;
> @@ -804,7 +804,7 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
>  		&pdata->bridge.encoder->crtc->state->adjusted_mode;
>  
>  	/* Calculate minimum bit rate based on our pixel clock. */
> -	bit_rate_khz = mode->clock * ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(pdata);
> +	bit_rate_khz = mode->clock * bpp;
>  
>  	/* Calculate minimum DP data rate, taking 80% as per DP spec */
>  	dp_rate_mhz = DIV_ROUND_UP(bit_rate_khz * DP_CLK_FUDGE_NUM,
> @@ -1016,12 +1016,19 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>  				       struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
>  {
>  	struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
> +	struct drm_connector *connector;
>  	const char *last_err_str = "No supported DP rate";
>  	unsigned int valid_rates;
>  	int dp_rate_idx;
>  	unsigned int val;
>  	int ret = -EINVAL;
>  	int max_dp_lanes;
> +	unsigned int bpp;
> +
> +	connector = drm_atomic_get_new_connector_for_encoder(old_bridge_state->base.state,
> +							     bridge->encoder);
> +	if (!connector)
> +		return;
It would be prudent with a dev_err() logging here as we do not expect to
fail.
I looked into something similar, but with a less elegant solution, and
could not convince myself that the display driver would create the
connector before ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable() was called.

This is another reason why a dev_err would be nice - so tester could see
if this fails or not.

With the dev_err added:
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>

>  
>  	max_dp_lanes = ti_sn_get_max_lanes(pdata);
>  	pdata->dp_lanes = min(pdata->dp_lanes, max_dp_lanes);
> @@ -1047,8 +1054,9 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>  	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&pdata->aux, DP_EDP_CONFIGURATION_SET,
>  			   DP_ALTERNATE_SCRAMBLER_RESET_ENABLE);
>  
> +	bpp = ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(connector);
>  	/* Set the DP output format (18 bpp or 24 bpp) */
> -	val = (ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(pdata) == 18) ? BPP_18_RGB : 0;
> +	val = (bpp == 18) ? BPP_18_RGB : 0;
>  	regmap_update_bits(pdata->regmap, SN_DATA_FORMAT_REG, BPP_18_RGB, val);
>  
>  	/* DP lane config */
> @@ -1059,7 +1067,7 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>  	valid_rates = ti_sn_bridge_read_valid_rates(pdata);
>  
>  	/* Train until we run out of rates */
> -	for (dp_rate_idx = ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(pdata);
> +	for (dp_rate_idx = ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(pdata, bpp);
>  	     dp_rate_idx < ARRAY_SIZE(ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut);
>  	     dp_rate_idx++) {
>  		if (!(valid_rates & BIT(dp_rate_idx)))
> -- 
> 2.35.1

Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: support DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR

[Sam Ravnborg]

Hi Dmitry,

On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 09:45:36PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Now as the driver does not depend on pdata->connector, add support for
> attaching the bridge with DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>

Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>

Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: support DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR

[Sam Ravnborg]

Hi Dmitry,

On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 09:45:36PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Now as the driver does not depend on pdata->connector, add support for
> attaching the bridge with DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>

Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>

Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: support DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR

[Laurent Pinchart]

Hi Dmitry,

Thank you for the patch.

On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 09:45:36PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Now as the driver does not depend on pdata->connector, add support for
> attaching the bridge with DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 15 +++++----------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> index df08207d6223..9bca4615f71b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> @@ -698,11 +698,6 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>  	struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (flags & DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR) {
> -		DRM_ERROR("Fix bridge driver to make connector optional!");
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> -
>  	pdata->aux.drm_dev = bridge->dev;
>  	ret = drm_dp_aux_register(&pdata->aux);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
> @@ -710,15 +705,15 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* We never want the next bridge to *also* create a connector: */
> -	flags |= DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR;
> -
> -	/* Attach the next bridge */
> +	/* Attach the next bridge, We never want the next bridge to *also* create a connector. */

s/bridge,/bridge./

I also would have wrapped this line.

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

>  	ret = drm_bridge_attach(bridge->encoder, pdata->next_bridge,
> -				&pdata->bridge, flags);
> +				&pdata->bridge, flags | DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		goto err_initted_aux;
>  
> +	if (flags & DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR)
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	pdata->connector = drm_bridge_connector_init(pdata->bridge.dev,
>  						     pdata->bridge.encoder);
>  	if (IS_ERR(pdata->connector)) {

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: support DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR

[Laurent Pinchart]

Hi Dmitry,

Thank you for the patch.

