From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>
Cc: Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mark Salyzyn <mark_salyzyn@us.xyratex.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [SCSI] libsas: Allow expander T-T attachments
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:50:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA9_cme=OUJcQB+GaJVWSvkg1ha7cmqotuMeZiRda1hzODHuOg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311839519.30253.16.camel@mulgrave>
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:52 AM, James Bottomley
<jbottomley@parallels.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 21:19 -0700, Luben Tuikov wrote:
>> Allow expander table-to-table attachments for
>> expanders that support it.
>
> This is half the code to do SAS 2.0 expanders. You seem to have
> additions from the other half (self configuring expanders) see below;
> does this mean you have a patch for self configuring expanders in the
> works?
I'd like to see that as well, but in the meantime support for the
other SAS-2 fields does not block basic operation like the lack of
table-to-table support does.
Can we also tag this for -stable? It's akin to a pci device id update
in terms of impact.
Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>
Cc: Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mark Salyzyn <mark_salyzyn@us.xyratex.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [SCSI] libsas: Allow expander T-T attachments
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:50:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA9_cme=OUJcQB+GaJVWSvkg1ha7cmqotuMeZiRda1hzODHuOg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311839519.30253.16.camel@mulgrave>
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:52 AM, James Bottomley
<jbottomley@parallels.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 21:19 -0700, Luben Tuikov wrote:
>> Allow expander table-to-table attachments for
>> expanders that support it.
>
> This is half the code to do SAS 2.0 expanders. You seem to have
> additions from the other half (self configuring expanders) see below;
> does this mean you have a patch for self configuring expanders in the
> works?
I'd like to see that as well, but in the meantime support for the
other SAS-2 fields does not block basic operation like the lack of
table-to-table support does.
Can we also tag this for -stable? It's akin to a pci device id update
in terms of impact.
Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-21 0:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-28 4:19 [PATCH] [SCSI] libsas: Allow expander T-T attachments Luben Tuikov
2011-07-28 6:46 ` Jack Wang
2011-07-28 6:46 ` Jack Wang
2011-07-28 7:52 ` James Bottomley
2011-07-28 7:52 ` James Bottomley
2011-09-21 0:50 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2011-09-21 0:50 ` Dan Williams
2011-09-22 11:30 ` James Bottomley
2011-09-22 11:30 ` James Bottomley
2011-09-22 15:04 ` Mark Salyzyn
2011-09-22 15:04 ` Mark Salyzyn
2011-09-22 15:32 ` [PATCH] [SCSI] libsas panic when single phy disabled on a wide port Mark Salyzyn
2011-09-22 15:50 ` [PATCH] [SCSI] pm8001 DEV_IS_GONE infinite retry Mark Salyzyn
2011-09-26 2:20 ` Jack Wang
2011-09-26 13:15 ` Mark Salyzyn
2011-09-26 14:57 ` [PATCH] [SCSI] pm8001 missing break statements Mark Salyzyn
2011-09-27 4:27 ` Jack Wang
2011-09-30 2:21 ` [PATCH] [SCSI] libsas panic when single phy disabled on a wide port Jack Wang
2011-10-01 1:43 ` Dan Williams
2011-10-03 13:07 ` Mark Salyzyn
2011-10-03 15:58 ` Mark Salyzyn
2011-10-04 8:35 ` Jack Wang
2011-10-04 23:30 ` Dan Williams
2011-10-04 23:38 ` Dan Williams
2011-10-05 12:10 ` Mark Salyzyn
2011-10-06 3:33 ` Jack Wang
2011-09-22 16:30 ` [PATCH] [SCSI] libsas: Allow expander T-T attachments Luben Tuikov
2011-09-22 16:35 ` Luben Tuikov
2011-09-22 17:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-22 17:11 ` Luben Tuikov
2011-09-22 17:11 ` Luben Tuikov
2011-09-23 18:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-23 18:46 ` Alan Cox
2011-09-22 16:41 ` [RESEND] " Luben Tuikov
2011-09-22 16:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-22 17:24 ` Luben Tuikov
2011-09-22 17:32 ` Bart Van Assche
2011-09-22 16:55 ` Mark Salyzyn
2011-09-22 16:55 ` Mark Salyzyn
2011-09-22 17:19 ` Luben Tuikov
2011-09-22 17:19 ` Luben Tuikov
2011-09-22 17:44 ` Mark Salyzyn
2011-09-22 17:44 ` Mark Salyzyn
2011-09-22 17:48 ` Dan Williams
2011-09-22 17:48 ` Dan Williams
2011-09-22 17:41 ` Dan Williams
2011-09-23 1:47 ` Jack Wang
2011-09-23 1:47 ` Jack Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAA9_cme=OUJcQB+GaJVWSvkg1ha7cmqotuMeZiRda1hzODHuOg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltuikov@yahoo.com \
--cc=mark_salyzyn@us.xyratex.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.