All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
To: Neal Liu <neal.liu@mediatek.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	wsd_upstream <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] soc: mediatek: devapc: add devapc-mt6873 driver
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 00:25:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAOTY_8JRnhGKOB+faOaHR6p2nknHiMjAnbfo=390c5jNHtp=A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1592559720-8482-3-git-send-email-neal.liu@mediatek.com>

Hi, Neal:

Neal Liu <neal.liu@mediatek.com> 於 2020年6月19日 週五 下午6:01寫道:
>
> MT6873 bus frabric provides TrustZone security support and data
> protection to prevent slaves from being accessed by unexpected
> masters.
> The security violations are logged and sent to the processor for
> further analysis or countermeasures.
>
> Any occurrence of security violation would raise an interrupt, and
> it will be handled by devapc-mt6873 driver. The violation
> information is printed in order to find the murderer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neal Liu <neal.liu@mediatek.com>
> ---

[snip]

> +
> +/*
> + * mtk_devapc_pd_get - get devapc pd_types of register address.
> + *
> + * Returns the value of reg addr
> + */
> +static void __iomem *mtk_devapc_pd_get(struct mtk_devapc_context *devapc_ctx,
> +                                      int slave_type,
> +                                      enum DEVAPC_PD_REG_TYPE pd_reg_type,
> +                                      u32 index)
> +{
> +       struct mtk_devapc_vio_info *vio_info = devapc_ctx->soc->vio_info;
> +       u32 slave_type_num = devapc_ctx->soc->slave_type_num;
> +       const u32 *devapc_pds = devapc_ctx->soc->devapc_pds;

devapc_pds = mt6873_devapc_pds;


> +       void __iomem *reg;
> +
> +       if (!devapc_pds)

Never happen.

> +               return NULL;
> +
> +       if ((slave_type < slave_type_num &&
> +            index < vio_info->vio_mask_sta_num[slave_type]) &&
> +           pd_reg_type < PD_REG_TYPE_NUM) {

Always true.

> +               reg = devapc_ctx->devapc_pd_base[slave_type] +
> +                       devapc_pds[pd_reg_type];
> +
> +               if (pd_reg_type == VIO_MASK || pd_reg_type == VIO_STA)
> +                       reg += 0x4 * index;
> +
> +       } else {
> +               pr_err(PFX "Out Of Boundary, slave_type:0x%x/pd_reg_type:0x%x/index:0x%x\n",
> +                      slave_type, pd_reg_type, index);
> +               return NULL;
> +       }
> +
> +       return reg;
> +}
> +

[snip]

> +
> +/*
> + * start_devapc - initialize devapc status and start receiving interrupt
> + *               while devapc violation is triggered.
> + */
> +static void start_devapc(struct mtk_devapc_context *devapc_ctx)
> +{
> +       u32 slave_type_num = devapc_ctx->soc->slave_type_num;
> +       const struct mtk_device_info **device_info;
> +       const struct mtk_device_num *ndevices;
> +       void __iomem *pd_vio_shift_sta_reg;
> +       void __iomem *pd_apc_con_reg;
> +       int slave_type, i, vio_idx, index;
> +       u32 vio_shift_sta;
> +
> +       ndevices = devapc_ctx->soc->ndevices;

ndevices = mtk6873_devices_num;


> +
> +       device_info = devapc_ctx->soc->device_info;
> +
> +       for (slave_type = 0; slave_type < slave_type_num; slave_type++) {
> +               pd_apc_con_reg = mtk_devapc_pd_get(devapc_ctx, slave_type,
> +                                                  APC_CON, 0);
> +               pd_vio_shift_sta_reg = mtk_devapc_pd_get(devapc_ctx, slave_type,
> +                                                        VIO_SHIFT_STA, 0);
> +
> +               if (!pd_apc_con_reg || !pd_vio_shift_sta_reg || !device_info)
> +                       return;
> +
> +               /* Clear DEVAPC violation status */
> +               writel(BIT(31), pd_apc_con_reg);
> +
> +               /* Clear violation shift status */
> +               vio_shift_sta = readl(pd_vio_shift_sta_reg);
> +               if (vio_shift_sta)
> +                       writel(vio_shift_sta, pd_vio_shift_sta_reg);
> +
> +               /* Clear type 2 violation status */
> +               check_type2_vio_status(devapc_ctx, slave_type, &vio_idx, &i);
> +
> +               /* Clear violation status */
> +               for (i = 0; i < ndevices[slave_type].vio_slave_num; i++) {
> +                       vio_idx = device_info[slave_type][i].vio_index;
> +                       if ((check_vio_status(devapc_ctx, slave_type, vio_idx)
> +                                             == VIOLATION_TRIGGERED) &&
> +                            clear_vio_status(devapc_ctx, slave_type,
> +                                             vio_idx)) {
> +                               pr_warn(PFX "Clear vio status failed, slave_type:0x%x, vio_index:0x%x\n",
> +                                       slave_type, vio_idx);
> +
> +                               index = i;
> +                               mtk_devapc_dump_vio_dbg(devapc_ctx, slave_type,
> +                                                       &vio_idx, &index);
> +                               i = index - 1;
> +                       }
> +
> +                       mask_module_irq(devapc_ctx, slave_type, vio_idx, false);
> +               }
> +       }
> +}
> +
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(devapc_lock);