On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 09:45:36PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Now as the driver does not depend on pdata->connector, add support for
> attaching the bridge with DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 15 +++++----------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> index df08207d6223..9bca4615f71b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> @@ -698,11 +698,6 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>  	struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (flags & DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR) {
> -		DRM_ERROR("Fix bridge driver to make connector optional!");
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> -
>  	pdata->aux.drm_dev = bridge->dev;
>  	ret = drm_dp_aux_register(&pdata->aux);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
> @@ -710,15 +705,15 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* We never want the next bridge to *also* create a connector: */
> -	flags |= DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR;
> -
> -	/* Attach the next bridge */
> +	/* Attach the next bridge, We never want the next bridge to *also* create a connector. */

s/bridge,/bridge./

I also would have wrapped this line.

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

>  	ret = drm_bridge_attach(bridge->encoder, pdata->next_bridge,
> -				&pdata->bridge, flags);
> +				&pdata->bridge, flags | DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		goto err_initted_aux;
>  
> +	if (flags & DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR)
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	pdata->connector = drm_bridge_connector_init(pdata->bridge.dev,
>  						     pdata->bridge.encoder);
>  	if (IS_ERR(pdata->connector)) {

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: fetch bpc using drm_atomic_state

[Laurent Pinchart]

Hi Dmitry,

Thank you for the patch.

On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 09:45:35PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Rather than reading the pdata->connector directly, fetch the connector
> using drm_atomic_state. This allows us to make pdata->connector optional
> (and thus supporting DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> index 01171547f638..df08207d6223 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> @@ -779,9 +779,9 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_set_dsi_rate(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
>  	regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_DSIA_CLK_FREQ_REG, val);
>  }
>  
> -static unsigned int ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
> +static unsigned int ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(struct drm_connector *connector)
>  {
> -	if (pdata->connector->display_info.bpc <= 6)
> +	if (connector->display_info.bpc <= 6)
>  		return 18;
>  	else
>  		return 24;
> @@ -796,7 +796,7 @@ static const unsigned int ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut[] = {
>  	0, 1620, 2160, 2430, 2700, 3240, 4320, 5400
>  };
>  
> -static int ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
> +static int ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata, unsigned int bpp)
>  {
>  	unsigned int bit_rate_khz, dp_rate_mhz;
>  	unsigned int i;
> @@ -804,7 +804,7 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
>  		&pdata->bridge.encoder->crtc->state->adjusted_mode;
>  
>  	/* Calculate minimum bit rate based on our pixel clock. */
> -	bit_rate_khz = mode->clock * ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(pdata);
> +	bit_rate_khz = mode->clock * bpp;
>  
>  	/* Calculate minimum DP data rate, taking 80% as per DP spec */
>  	dp_rate_mhz = DIV_ROUND_UP(bit_rate_khz * DP_CLK_FUDGE_NUM,
> @@ -1016,12 +1016,19 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>  				       struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
>  {
>  	struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
> +	struct drm_connector *connector;
>  	const char *last_err_str = "No supported DP rate";
>  	unsigned int valid_rates;
>  	int dp_rate_idx;
>  	unsigned int val;
>  	int ret = -EINVAL;
>  	int max_dp_lanes;
> +	unsigned int bpp;
> +
> +	connector = drm_atomic_get_new_connector_for_encoder(old_bridge_state->base.state,
> +							     bridge->encoder);
> +	if (!connector)

As Sam mentioned, a dev_err() would be good here if you think this can
happen. If there's no risk that connector will be null, you could drop
the check.

> +		return;
>  
>  	max_dp_lanes = ti_sn_get_max_lanes(pdata);
>  	pdata->dp_lanes = min(pdata->dp_lanes, max_dp_lanes);
> @@ -1047,8 +1054,9 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>  	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&pdata->aux, DP_EDP_CONFIGURATION_SET,
>  			   DP_ALTERNATE_SCRAMBLER_RESET_ENABLE);
>  
> +	bpp = ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(connector);
>  	/* Set the DP output format (18 bpp or 24 bpp) */
> -	val = (ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(pdata) == 18) ? BPP_18_RGB : 0;
> +	val = (bpp == 18) ? BPP_18_RGB : 0;

You can drop the parentheses.

