All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC] Creating an eeprom class
@ 2013-01-20 18:08 Thomas De Schampheleire
  2013-01-20 22:39 ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Thomas De Schampheleire @ 2013-01-20 18:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, David Brownell, Wolfram Sang, Anatolij Gustschin,
	Frodo Looijaard, Philip Edelbrock, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
	Ben Gardner
  Cc: Ronny Meeus, Thomas De Schampheleire

[plaintext and fixed address of David Brownell]

Hi,

Several of the eeprom drivers that live in drivers/misc/eeprom export
a binary sysfs file 'eeprom'. If a userspace program or script wants
to access this file, it needs to know the full path, for example:

/sys/bus/spi/devices/spi32766.0/eeprom

The problem with this approach is that it requires knowledge about the
hardware configuration: is the eeprom on the SPI bus, the I2C bus, or
maybe memory mapped?

It would therefore be more interesting to have a bus-agnostic way to
access this eeprom file, for example:
/sys/class/eeprom/eeprom0/eeprom

Maybe it'd be even better to use a more generic class name than
'eeprom', since there are several types of eeprom-like devices that
you could export this way.

Or should we rather hook the eeprom code into the mtd subsystem?

What is your opinion?

Thanks,
Thomas

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC] Creating an eeprom class
@ 2014-01-22 13:25 Laszlo Papp
  2014-01-22 17:18 ` Curt Brune
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Laszlo Papp @ 2014-01-22 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: LKML; +Cc: patrickdepinguin, gregkh, linux-i2c, curt

> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 07:08:28PM +0100, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
>> [plaintext and fixed address of David Brownell]
>
> David passed away a year or so ago, so that's really not going to help :(
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Several of the eeprom drivers that live in drivers/misc/eeprom export
>> a binary sysfs file 'eeprom'. If a userspace program or script wants
>> to access this file, it needs to know the full path, for example:
>>
>> /sys/bus/spi/devices/spi32766.0/eeprom
>>
>> The problem with this approach is that it requires knowledge about the
>> hardware configuration: is the eeprom on the SPI bus, the I2C bus, or
>> maybe memory mapped?
>>
>> It would therefore be more interesting to have a bus-agnostic way to
>> access this eeprom file, for example:
>> /sys/class/eeprom/eeprom0/eeprom
>>
>> Maybe it'd be even better to use a more generic class name than
>> 'eeprom', since there are several types of eeprom-like devices that
>> you could export this way.
>
> Does all of the existing "eeprom" devices use the same userspace
> interface?  If so, yes, having a "class" would make sense.

Was there any progress done? I saw the following thread, too, so
including CC in the loop:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg13141.html

Needless to say that I am writing this email because I would also be
interested in a handy and convenient class interface - as opposed to
the raw bus specific path -, similarly to hwmon, gpio, leds, etc.

I could probably even try to volunteer, with very limited resources
admittedly, to get some driver done for our EEPROM if that is needed.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-01-22 17:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-01-20 18:08 [RFC] Creating an eeprom class Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-01-20 22:39 ` Greg KH
2013-01-21  7:25   ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-01-22  0:14     ` Greg KH
2014-01-22 13:25 Laszlo Papp
2014-01-22 17:18 ` Curt Brune

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.