Useless, so remove it.

> +
> +/*
> + * devapc_violation_irq - the devapc Interrupt Service Routine (ISR) will dump
> + *                       violation information including which master violates
> + *                       access slave.
> + */
> +static irqreturn_t devapc_violation_irq(int irq_number,
> +                                       struct mtk_devapc_context *devapc_ctx)
> +{
> +       u32 slave_type_num = devapc_ctx->soc->slave_type_num;
> +       const struct mtk_device_info **device_info;
> +       struct mtk_devapc_vio_info *vio_info;
> +       int slave_type, vio_idx, index;
> +       const char *vio_master;
> +       unsigned long flags;
> +       u8 perm;
> +
> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&devapc_lock, flags);
> +
> +       device_info = devapc_ctx->soc->device_info;
> +       vio_info = devapc_ctx->soc->vio_info;
> +       vio_idx = -1;
> +       index = -1;
> +
> +       /* There are multiple DEVAPC_PD */
> +       for (slave_type = 0; slave_type < slave_type_num; slave_type++) {
> +               if (!check_type2_vio_status(devapc_ctx, slave_type, &vio_idx,
> +                                           &index))
> +                       if (!mtk_devapc_dump_vio_dbg(devapc_ctx, slave_type,
> +                                                    &vio_idx, &index))
> +                               continue;
> +
> +               /* Ensure that violation info are written before
> +                * further operations
> +                */
> +               smp_mb();
> +
> +               mask_module_irq(devapc_ctx, slave_type, vio_idx, true);
> +
> +               clear_vio_status(devapc_ctx, slave_type, vio_idx);
> +
> +               perm = get_permission(devapc_ctx, slave_type, index,
> +                                     vio_info->domain_id);
> +
> +               vio_master = devapc_ctx->soc->master_get
> +                       (vio_info->master_id,
> +                        vio_info->vio_addr,
> +                        slave_type,
> +                        vio_info->shift_sta_bit,
> +                        vio_info->domain_id);

Call mt6873_bus_id_to_master() directly.

> +
> +               if (!vio_master)
> +                       vio_master = "UNKNOWN_MASTER";
> +
> +               pr_info(PFX "Violation - slave_type:0x%x, sys_index:0x%x, ctrl_index:0x%x, vio_index:0x%x\n",
> +                       slave_type,
> +                       device_info[slave_type][index].sys_index,
> +                       device_info[slave_type][index].ctrl_index,
> +                       device_info[slave_type][index].vio_index);
> +
> +               pr_info(PFX "Violation Master: %s\n", vio_master);
> +
> +               devapc_vio_reason(perm);
> +
> +               mask_module_irq(devapc_ctx, slave_type, vio_idx, false);
> +       }
> +
> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devapc_lock, flags);
> +       return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +

[snip]

> +
> +/******************************************************************************
> + * VARIABLE DEFINATION
> + ******************************************************************************/
> +#define MOD_NO_IN_1_DEVAPC     16
> +#define VIOLATION_TRIGGERED    1
> +#define VIOLATION_MASKED       1
> +#define DEAD                   0xdeadbeaf
> +#define PFX                    "[DEVAPC]: "
> +#define SLAVE_TYPE_NUM_MAX     5

SLAVE_TYPE_NUM is 4, why SLAVE_TYPE_NUM_MAX is 5?