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

>  	regmap_update_bits(pdata->regmap, SN_DATA_FORMAT_REG, BPP_18_RGB, val);
>  
>  	/* DP lane config */
> @@ -1059,7 +1067,7 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>  	valid_rates = ti_sn_bridge_read_valid_rates(pdata);
>  
>  	/* Train until we run out of rates */
> -	for (dp_rate_idx = ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(pdata);
> +	for (dp_rate_idx = ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(pdata, bpp);
>  	     dp_rate_idx < ARRAY_SIZE(ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut);
>  	     dp_rate_idx++) {
>  		if (!(valid_rates & BIT(dp_rate_idx)))

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: fetch bpc using drm_atomic_state

[Laurent Pinchart]

Hi Dmitry,

Thank you for the patch.

On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 09:45:35PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Rather than reading the pdata->connector directly, fetch the connector
> using drm_atomic_state. This allows us to make pdata->connector optional
> (and thus supporting DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> index 01171547f638..df08207d6223 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> @@ -779,9 +779,9 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_set_dsi_rate(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
>  	regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_DSIA_CLK_FREQ_REG, val);
>  }
>  
> -static unsigned int ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
> +static unsigned int ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(struct drm_connector *connector)
>  {
> -	if (pdata->connector->display_info.bpc <= 6)
> +	if (connector->display_info.bpc <= 6)
>  		return 18;
>  	else
>  		return 24;
> @@ -796,7 +796,7 @@ static const unsigned int ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut[] = {
>  	0, 1620, 2160, 2430, 2700, 3240, 4320, 5400
>  };
>  
> -static int ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
> +static int ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata, unsigned int bpp)
>  {
>  	unsigned int bit_rate_khz, dp_rate_mhz;
>  	unsigned int i;
> @@ -804,7 +804,7 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
>  		&pdata->bridge.encoder->crtc->state->adjusted_mode;
>  
>  	/* Calculate minimum bit rate based on our pixel clock. */
> -	bit_rate_khz = mode->clock * ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(pdata);
> +	bit_rate_khz = mode->clock * bpp;
>  
>  	/* Calculate minimum DP data rate, taking 80% as per DP spec */
>  	dp_rate_mhz = DIV_ROUND_UP(bit_rate_khz * DP_CLK_FUDGE_NUM,
> @@ -1016,12 +1016,19 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>  				       struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
>  {
>  	struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
> +	struct drm_connector *connector;
>  	const char *last_err_str = "No supported DP rate";
>  	unsigned int valid_rates;
>  	int dp_rate_idx;
>  	unsigned int val;
>  	int ret = -EINVAL;
>  	int max_dp_lanes;
> +	unsigned int bpp;
> +
> +	connector = drm_atomic_get_new_connector_for_encoder(old_bridge_state->base.state,
> +							     bridge->encoder);
> +	if (!connector)

As Sam mentioned, a dev_err() would be good here if you think this can
happen. If there's no risk that connector will be null, you could drop
the check.

> +		return;
>  
>  	max_dp_lanes = ti_sn_get_max_lanes(pdata);
>  	pdata->dp_lanes = min(pdata->dp_lanes, max_dp_lanes);
> @@ -1047,8 +1054,9 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>  	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&pdata->aux, DP_EDP_CONFIGURATION_SET,
>  			   DP_ALTERNATE_SCRAMBLER_RESET_ENABLE);
>  
> +	bpp = ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(connector);
>  	/* Set the DP output format (18 bpp or 24 bpp) */
> -	val = (ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(pdata) == 18) ? BPP_18_RGB : 0;
> +	val = (bpp == 18) ? BPP_18_RGB : 0;

You can drop the parentheses.

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

>  	regmap_update_bits(pdata->regmap, SN_DATA_FORMAT_REG, BPP_18_RGB, val);
>  
>  	/* DP lane config */
> @@ -1059,7 +1067,7 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>  	valid_rates = ti_sn_bridge_read_valid_rates(pdata);
>  
>  	/* Train until we run out of rates */
> -	for (dp_rate_idx = ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(pdata);
> +	for (dp_rate_idx = ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(pdata, bpp);
>  	     dp_rate_idx < ARRAY_SIZE(ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut);
>  	     dp_rate_idx++) {
>  		if (!(valid_rates & BIT(dp_rate_idx)))

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: switch to atomic ops

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 at 22:04, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 09:45:34PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > Make ti-sn65dsi86 use atomic_enable / atomic_disable / atomic_pre_enable
> > / atomic_post_disable rather than their non-atomic versions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
>
> a more or less identical patch was applied to drm-misc-next
> the other day.
> See d8b599bf625d1d818fdbb322a272fd2a5ea32e38.