> +
> +#define devapc_log(p, s, fmt, args...) \
> +       do { \
> +               typeof(p) (_p) = (p); \
> +               ((_p) += scnprintf(_p, sizeof(s) - strlen(s), fmt, ##args)); \
> +       } while (0)

Useless, so remove it.

> +
> +#define UNUSED(x)              (void)(x)

Useless, so remove it.

> +
> +/******************************************************************************
> + * DATA STRUCTURE & FUNCTION DEFINATION
> + ******************************************************************************/
> +enum DEVAPC_PD_REG_TYPE {
> +       VIO_MASK = 0,
> +       VIO_STA,
> +       VIO_DBG0,
> +       VIO_DBG1,
> +       VIO_DBG2,
> +       APC_CON,
> +       VIO_SHIFT_STA,
> +       VIO_SHIFT_SEL,
> +       VIO_SHIFT_CON,
> +       PD_REG_TYPE_NUM,
> +};
> +
> +enum DEVAPC_UT_CMD {
> +       DEVAPC_UT_DAPC_VIO = 1,
> +       DEVAPC_UT_SRAM_VIO,
> +};

Useless, so remove it.

> +
> +enum DEVAPC_DOM_ID {
> +       DOMAIN_0 = 0,
> +       DOMAIN_1,
> +       DOMAIN_2,
> +       DOMAIN_3,
> +       DOMAIN_4,
> +       DOMAIN_5,
> +       DOMAIN_6,
> +       DOMAIN_7,
> +       DOMAIN_8,
> +       DOMAIN_9,
> +       DOMAIN_10,
> +       DOMAIN_11,
> +       DOMAIN_12,
> +       DOMAIN_13,
> +       DOMAIN_14,
> +       DOMAIN_15,
> +       DOMAIN_OTHERS,
> +};

Useless, so remove it.

> +
> +enum SRAMROM_VIO {
> +       ROM_VIOLATION = 0,
> +       SRAM_VIOLATION,
> +};
> +
> +enum DEVAPC_PERM_TYPE {
> +       NO_PROTECTION = 0,
> +       SEC_RW_ONLY,
> +       SEC_RW_NS_R,
> +       FORBIDDEN,
> +       PERM_TYPE_NUM,
> +};
> +
> +struct mtk_devapc_dbg_status {
> +       bool enable_ut;
> +       bool enable_dapc; /* dump APC */
> +};

Useless, so remove it.

Regards,
Chun-Kuang.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
To: Neal Liu <neal.liu@mediatek.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	wsd_upstream <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] soc: mediatek: devapc: add devapc-mt6873 driver
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 00:25:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAOTY_8JRnhGKOB+faOaHR6p2nknHiMjAnbfo=390c5jNHtp=A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1592559720-8482-3-git-send-email-neal.liu@mediatek.com>

Hi, Neal:

Neal Liu <neal.liu@mediatek.com> 於 2020年6月19日 週五 下午6:01寫道:
>
> MT6873 bus frabric provides TrustZone security support and data
> protection to prevent slaves from being accessed by unexpected
> masters.
> The security violations are logged and sent to the processor for
> further analysis or countermeasures.
>
> Any occurrence of security violation would raise an interrupt, and
> it will be handled by devapc-mt6873 driver. The violation
> information is printed in order to find the murderer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neal Liu <neal.liu@mediatek.com>
> ---

[snip]

> +
> +/*
> + * mtk_devapc_pd_get - get devapc pd_types of register address.
> + *
> + * Returns the value of reg addr
> + */
> +static void __iomem *mtk_devapc_pd_get(struct mtk_devapc_context *devapc_ctx,
> +                                      int slave_type,
> +                                      enum DEVAPC_PD_REG_TYPE pd_reg_type,
> +                                      u32 index)
> +{
> +       struct mtk_devapc_vio_info *vio_info = devapc_ctx->soc->vio_info;
> +       u32 slave_type_num = devapc_ctx->soc->slave_type_num;
> +       const u32 *devapc_pds = devapc_ctx->soc->devapc_pds;

devapc_pds = mt6873_devapc_pds;


> +       void __iomem *reg;
> +
> +       if (!devapc_pds)

Never happen.

> +               return NULL;
> +
> +       if ((slave_type < slave_type_num &&
> +            index < vio_info->vio_mask_sta_num[slave_type]) &&
> +           pd_reg_type < PD_REG_TYPE_NUM) {

Always true.

> +               reg = devapc_ctx->devapc_pd_base[slave_type] +
> +                       devapc_pds[pd_reg_type];
> +
> +               if (pd_reg_type == VIO_MASK || pd_reg_type == VIO_STA)
> +                       reg += 0x4 * index;
> +
> +       } else {
> +               pr_err(PFX "Out Of Boundary, slave_type:0x%x/pd_reg_type:0x%x/index:0x%x\n",
> +                      slave_type, pd_reg_type, index);
> +               return NULL;
> +       }
> +
> +       return reg;
> +}
> +

[snip]

> +
> +/*
> + * start_devapc - initialize devapc status and start receiving interrupt
> + *               while devapc violation is triggered.
> + */
> +static void start_devapc(struct mtk_devapc_context *devapc_ctx)
> +{
> +       u32 slave_type_num = devapc_ctx->soc->slave_type_num;
> +       const struct mtk_device_info **device_info;
> +       const struct mtk_device_num *ndevices;
> +       void __iomem *pd_vio_shift_sta_reg;
> +       void __iomem *pd_apc_con_reg;
> +       int slave_type, i, vio_idx, index;
> +       u32 vio_shift_sta;
> +
> +       ndevices = devapc_ctx->soc->ndevices;

ndevices = mtk6873_devices_num;


> +
> +       device_info = devapc_ctx->soc->device_info;
> +
> +       for (slave_type = 0; slave_type < slave_type_num; slave_type++) {
> +               pd_apc_con_reg = mtk_devapc_pd_get(devapc_ctx, slave_type,
> +                                                  APC_CON, 0);
> +               pd_vio_shift_sta_reg = mtk_devapc_pd_get(devapc_ctx, slave_type,
> +                                                        VIO_SHIFT_STA, 0);
> +
> +               if (!pd_apc_con_reg || !pd_vio_shift_sta_reg || !device_info)
> +                       return;
> +
> +               /* Clear DEVAPC violation status */
> +               writel(BIT(31), pd_apc_con_reg);
> +
> +               /* Clear violation shift status */
> +               vio_shift_sta = readl(pd_vio_shift_sta_reg);
> +               if (vio_shift_sta)
> +                       writel(vio_shift_sta, pd_vio_shift_sta_reg);
> +
> +               /* Clear type 2 violation status */
> +               check_type2_vio_status(devapc_ctx, slave_type, &vio_idx, &i);
> +
> +               /* Clear violation status */
> +               for (i = 0; i < ndevices[slave_type].vio_slave_num; i++) {
> +                       vio_idx = device_info[slave_type][i].vio_index;
> +                       if ((check_vio_status(devapc_ctx, slave_type, vio_idx)
> +                                             == VIOLATION_TRIGGERED) &&
> +                            clear_vio_status(devapc_ctx, slave_type,
> +                                             vio_idx)) {
> +                               pr_warn(PFX "Clear vio status failed, slave_type:0x%x, vio_index:0x%x\n",
> +                                       slave_type, vio_idx);
> +
> +                               index = i;
> +                               mtk_devapc_dump_vio_dbg(devapc_ctx, slave_type,
> +                                                       &vio_idx, &index);
> +                               i = index - 1;
> +                       }
> +
> +                       mask_module_irq(devapc_ctx, slave_type, vio_idx, false);
> +               }
> +       }
> +}
> +
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(devapc_lock);

Useless, so remove it.

> +
> +/*
> + * devapc_violation_irq - the devapc Interrupt Service Routine (ISR) will dump
> + *                       violation information including which master violates
> + *                       access slave.
> + */
> +static irqreturn_t devapc_violation_irq(int irq_number,
> +                                       struct mtk_devapc_context *devapc_ctx)
> +{
> +       u32 slave_type_num = devapc_ctx->soc->slave_type_num;
> +       const struct mtk_device_info **device_info;
> +       struct mtk_devapc_vio_info *vio_info;
> +       int slave_type, vio_idx, index;
> +       const char *vio_master;
> +       unsigned long flags;
> +       u8 perm;
> +
> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&devapc_lock, flags);
> +
> +       device_info = devapc_ctx->soc->device_info;
> +       vio_info = devapc_ctx->soc->vio_info;
> +       vio_idx = -1;
> +       index = -1;
> +
> +       /* There are multiple DEVAPC_PD */
> +       for (slave_type = 0; slave_type < slave_type_num; slave_type++) {
> +               if (!check_type2_vio_status(devapc_ctx, slave_type, &vio_idx,
> +                                           &index))
> +                       if (!mtk_devapc_dump_vio_dbg(devapc_ctx, slave_type,
> +                                                    &vio_idx, &index))
> +                               continue;
> +
> +               /* Ensure that violation info are written before
> +                * further operations
> +                */
> +               smp_mb();
> +
> +               mask_module_irq(devapc_ctx, slave_type, vio_idx, true);
> +
> +               clear_vio_status(devapc_ctx, slave_type, vio_idx);
> +
> +               perm = get_permission(devapc_ctx, slave_type, index,
> +                                     vio_info->domain_id);
> +
> +               vio_master = devapc_ctx->soc->master_get
> +                       (vio_info->master_id,
> +                        vio_info->vio_addr,
> +                        slave_type,
> +                        vio_info->shift_sta_bit,
> +                        vio_info->domain_id);