Ugh, thanks for pointing this out.

>
>         Sam
>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> > index 8cad662de9bb..01171547f638 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> > @@ -752,7 +752,8 @@ ti_sn_bridge_mode_valid(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> >       return MODE_OK;
> >  }
> >
> > -static void ti_sn_bridge_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> > +static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> > +                                     struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
> >  {
> >       struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
> >
> > @@ -1011,7 +1012,8 @@ static int ti_sn_link_training(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata, int dp_rate_idx,
> >       return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > -static void ti_sn_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> > +static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> > +                                    struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
> >  {
> >       struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
> >       const char *last_err_str = "No supported DP rate";
> > @@ -1080,7 +1082,8 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> >                          VSTREAM_ENABLE);
> >  }
> >
> > -static void ti_sn_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> > +static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> > +                                        struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
> >  {
> >       struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
> >
> > @@ -1093,7 +1096,8 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> >       usleep_range(100, 110);
> >  }
> >
> > -static void ti_sn_bridge_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> > +static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> > +                                          struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
> >  {
> >       struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
> >
> > @@ -1114,10 +1118,10 @@ static const struct drm_bridge_funcs ti_sn_bridge_funcs = {
> >       .attach = ti_sn_bridge_attach,
> >       .detach = ti_sn_bridge_detach,
> >       .mode_valid = ti_sn_bridge_mode_valid,
> > -     .pre_enable = ti_sn_bridge_pre_enable,
> > -     .enable = ti_sn_bridge_enable,
> > -     .disable = ti_sn_bridge_disable,
> > -     .post_disable = ti_sn_bridge_post_disable,
> > +     .atomic_pre_enable = ti_sn_bridge_atomic_pre_enable,
> > +     .atomic_enable = ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable,
> > +     .atomic_disable = ti_sn_bridge_atomic_disable,
> > +     .atomic_post_disable = ti_sn_bridge_atomic_post_disable,
> >  };
> >
> >  static void ti_sn_bridge_parse_lanes(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata,
> > --
> > 2.35.1



-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: switch to atomic ops

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 at 22:04, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 09:45:34PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > Make ti-sn65dsi86 use atomic_enable / atomic_disable / atomic_pre_enable
> > / atomic_post_disable rather than their non-atomic versions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
>
> a more or less identical patch was applied to drm-misc-next
> the other day.
> See d8b599bf625d1d818fdbb322a272fd2a5ea32e38.

Ugh, thanks for pointing this out.

>
>         Sam
>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> > index 8cad662de9bb..01171547f638 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> > @@ -752,7 +752,8 @@ ti_sn_bridge_mode_valid(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> >       return MODE_OK;
> >  }
> >
> > -static void ti_sn_bridge_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> > +static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> > +                                     struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
> >  {
> >       struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
> >
> > @@ -1011,7 +1012,8 @@ static int ti_sn_link_training(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata, int dp_rate_idx,
> >       return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > -static void ti_sn_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> > +static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> > +                                    struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
> >  {
> >       struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
> >       const char *last_err_str = "No supported DP rate";
> > @@ -1080,7 +1082,8 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> >                          VSTREAM_ENABLE);
> >  }
> >
> > -static void ti_sn_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> > +static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> > +                                        struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
> >  {
> >       struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
> >
> > @@ -1093,7 +1096,8 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> >       usleep_range(100, 110);
> >  }
> >
> > -static void ti_sn_bridge_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> > +static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> > +                                          struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
> >  {
> >       struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
> >
> > @@ -1114,10 +1118,10 @@ static const struct drm_bridge_funcs ti_sn_bridge_funcs = {
> >       .attach = ti_sn_bridge_attach,
> >       .detach = ti_sn_bridge_detach,
> >       .mode_valid = ti_sn_bridge_mode_valid,
> > -     .pre_enable = ti_sn_bridge_pre_enable,
> > -     .enable = ti_sn_bridge_enable,
> > -     .disable = ti_sn_bridge_disable,
> > -     .post_disable = ti_sn_bridge_post_disable,
> > +     .atomic_pre_enable = ti_sn_bridge_atomic_pre_enable,
> > +     .atomic_enable = ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable,
> > +     .atomic_disable = ti_sn_bridge_atomic_disable,
> > +     .atomic_post_disable = ti_sn_bridge_atomic_post_disable,
> >  };
> >
> >  static void ti_sn_bridge_parse_lanes(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata,
> > --
> > 2.35.1