Call mt6873_bus_id_to_master() directly.

> +
> +               if (!vio_master)
> +                       vio_master = "UNKNOWN_MASTER";
> +
> +               pr_info(PFX "Violation - slave_type:0x%x, sys_index:0x%x, ctrl_index:0x%x, vio_index:0x%x\n",
> +                       slave_type,
> +                       device_info[slave_type][index].sys_index,
> +                       device_info[slave_type][index].ctrl_index,
> +                       device_info[slave_type][index].vio_index);
> +
> +               pr_info(PFX "Violation Master: %s\n", vio_master);
> +
> +               devapc_vio_reason(perm);
> +
> +               mask_module_irq(devapc_ctx, slave_type, vio_idx, false);
> +       }
> +
> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devapc_lock, flags);
> +       return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +

[snip]

> +
> +/******************************************************************************
> + * VARIABLE DEFINATION
> + ******************************************************************************/
> +#define MOD_NO_IN_1_DEVAPC     16
> +#define VIOLATION_TRIGGERED    1
> +#define VIOLATION_MASKED       1
> +#define DEAD                   0xdeadbeaf
> +#define PFX                    "[DEVAPC]: "
> +#define SLAVE_TYPE_NUM_MAX     5

SLAVE_TYPE_NUM is 4, why SLAVE_TYPE_NUM_MAX is 5?

> +
> +#define devapc_log(p, s, fmt, args...) \
> +       do { \
> +               typeof(p) (_p) = (p); \
> +               ((_p) += scnprintf(_p, sizeof(s) - strlen(s), fmt, ##args)); \
> +       } while (0)

Useless, so remove it.

> +
> +#define UNUSED(x)              (void)(x)

Useless, so remove it.

> +
> +/******************************************************************************
> + * DATA STRUCTURE & FUNCTION DEFINATION
> + ******************************************************************************/
> +enum DEVAPC_PD_REG_TYPE {
> +       VIO_MASK = 0,
> +       VIO_STA,
> +       VIO_DBG0,
> +       VIO_DBG1,
> +       VIO_DBG2,
> +       APC_CON,
> +       VIO_SHIFT_STA,
> +       VIO_SHIFT_SEL,
> +       VIO_SHIFT_CON,
> +       PD_REG_TYPE_NUM,
> +};
> +
> +enum DEVAPC_UT_CMD {
> +       DEVAPC_UT_DAPC_VIO = 1,
> +       DEVAPC_UT_SRAM_VIO,
> +};

Useless, so remove it.

> +
> +enum DEVAPC_DOM_ID {
> +       DOMAIN_0 = 0,
> +       DOMAIN_1,
> +       DOMAIN_2,
> +       DOMAIN_3,
> +       DOMAIN_4,
> +       DOMAIN_5,
> +       DOMAIN_6,
> +       DOMAIN_7,
> +       DOMAIN_8,
> +       DOMAIN_9,
> +       DOMAIN_10,
> +       DOMAIN_11,
> +       DOMAIN_12,
> +       DOMAIN_13,
> +       DOMAIN_14,
> +       DOMAIN_15,
> +       DOMAIN_OTHERS,
> +};

Useless, so remove it.

> +
> +enum SRAMROM_VIO {
> +       ROM_VIOLATION = 0,
> +       SRAM_VIOLATION,
> +};
> +
> +enum DEVAPC_PERM_TYPE {
> +       NO_PROTECTION = 0,
> +       SEC_RW_ONLY,
> +       SEC_RW_NS_R,
> +       FORBIDDEN,
> +       PERM_TYPE_NUM,
> +};
> +
> +struct mtk_devapc_dbg_status {
> +       bool enable_ut;
> +       bool enable_dapc; /* dump APC */
> +};

Useless, so remove it.

Regards,
Chun-Kuang.

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
To: Neal Liu <neal.liu@mediatek.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	wsd_upstream <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] soc: mediatek: devapc: add devapc-mt6873 driver
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 00:25:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAOTY_8JRnhGKOB+faOaHR6p2nknHiMjAnbfo=390c5jNHtp=A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1592559720-8482-3-git-send-email-neal.liu@mediatek.com>

Hi, Neal:

Neal Liu <neal.liu@mediatek.com> 於 2020年6月19日 週五 下午6:01寫道:
>
> MT6873 bus frabric provides TrustZone security support and data
> protection to prevent slaves from being accessed by unexpected
> masters.
> The security violations are logged and sent to the processor for
> further analysis or countermeasures.
>
> Any occurrence of security violation would raise an interrupt, and
> it will be handled by devapc-mt6873 driver. The violation
> information is printed in order to find the murderer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neal Liu <neal.liu@mediatek.com>
> ---

[snip]

> +
> +/*
> + * mtk_devapc_pd_get - get devapc pd_types of register address.
> + *
> + * Returns the value of reg addr
> + */
> +static void __iomem *mtk_devapc_pd_get(struct mtk_devapc_context *devapc_ctx,
> +                                      int slave_type,
> +                                      enum DEVAPC_PD_REG_TYPE pd_reg_type,
> +                                      u32 index)
> +{
> +       struct mtk_devapc_vio_info *vio_info = devapc_ctx->soc->vio_info;
> +       u32 slave_type_num = devapc_ctx->soc->slave_type_num;
> +       const u32 *devapc_pds = devapc_ctx->soc->devapc_pds;

devapc_pds = mt6873_devapc_pds;


> +       void __iomem *reg;
> +
> +       if (!devapc_pds)

Never happen.

> +               return NULL;
> +
> +       if ((slave_type < slave_type_num &&
> +            index < vio_info->vio_mask_sta_num[slave_type]) &&
> +           pd_reg_type < PD_REG_TYPE_NUM) {

Always true.

> +               reg = devapc_ctx->devapc_pd_base[slave_type] +
> +                       devapc_pds[pd_reg_type];
> +
> +               if (pd_reg_type == VIO_MASK || pd_reg_type == VIO_STA)
> +                       reg += 0x4 * index;
> +
> +       } else {
> +               pr_err(PFX "Out Of Boundary, slave_type:0x%x/pd_reg_type:0x%x/index:0x%x\n",
> +                      slave_type, pd_reg_type, index);
> +               return NULL;
> +       }
> +
> +       return reg;
> +}
> +

[snip]

> +
> +/*
> + * start_devapc - initialize devapc status and start receiving interrupt
> + *               while devapc violation is triggered.
> + */
> +static void start_devapc(struct mtk_devapc_context *devapc_ctx)
> +{
> +       u32 slave_type_num = devapc_ctx->soc->slave_type_num;
> +       const struct mtk_device_info **device_info;
> +       const struct mtk_device_num *ndevices;
> +       void __iomem *pd_vio_shift_sta_reg;
> +       void __iomem *pd_apc_con_reg;
> +       int slave_type, i, vio_idx, index;
> +       u32 vio_shift_sta;
> +
> +       ndevices = devapc_ctx->soc->ndevices;

ndevices = mtk6873_devices_num;