-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: fetch bpc using drm_atomic_state

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 at 22:11, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 09:45:35PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > Rather than reading the pdata->connector directly, fetch the connector
> > using drm_atomic_state. This allows us to make pdata->connector optional
> > (and thus supporting DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> > index 01171547f638..df08207d6223 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> > @@ -779,9 +779,9 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_set_dsi_rate(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
> >       regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_DSIA_CLK_FREQ_REG, val);
> >  }
> >
> > -static unsigned int ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
> > +static unsigned int ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(struct drm_connector *connector)
> >  {
> > -     if (pdata->connector->display_info.bpc <= 6)
> > +     if (connector->display_info.bpc <= 6)
> >               return 18;
> >       else
> >               return 24;
> > @@ -796,7 +796,7 @@ static const unsigned int ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut[] = {
> >       0, 1620, 2160, 2430, 2700, 3240, 4320, 5400
> >  };
> >
> > -static int ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
> > +static int ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata, unsigned int bpp)
> >  {
> >       unsigned int bit_rate_khz, dp_rate_mhz;
> >       unsigned int i;
> > @@ -804,7 +804,7 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
> >               &pdata->bridge.encoder->crtc->state->adjusted_mode;
> >
> >       /* Calculate minimum bit rate based on our pixel clock. */
> > -     bit_rate_khz = mode->clock * ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(pdata);
> > +     bit_rate_khz = mode->clock * bpp;
> >
> >       /* Calculate minimum DP data rate, taking 80% as per DP spec */
> >       dp_rate_mhz = DIV_ROUND_UP(bit_rate_khz * DP_CLK_FUDGE_NUM,
> > @@ -1016,12 +1016,19 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> >                                      struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
> >  {
> >       struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
> > +     struct drm_connector *connector;
> >       const char *last_err_str = "No supported DP rate";
> >       unsigned int valid_rates;
> >       int dp_rate_idx;
> >       unsigned int val;
> >       int ret = -EINVAL;
> >       int max_dp_lanes;
> > +     unsigned int bpp;
> > +
> > +     connector = drm_atomic_get_new_connector_for_encoder(old_bridge_state->base.state,
> > +                                                          bridge->encoder);
> > +     if (!connector)
> > +             return;
> It would be prudent with a dev_err() logging here as we do not expect to
> fail.
> I looked into something similar, but with a less elegant solution, and
> could not convince myself that the display driver would create the
> connector before ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable() was called.

If I understand your concern, the connectors (as does the rest of
CRTC/encoder/etc objects) are not dynamic, so they must be created
before being able to use the DRM device or any part of thereof is
being actually used (enable/disable/modeset).

>
> This is another reason why a dev_err would be nice - so tester could see
> if this fails or not.

Will fix this in v2.

>
> With the dev_err added:
> Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
>
> >
> >       max_dp_lanes = ti_sn_get_max_lanes(pdata);
> >       pdata->dp_lanes = min(pdata->dp_lanes, max_dp_lanes);
> > @@ -1047,8 +1054,9 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> >       drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&pdata->aux, DP_EDP_CONFIGURATION_SET,
> >                          DP_ALTERNATE_SCRAMBLER_RESET_ENABLE);
> >
> > +     bpp = ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(connector);
> >       /* Set the DP output format (18 bpp or 24 bpp) */
> > -     val = (ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(pdata) == 18) ? BPP_18_RGB : 0;
> > +     val = (bpp == 18) ? BPP_18_RGB : 0;
> >       regmap_update_bits(pdata->regmap, SN_DATA_FORMAT_REG, BPP_18_RGB, val);
> >
> >       /* DP lane config */
> > @@ -1059,7 +1067,7 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> >       valid_rates = ti_sn_bridge_read_valid_rates(pdata);
> >
> >       /* Train until we run out of rates */
> > -     for (dp_rate_idx = ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(pdata);
> > +     for (dp_rate_idx = ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(pdata, bpp);
> >            dp_rate_idx < ARRAY_SIZE(ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut);
> >            dp_rate_idx++) {
> >               if (!(valid_rates & BIT(dp_rate_idx)))
> > --
> > 2.35.1