> +
> +       device_info = devapc_ctx->soc->device_info;
> +
> +       for (slave_type = 0; slave_type < slave_type_num; slave_type++) {
> +               pd_apc_con_reg = mtk_devapc_pd_get(devapc_ctx, slave_type,
> +                                                  APC_CON, 0);
> +               pd_vio_shift_sta_reg = mtk_devapc_pd_get(devapc_ctx, slave_type,
> +                                                        VIO_SHIFT_STA, 0);
> +
> +               if (!pd_apc_con_reg || !pd_vio_shift_sta_reg || !device_info)
> +                       return;
> +
> +               /* Clear DEVAPC violation status */
> +               writel(BIT(31), pd_apc_con_reg);
> +
> +               /* Clear violation shift status */
> +               vio_shift_sta = readl(pd_vio_shift_sta_reg);
> +               if (vio_shift_sta)
> +                       writel(vio_shift_sta, pd_vio_shift_sta_reg);
> +
> +               /* Clear type 2 violation status */
> +               check_type2_vio_status(devapc_ctx, slave_type, &vio_idx, &i);
> +
> +               /* Clear violation status */
> +               for (i = 0; i < ndevices[slave_type].vio_slave_num; i++) {
> +                       vio_idx = device_info[slave_type][i].vio_index;
> +                       if ((check_vio_status(devapc_ctx, slave_type, vio_idx)
> +                                             == VIOLATION_TRIGGERED) &&
> +                            clear_vio_status(devapc_ctx, slave_type,
> +                                             vio_idx)) {
> +                               pr_warn(PFX "Clear vio status failed, slave_type:0x%x, vio_index:0x%x\n",
> +                                       slave_type, vio_idx);
> +
> +                               index = i;
> +                               mtk_devapc_dump_vio_dbg(devapc_ctx, slave_type,
> +                                                       &vio_idx, &index);
> +                               i = index - 1;
> +                       }
> +
> +                       mask_module_irq(devapc_ctx, slave_type, vio_idx, false);
> +               }
> +       }
> +}
> +
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(devapc_lock);

Useless, so remove it.

> +
> +/*
> + * devapc_violation_irq - the devapc Interrupt Service Routine (ISR) will dump
> + *                       violation information including which master violates
> + *                       access slave.
> + */
> +static irqreturn_t devapc_violation_irq(int irq_number,
> +                                       struct mtk_devapc_context *devapc_ctx)
> +{
> +       u32 slave_type_num = devapc_ctx->soc->slave_type_num;
> +       const struct mtk_device_info **device_info;
> +       struct mtk_devapc_vio_info *vio_info;
> +       int slave_type, vio_idx, index;
> +       const char *vio_master;
> +       unsigned long flags;
> +       u8 perm;
> +
> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&devapc_lock, flags);
> +
> +       device_info = devapc_ctx->soc->device_info;
> +       vio_info = devapc_ctx->soc->vio_info;
> +       vio_idx = -1;
> +       index = -1;
> +
> +       /* There are multiple DEVAPC_PD */
> +       for (slave_type = 0; slave_type < slave_type_num; slave_type++) {
> +               if (!check_type2_vio_status(devapc_ctx, slave_type, &vio_idx,
> +                                           &index))
> +                       if (!mtk_devapc_dump_vio_dbg(devapc_ctx, slave_type,
> +                                                    &vio_idx, &index))
> +                               continue;
> +
> +               /* Ensure that violation info are written before
> +                * further operations
> +                */
> +               smp_mb();
> +
> +               mask_module_irq(devapc_ctx, slave_type, vio_idx, true);
> +
> +               clear_vio_status(devapc_ctx, slave_type, vio_idx);
> +
> +               perm = get_permission(devapc_ctx, slave_type, index,
> +                                     vio_info->domain_id);
> +
> +               vio_master = devapc_ctx->soc->master_get
> +                       (vio_info->master_id,
> +                        vio_info->vio_addr,
> +                        slave_type,
> +                        vio_info->shift_sta_bit,
> +                        vio_info->domain_id);

Call mt6873_bus_id_to_master() directly.

> +
> +               if (!vio_master)
> +                       vio_master = "UNKNOWN_MASTER";
> +
> +               pr_info(PFX "Violation - slave_type:0x%x, sys_index:0x%x, ctrl_index:0x%x, vio_index:0x%x\n",
> +                       slave_type,
> +                       device_info[slave_type][index].sys_index,
> +                       device_info[slave_type][index].ctrl_index,
> +                       device_info[slave_type][index].vio_index);
> +
> +               pr_info(PFX "Violation Master: %s\n", vio_master);
> +
> +               devapc_vio_reason(perm);
> +
> +               mask_module_irq(devapc_ctx, slave_type, vio_idx, false);
> +       }
> +
> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devapc_lock, flags);
> +       return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +

[snip]

> +
> +/******************************************************************************
> + * VARIABLE DEFINATION
> + ******************************************************************************/
> +#define MOD_NO_IN_1_DEVAPC     16
> +#define VIOLATION_TRIGGERED    1
> +#define VIOLATION_MASKED       1
> +#define DEAD                   0xdeadbeaf
> +#define PFX                    "[DEVAPC]: "
> +#define SLAVE_TYPE_NUM_MAX     5

SLAVE_TYPE_NUM is 4, why SLAVE_TYPE_NUM_MAX is 5?

> +
> +#define devapc_log(p, s, fmt, args...) \
> +       do { \
> +               typeof(p) (_p) = (p); \
> +               ((_p) += scnprintf(_p, sizeof(s) - strlen(s), fmt, ##args)); \
> +       } while (0)

Useless, so remove it.

> +
> +#define UNUSED(x)              (void)(x)

Useless, so remove it.

> +
> +/******************************************************************************
> + * DATA STRUCTURE & FUNCTION DEFINATION
> + ******************************************************************************/
> +enum DEVAPC_PD_REG_TYPE {
> +       VIO_MASK = 0,
> +       VIO_STA,
> +       VIO_DBG0,
> +       VIO_DBG1,
> +       VIO_DBG2,
> +       APC_CON,
> +       VIO_SHIFT_STA,
> +       VIO_SHIFT_SEL,
> +       VIO_SHIFT_CON,
> +       PD_REG_TYPE_NUM,
> +};
> +
> +enum DEVAPC_UT_CMD {
> +       DEVAPC_UT_DAPC_VIO = 1,
> +       DEVAPC_UT_SRAM_VIO,
> +};

Useless, so remove it.

> +
> +enum DEVAPC_DOM_ID {
> +       DOMAIN_0 = 0,
> +       DOMAIN_1,
> +       DOMAIN_2,
> +       DOMAIN_3,
> +       DOMAIN_4,
> +       DOMAIN_5,
> +       DOMAIN_6,
> +       DOMAIN_7,
> +       DOMAIN_8,
> +       DOMAIN_9,
> +       DOMAIN_10,
> +       DOMAIN_11,
> +       DOMAIN_12,
> +       DOMAIN_13,
> +       DOMAIN_14,
> +       DOMAIN_15,
> +       DOMAIN_OTHERS,
> +};

Useless, so remove it.

> +
> +enum SRAMROM_VIO {
> +       ROM_VIOLATION = 0,
> +       SRAM_VIOLATION,
> +};
> +
> +enum DEVAPC_PERM_TYPE {
> +       NO_PROTECTION = 0,
> +       SEC_RW_ONLY,
> +       SEC_RW_NS_R,
> +       FORBIDDEN,
> +       PERM_TYPE_NUM,
> +};
> +
> +struct mtk_devapc_dbg_status {
> +       bool enable_ut;
> +       bool enable_dapc; /* dump APC */
> +};

Useless, so remove it.

Regards,
Chun-Kuang.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-19 16:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-19  9:41 Add MediaTek MT6873 devapc driver Neal Liu
2020-06-19  9:41 ` Neal Liu
2020-06-19  9:41 ` Neal Liu
2020-06-19  9:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: devapc: add bindings for devapc-mt6873 Neal Liu
2020-06-19  9:41   ` Neal Liu
2020-06-19  9:41   ` Neal Liu
2020-06-29 21:56   ` Rob Herring
2020-06-29 21:56     ` Rob Herring
2020-06-29 21:56     ` Rob Herring
2020-06-30  9:30     ` Neal Liu
2020-06-30  9:30       ` Neal Liu
2020-06-30  9:30       ` Neal Liu
2020-06-19  9:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] soc: mediatek: devapc: add devapc-mt6873 driver Neal Liu
2020-06-19  9:42   ` Neal Liu
2020-06-19  9:42   ` Neal Liu
2020-06-19 16:25   ` Chun-Kuang Hu [this message]
2020-06-19 16:25     ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-06-19 16:25     ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-06-20  3:18     ` Neal Liu
2020-06-20  3:18       ` Neal Liu
2020-06-20  3:18       ` Neal Liu
2020-06-20 23:36       ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-06-23  4:02         ` Neal Liu
2020-06-22 10:05   ` Matthias Brugger
2020-06-24  8:08     ` Neal Liu
2020-06-24  8:08       ` Neal Liu
2020-06-25  6:19   ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-06-25  6:19     ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-06-25  6:19     ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-06-29  6:28     ` Neal Liu
2020-06-29  6:28       ` Neal Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAAOTY_8JRnhGKOB+faOaHR6p2nknHiMjAnbfo=390c5jNHtp=A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=chunkuang.hu@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=neal.liu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.