-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: fetch bpc using drm_atomic_state

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 at 22:11, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 09:45:35PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > Rather than reading the pdata->connector directly, fetch the connector
> > using drm_atomic_state. This allows us to make pdata->connector optional
> > (and thus supporting DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> > index 01171547f638..df08207d6223 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> > @@ -779,9 +779,9 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_set_dsi_rate(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
> >       regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_DSIA_CLK_FREQ_REG, val);
> >  }
> >
> > -static unsigned int ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
> > +static unsigned int ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(struct drm_connector *connector)
> >  {
> > -     if (pdata->connector->display_info.bpc <= 6)
> > +     if (connector->display_info.bpc <= 6)
> >               return 18;
> >       else
> >               return 24;
> > @@ -796,7 +796,7 @@ static const unsigned int ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut[] = {
> >       0, 1620, 2160, 2430, 2700, 3240, 4320, 5400
> >  };
> >
> > -static int ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
> > +static int ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata, unsigned int bpp)
> >  {
> >       unsigned int bit_rate_khz, dp_rate_mhz;
> >       unsigned int i;
> > @@ -804,7 +804,7 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
> >               &pdata->bridge.encoder->crtc->state->adjusted_mode;
> >
> >       /* Calculate minimum bit rate based on our pixel clock. */
> > -     bit_rate_khz = mode->clock * ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(pdata);
> > +     bit_rate_khz = mode->clock * bpp;
> >
> >       /* Calculate minimum DP data rate, taking 80% as per DP spec */
> >       dp_rate_mhz = DIV_ROUND_UP(bit_rate_khz * DP_CLK_FUDGE_NUM,
> > @@ -1016,12 +1016,19 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> >                                      struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
> >  {
> >       struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
> > +     struct drm_connector *connector;
> >       const char *last_err_str = "No supported DP rate";
> >       unsigned int valid_rates;
> >       int dp_rate_idx;
> >       unsigned int val;
> >       int ret = -EINVAL;
> >       int max_dp_lanes;
> > +     unsigned int bpp;
> > +
> > +     connector = drm_atomic_get_new_connector_for_encoder(old_bridge_state->base.state,
> > +                                                          bridge->encoder);
> > +     if (!connector)
> > +             return;
> It would be prudent with a dev_err() logging here as we do not expect to
> fail.
> I looked into something similar, but with a less elegant solution, and
> could not convince myself that the display driver would create the
> connector before ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable() was called.

If I understand your concern, the connectors (as does the rest of
CRTC/encoder/etc objects) are not dynamic, so they must be created
before being able to use the DRM device or any part of thereof is
being actually used (enable/disable/modeset).

>
> This is another reason why a dev_err would be nice - so tester could see
> if this fails or not.

Will fix this in v2.

>
> With the dev_err added:
> Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
>
> >
> >       max_dp_lanes = ti_sn_get_max_lanes(pdata);
> >       pdata->dp_lanes = min(pdata->dp_lanes, max_dp_lanes);
> > @@ -1047,8 +1054,9 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> >       drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&pdata->aux, DP_EDP_CONFIGURATION_SET,
> >                          DP_ALTERNATE_SCRAMBLER_RESET_ENABLE);
> >
> > +     bpp = ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(connector);
> >       /* Set the DP output format (18 bpp or 24 bpp) */
> > -     val = (ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(pdata) == 18) ? BPP_18_RGB : 0;
> > +     val = (bpp == 18) ? BPP_18_RGB : 0;
> >       regmap_update_bits(pdata->regmap, SN_DATA_FORMAT_REG, BPP_18_RGB, val);
> >
> >       /* DP lane config */
> > @@ -1059,7 +1067,7 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> >       valid_rates = ti_sn_bridge_read_valid_rates(pdata);
> >
> >       /* Train until we run out of rates */
> > -     for (dp_rate_idx = ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(pdata);
> > +     for (dp_rate_idx = ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(pdata, bpp);
> >            dp_rate_idx < ARRAY_SIZE(ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut);
> >            dp_rate_idx++) {
> >               if (!(valid_rates & BIT(dp_rate_idx)))
> > --
> > 2.35.1



-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry