* [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-16 2:52 ` Kai-Heng Feng 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Kai-Heng Feng @ 2022-08-16 2:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: jani.nikula, joonas.lahtinen, rodrigo.vivi, tvrtko.ursulin Cc: Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, Hans de Goede, Kai-Heng Feng, Zenghui Yu On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be supported as result. To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); acpi_handle dhandle; union acpi_object *obj; + int supported = 0; dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); if (!dhandle) @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); - if (obj) + if (obj) { + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) + supported = obj->integer.value; + ACPI_FREE(obj); + } + + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ + if (supported & BIT(20)) { + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, + NULL); + if (obj) + ACPI_FREE(obj); + } } /* -- 2.36.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-16 2:52 ` Kai-Heng Feng 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Kai-Heng Feng @ 2022-08-16 2:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: jani.nikula, joonas.lahtinen, rodrigo.vivi, tvrtko.ursulin Cc: Kai-Heng Feng, David Airlie, Daniel Vetter, Ville Syrjälä, Zenghui Yu, Lyude Paul, Hans de Goede, Heikki Krogerus, intel-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be supported as result. To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); acpi_handle dhandle; union acpi_object *obj; + int supported = 0; dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); if (!dhandle) @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); - if (obj) + if (obj) { + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) + supported = obj->integer.value; + ACPI_FREE(obj); + } + + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ + if (supported & BIT(20)) { + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, + NULL); + if (obj) + ACPI_FREE(obj); + } } /* -- 2.36.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-16 2:52 ` Kai-Heng Feng 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Kai-Heng Feng @ 2022-08-16 2:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: jani.nikula, joonas.lahtinen, rodrigo.vivi, tvrtko.ursulin Cc: Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, Kai-Heng Feng, Daniel Vetter, Zenghui Yu On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be supported as result. To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); acpi_handle dhandle; union acpi_object *obj; + int supported = 0; dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); if (!dhandle) @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); - if (obj) + if (obj) { + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) + supported = obj->integer.value; + ACPI_FREE(obj); + } + + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ + if (supported & BIT(20)) { + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, + NULL); + if (obj) + ACPI_FREE(obj); + } } /* -- 2.36.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported 2022-08-16 2:52 ` [Intel-gfx] " Kai-Heng Feng (?) (?) @ 2022-08-16 3:52 ` Patchwork -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2022-08-16 3:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kai-Heng Feng; +Cc: intel-gfx [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6010 bytes --] == Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/107312/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11989 -> Patchwork_107312v1 ==================================================== Summary ------- **FAILURE** Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_107312v1 absolutely need to be verified manually. If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes introduced in Patchwork_107312v1, please notify your bug team to allow them to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107312v1/index.html Participating hosts (29 -> 28) ------------------------------ Missing (1): bat-rpls-2 Possible new issues ------------------- Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_107312v1: ### IGT changes ### #### Possible regressions #### * igt@vgem_basic@unload: - fi-bsw-nick: [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2] [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11989/fi-bsw-nick/igt@vgem_basic@unload.html [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107312v1/fi-bsw-nick/igt@vgem_basic@unload.html Known issues ------------ Here are the changes found in Patchwork_107312v1 that come from known issues: ### IGT changes ### #### Issues hit #### * igt@core_hotunplug@unbind-rebind: - fi-apl-guc: [PASS][3] -> [INCOMPLETE][4] ([i915#6533]) [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11989/fi-apl-guc/igt@core_hotunplug@unbind-rebind.html [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107312v1/fi-apl-guc/igt@core_hotunplug@unbind-rebind.html * igt@i915_selftest@live@gem: - fi-blb-e6850: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-FAIL][5] ([i915#4528]) [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107312v1/fi-blb-e6850/igt@i915_selftest@live@gem.html * igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_heartbeat: - fi-bdw-5557u: [PASS][6] -> [DMESG-FAIL][7] ([i915#5334]) [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11989/fi-bdw-5557u/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_heartbeat.html [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107312v1/fi-bdw-5557u/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_heartbeat.html * igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck: - bat-dg1-6: [PASS][8] -> [DMESG-FAIL][9] ([i915#4494] / [i915#4957]) [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11989/bat-dg1-6/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107312v1/bat-dg1-6/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html * igt@i915_suspend@basic-s2idle-without-i915: - fi-bdw-gvtdvm: NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][10] ([i915#4817]) [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107312v1/fi-bdw-gvtdvm/igt@i915_suspend@basic-s2idle-without-i915.html * igt@kms_chamelium@common-hpd-after-suspend: - fi-bsw-kefka: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][11] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107312v1/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@kms_chamelium@common-hpd-after-suspend.html #### Possible fixes #### * igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists: - fi-bdw-gvtdvm: [INCOMPLETE][12] ([i915#2940]) -> [PASS][13] [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11989/fi-bdw-gvtdvm/igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists.html [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107312v1/fi-bdw-gvtdvm/igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists.html - fi-bsw-kefka: [INCOMPLETE][14] ([i915#2940]) -> [PASS][15] [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11989/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists.html [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107312v1/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists.html * igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck: - {fi-ehl-2}: [INCOMPLETE][16] ([i915#6106]) -> [PASS][17] [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11989/fi-ehl-2/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107312v1/fi-ehl-2/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html * igt@i915_selftest@live@requests: - fi-blb-e6850: [DMESG-FAIL][18] ([i915#4528]) -> [PASS][19] [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11989/fi-blb-e6850/igt@i915_selftest@live@requests.html [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107312v1/fi-blb-e6850/igt@i915_selftest@live@requests.html {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE). [fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271 [fdo#111827]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111827 [i915#2940]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2940 [i915#4494]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4494 [i915#4528]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4528 [i915#4817]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4817 [i915#4957]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4957 [i915#5334]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5334 [i915#6106]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6106 [i915#6533]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6533 Build changes ------------- * Linux: CI_DRM_11989 -> Patchwork_107312v1 CI-20190529: 20190529 CI_DRM_11989: 8953e41fa70d4507c6f5508e030347f7eda3ba8a @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux IGT_6625: d47beef9b01595f721c584070940c95be1cf11e8 @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git Patchwork_107312v1: 8953e41fa70d4507c6f5508e030347f7eda3ba8a @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux ### Linux commits 060988449f9d drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported == Logs == For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107312v1/index.html [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7035 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported 2022-08-16 2:52 ` [Intel-gfx] " Kai-Heng Feng (?) @ 2022-08-16 8:06 ` Jani Nikula -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Jani Nikula @ 2022-08-16 8:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kai-Heng Feng, joonas.lahtinen, rodrigo.vivi, tvrtko.ursulin Cc: Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, Kai-Heng Feng, Daniel Vetter, Zenghui Yu On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > supported as result. > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, though? BR, Jani. > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > acpi_handle dhandle; > union acpi_object *obj; > + int supported = 0; > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > if (!dhandle) > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > - if (obj) > + if (obj) { > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > + supported = obj->integer.value; > + > ACPI_FREE(obj); > + } > + > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > + NULL); > + if (obj) > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > + } > } > > /* -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-16 8:06 ` Jani Nikula 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Jani Nikula @ 2022-08-16 8:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kai-Heng Feng, joonas.lahtinen, rodrigo.vivi, tvrtko.ursulin Cc: Kai-Heng Feng, David Airlie, Daniel Vetter, Ville Syrjälä, Zenghui Yu, Lyude Paul, Hans de Goede, Heikki Krogerus, intel-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > supported as result. > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, though? BR, Jani. > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > acpi_handle dhandle; > union acpi_object *obj; > + int supported = 0; > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > if (!dhandle) > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > - if (obj) > + if (obj) { > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > + supported = obj->integer.value; > + > ACPI_FREE(obj); > + } > + > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > + NULL); > + if (obj) > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > + } > } > > /* -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-16 8:06 ` Jani Nikula 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Jani Nikula @ 2022-08-16 8:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kai-Heng Feng, joonas.lahtinen, rodrigo.vivi, tvrtko.ursulin Cc: Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, Hans de Goede, Kai-Heng Feng, Zenghui Yu On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > supported as result. > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, though? BR, Jani. > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > acpi_handle dhandle; > union acpi_object *obj; > + int supported = 0; > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > if (!dhandle) > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > - if (obj) > + if (obj) { > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > + supported = obj->integer.value; > + > ACPI_FREE(obj); > + } > + > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > + NULL); > + if (obj) > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > + } > } > > /* -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported 2022-08-16 8:06 ` Jani Nikula (?) @ 2022-08-16 11:29 ` Kai-Heng Feng -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Kai-Heng Feng @ 2022-08-16 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jani Nikula Cc: Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, Daniel Vetter, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:06 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > supported as result. > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > though? I believes so, so more external monitors can be supported at the same time. Kai-Heng > > BR, > Jani. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > union acpi_object *obj; > > + int supported = 0; > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > if (!dhandle) > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > - if (obj) > > + if (obj) { > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > + > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > + } > > + > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > + NULL); > > + if (obj) > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > + } > > } > > > > /* > > -- > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-16 11:29 ` Kai-Heng Feng 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Kai-Heng Feng @ 2022-08-16 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jani Nikula Cc: tvrtko.ursulin, Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, Hans de Goede, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:06 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > supported as result. > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > though? I believes so, so more external monitors can be supported at the same time. Kai-Heng > > BR, > Jani. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > union acpi_object *obj; > > + int supported = 0; > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > if (!dhandle) > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > - if (obj) > > + if (obj) { > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > + > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > + } > > + > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > + NULL); > > + if (obj) > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > + } > > } > > > > /* > > -- > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-16 11:29 ` Kai-Heng Feng 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Kai-Heng Feng @ 2022-08-16 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jani Nikula Cc: joonas.lahtinen, rodrigo.vivi, tvrtko.ursulin, David Airlie, Daniel Vetter, Ville Syrjälä, Zenghui Yu, Lyude Paul, Hans de Goede, Heikki Krogerus, intel-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:06 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > supported as result. > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > though? I believes so, so more external monitors can be supported at the same time. Kai-Heng > > BR, > Jani. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > union acpi_object *obj; > > + int supported = 0; > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > if (!dhandle) > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > - if (obj) > > + if (obj) { > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > + > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > + } > > + > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > + NULL); > > + if (obj) > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > + } > > } > > > > /* > > -- > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported 2022-08-16 11:29 ` Kai-Heng Feng (?) @ 2022-08-16 18:24 ` Lyude Paul -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Lyude Paul @ 2022-08-16 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kai-Heng Feng, Jani Nikula Cc: joonas.lahtinen, rodrigo.vivi, tvrtko.ursulin, David Airlie, Daniel Vetter, Ville Syrjälä, Zenghui Yu, Hans de Goede, Heikki Krogerus, intel-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 19:29 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:06 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > supported as result. > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. Is this documentation released anywhere? We've been wondering about these interfaces for quite a long time, and it would be good to know if there's docs for this we haven't really been seeing. > > > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > > though? > > I believes so, so more external monitors can be supported at the same time. > > Kai-Heng Is this for systems with dual Intel GPUs? I ask because if this affects Intel/Nvidia hybrid systems then this is a huge no from me. Nouveau is able to support these systems, but at a limited capacity. This would imply that we are making external displays work for users of the nvidia proprietary driver, at the expense making external display support for mainline kernel users substantially worse for people who are using the mainline kernel. Which isn't a choice we should be making, because nvidia's OOT driver is not a mainline kernel driver. If this is just for Intel/Intel systems though that's probably fine, and it might also be fine for AMD systems. > > > > > BR, > > Jani. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > > union acpi_object *obj; > > > + int supported = 0; > > > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > > if (!dhandle) > > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > > - if (obj) > > > + if (obj) { > > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > > + > > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > + } > > > + > > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > > + NULL); > > > + if (obj) > > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > + } > > > } > > > > > > /* > > > > -- > > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center > -- Cheers, Lyude Paul (she/her) Software Engineer at Red Hat ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-16 18:24 ` Lyude Paul 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Lyude Paul @ 2022-08-16 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kai-Heng Feng, Jani Nikula Cc: Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, Daniel Vetter, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 19:29 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:06 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > supported as result. > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. Is this documentation released anywhere? We've been wondering about these interfaces for quite a long time, and it would be good to know if there's docs for this we haven't really been seeing. > > > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > > though? > > I believes so, so more external monitors can be supported at the same time. > > Kai-Heng Is this for systems with dual Intel GPUs? I ask because if this affects Intel/Nvidia hybrid systems then this is a huge no from me. Nouveau is able to support these systems, but at a limited capacity. This would imply that we are making external displays work for users of the nvidia proprietary driver, at the expense making external display support for mainline kernel users substantially worse for people who are using the mainline kernel. Which isn't a choice we should be making, because nvidia's OOT driver is not a mainline kernel driver. If this is just for Intel/Intel systems though that's probably fine, and it might also be fine for AMD systems. > > > > > BR, > > Jani. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > > union acpi_object *obj; > > > + int supported = 0; > > > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > > if (!dhandle) > > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > > - if (obj) > > > + if (obj) { > > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > > + > > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > + } > > > + > > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > > + NULL); > > > + if (obj) > > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > + } > > > } > > > > > > /* > > > > -- > > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center > -- Cheers, Lyude Paul (she/her) Software Engineer at Red Hat ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-16 18:24 ` Lyude Paul 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Lyude Paul @ 2022-08-16 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kai-Heng Feng, Jani Nikula Cc: tvrtko.ursulin, Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, Hans de Goede, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 19:29 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:06 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > supported as result. > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. Is this documentation released anywhere? We've been wondering about these interfaces for quite a long time, and it would be good to know if there's docs for this we haven't really been seeing. > > > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > > though? > > I believes so, so more external monitors can be supported at the same time. > > Kai-Heng Is this for systems with dual Intel GPUs? I ask because if this affects Intel/Nvidia hybrid systems then this is a huge no from me. Nouveau is able to support these systems, but at a limited capacity. This would imply that we are making external displays work for users of the nvidia proprietary driver, at the expense making external display support for mainline kernel users substantially worse for people who are using the mainline kernel. Which isn't a choice we should be making, because nvidia's OOT driver is not a mainline kernel driver. If this is just for Intel/Intel systems though that's probably fine, and it might also be fine for AMD systems. > > > > > BR, > > Jani. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > > union acpi_object *obj; > > > + int supported = 0; > > > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > > if (!dhandle) > > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > > - if (obj) > > > + if (obj) { > > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > > + > > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > + } > > > + > > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > > + NULL); > > > + if (obj) > > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > + } > > > } > > > > > > /* > > > > -- > > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center > -- Cheers, Lyude Paul (she/her) Software Engineer at Red Hat ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported 2022-08-16 18:24 ` Lyude Paul (?) @ 2022-08-16 18:36 ` Lyude Paul -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Lyude Paul @ 2022-08-16 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kai-Heng Feng, Jani Nikula Cc: joonas.lahtinen, rodrigo.vivi, tvrtko.ursulin, David Airlie, Daniel Vetter, Ville Syrjälä, Zenghui Yu, Hans de Goede, Heikki Krogerus, intel-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 14:24 -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 19:29 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:06 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > > supported as result. > > > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > Is this documentation released anywhere? We've been wondering about these > interfaces for quite a long time, and it would be good to know if there's docs > for this we haven't really been seeing. > > > > > > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > > > though? > > > > I believes so, so more external monitors can be supported at the same time. > > > > Kai-Heng > > Is this for systems with dual Intel GPUs? I ask because if this affects > Intel/Nvidia hybrid systems then this is a huge no from me. Nouveau is able to > support these systems, but at a limited capacity. This would imply that we are > making external displays work for users of the nvidia proprietary driver, at > the expense making external display support for mainline kernel users > substantially worse for people who are using the mainline kernel. Which isn't > a choice we should be making, because nvidia's OOT driver is not a mainline > kernel driver. Doing some quick research, unless the models mentioned in the commit message are unreleased some of them are definitely Intel/Nvidia hybrids. So I'm going to say: NAK-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> If you'd like to resubmit this for systems with amdgpus and Intel only, that's perfectly fine with me if the Intel folks are ok with it. But please hold off on this for Nvidia systems, at least until we've got GSP reworks functional in nouveau. If nvidia's interested in making this work for their driver, they're welcome to do the work there. For reference: the main limitations you would hit as a result of this patch would be lagginess on the external displays as a result of us not being able to reclock the GPU, which means PCIe bandwidth will be pretty limited. > > If this is just for Intel/Intel systems though that's probably fine, and it > might also be fine for AMD systems. > > > > > > > > > BR, > > > Jani. > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > > > union acpi_object *obj; > > > > + int supported = 0; > > > > > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > > > if (!dhandle) > > > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > > > - if (obj) > > > > + if (obj) { > > > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > > > + > > > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > > > + NULL); > > > > + if (obj) > > > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > + } > > > > } > > > > > > > > /* > > > > > > -- > > > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center > > > -- Cheers, Lyude Paul (she/her) Software Engineer at Red Hat ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-16 18:36 ` Lyude Paul 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Lyude Paul @ 2022-08-16 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kai-Heng Feng, Jani Nikula Cc: Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, Daniel Vetter, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 14:24 -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 19:29 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:06 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > > supported as result. > > > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > Is this documentation released anywhere? We've been wondering about these > interfaces for quite a long time, and it would be good to know if there's docs > for this we haven't really been seeing. > > > > > > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > > > though? > > > > I believes so, so more external monitors can be supported at the same time. > > > > Kai-Heng > > Is this for systems with dual Intel GPUs? I ask because if this affects > Intel/Nvidia hybrid systems then this is a huge no from me. Nouveau is able to > support these systems, but at a limited capacity. This would imply that we are > making external displays work for users of the nvidia proprietary driver, at > the expense making external display support for mainline kernel users > substantially worse for people who are using the mainline kernel. Which isn't > a choice we should be making, because nvidia's OOT driver is not a mainline > kernel driver. Doing some quick research, unless the models mentioned in the commit message are unreleased some of them are definitely Intel/Nvidia hybrids. So I'm going to say: NAK-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> If you'd like to resubmit this for systems with amdgpus and Intel only, that's perfectly fine with me if the Intel folks are ok with it. But please hold off on this for Nvidia systems, at least until we've got GSP reworks functional in nouveau. If nvidia's interested in making this work for their driver, they're welcome to do the work there. For reference: the main limitations you would hit as a result of this patch would be lagginess on the external displays as a result of us not being able to reclock the GPU, which means PCIe bandwidth will be pretty limited. > > If this is just for Intel/Intel systems though that's probably fine, and it > might also be fine for AMD systems. > > > > > > > > > BR, > > > Jani. > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > > > union acpi_object *obj; > > > > + int supported = 0; > > > > > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > > > if (!dhandle) > > > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > > > - if (obj) > > > > + if (obj) { > > > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > > > + > > > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > > > + NULL); > > > > + if (obj) > > > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > + } > > > > } > > > > > > > > /* > > > > > > -- > > > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center > > > -- Cheers, Lyude Paul (she/her) Software Engineer at Red Hat ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-16 18:36 ` Lyude Paul 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Lyude Paul @ 2022-08-16 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kai-Heng Feng, Jani Nikula Cc: tvrtko.ursulin, Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, Hans de Goede, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 14:24 -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 19:29 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:06 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > > supported as result. > > > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > Is this documentation released anywhere? We've been wondering about these > interfaces for quite a long time, and it would be good to know if there's docs > for this we haven't really been seeing. > > > > > > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > > > though? > > > > I believes so, so more external monitors can be supported at the same time. > > > > Kai-Heng > > Is this for systems with dual Intel GPUs? I ask because if this affects > Intel/Nvidia hybrid systems then this is a huge no from me. Nouveau is able to > support these systems, but at a limited capacity. This would imply that we are > making external displays work for users of the nvidia proprietary driver, at > the expense making external display support for mainline kernel users > substantially worse for people who are using the mainline kernel. Which isn't > a choice we should be making, because nvidia's OOT driver is not a mainline > kernel driver. Doing some quick research, unless the models mentioned in the commit message are unreleased some of them are definitely Intel/Nvidia hybrids. So I'm going to say: NAK-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> If you'd like to resubmit this for systems with amdgpus and Intel only, that's perfectly fine with me if the Intel folks are ok with it. But please hold off on this for Nvidia systems, at least until we've got GSP reworks functional in nouveau. If nvidia's interested in making this work for their driver, they're welcome to do the work there. For reference: the main limitations you would hit as a result of this patch would be lagginess on the external displays as a result of us not being able to reclock the GPU, which means PCIe bandwidth will be pretty limited. > > If this is just for Intel/Intel systems though that's probably fine, and it > might also be fine for AMD systems. > > > > > > > > > BR, > > > Jani. > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > > > union acpi_object *obj; > > > > + int supported = 0; > > > > > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > > > if (!dhandle) > > > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > > > - if (obj) > > > > + if (obj) { > > > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > > > + > > > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > > > + NULL); > > > > + if (obj) > > > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > + } > > > > } > > > > > > > > /* > > > > > > -- > > > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center > > > -- Cheers, Lyude Paul (she/her) Software Engineer at Red Hat ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported 2022-08-16 18:36 ` Lyude Paul (?) @ 2022-08-17 1:08 ` Kai-Heng Feng -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Kai-Heng Feng @ 2022-08-17 1:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lyude Paul Cc: Jani Nikula, joonas.lahtinen, rodrigo.vivi, tvrtko.ursulin, David Airlie, Daniel Vetter, Ville Syrjälä, Zenghui Yu, Hans de Goede, Heikki Krogerus, intel-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:36 AM Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 14:24 -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > > On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 19:29 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:06 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > > > supported as result. > > > > > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > > > Is this documentation released anywhere? We've been wondering about these > > interfaces for quite a long time, and it would be good to know if there's docs > > for this we haven't really been seeing. > > > > > > > > > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > > > > though? > > > > > > I believes so, so more external monitors can be supported at the same time. > > > > > > Kai-Heng > > > > Is this for systems with dual Intel GPUs? I ask because if this affects > > Intel/Nvidia hybrid systems then this is a huge no from me. Nouveau is able to > > support these systems, but at a limited capacity. This would imply that we are > > making external displays work for users of the nvidia proprietary driver, at > > the expense making external display support for mainline kernel users > > substantially worse for people who are using the mainline kernel. Which isn't > > a choice we should be making, because nvidia's OOT driver is not a mainline > > kernel driver. > > Doing some quick research, unless the models mentioned in the commit message > are unreleased some of them are definitely Intel/Nvidia hybrids. So I'm going > to say: > > NAK-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> > > If you'd like to resubmit this for systems with amdgpus and Intel only, that's > perfectly fine with me if the Intel folks are ok with it. But please hold off > on this for Nvidia systems, at least until we've got GSP reworks functional in > nouveau. If nvidia's interested in making this work for their driver, they're > welcome to do the work there. For reference: the main limitations you would > hit as a result of this patch would be lagginess on the external displays as a > result of us not being able to reclock the GPU, which means PCIe bandwidth > will be pretty limited. The change should be agnostic to any discrete GPU, so I don't think it's easy to make i915 be aware of the presence of AMD or NVIDIA. As I replied in previous mail, the external displays may not even work on Intel GPU, so I really hope we can get this merged. Will the 'GSP rework' finish anytime soon? Kai-Heng > > > > > If this is just for Intel/Intel systems though that's probably fine, and it > > might also be fine for AMD systems. > > > > > > > > > > > > > BR, > > > > Jani. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > > > > --- > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > > > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > > > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > > > > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > > > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > > > > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > > > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > > > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > > > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > > > > union acpi_object *obj; > > > > > + int supported = 0; > > > > > > > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > > > > if (!dhandle) > > > > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > > > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > > > > - if (obj) > > > > > + if (obj) { > > > > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > > > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > > > > + > > > > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > > + } > > > > > + > > > > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > > > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > > > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > > > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > > > > + NULL); > > > > > + if (obj) > > > > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > > + } > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > /* > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center > > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Lyude Paul (she/her) > Software Engineer at Red Hat > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-17 1:08 ` Kai-Heng Feng 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Kai-Heng Feng @ 2022-08-17 1:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lyude Paul Cc: Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, Daniel Vetter, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:36 AM Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 14:24 -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > > On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 19:29 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:06 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > > > supported as result. > > > > > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > > > Is this documentation released anywhere? We've been wondering about these > > interfaces for quite a long time, and it would be good to know if there's docs > > for this we haven't really been seeing. > > > > > > > > > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > > > > though? > > > > > > I believes so, so more external monitors can be supported at the same time. > > > > > > Kai-Heng > > > > Is this for systems with dual Intel GPUs? I ask because if this affects > > Intel/Nvidia hybrid systems then this is a huge no from me. Nouveau is able to > > support these systems, but at a limited capacity. This would imply that we are > > making external displays work for users of the nvidia proprietary driver, at > > the expense making external display support for mainline kernel users > > substantially worse for people who are using the mainline kernel. Which isn't > > a choice we should be making, because nvidia's OOT driver is not a mainline > > kernel driver. > > Doing some quick research, unless the models mentioned in the commit message > are unreleased some of them are definitely Intel/Nvidia hybrids. So I'm going > to say: > > NAK-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> > > If you'd like to resubmit this for systems with amdgpus and Intel only, that's > perfectly fine with me if the Intel folks are ok with it. But please hold off > on this for Nvidia systems, at least until we've got GSP reworks functional in > nouveau. If nvidia's interested in making this work for their driver, they're > welcome to do the work there. For reference: the main limitations you would > hit as a result of this patch would be lagginess on the external displays as a > result of us not being able to reclock the GPU, which means PCIe bandwidth > will be pretty limited. The change should be agnostic to any discrete GPU, so I don't think it's easy to make i915 be aware of the presence of AMD or NVIDIA. As I replied in previous mail, the external displays may not even work on Intel GPU, so I really hope we can get this merged. Will the 'GSP rework' finish anytime soon? Kai-Heng > > > > > If this is just for Intel/Intel systems though that's probably fine, and it > > might also be fine for AMD systems. > > > > > > > > > > > > > BR, > > > > Jani. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > > > > --- > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > > > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > > > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > > > > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > > > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > > > > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > > > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > > > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > > > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > > > > union acpi_object *obj; > > > > > + int supported = 0; > > > > > > > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > > > > if (!dhandle) > > > > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > > > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > > > > - if (obj) > > > > > + if (obj) { > > > > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > > > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > > > > + > > > > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > > + } > > > > > + > > > > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > > > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > > > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > > > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > > > > + NULL); > > > > > + if (obj) > > > > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > > + } > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > /* > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center > > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Lyude Paul (she/her) > Software Engineer at Red Hat > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-17 1:08 ` Kai-Heng Feng 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Kai-Heng Feng @ 2022-08-17 1:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lyude Paul Cc: tvrtko.ursulin, Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, Hans de Goede, dri-devel, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:36 AM Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 14:24 -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > > On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 19:29 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:06 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > > > supported as result. > > > > > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > > > Is this documentation released anywhere? We've been wondering about these > > interfaces for quite a long time, and it would be good to know if there's docs > > for this we haven't really been seeing. > > > > > > > > > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > > > > though? > > > > > > I believes so, so more external monitors can be supported at the same time. > > > > > > Kai-Heng > > > > Is this for systems with dual Intel GPUs? I ask because if this affects > > Intel/Nvidia hybrid systems then this is a huge no from me. Nouveau is able to > > support these systems, but at a limited capacity. This would imply that we are > > making external displays work for users of the nvidia proprietary driver, at > > the expense making external display support for mainline kernel users > > substantially worse for people who are using the mainline kernel. Which isn't > > a choice we should be making, because nvidia's OOT driver is not a mainline > > kernel driver. > > Doing some quick research, unless the models mentioned in the commit message > are unreleased some of them are definitely Intel/Nvidia hybrids. So I'm going > to say: > > NAK-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> > > If you'd like to resubmit this for systems with amdgpus and Intel only, that's > perfectly fine with me if the Intel folks are ok with it. But please hold off > on this for Nvidia systems, at least until we've got GSP reworks functional in > nouveau. If nvidia's interested in making this work for their driver, they're > welcome to do the work there. For reference: the main limitations you would > hit as a result of this patch would be lagginess on the external displays as a > result of us not being able to reclock the GPU, which means PCIe bandwidth > will be pretty limited. The change should be agnostic to any discrete GPU, so I don't think it's easy to make i915 be aware of the presence of AMD or NVIDIA. As I replied in previous mail, the external displays may not even work on Intel GPU, so I really hope we can get this merged. Will the 'GSP rework' finish anytime soon? Kai-Heng > > > > > If this is just for Intel/Intel systems though that's probably fine, and it > > might also be fine for AMD systems. > > > > > > > > > > > > > BR, > > > > Jani. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > > > > --- > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > > > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > > > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > > > > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > > > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > > > > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > > > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > > > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > > > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > > > > union acpi_object *obj; > > > > > + int supported = 0; > > > > > > > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > > > > if (!dhandle) > > > > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > > > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > > > > - if (obj) > > > > > + if (obj) { > > > > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > > > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > > > > + > > > > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > > + } > > > > > + > > > > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > > > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > > > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > > > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > > > > + NULL); > > > > > + if (obj) > > > > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > > + } > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > /* > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center > > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Lyude Paul (she/her) > Software Engineer at Red Hat > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported 2022-08-16 18:24 ` Lyude Paul (?) @ 2022-08-17 1:02 ` Kai-Heng Feng -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Kai-Heng Feng @ 2022-08-17 1:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lyude Paul Cc: Jani Nikula, joonas.lahtinen, rodrigo.vivi, tvrtko.ursulin, David Airlie, Daniel Vetter, Ville Syrjälä, Zenghui Yu, Hans de Goede, Heikki Krogerus, intel-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:24 AM Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 19:29 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:06 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > > supported as result. > > > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > Is this documentation released anywhere? We've been wondering about these > interfaces for quite a long time, and it would be good to know if there's docs > for this we haven't really been seeing. > > > > > > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > > > though? > > > > I believes so, so more external monitors can be supported at the same time. > > > > Kai-Heng > > Is this for systems with dual Intel GPUs? I ask because if this affects > Intel/Nvidia hybrid systems then this is a huge no from me. Nouveau is able to > support these systems, but at a limited capacity. This would imply that we are > making external displays work for users of the nvidia proprietary driver, at > the expense making external display support for mainline kernel users > substantially worse for people who are using the mainline kernel. Which isn't > a choice we should be making, because nvidia's OOT driver is not a mainline > kernel driver. Yes it's for Intel/NVIDIA hybrid systems. The problem is that hardware vendor design the systems to use NVIDIA for external displays, so using external displays on Intel are never tested by the vendors. I don't think that's any good either. Kai-Heng > > If this is just for Intel/Intel systems though that's probably fine, and it > might also be fine for AMD systems. > > > > > > > > > BR, > > > Jani. > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > > > union acpi_object *obj; > > > > + int supported = 0; > > > > > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > > > if (!dhandle) > > > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > > > - if (obj) > > > > + if (obj) { > > > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > > > + > > > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > > > + NULL); > > > > + if (obj) > > > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > + } > > > > } > > > > > > > > /* > > > > > > -- > > > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center > > > > -- > Cheers, > Lyude Paul (she/her) > Software Engineer at Red Hat > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-17 1:02 ` Kai-Heng Feng 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Kai-Heng Feng @ 2022-08-17 1:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lyude Paul Cc: tvrtko.ursulin, Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, Hans de Goede, dri-devel, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:24 AM Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 19:29 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:06 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > > supported as result. > > > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > Is this documentation released anywhere? We've been wondering about these > interfaces for quite a long time, and it would be good to know if there's docs > for this we haven't really been seeing. > > > > > > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > > > though? > > > > I believes so, so more external monitors can be supported at the same time. > > > > Kai-Heng > > Is this for systems with dual Intel GPUs? I ask because if this affects > Intel/Nvidia hybrid systems then this is a huge no from me. Nouveau is able to > support these systems, but at a limited capacity. This would imply that we are > making external displays work for users of the nvidia proprietary driver, at > the expense making external display support for mainline kernel users > substantially worse for people who are using the mainline kernel. Which isn't > a choice we should be making, because nvidia's OOT driver is not a mainline > kernel driver. Yes it's for Intel/NVIDIA hybrid systems. The problem is that hardware vendor design the systems to use NVIDIA for external displays, so using external displays on Intel are never tested by the vendors. I don't think that's any good either. Kai-Heng > > If this is just for Intel/Intel systems though that's probably fine, and it > might also be fine for AMD systems. > > > > > > > > > BR, > > > Jani. > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > > > union acpi_object *obj; > > > > + int supported = 0; > > > > > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > > > if (!dhandle) > > > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > > > - if (obj) > > > > + if (obj) { > > > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > > > + > > > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > > > + NULL); > > > > + if (obj) > > > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > + } > > > > } > > > > > > > > /* > > > > > > -- > > > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center > > > > -- > Cheers, > Lyude Paul (she/her) > Software Engineer at Red Hat > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-17 1:02 ` Kai-Heng Feng 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Kai-Heng Feng @ 2022-08-17 1:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lyude Paul Cc: Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, Daniel Vetter, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:24 AM Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 19:29 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:06 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > > supported as result. > > > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > Is this documentation released anywhere? We've been wondering about these > interfaces for quite a long time, and it would be good to know if there's docs > for this we haven't really been seeing. > > > > > > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > > > though? > > > > I believes so, so more external monitors can be supported at the same time. > > > > Kai-Heng > > Is this for systems with dual Intel GPUs? I ask because if this affects > Intel/Nvidia hybrid systems then this is a huge no from me. Nouveau is able to > support these systems, but at a limited capacity. This would imply that we are > making external displays work for users of the nvidia proprietary driver, at > the expense making external display support for mainline kernel users > substantially worse for people who are using the mainline kernel. Which isn't > a choice we should be making, because nvidia's OOT driver is not a mainline > kernel driver. Yes it's for Intel/NVIDIA hybrid systems. The problem is that hardware vendor design the systems to use NVIDIA for external displays, so using external displays on Intel are never tested by the vendors. I don't think that's any good either. Kai-Heng > > If this is just for Intel/Intel systems though that's probably fine, and it > might also be fine for AMD systems. > > > > > > > > > BR, > > > Jani. > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > > > union acpi_object *obj; > > > > + int supported = 0; > > > > > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > > > if (!dhandle) > > > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > > > - if (obj) > > > > + if (obj) { > > > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > > > + > > > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > > > + NULL); > > > > + if (obj) > > > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > + } > > > > } > > > > > > > > /* > > > > > > -- > > > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center > > > > -- > Cheers, > Lyude Paul (she/her) > Software Engineer at Red Hat > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported 2022-08-17 1:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Kai-Heng Feng (?) @ 2022-08-17 17:56 ` Lyude Paul -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Lyude Paul @ 2022-08-17 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kai-Heng Feng, Mark Pearson Cc: Jani Nikula, joonas.lahtinen, rodrigo.vivi, tvrtko.ursulin, David Airlie, Daniel Vetter, Ville Syrjälä, Zenghui Yu, Hans de Goede, Heikki Krogerus, intel-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel Adding Mark Pearson from Lenovo to this, Mark for reference the original patch is here: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/497807/?series=107312&rev=1 Comments from me down below On Wed, 2022-08-17 at 09:02 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:24 AM Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 19:29 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:06 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > > > supported as result. > > > > > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > > > Is this documentation released anywhere? We've been wondering about these > > interfaces for quite a long time, and it would be good to know if there's docs > > for this we haven't really been seeing. > > > > > > > > > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > > > > though? > > > > > > I believes so, so more external monitors can be supported at the same time. > > > > > > Kai-Heng > > > > Is this for systems with dual Intel GPUs? I ask because if this affects > > Intel/Nvidia hybrid systems then this is a huge no from me. Nouveau is able to > > support these systems, but at a limited capacity. This would imply that we are > > making external displays work for users of the nvidia proprietary driver, at > > the expense making external display support for mainline kernel users > > substantially worse for people who are using the mainline kernel. Which isn't > > a choice we should be making, because nvidia's OOT driver is not a mainline > > kernel driver. > > Yes it's for Intel/NVIDIA hybrid systems. > > The problem is that hardware vendor design the systems to use NVIDIA > for external displays, so using external displays on Intel are never > tested by the vendors. > I don't think that's any good either. > Sigh, the constant forcing of nvidia hardware into laptops from vendors is seriously something I wish they would knock it off with considering they're basically the most difficult hardware vendor to work with. Anyway, if we -need- to route displays through the external GPU then we can. But I'd like to at least get convinced first that this is an actual necessity we should expect for multiple vendors, or the exception to the rule. Because if these laptops are capable of driving displays through Intel, at the moment not doing that is a huge downgrade in terms of functionality. -Especially- if these machines were already working in the field as-is. Probably worth noting I don't think I have yet to actually hear of any complaints about this being the case, and I'd like to also make sure this isn't a change being done for one or two vendors when most vendors aren't actually doing something like this. Note that for a lot of systems it won't -technically- be a big difference since the current situation in the market right now is that a lot of laptops will have all their external displays routed through the nvidia GPU and nowhere else. It's not great compared to just being able to use the well supported Intel GPU for everything though. And if we're controlling display routing through ACPI, that implies things aren't directly hooked up and someone went through the hassle of adding a display mux - which kind of seems like a waste of engineering effort and money if it can't actually be used for muxing between the two GPUs. Especially considering that up until very recently muxes had more or less been dropped from the majority of laptop vendors (I think Dell was an exception for this fwiw). Mark, since you're from Lenovo can you help to confirm this as well? Also re: external displays not even working: so then how exactly does the BIOS handle this? Is the BIOS changing the routing to the nvidia GPU then switching it back right before the OS load? I assume something must have been done to make it so that external displays aren't just suddenly broken there. And re: gsp work being done soon: it's going to be a while unfortunately, there's a lot for us to catch up on so it's hard for me to give a precise date. > Kai-Heng > > > > > If this is just for Intel/Intel systems though that's probably fine, and it > > might also be fine for AMD systems. > > > > > > > > > > > > > BR, > > > > Jani. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > > > > --- > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > > > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > > > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > > > > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > > > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > > > > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > > > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > > > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > > > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > > > > union acpi_object *obj; > > > > > + int supported = 0; > > > > > > > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > > > > if (!dhandle) > > > > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > > > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > > > > - if (obj) > > > > > + if (obj) { > > > > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > > > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > > > > + > > > > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > > + } > > > > > + > > > > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > > > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > > > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > > > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > > > > + NULL); > > > > > + if (obj) > > > > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > > + } > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > /* > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center > > > > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > Lyude Paul (she/her) > > Software Engineer at Red Hat > > > -- Cheers, Lyude Paul (she/her) Software Engineer at Red Hat ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-17 17:56 ` Lyude Paul 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Lyude Paul @ 2022-08-17 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kai-Heng Feng, Mark Pearson Cc: tvrtko.ursulin, Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, Hans de Goede, dri-devel, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu Adding Mark Pearson from Lenovo to this, Mark for reference the original patch is here: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/497807/?series=107312&rev=1 Comments from me down below On Wed, 2022-08-17 at 09:02 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:24 AM Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 19:29 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:06 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > > > supported as result. > > > > > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > > > Is this documentation released anywhere? We've been wondering about these > > interfaces for quite a long time, and it would be good to know if there's docs > > for this we haven't really been seeing. > > > > > > > > > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > > > > though? > > > > > > I believes so, so more external monitors can be supported at the same time. > > > > > > Kai-Heng > > > > Is this for systems with dual Intel GPUs? I ask because if this affects > > Intel/Nvidia hybrid systems then this is a huge no from me. Nouveau is able to > > support these systems, but at a limited capacity. This would imply that we are > > making external displays work for users of the nvidia proprietary driver, at > > the expense making external display support for mainline kernel users > > substantially worse for people who are using the mainline kernel. Which isn't > > a choice we should be making, because nvidia's OOT driver is not a mainline > > kernel driver. > > Yes it's for Intel/NVIDIA hybrid systems. > > The problem is that hardware vendor design the systems to use NVIDIA > for external displays, so using external displays on Intel are never > tested by the vendors. > I don't think that's any good either. > Sigh, the constant forcing of nvidia hardware into laptops from vendors is seriously something I wish they would knock it off with considering they're basically the most difficult hardware vendor to work with. Anyway, if we -need- to route displays through the external GPU then we can. But I'd like to at least get convinced first that this is an actual necessity we should expect for multiple vendors, or the exception to the rule. Because if these laptops are capable of driving displays through Intel, at the moment not doing that is a huge downgrade in terms of functionality. -Especially- if these machines were already working in the field as-is. Probably worth noting I don't think I have yet to actually hear of any complaints about this being the case, and I'd like to also make sure this isn't a change being done for one or two vendors when most vendors aren't actually doing something like this. Note that for a lot of systems it won't -technically- be a big difference since the current situation in the market right now is that a lot of laptops will have all their external displays routed through the nvidia GPU and nowhere else. It's not great compared to just being able to use the well supported Intel GPU for everything though. And if we're controlling display routing through ACPI, that implies things aren't directly hooked up and someone went through the hassle of adding a display mux - which kind of seems like a waste of engineering effort and money if it can't actually be used for muxing between the two GPUs. Especially considering that up until very recently muxes had more or less been dropped from the majority of laptop vendors (I think Dell was an exception for this fwiw). Mark, since you're from Lenovo can you help to confirm this as well? Also re: external displays not even working: so then how exactly does the BIOS handle this? Is the BIOS changing the routing to the nvidia GPU then switching it back right before the OS load? I assume something must have been done to make it so that external displays aren't just suddenly broken there. And re: gsp work being done soon: it's going to be a while unfortunately, there's a lot for us to catch up on so it's hard for me to give a precise date. > Kai-Heng > > > > > If this is just for Intel/Intel systems though that's probably fine, and it > > might also be fine for AMD systems. > > > > > > > > > > > > > BR, > > > > Jani. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > > > > --- > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > > > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > > > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > > > > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > > > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > > > > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > > > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > > > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > > > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > > > > union acpi_object *obj; > > > > > + int supported = 0; > > > > > > > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > > > > if (!dhandle) > > > > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > > > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > > > > - if (obj) > > > > > + if (obj) { > > > > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > > > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > > > > + > > > > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > > + } > > > > > + > > > > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > > > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > > > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > > > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > > > > + NULL); > > > > > + if (obj) > > > > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > > + } > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > /* > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center > > > > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > Lyude Paul (she/her) > > Software Engineer at Red Hat > > > -- Cheers, Lyude Paul (she/her) Software Engineer at Red Hat ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-17 17:56 ` Lyude Paul 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Lyude Paul @ 2022-08-17 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kai-Heng Feng, Mark Pearson Cc: Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, Daniel Vetter, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu Adding Mark Pearson from Lenovo to this, Mark for reference the original patch is here: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/497807/?series=107312&rev=1 Comments from me down below On Wed, 2022-08-17 at 09:02 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:24 AM Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 19:29 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:06 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > > > supported as result. > > > > > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > > > Is this documentation released anywhere? We've been wondering about these > > interfaces for quite a long time, and it would be good to know if there's docs > > for this we haven't really been seeing. > > > > > > > > > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > > > > though? > > > > > > I believes so, so more external monitors can be supported at the same time. > > > > > > Kai-Heng > > > > Is this for systems with dual Intel GPUs? I ask because if this affects > > Intel/Nvidia hybrid systems then this is a huge no from me. Nouveau is able to > > support these systems, but at a limited capacity. This would imply that we are > > making external displays work for users of the nvidia proprietary driver, at > > the expense making external display support for mainline kernel users > > substantially worse for people who are using the mainline kernel. Which isn't > > a choice we should be making, because nvidia's OOT driver is not a mainline > > kernel driver. > > Yes it's for Intel/NVIDIA hybrid systems. > > The problem is that hardware vendor design the systems to use NVIDIA > for external displays, so using external displays on Intel are never > tested by the vendors. > I don't think that's any good either. > Sigh, the constant forcing of nvidia hardware into laptops from vendors is seriously something I wish they would knock it off with considering they're basically the most difficult hardware vendor to work with. Anyway, if we -need- to route displays through the external GPU then we can. But I'd like to at least get convinced first that this is an actual necessity we should expect for multiple vendors, or the exception to the rule. Because if these laptops are capable of driving displays through Intel, at the moment not doing that is a huge downgrade in terms of functionality. -Especially- if these machines were already working in the field as-is. Probably worth noting I don't think I have yet to actually hear of any complaints about this being the case, and I'd like to also make sure this isn't a change being done for one or two vendors when most vendors aren't actually doing something like this. Note that for a lot of systems it won't -technically- be a big difference since the current situation in the market right now is that a lot of laptops will have all their external displays routed through the nvidia GPU and nowhere else. It's not great compared to just being able to use the well supported Intel GPU for everything though. And if we're controlling display routing through ACPI, that implies things aren't directly hooked up and someone went through the hassle of adding a display mux - which kind of seems like a waste of engineering effort and money if it can't actually be used for muxing between the two GPUs. Especially considering that up until very recently muxes had more or less been dropped from the majority of laptop vendors (I think Dell was an exception for this fwiw). Mark, since you're from Lenovo can you help to confirm this as well? Also re: external displays not even working: so then how exactly does the BIOS handle this? Is the BIOS changing the routing to the nvidia GPU then switching it back right before the OS load? I assume something must have been done to make it so that external displays aren't just suddenly broken there. And re: gsp work being done soon: it's going to be a while unfortunately, there's a lot for us to catch up on so it's hard for me to give a precise date. > Kai-Heng > > > > > If this is just for Intel/Intel systems though that's probably fine, and it > > might also be fine for AMD systems. > > > > > > > > > > > > > BR, > > > > Jani. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > > > > --- > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > > > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > > > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > > > > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > > > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > > > > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > > > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > > > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > > > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > > > > union acpi_object *obj; > > > > > + int supported = 0; > > > > > > > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > > > > if (!dhandle) > > > > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > > > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > > > > - if (obj) > > > > > + if (obj) { > > > > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > > > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > > > > + > > > > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > > + } > > > > > + > > > > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > > > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > > > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > > > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > > > > + NULL); > > > > > + if (obj) > > > > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > > + } > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > /* > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center > > > > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > Lyude Paul (she/her) > > Software Engineer at Red Hat > > > -- Cheers, Lyude Paul (she/her) Software Engineer at Red Hat ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported 2022-08-17 17:56 ` [Intel-gfx] " Lyude Paul (?) @ 2022-08-18 20:26 ` Mark Pearson -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Mark Pearson @ 2022-08-18 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lyude Paul, Kai-Heng Feng Cc: Jani Nikula, joonas.lahtinen, rodrigo.vivi, tvrtko.ursulin, David Airlie, Daniel Vetter, Ville Syrjälä, Zenghui Yu, Hans de Goede, Heikki Krogerus, intel-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel On 2022-08-17 13:56, Lyude Paul wrote: > Adding Mark Pearson from Lenovo to this, Mark for reference the original patch > is here: > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/497807/?series=107312&rev=1>> > Comments from me down below > > On Wed, 2022-08-17 at 09:02 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:24 AM Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 19:29 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: >>>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:06 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: >>>>>> On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to >>>>>> dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be >>>>>> supported as result. >>>>>> >>>>>> To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 >>>>>> on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. >>> >>> Is this documentation released anywhere? We've been wondering about these >>> interfaces for quite a long time, and it would be good to know if there's docs >>> for this we haven't really been seeing. >>> >>>>> >>>>> Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, >>>>> though? >>>> >>>> I believes so, so more external monitors can be supported at the same time. >>>> >>>> Kai-Heng >>> >>> Is this for systems with dual Intel GPUs? I ask because if this affects >>> Intel/Nvidia hybrid systems then this is a huge no from me. Nouveau is able to >>> support these systems, but at a limited capacity. This would imply that we are >>> making external displays work for users of the nvidia proprietary driver, at >>> the expense making external display support for mainline kernel users >>> substantially worse for people who are using the mainline kernel. Which isn't >>> a choice we should be making, because nvidia's OOT driver is not a mainline >>> kernel driver. >> >> Yes it's for Intel/NVIDIA hybrid systems. >> >> The problem is that hardware vendor design the systems to use NVIDIA >> for external displays, so using external displays on Intel are never >> tested by the vendors. >> I don't think that's any good either. >> > > Sigh, the constant forcing of nvidia hardware into laptops from vendors is > seriously something I wish they would knock it off with considering they're > basically the most difficult hardware vendor to work with. > > Anyway, if we -need- to route displays through the external GPU then we can. > But I'd like to at least get convinced first that this is an actual necessity > we should expect for multiple vendors, or the exception to the rule. Because > if these laptops are capable of driving displays through Intel, at the moment > not doing that is a huge downgrade in terms of functionality. -Especially- if > these machines were already working in the field as-is. Probably worth noting > I don't think I have yet to actually hear of any complaints about this being > the case, and I'd like to also make sure this isn't a change being done for > one or two vendors when most vendors aren't actually doing something like > this. > > Note that for a lot of systems it won't -technically- be a big difference > since the current situation in the market right now is that a lot of laptops > will have all their external displays routed through the nvidia GPU and > nowhere else. It's not great compared to just being able to use the well > supported Intel GPU for everything though. And if we're controlling display > routing through ACPI, that implies things aren't directly hooked up and > someone went through the hassle of adding a display mux - which kind of seems > like a waste of engineering effort and money if it can't actually be used for > muxing between the two GPUs. Especially considering that up until very > recently muxes had more or less been dropped from the majority of laptop > vendors (I think Dell was an exception for this fwiw). > > Mark, since you're from Lenovo can you help to confirm this as well? I'll have to do some checking for this years models and get back to you I know on last years that we had a HW mux available on the P1. There wasn't one on the P17 (and I'm not sure about the P15). My understanding is the Intel display just wasn't available at all for external display on the P17 (and I do agree with your comments on the wiseness of this!). I believe it was hardwired with no way to switch it - we lost a sale from this, and if there had been an alternative we would have pursued it. I'll confirm with the HW/FW team. We also have lots of users on Legion gaming systems - but unfortunately I don't know what happens on those platforms as they're not in our Linux program. Mark ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [External] Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-18 20:26 ` Mark Pearson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Mark Pearson @ 2022-08-18 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lyude Paul, Kai-Heng Feng Cc: Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, Daniel Vetter, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On 2022-08-17 13:56, Lyude Paul wrote: > Adding Mark Pearson from Lenovo to this, Mark for reference the original patch > is here: > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/497807/?series=107312&rev=1>> > Comments from me down below > > On Wed, 2022-08-17 at 09:02 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:24 AM Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 19:29 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: >>>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:06 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: >>>>>> On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to >>>>>> dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be >>>>>> supported as result. >>>>>> >>>>>> To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 >>>>>> on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. >>> >>> Is this documentation released anywhere? We've been wondering about these >>> interfaces for quite a long time, and it would be good to know if there's docs >>> for this we haven't really been seeing. >>> >>>>> >>>>> Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, >>>>> though? >>>> >>>> I believes so, so more external monitors can be supported at the same time. >>>> >>>> Kai-Heng >>> >>> Is this for systems with dual Intel GPUs? I ask because if this affects >>> Intel/Nvidia hybrid systems then this is a huge no from me. Nouveau is able to >>> support these systems, but at a limited capacity. This would imply that we are >>> making external displays work for users of the nvidia proprietary driver, at >>> the expense making external display support for mainline kernel users >>> substantially worse for people who are using the mainline kernel. Which isn't >>> a choice we should be making, because nvidia's OOT driver is not a mainline >>> kernel driver. >> >> Yes it's for Intel/NVIDIA hybrid systems. >> >> The problem is that hardware vendor design the systems to use NVIDIA >> for external displays, so using external displays on Intel are never >> tested by the vendors. >> I don't think that's any good either. >> > > Sigh, the constant forcing of nvidia hardware into laptops from vendors is > seriously something I wish they would knock it off with considering they're > basically the most difficult hardware vendor to work with. > > Anyway, if we -need- to route displays through the external GPU then we can. > But I'd like to at least get convinced first that this is an actual necessity > we should expect for multiple vendors, or the exception to the rule. Because > if these laptops are capable of driving displays through Intel, at the moment > not doing that is a huge downgrade in terms of functionality. -Especially- if > these machines were already working in the field as-is. Probably worth noting > I don't think I have yet to actually hear of any complaints about this being > the case, and I'd like to also make sure this isn't a change being done for > one or two vendors when most vendors aren't actually doing something like > this. > > Note that for a lot of systems it won't -technically- be a big difference > since the current situation in the market right now is that a lot of laptops > will have all their external displays routed through the nvidia GPU and > nowhere else. It's not great compared to just being able to use the well > supported Intel GPU for everything though. And if we're controlling display > routing through ACPI, that implies things aren't directly hooked up and > someone went through the hassle of adding a display mux - which kind of seems > like a waste of engineering effort and money if it can't actually be used for > muxing between the two GPUs. Especially considering that up until very > recently muxes had more or less been dropped from the majority of laptop > vendors (I think Dell was an exception for this fwiw). > > Mark, since you're from Lenovo can you help to confirm this as well? I'll have to do some checking for this years models and get back to you I know on last years that we had a HW mux available on the P1. There wasn't one on the P17 (and I'm not sure about the P15). My understanding is the Intel display just wasn't available at all for external display on the P17 (and I do agree with your comments on the wiseness of this!). I believe it was hardwired with no way to switch it - we lost a sale from this, and if there had been an alternative we would have pursued it. I'll confirm with the HW/FW team. We also have lots of users on Legion gaming systems - but unfortunately I don't know what happens on those platforms as they're not in our Linux program. Mark ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-18 20:26 ` Mark Pearson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Mark Pearson @ 2022-08-18 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lyude Paul, Kai-Heng Feng Cc: tvrtko.ursulin, Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, Hans de Goede, dri-devel, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On 2022-08-17 13:56, Lyude Paul wrote: > Adding Mark Pearson from Lenovo to this, Mark for reference the original patch > is here: > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/497807/?series=107312&rev=1>> > Comments from me down below > > On Wed, 2022-08-17 at 09:02 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:24 AM Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 19:29 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: >>>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:06 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: >>>>>> On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to >>>>>> dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be >>>>>> supported as result. >>>>>> >>>>>> To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 >>>>>> on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. >>> >>> Is this documentation released anywhere? We've been wondering about these >>> interfaces for quite a long time, and it would be good to know if there's docs >>> for this we haven't really been seeing. >>> >>>>> >>>>> Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, >>>>> though? >>>> >>>> I believes so, so more external monitors can be supported at the same time. >>>> >>>> Kai-Heng >>> >>> Is this for systems with dual Intel GPUs? I ask because if this affects >>> Intel/Nvidia hybrid systems then this is a huge no from me. Nouveau is able to >>> support these systems, but at a limited capacity. This would imply that we are >>> making external displays work for users of the nvidia proprietary driver, at >>> the expense making external display support for mainline kernel users >>> substantially worse for people who are using the mainline kernel. Which isn't >>> a choice we should be making, because nvidia's OOT driver is not a mainline >>> kernel driver. >> >> Yes it's for Intel/NVIDIA hybrid systems. >> >> The problem is that hardware vendor design the systems to use NVIDIA >> for external displays, so using external displays on Intel are never >> tested by the vendors. >> I don't think that's any good either. >> > > Sigh, the constant forcing of nvidia hardware into laptops from vendors is > seriously something I wish they would knock it off with considering they're > basically the most difficult hardware vendor to work with. > > Anyway, if we -need- to route displays through the external GPU then we can. > But I'd like to at least get convinced first that this is an actual necessity > we should expect for multiple vendors, or the exception to the rule. Because > if these laptops are capable of driving displays through Intel, at the moment > not doing that is a huge downgrade in terms of functionality. -Especially- if > these machines were already working in the field as-is. Probably worth noting > I don't think I have yet to actually hear of any complaints about this being > the case, and I'd like to also make sure this isn't a change being done for > one or two vendors when most vendors aren't actually doing something like > this. > > Note that for a lot of systems it won't -technically- be a big difference > since the current situation in the market right now is that a lot of laptops > will have all their external displays routed through the nvidia GPU and > nowhere else. It's not great compared to just being able to use the well > supported Intel GPU for everything though. And if we're controlling display > routing through ACPI, that implies things aren't directly hooked up and > someone went through the hassle of adding a display mux - which kind of seems > like a waste of engineering effort and money if it can't actually be used for > muxing between the two GPUs. Especially considering that up until very > recently muxes had more or less been dropped from the majority of laptop > vendors (I think Dell was an exception for this fwiw). > > Mark, since you're from Lenovo can you help to confirm this as well? I'll have to do some checking for this years models and get back to you I know on last years that we had a HW mux available on the P1. There wasn't one on the P17 (and I'm not sure about the P15). My understanding is the Intel display just wasn't available at all for external display on the P17 (and I do agree with your comments on the wiseness of this!). I believe it was hardwired with no way to switch it - we lost a sale from this, and if there had been an alternative we would have pursued it. I'll confirm with the HW/FW team. We also have lots of users on Legion gaming systems - but unfortunately I don't know what happens on those platforms as they're not in our Linux program. Mark ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported 2022-08-16 11:29 ` Kai-Heng Feng (?) @ 2022-08-24 18:33 ` Karol Herbst -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Karol Herbst @ 2022-08-24 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kai-Heng Feng Cc: Jani Nikula, tvrtko.ursulin, Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, Hans de Goede, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 7:50 PM Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:06 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > supported as result. > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > > though? > > I believes so, so more external monitors can be supported at the same time. > if there wouldn't be any drawbacks, yes, but sadly there are and I don't see that hurting _all_ users affected with this by making their system consume/generate around 10-15W more power/heat just that maybe one user can use 4 instead of 3 displays at 4K is really worth it... > Kai-Heng > > > > > BR, > > Jani. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > > union acpi_object *obj; > > > + int supported = 0; > > > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > > if (!dhandle) > > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > > - if (obj) > > > + if (obj) { > > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > > + > > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > + } > > > + > > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > > + NULL); > > > + if (obj) > > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > + } > > > } > > > > > > /* > > > > -- > > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-24 18:33 ` Karol Herbst 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Karol Herbst @ 2022-08-24 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kai-Heng Feng Cc: Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 7:50 PM Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:06 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > supported as result. > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > > though? > > I believes so, so more external monitors can be supported at the same time. > if there wouldn't be any drawbacks, yes, but sadly there are and I don't see that hurting _all_ users affected with this by making their system consume/generate around 10-15W more power/heat just that maybe one user can use 4 instead of 3 displays at 4K is really worth it... > Kai-Heng > > > > > BR, > > Jani. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > > union acpi_object *obj; > > > + int supported = 0; > > > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > > if (!dhandle) > > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > > - if (obj) > > > + if (obj) { > > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > > + > > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > + } > > > + > > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > > + NULL); > > > + if (obj) > > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > + } > > > } > > > > > > /* > > > > -- > > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-24 18:33 ` Karol Herbst 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Karol Herbst @ 2022-08-24 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kai-Heng Feng Cc: tvrtko.ursulin, Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, Hans de Goede, dri-devel, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 7:50 PM Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:06 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > supported as result. > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > > though? > > I believes so, so more external monitors can be supported at the same time. > if there wouldn't be any drawbacks, yes, but sadly there are and I don't see that hurting _all_ users affected with this by making their system consume/generate around 10-15W more power/heat just that maybe one user can use 4 instead of 3 displays at 4K is really worth it... > Kai-Heng > > > > > BR, > > Jani. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > > union acpi_object *obj; > > > + int supported = 0; > > > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > > if (!dhandle) > > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > > - if (obj) > > > + if (obj) { > > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > > + > > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > + } > > > + > > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > > + NULL); > > > + if (obj) > > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > + } > > > } > > > > > > /* > > > > -- > > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported 2022-08-16 8:06 ` Jani Nikula (?) @ 2022-08-18 11:53 ` Lukas Wunner -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Lukas Wunner @ 2022-08-18 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jani Nikula Cc: Kai-Heng Feng, joonas.lahtinen, rodrigo.vivi, tvrtko.ursulin, Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, Hans de Goede, Zenghui Yu On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 11:06:18AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > supported as result. > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > though? In general, we handle switching of outputs between GPUs in vga_switcheroo.c upon a request from user space via sysfs (well, debugfs currently). It's up to users to decide which policy suits their needs best. That said, we never grew support to allow different switching policies for the built-in panel and external outputs. Laptops supporting this are rare. Older MacBook Pros introduced between 2008 and 2010 are among them: They have separate muxes for the panel and external DP port. Our policy is documented in a code comment in drivers/platform/x86/apple-gmux.c: * The external DP port is only fully switchable on the first two unibody * MacBook Pro generations, MBP5 2008/09 and MBP6 2010. This is done by an * `NXP CBTL06141`_ which is controlled by gmux. [...] * Our switching policy for the external port is that on those generations * which are able to switch it fully, the port is switched together with the * panel when IGD / DIS commands are issued to vga_switcheroo. It is thus * possible to drive e.g. a beamer on battery power with the integrated GPU. * The user may manually switch to the discrete GPU if more performance is * needed. * * On all newer generations, the external port can only be driven by the * discrete GPU. If a display is plugged in while the panel is switched to * the integrated GPU, *both* GPUs will be in use for maximum performance. * To decrease power consumption, the user may manually switch to the * discrete GPU, thereby suspending the integrated GPU. In other words, on these older MacBook Pros, we switch the panel and external DP port in unison, thus always allowing one of the two GPUs to runtime suspend and save power. Thanks, Lukas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-18 11:53 ` Lukas Wunner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Lukas Wunner @ 2022-08-18 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jani Nikula Cc: Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, Kai-Heng Feng, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 11:06:18AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > supported as result. > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > though? In general, we handle switching of outputs between GPUs in vga_switcheroo.c upon a request from user space via sysfs (well, debugfs currently). It's up to users to decide which policy suits their needs best. That said, we never grew support to allow different switching policies for the built-in panel and external outputs. Laptops supporting this are rare. Older MacBook Pros introduced between 2008 and 2010 are among them: They have separate muxes for the panel and external DP port. Our policy is documented in a code comment in drivers/platform/x86/apple-gmux.c: * The external DP port is only fully switchable on the first two unibody * MacBook Pro generations, MBP5 2008/09 and MBP6 2010. This is done by an * `NXP CBTL06141`_ which is controlled by gmux. [...] * Our switching policy for the external port is that on those generations * which are able to switch it fully, the port is switched together with the * panel when IGD / DIS commands are issued to vga_switcheroo. It is thus * possible to drive e.g. a beamer on battery power with the integrated GPU. * The user may manually switch to the discrete GPU if more performance is * needed. * * On all newer generations, the external port can only be driven by the * discrete GPU. If a display is plugged in while the panel is switched to * the integrated GPU, *both* GPUs will be in use for maximum performance. * To decrease power consumption, the user may manually switch to the * discrete GPU, thereby suspending the integrated GPU. In other words, on these older MacBook Pros, we switch the panel and external DP port in unison, thus always allowing one of the two GPUs to runtime suspend and save power. Thanks, Lukas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-18 11:53 ` Lukas Wunner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Lukas Wunner @ 2022-08-18 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jani Nikula Cc: tvrtko.ursulin, Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, Hans de Goede, Kai-Heng Feng, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 11:06:18AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > supported as result. > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > though? In general, we handle switching of outputs between GPUs in vga_switcheroo.c upon a request from user space via sysfs (well, debugfs currently). It's up to users to decide which policy suits their needs best. That said, we never grew support to allow different switching policies for the built-in panel and external outputs. Laptops supporting this are rare. Older MacBook Pros introduced between 2008 and 2010 are among them: They have separate muxes for the panel and external DP port. Our policy is documented in a code comment in drivers/platform/x86/apple-gmux.c: * The external DP port is only fully switchable on the first two unibody * MacBook Pro generations, MBP5 2008/09 and MBP6 2010. This is done by an * `NXP CBTL06141`_ which is controlled by gmux. [...] * Our switching policy for the external port is that on those generations * which are able to switch it fully, the port is switched together with the * panel when IGD / DIS commands are issued to vga_switcheroo. It is thus * possible to drive e.g. a beamer on battery power with the integrated GPU. * The user may manually switch to the discrete GPU if more performance is * needed. * * On all newer generations, the external port can only be driven by the * discrete GPU. If a display is plugged in while the panel is switched to * the integrated GPU, *both* GPUs will be in use for maximum performance. * To decrease power consumption, the user may manually switch to the * discrete GPU, thereby suspending the integrated GPU. In other words, on these older MacBook Pros, we switch the panel and external DP port in unison, thus always allowing one of the two GPUs to runtime suspend and save power. Thanks, Lukas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported 2022-08-18 11:53 ` Lukas Wunner (?) @ 2022-08-19 17:01 ` Karol Herbst -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Karol Herbst @ 2022-08-19 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lukas Wunner Cc: tvrtko.ursulin, Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, Hans de Goede, Kai-Heng Feng, dri-devel, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 2:09 PM Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 11:06:18AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > supported as result. > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > > though? > > In general, we handle switching of outputs between GPUs in vga_switcheroo.c > upon a request from user space via sysfs (well, debugfs currently). > It's up to users to decide which policy suits their needs best. > > That said, we never grew support to allow different switching policies for > the built-in panel and external outputs. Laptops supporting this are > rare. Older MacBook Pros introduced between 2008 and 2010 are among them: > They have separate muxes for the panel and external DP port. Our policy > is documented in a code comment in drivers/platform/x86/apple-gmux.c: > > * The external DP port is only fully switchable on the first two unibody > * MacBook Pro generations, MBP5 2008/09 and MBP6 2010. This is done by an > * `NXP CBTL06141`_ which is controlled by gmux. > [...] > * Our switching policy for the external port is that on those generations > * which are able to switch it fully, the port is switched together with the > * panel when IGD / DIS commands are issued to vga_switcheroo. It is thus > * possible to drive e.g. a beamer on battery power with the integrated GPU. > * The user may manually switch to the discrete GPU if more performance is > * needed. > * > * On all newer generations, the external port can only be driven by the > * discrete GPU. If a display is plugged in while the panel is switched to > * the integrated GPU, *both* GPUs will be in use for maximum performance. > * To decrease power consumption, the user may manually switch to the > * discrete GPU, thereby suspending the integrated GPU. > > In other words, on these older MacBook Pros, we switch the panel and > external DP port in unison, thus always allowing one of the two GPUs > to runtime suspend and save power. > > Thanks, > > Lukas > sure, but this is changing now. I do have a laptop with a muxable internal display. But this is considered to be a dynamic on demand switching thing not a boot time switch. Anyway, I am still not convinced that doing that unconditionally is what we want, especially as userspace has to support dynamic switching regardless. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-19 17:01 ` Karol Herbst 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Karol Herbst @ 2022-08-19 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lukas Wunner Cc: Jani Nikula, tvrtko.ursulin, Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, Hans de Goede, Kai-Heng Feng, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 2:09 PM Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 11:06:18AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > supported as result. > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > > though? > > In general, we handle switching of outputs between GPUs in vga_switcheroo.c > upon a request from user space via sysfs (well, debugfs currently). > It's up to users to decide which policy suits their needs best. > > That said, we never grew support to allow different switching policies for > the built-in panel and external outputs. Laptops supporting this are > rare. Older MacBook Pros introduced between 2008 and 2010 are among them: > They have separate muxes for the panel and external DP port. Our policy > is documented in a code comment in drivers/platform/x86/apple-gmux.c: > > * The external DP port is only fully switchable on the first two unibody > * MacBook Pro generations, MBP5 2008/09 and MBP6 2010. This is done by an > * `NXP CBTL06141`_ which is controlled by gmux. > [...] > * Our switching policy for the external port is that on those generations > * which are able to switch it fully, the port is switched together with the > * panel when IGD / DIS commands are issued to vga_switcheroo. It is thus > * possible to drive e.g. a beamer on battery power with the integrated GPU. > * The user may manually switch to the discrete GPU if more performance is > * needed. > * > * On all newer generations, the external port can only be driven by the > * discrete GPU. If a display is plugged in while the panel is switched to > * the integrated GPU, *both* GPUs will be in use for maximum performance. > * To decrease power consumption, the user may manually switch to the > * discrete GPU, thereby suspending the integrated GPU. > > In other words, on these older MacBook Pros, we switch the panel and > external DP port in unison, thus always allowing one of the two GPUs > to runtime suspend and save power. > > Thanks, > > Lukas > sure, but this is changing now. I do have a laptop with a muxable internal display. But this is considered to be a dynamic on demand switching thing not a boot time switch. Anyway, I am still not convinced that doing that unconditionally is what we want, especially as userspace has to support dynamic switching regardless. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-19 17:01 ` Karol Herbst 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Karol Herbst @ 2022-08-19 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lukas Wunner Cc: Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, Kai-Heng Feng, dri-devel, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 2:09 PM Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 11:06:18AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > supported as result. > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > > though? > > In general, we handle switching of outputs between GPUs in vga_switcheroo.c > upon a request from user space via sysfs (well, debugfs currently). > It's up to users to decide which policy suits their needs best. > > That said, we never grew support to allow different switching policies for > the built-in panel and external outputs. Laptops supporting this are > rare. Older MacBook Pros introduced between 2008 and 2010 are among them: > They have separate muxes for the panel and external DP port. Our policy > is documented in a code comment in drivers/platform/x86/apple-gmux.c: > > * The external DP port is only fully switchable on the first two unibody > * MacBook Pro generations, MBP5 2008/09 and MBP6 2010. This is done by an > * `NXP CBTL06141`_ which is controlled by gmux. > [...] > * Our switching policy for the external port is that on those generations > * which are able to switch it fully, the port is switched together with the > * panel when IGD / DIS commands are issued to vga_switcheroo. It is thus > * possible to drive e.g. a beamer on battery power with the integrated GPU. > * The user may manually switch to the discrete GPU if more performance is > * needed. > * > * On all newer generations, the external port can only be driven by the > * discrete GPU. If a display is plugged in while the panel is switched to > * the integrated GPU, *both* GPUs will be in use for maximum performance. > * To decrease power consumption, the user may manually switch to the > * discrete GPU, thereby suspending the integrated GPU. > > In other words, on these older MacBook Pros, we switch the panel and > external DP port in unison, thus always allowing one of the two GPUs > to runtime suspend and save power. > > Thanks, > > Lukas > sure, but this is changing now. I do have a laptop with a muxable internal display. But this is considered to be a dynamic on demand switching thing not a boot time switch. Anyway, I am still not convinced that doing that unconditionally is what we want, especially as userspace has to support dynamic switching regardless. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported 2022-08-19 17:01 ` [Intel-gfx] " Karol Herbst (?) @ 2022-08-24 14:22 ` Kai-Heng Feng -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Kai-Heng Feng @ 2022-08-24 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Karol Herbst Cc: Lukas Wunner, Jani Nikula, tvrtko.ursulin, Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, Hans de Goede, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 1:01 AM Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 2:09 PM Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 11:06:18AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > > supported as result. > > > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > > > > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > > > though? > > > > In general, we handle switching of outputs between GPUs in vga_switcheroo.c > > upon a request from user space via sysfs (well, debugfs currently). > > It's up to users to decide which policy suits their needs best. > > > > That said, we never grew support to allow different switching policies for > > the built-in panel and external outputs. Laptops supporting this are > > rare. Older MacBook Pros introduced between 2008 and 2010 are among them: > > They have separate muxes for the panel and external DP port. Our policy > > is documented in a code comment in drivers/platform/x86/apple-gmux.c: > > > > * The external DP port is only fully switchable on the first two unibody > > * MacBook Pro generations, MBP5 2008/09 and MBP6 2010. This is done by an > > * `NXP CBTL06141`_ which is controlled by gmux. > > [...] > > * Our switching policy for the external port is that on those generations > > * which are able to switch it fully, the port is switched together with the > > * panel when IGD / DIS commands are issued to vga_switcheroo. It is thus > > * possible to drive e.g. a beamer on battery power with the integrated GPU. > > * The user may manually switch to the discrete GPU if more performance is > > * needed. > > * > > * On all newer generations, the external port can only be driven by the > > * discrete GPU. If a display is plugged in while the panel is switched to > > * the integrated GPU, *both* GPUs will be in use for maximum performance. > > * To decrease power consumption, the user may manually switch to the > > * discrete GPU, thereby suspending the integrated GPU. > > > > In other words, on these older MacBook Pros, we switch the panel and > > external DP port in unison, thus always allowing one of the two GPUs > > to runtime suspend and save power. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Lukas > > > > sure, but this is changing now. I do have a laptop with a muxable > internal display. But this is considered to be a dynamic on demand > switching thing not a boot time switch. > > Anyway, I am still not convinced that doing that unconditionally is > what we want, especially as userspace has to support dynamic switching > regardless. > According to the doc, there's no MUX in TGL-H DP-IN. The dGPU outputs are routed through TGL-H TCSS directly. That's probably the reason why it can't be dynamic. Kai-Heng ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-24 14:22 ` Kai-Heng Feng 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Kai-Heng Feng @ 2022-08-24 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Karol Herbst Cc: Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 1:01 AM Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 2:09 PM Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 11:06:18AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > > supported as result. > > > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > > > > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > > > though? > > > > In general, we handle switching of outputs between GPUs in vga_switcheroo.c > > upon a request from user space via sysfs (well, debugfs currently). > > It's up to users to decide which policy suits their needs best. > > > > That said, we never grew support to allow different switching policies for > > the built-in panel and external outputs. Laptops supporting this are > > rare. Older MacBook Pros introduced between 2008 and 2010 are among them: > > They have separate muxes for the panel and external DP port. Our policy > > is documented in a code comment in drivers/platform/x86/apple-gmux.c: > > > > * The external DP port is only fully switchable on the first two unibody > > * MacBook Pro generations, MBP5 2008/09 and MBP6 2010. This is done by an > > * `NXP CBTL06141`_ which is controlled by gmux. > > [...] > > * Our switching policy for the external port is that on those generations > > * which are able to switch it fully, the port is switched together with the > > * panel when IGD / DIS commands are issued to vga_switcheroo. It is thus > > * possible to drive e.g. a beamer on battery power with the integrated GPU. > > * The user may manually switch to the discrete GPU if more performance is > > * needed. > > * > > * On all newer generations, the external port can only be driven by the > > * discrete GPU. If a display is plugged in while the panel is switched to > > * the integrated GPU, *both* GPUs will be in use for maximum performance. > > * To decrease power consumption, the user may manually switch to the > > * discrete GPU, thereby suspending the integrated GPU. > > > > In other words, on these older MacBook Pros, we switch the panel and > > external DP port in unison, thus always allowing one of the two GPUs > > to runtime suspend and save power. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Lukas > > > > sure, but this is changing now. I do have a laptop with a muxable > internal display. But this is considered to be a dynamic on demand > switching thing not a boot time switch. > > Anyway, I am still not convinced that doing that unconditionally is > what we want, especially as userspace has to support dynamic switching > regardless. > According to the doc, there's no MUX in TGL-H DP-IN. The dGPU outputs are routed through TGL-H TCSS directly. That's probably the reason why it can't be dynamic. Kai-Heng ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-24 14:22 ` Kai-Heng Feng 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Kai-Heng Feng @ 2022-08-24 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Karol Herbst Cc: tvrtko.ursulin, Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, Hans de Goede, dri-devel, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 1:01 AM Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 2:09 PM Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 11:06:18AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > > supported as result. > > > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > > > > > Is this the policy decision that we want to unconditionally make, > > > though? > > > > In general, we handle switching of outputs between GPUs in vga_switcheroo.c > > upon a request from user space via sysfs (well, debugfs currently). > > It's up to users to decide which policy suits their needs best. > > > > That said, we never grew support to allow different switching policies for > > the built-in panel and external outputs. Laptops supporting this are > > rare. Older MacBook Pros introduced between 2008 and 2010 are among them: > > They have separate muxes for the panel and external DP port. Our policy > > is documented in a code comment in drivers/platform/x86/apple-gmux.c: > > > > * The external DP port is only fully switchable on the first two unibody > > * MacBook Pro generations, MBP5 2008/09 and MBP6 2010. This is done by an > > * `NXP CBTL06141`_ which is controlled by gmux. > > [...] > > * Our switching policy for the external port is that on those generations > > * which are able to switch it fully, the port is switched together with the > > * panel when IGD / DIS commands are issued to vga_switcheroo. It is thus > > * possible to drive e.g. a beamer on battery power with the integrated GPU. > > * The user may manually switch to the discrete GPU if more performance is > > * needed. > > * > > * On all newer generations, the external port can only be driven by the > > * discrete GPU. If a display is plugged in while the panel is switched to > > * the integrated GPU, *both* GPUs will be in use for maximum performance. > > * To decrease power consumption, the user may manually switch to the > > * discrete GPU, thereby suspending the integrated GPU. > > > > In other words, on these older MacBook Pros, we switch the panel and > > external DP port in unison, thus always allowing one of the two GPUs > > to runtime suspend and save power. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Lukas > > > > sure, but this is changing now. I do have a laptop with a muxable > internal display. But this is considered to be a dynamic on demand > switching thing not a boot time switch. > > Anyway, I am still not convinced that doing that unconditionally is > what we want, especially as userspace has to support dynamic switching > regardless. > According to the doc, there's no MUX in TGL-H DP-IN. The dGPU outputs are routed through TGL-H TCSS directly. That's probably the reason why it can't be dynamic. Kai-Heng ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported 2022-08-16 2:52 ` [Intel-gfx] " Kai-Heng Feng (?) @ 2022-08-16 18:49 ` Karol Herbst -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Karol Herbst @ 2022-08-16 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kai-Heng Feng Cc: jani.nikula, joonas.lahtinen, rodrigo.vivi, tvrtko.ursulin, Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, Hans de Goede, Zenghui Yu On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:53 AM Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > supported as result. > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > Can we please not do things like this just because? It forces the discrete GPU to be on leading to higher thermal pressure and power consumption of the system. Lower battery runtime or higher fan noise is the result. Not everybody wants to use an AC simply just because they attach an external display. If the problem is "we run out of displays" then can we have something more dynamic, where we are doing this only and only if we run out of resources to drive as that many displays. Most users will be fine with ports being driven by the iGPU. Why hurt most users, because of some weird special case with mostly only drawbacks? > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > acpi_handle dhandle; > union acpi_object *obj; > + int supported = 0; > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > if (!dhandle) > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > - if (obj) > + if (obj) { > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > + supported = obj->integer.value; > + > ACPI_FREE(obj); > + } > + > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > + NULL); > + if (obj) > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > + } > } > > /* > -- > 2.36.1 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-16 18:49 ` Karol Herbst 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Karol Herbst @ 2022-08-16 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kai-Heng Feng Cc: Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:53 AM Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > supported as result. > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > Can we please not do things like this just because? It forces the discrete GPU to be on leading to higher thermal pressure and power consumption of the system. Lower battery runtime or higher fan noise is the result. Not everybody wants to use an AC simply just because they attach an external display. If the problem is "we run out of displays" then can we have something more dynamic, where we are doing this only and only if we run out of resources to drive as that many displays. Most users will be fine with ports being driven by the iGPU. Why hurt most users, because of some weird special case with mostly only drawbacks? > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > acpi_handle dhandle; > union acpi_object *obj; > + int supported = 0; > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > if (!dhandle) > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > - if (obj) > + if (obj) { > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > + supported = obj->integer.value; > + > ACPI_FREE(obj); > + } > + > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > + NULL); > + if (obj) > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > + } > } > > /* > -- > 2.36.1 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-16 18:49 ` Karol Herbst 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Karol Herbst @ 2022-08-16 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kai-Heng Feng Cc: tvrtko.ursulin, Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, Hans de Goede, dri-devel, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:53 AM Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > supported as result. > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > Can we please not do things like this just because? It forces the discrete GPU to be on leading to higher thermal pressure and power consumption of the system. Lower battery runtime or higher fan noise is the result. Not everybody wants to use an AC simply just because they attach an external display. If the problem is "we run out of displays" then can we have something more dynamic, where we are doing this only and only if we run out of resources to drive as that many displays. Most users will be fine with ports being driven by the iGPU. Why hurt most users, because of some weird special case with mostly only drawbacks? > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > acpi_handle dhandle; > union acpi_object *obj; > + int supported = 0; > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > if (!dhandle) > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > - if (obj) > + if (obj) { > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > + supported = obj->integer.value; > + > ACPI_FREE(obj); > + } > + > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > + NULL); > + if (obj) > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > + } > } > > /* > -- > 2.36.1 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported 2022-08-16 18:49 ` Karol Herbst (?) @ 2022-08-17 1:18 ` Kai-Heng Feng -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Kai-Heng Feng @ 2022-08-17 1:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Karol Herbst Cc: jani.nikula, joonas.lahtinen, rodrigo.vivi, tvrtko.ursulin, Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, Hans de Goede, Zenghui Yu On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:50 AM Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:53 AM Kai-Heng Feng > <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > supported as result. > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > > > Can we please not do things like this just because? I there's a very good reason to support more external monitors, especially when eDP is already 4K so iGPU don't have enough buffer for more displays. > > It forces the discrete GPU to be on leading to higher thermal pressure > and power consumption of the system. Lower battery runtime or higher > fan noise is the result. Not everybody wants to use an AC simply just > because they attach an external display. The system is designed in this way. And many (if not all) gaming laptops and mobile workstations use discrete GPU for external monitors. We just recently found out we have to use a switch to make it work. > > If the problem is "we run out of displays" then can we have something > more dynamic, where we are doing this only and only if we run out of > resources to drive as that many displays. This is a boot-time switch, so it's not possible to switch it dynamically. > > Most users will be fine with ports being driven by the iGPU. Why hurt > most users, because of some weird special case with mostly only > drawbacks? This is a use case that hardware vendor never bother to test. And this is not a special case - the system is designed to use dGPU for external monitors. Kai-Heng > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > union acpi_object *obj; > > + int supported = 0; > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > if (!dhandle) > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > - if (obj) > > + if (obj) { > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > + > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > + } > > + > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > + NULL); > > + if (obj) > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > + } > > } > > > > /* > > -- > > 2.36.1 > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-17 1:18 ` Kai-Heng Feng 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Kai-Heng Feng @ 2022-08-17 1:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Karol Herbst Cc: Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:50 AM Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:53 AM Kai-Heng Feng > <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > supported as result. > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > > > Can we please not do things like this just because? I there's a very good reason to support more external monitors, especially when eDP is already 4K so iGPU don't have enough buffer for more displays. > > It forces the discrete GPU to be on leading to higher thermal pressure > and power consumption of the system. Lower battery runtime or higher > fan noise is the result. Not everybody wants to use an AC simply just > because they attach an external display. The system is designed in this way. And many (if not all) gaming laptops and mobile workstations use discrete GPU for external monitors. We just recently found out we have to use a switch to make it work. > > If the problem is "we run out of displays" then can we have something > more dynamic, where we are doing this only and only if we run out of > resources to drive as that many displays. This is a boot-time switch, so it's not possible to switch it dynamically. > > Most users will be fine with ports being driven by the iGPU. Why hurt > most users, because of some weird special case with mostly only > drawbacks? This is a use case that hardware vendor never bother to test. And this is not a special case - the system is designed to use dGPU for external monitors. Kai-Heng > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > union acpi_object *obj; > > + int supported = 0; > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > if (!dhandle) > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > - if (obj) > > + if (obj) { > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > + > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > + } > > + > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > + NULL); > > + if (obj) > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > + } > > } > > > > /* > > -- > > 2.36.1 > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-17 1:18 ` Kai-Heng Feng 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Kai-Heng Feng @ 2022-08-17 1:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Karol Herbst Cc: tvrtko.ursulin, Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, Hans de Goede, dri-devel, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:50 AM Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:53 AM Kai-Heng Feng > <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > supported as result. > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > > > Can we please not do things like this just because? I there's a very good reason to support more external monitors, especially when eDP is already 4K so iGPU don't have enough buffer for more displays. > > It forces the discrete GPU to be on leading to higher thermal pressure > and power consumption of the system. Lower battery runtime or higher > fan noise is the result. Not everybody wants to use an AC simply just > because they attach an external display. The system is designed in this way. And many (if not all) gaming laptops and mobile workstations use discrete GPU for external monitors. We just recently found out we have to use a switch to make it work. > > If the problem is "we run out of displays" then can we have something > more dynamic, where we are doing this only and only if we run out of > resources to drive as that many displays. This is a boot-time switch, so it's not possible to switch it dynamically. > > Most users will be fine with ports being driven by the iGPU. Why hurt > most users, because of some weird special case with mostly only > drawbacks? This is a use case that hardware vendor never bother to test. And this is not a special case - the system is designed to use dGPU for external monitors. Kai-Heng > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > union acpi_object *obj; > > + int supported = 0; > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > if (!dhandle) > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > - if (obj) > > + if (obj) { > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > + > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > + } > > + > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > + NULL); > > + if (obj) > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > + } > > } > > > > /* > > -- > > 2.36.1 > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported 2022-08-17 1:18 ` Kai-Heng Feng (?) @ 2022-08-17 1:48 ` Karol Herbst -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Karol Herbst @ 2022-08-17 1:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kai-Heng Feng Cc: jani.nikula, joonas.lahtinen, rodrigo.vivi, tvrtko.ursulin, Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, Hans de Goede, Zenghui Yu On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 3:18 AM Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:50 AM Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:53 AM Kai-Heng Feng > > <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > supported as result. > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > > > > > > Can we please not do things like this just because? > > I there's a very good reason to support more external monitors, > especially when eDP is already 4K so iGPU don't have enough buffer for > more displays. > well.. they do have it. What's the limit? 3 or 4 4K displays with gen 11th+? I find conflicting information, but 3 4K displays are no problem. It might be if you get to higher refresh rates or something. I know that 2 work quite reliably and I know I can put even more on the Intel GPU. > > > > It forces the discrete GPU to be on leading to higher thermal pressure > > and power consumption of the system. Lower battery runtime or higher > > fan noise is the result. Not everybody wants to use an AC simply just > > because they attach an external display. > > The system is designed in this way. > ?!? This makes no sense. If the discrete GPU is turned on, it means the system has to cool away more heat, because it consumes more power. It then causes louder fans. No idea how a "system design" can just go around simple physics... Even the CPU consumes more power, because on some systems it prevents deeper package sleeping modes due to the active PCIe bridge controller. But if you have certain systems where you want to enable this behavior despite the drawbacks, maybe maintain a list of systems where to apply this method? > And many (if not all) gaming laptops and mobile workstations use > discrete GPU for external monitors. > We just recently found out we have to use a switch to make it work. > yeah some do, and if people buy those, they already deal with loud fans and just accept this fact. Others might want silent fans... and why do you have to switch? Out of the box Intel GPUs support 3 4K displays. I want to see the general use case for 4 4K displays. So what systems are actually affected and do users have the option to disable it, if they prefer a more silent system? > > > > If the problem is "we run out of displays" then can we have something > > more dynamic, where we are doing this only and only if we run out of > > resources to drive as that many displays. > > This is a boot-time switch, so it's not possible to switch it dynamically. > This makes it even worse. > > > > Most users will be fine with ports being driven by the iGPU. Why hurt > > most users, because of some weird special case with mostly only > > drawbacks? > > This is a use case that hardware vendor never bother to test. > And this is not a special case - the system is designed to use dGPU > for external monitors. > > Kai-Heng > so instead of hard wiring, they added a software switch to do the same thing? And then don't bother to test both possibilities? Anyway.. it doesn't make any sense and this opens up more questions than I initially had. I honestly still don't see the point here and still doubt that pleasing a handful of users is worth accepting the drawbacks. I also have no say if it comes to the i915 driver, but from a user perspective none of this makes much sense tbh. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > > union acpi_object *obj; > > > + int supported = 0; > > > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > > if (!dhandle) > > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > > - if (obj) > > > + if (obj) { > > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > > + > > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > + } > > > + > > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > > + NULL); > > > + if (obj) > > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > + } > > > } > > > > > > /* > > > -- > > > 2.36.1 > > > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-17 1:48 ` Karol Herbst 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Karol Herbst @ 2022-08-17 1:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kai-Heng Feng Cc: Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 3:18 AM Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:50 AM Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:53 AM Kai-Heng Feng > > <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > supported as result. > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > > > > > > Can we please not do things like this just because? > > I there's a very good reason to support more external monitors, > especially when eDP is already 4K so iGPU don't have enough buffer for > more displays. > well.. they do have it. What's the limit? 3 or 4 4K displays with gen 11th+? I find conflicting information, but 3 4K displays are no problem. It might be if you get to higher refresh rates or something. I know that 2 work quite reliably and I know I can put even more on the Intel GPU. > > > > It forces the discrete GPU to be on leading to higher thermal pressure > > and power consumption of the system. Lower battery runtime or higher > > fan noise is the result. Not everybody wants to use an AC simply just > > because they attach an external display. > > The system is designed in this way. > ?!? This makes no sense. If the discrete GPU is turned on, it means the system has to cool away more heat, because it consumes more power. It then causes louder fans. No idea how a "system design" can just go around simple physics... Even the CPU consumes more power, because on some systems it prevents deeper package sleeping modes due to the active PCIe bridge controller. But if you have certain systems where you want to enable this behavior despite the drawbacks, maybe maintain a list of systems where to apply this method? > And many (if not all) gaming laptops and mobile workstations use > discrete GPU for external monitors. > We just recently found out we have to use a switch to make it work. > yeah some do, and if people buy those, they already deal with loud fans and just accept this fact. Others might want silent fans... and why do you have to switch? Out of the box Intel GPUs support 3 4K displays. I want to see the general use case for 4 4K displays. So what systems are actually affected and do users have the option to disable it, if they prefer a more silent system? > > > > If the problem is "we run out of displays" then can we have something > > more dynamic, where we are doing this only and only if we run out of > > resources to drive as that many displays. > > This is a boot-time switch, so it's not possible to switch it dynamically. > This makes it even worse. > > > > Most users will be fine with ports being driven by the iGPU. Why hurt > > most users, because of some weird special case with mostly only > > drawbacks? > > This is a use case that hardware vendor never bother to test. > And this is not a special case - the system is designed to use dGPU > for external monitors. > > Kai-Heng > so instead of hard wiring, they added a software switch to do the same thing? And then don't bother to test both possibilities? Anyway.. it doesn't make any sense and this opens up more questions than I initially had. I honestly still don't see the point here and still doubt that pleasing a handful of users is worth accepting the drawbacks. I also have no say if it comes to the i915 driver, but from a user perspective none of this makes much sense tbh. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > > union acpi_object *obj; > > > + int supported = 0; > > > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > > if (!dhandle) > > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > > - if (obj) > > > + if (obj) { > > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > > + > > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > + } > > > + > > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > > + NULL); > > > + if (obj) > > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > + } > > > } > > > > > > /* > > > -- > > > 2.36.1 > > > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-17 1:48 ` Karol Herbst 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Karol Herbst @ 2022-08-17 1:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kai-Heng Feng Cc: tvrtko.ursulin, Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, Hans de Goede, dri-devel, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 3:18 AM Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:50 AM Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:53 AM Kai-Heng Feng > > <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > supported as result. > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > > > > > > Can we please not do things like this just because? > > I there's a very good reason to support more external monitors, > especially when eDP is already 4K so iGPU don't have enough buffer for > more displays. > well.. they do have it. What's the limit? 3 or 4 4K displays with gen 11th+? I find conflicting information, but 3 4K displays are no problem. It might be if you get to higher refresh rates or something. I know that 2 work quite reliably and I know I can put even more on the Intel GPU. > > > > It forces the discrete GPU to be on leading to higher thermal pressure > > and power consumption of the system. Lower battery runtime or higher > > fan noise is the result. Not everybody wants to use an AC simply just > > because they attach an external display. > > The system is designed in this way. > ?!? This makes no sense. If the discrete GPU is turned on, it means the system has to cool away more heat, because it consumes more power. It then causes louder fans. No idea how a "system design" can just go around simple physics... Even the CPU consumes more power, because on some systems it prevents deeper package sleeping modes due to the active PCIe bridge controller. But if you have certain systems where you want to enable this behavior despite the drawbacks, maybe maintain a list of systems where to apply this method? > And many (if not all) gaming laptops and mobile workstations use > discrete GPU for external monitors. > We just recently found out we have to use a switch to make it work. > yeah some do, and if people buy those, they already deal with loud fans and just accept this fact. Others might want silent fans... and why do you have to switch? Out of the box Intel GPUs support 3 4K displays. I want to see the general use case for 4 4K displays. So what systems are actually affected and do users have the option to disable it, if they prefer a more silent system? > > > > If the problem is "we run out of displays" then can we have something > > more dynamic, where we are doing this only and only if we run out of > > resources to drive as that many displays. > > This is a boot-time switch, so it's not possible to switch it dynamically. > This makes it even worse. > > > > Most users will be fine with ports being driven by the iGPU. Why hurt > > most users, because of some weird special case with mostly only > > drawbacks? > > This is a use case that hardware vendor never bother to test. > And this is not a special case - the system is designed to use dGPU > for external monitors. > > Kai-Heng > so instead of hard wiring, they added a software switch to do the same thing? And then don't bother to test both possibilities? Anyway.. it doesn't make any sense and this opens up more questions than I initially had. I honestly still don't see the point here and still doubt that pleasing a handful of users is worth accepting the drawbacks. I also have no say if it comes to the i915 driver, but from a user perspective none of this makes much sense tbh. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > > union acpi_object *obj; > > > + int supported = 0; > > > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > > if (!dhandle) > > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > > - if (obj) > > > + if (obj) { > > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > > + > > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > + } > > > + > > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > > + NULL); > > > + if (obj) > > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > + } > > > } > > > > > > /* > > > -- > > > 2.36.1 > > > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported 2022-08-17 1:48 ` Karol Herbst (?) @ 2022-08-17 3:04 ` Kai-Heng Feng -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Kai-Heng Feng @ 2022-08-17 3:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Karol Herbst Cc: jani.nikula, joonas.lahtinen, rodrigo.vivi, tvrtko.ursulin, Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, Hans de Goede, Zenghui Yu On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 9:49 AM Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 3:18 AM Kai-Heng Feng > <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:50 AM Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:53 AM Kai-Heng Feng > > > <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > > supported as result. > > > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > > > > > > > > > Can we please not do things like this just because? > > > > I there's a very good reason to support more external monitors, > > especially when eDP is already 4K so iGPU don't have enough buffer for > > more displays. > > > > well.. they do have it. What's the limit? 3 or 4 4K displays with gen > 11th+? I find conflicting information, but 3 4K displays are no > problem. It might be if you get to higher refresh rates or something. > > I know that 2 work quite reliably and I know I can put even more on > the Intel GPU. More monitors can be supported via a thunderbolt dock. > > > > > > > It forces the discrete GPU to be on leading to higher thermal pressure > > > and power consumption of the system. Lower battery runtime or higher > > > fan noise is the result. Not everybody wants to use an AC simply just > > > because they attach an external display. > > > > The system is designed in this way. > > > > ?!? This makes no sense. If the discrete GPU is turned on, it means > the system has to cool away more heat, because it consumes more power. > It then causes louder fans. No idea how a "system design" can just go > around simple physics... The spec from HP [1] says: Multi Display Support Without HP Thunderbolt™ Dock G2 UMA Graphics: Unit supports up to 4 independent displays. Any combination of displays outputs may be used except one of Thunderbolt™ 4 and HDMI. Hybrid Graphics: Unit supports up 5 simultaneous displays (4 from dGPU + 1 from iGPU). Any combination of displays outputs may be used except when using one USBC and HDMI are exclusive With HP Thunderbolt™ Dock G2 UMA Graphics: Unit supports up to 4 simultaneous displays. Any combination of displays outputs may be used except one of Thunderbolt™ 4 and HDMI. Hybrid Graphics (NVIDIA): Unit supports up to 5 simultaneous displays (4 from dGPU + 1 from iGPU). Any combination of displays outputs may be used except when using one USBC and HDMI are exclusive Hybrid Graphics (AMD): Unit supports up to 5 simultaneous displays (5 from dGPU + 1 from iGPU). Any combination of displays outputs may be used except when using one USBC and HDMI are exclusive So it's "designed" to use dGPU on the hybrid configs. Let's hope the copper tubes have can dissipate the heat fast enough. > > Even the CPU consumes more power, because on some systems it prevents > deeper package sleeping modes due to the active PCIe bridge > controller. > > But if you have certain systems where you want to enable this behavior > despite the drawbacks, maybe maintain a list of systems where to apply > this method? The behavior will be enabled only when _DSM function 20 is present. So it's already a selected few. > > > And many (if not all) gaming laptops and mobile workstations use > > discrete GPU for external monitors. > > We just recently found out we have to use a switch to make it work. > > > > yeah some do, and if people buy those, they already deal with loud > fans and just accept this fact. > > Others might want silent fans... and why do you have to switch? Out of > the box Intel GPUs support 3 4K displays. I want to see the general > use case for 4 4K displays. It's not for us to decide. When a user buys a laptop according to the spec, the expectation is to have those supported. > > So what systems are actually affected and do users have the option to > disable it, if they prefer a more silent system? Maybe adding a new i915 option to override the default behavior? But it depends on i915 maintainers' opinion. > > > > > > > If the problem is "we run out of displays" then can we have something > > > more dynamic, where we are doing this only and only if we run out of > > > resources to drive as that many displays. > > > > This is a boot-time switch, so it's not possible to switch it dynamically. > > > > This makes it even worse. > > > > > > > Most users will be fine with ports being driven by the iGPU. Why hurt > > > most users, because of some weird special case with mostly only > > > drawbacks? > > > > This is a use case that hardware vendor never bother to test. > > And this is not a special case - the system is designed to use dGPU > > for external monitors. > > > > Kai-Heng > > > > so instead of hard wiring, they added a software switch to do the same thing? I think it's a TGL-H thing, to provide a way so discrete GPU can use the generic TCSS. I don't know the reason though. > > And then don't bother to test both possibilities? That's ODM and hardware vendors :) > > Anyway.. it doesn't make any sense and this opens up more questions > than I initially had. > > I honestly still don't see the point here and still doubt that > pleasing a handful of users is worth accepting the drawbacks. Users may purchase the system based on the number of external monitors it can support. Besides, the drawbacks (if any) will only happen on systems with this design (i.e. with _DSM function 20 supported). > > I also have no say if it comes to the i915 driver, but from a user > perspective none of this makes much sense tbh. It makes much sense for users that need more monitors. [1] https://h20195.www2.hp.com/v2/GetDocument.aspx?docname=c07606964 Kai-Heng > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > > > union acpi_object *obj; > > > > + int supported = 0; > > > > > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > > > if (!dhandle) > > > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > > > - if (obj) > > > > + if (obj) { > > > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > > > + > > > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > > > + NULL); > > > > + if (obj) > > > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > + } > > > > } > > > > > > > > /* > > > > -- > > > > 2.36.1 > > > > > > > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-17 3:04 ` Kai-Heng Feng 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Kai-Heng Feng @ 2022-08-17 3:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Karol Herbst Cc: Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 9:49 AM Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 3:18 AM Kai-Heng Feng > <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:50 AM Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:53 AM Kai-Heng Feng > > > <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > > supported as result. > > > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > > > > > > > > > Can we please not do things like this just because? > > > > I there's a very good reason to support more external monitors, > > especially when eDP is already 4K so iGPU don't have enough buffer for > > more displays. > > > > well.. they do have it. What's the limit? 3 or 4 4K displays with gen > 11th+? I find conflicting information, but 3 4K displays are no > problem. It might be if you get to higher refresh rates or something. > > I know that 2 work quite reliably and I know I can put even more on > the Intel GPU. More monitors can be supported via a thunderbolt dock. > > > > > > > It forces the discrete GPU to be on leading to higher thermal pressure > > > and power consumption of the system. Lower battery runtime or higher > > > fan noise is the result. Not everybody wants to use an AC simply just > > > because they attach an external display. > > > > The system is designed in this way. > > > > ?!? This makes no sense. If the discrete GPU is turned on, it means > the system has to cool away more heat, because it consumes more power. > It then causes louder fans. No idea how a "system design" can just go > around simple physics... The spec from HP [1] says: Multi Display Support Without HP Thunderbolt™ Dock G2 UMA Graphics: Unit supports up to 4 independent displays. Any combination of displays outputs may be used except one of Thunderbolt™ 4 and HDMI. Hybrid Graphics: Unit supports up 5 simultaneous displays (4 from dGPU + 1 from iGPU). Any combination of displays outputs may be used except when using one USBC and HDMI are exclusive With HP Thunderbolt™ Dock G2 UMA Graphics: Unit supports up to 4 simultaneous displays. Any combination of displays outputs may be used except one of Thunderbolt™ 4 and HDMI. Hybrid Graphics (NVIDIA): Unit supports up to 5 simultaneous displays (4 from dGPU + 1 from iGPU). Any combination of displays outputs may be used except when using one USBC and HDMI are exclusive Hybrid Graphics (AMD): Unit supports up to 5 simultaneous displays (5 from dGPU + 1 from iGPU). Any combination of displays outputs may be used except when using one USBC and HDMI are exclusive So it's "designed" to use dGPU on the hybrid configs. Let's hope the copper tubes have can dissipate the heat fast enough. > > Even the CPU consumes more power, because on some systems it prevents > deeper package sleeping modes due to the active PCIe bridge > controller. > > But if you have certain systems where you want to enable this behavior > despite the drawbacks, maybe maintain a list of systems where to apply > this method? The behavior will be enabled only when _DSM function 20 is present. So it's already a selected few. > > > And many (if not all) gaming laptops and mobile workstations use > > discrete GPU for external monitors. > > We just recently found out we have to use a switch to make it work. > > > > yeah some do, and if people buy those, they already deal with loud > fans and just accept this fact. > > Others might want silent fans... and why do you have to switch? Out of > the box Intel GPUs support 3 4K displays. I want to see the general > use case for 4 4K displays. It's not for us to decide. When a user buys a laptop according to the spec, the expectation is to have those supported. > > So what systems are actually affected and do users have the option to > disable it, if they prefer a more silent system? Maybe adding a new i915 option to override the default behavior? But it depends on i915 maintainers' opinion. > > > > > > > If the problem is "we run out of displays" then can we have something > > > more dynamic, where we are doing this only and only if we run out of > > > resources to drive as that many displays. > > > > This is a boot-time switch, so it's not possible to switch it dynamically. > > > > This makes it even worse. > > > > > > > Most users will be fine with ports being driven by the iGPU. Why hurt > > > most users, because of some weird special case with mostly only > > > drawbacks? > > > > This is a use case that hardware vendor never bother to test. > > And this is not a special case - the system is designed to use dGPU > > for external monitors. > > > > Kai-Heng > > > > so instead of hard wiring, they added a software switch to do the same thing? I think it's a TGL-H thing, to provide a way so discrete GPU can use the generic TCSS. I don't know the reason though. > > And then don't bother to test both possibilities? That's ODM and hardware vendors :) > > Anyway.. it doesn't make any sense and this opens up more questions > than I initially had. > > I honestly still don't see the point here and still doubt that > pleasing a handful of users is worth accepting the drawbacks. Users may purchase the system based on the number of external monitors it can support. Besides, the drawbacks (if any) will only happen on systems with this design (i.e. with _DSM function 20 supported). > > I also have no say if it comes to the i915 driver, but from a user > perspective none of this makes much sense tbh. It makes much sense for users that need more monitors. [1] https://h20195.www2.hp.com/v2/GetDocument.aspx?docname=c07606964 Kai-Heng > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > > > union acpi_object *obj; > > > > + int supported = 0; > > > > > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > > > if (!dhandle) > > > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > > > - if (obj) > > > > + if (obj) { > > > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > > > + > > > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > > > + NULL); > > > > + if (obj) > > > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > + } > > > > } > > > > > > > > /* > > > > -- > > > > 2.36.1 > > > > > > > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-17 3:04 ` Kai-Heng Feng 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Kai-Heng Feng @ 2022-08-17 3:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Karol Herbst Cc: tvrtko.ursulin, Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, Hans de Goede, dri-devel, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 9:49 AM Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 3:18 AM Kai-Heng Feng > <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:50 AM Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:53 AM Kai-Heng Feng > > > <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > > supported as result. > > > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > > > > > > > > > Can we please not do things like this just because? > > > > I there's a very good reason to support more external monitors, > > especially when eDP is already 4K so iGPU don't have enough buffer for > > more displays. > > > > well.. they do have it. What's the limit? 3 or 4 4K displays with gen > 11th+? I find conflicting information, but 3 4K displays are no > problem. It might be if you get to higher refresh rates or something. > > I know that 2 work quite reliably and I know I can put even more on > the Intel GPU. More monitors can be supported via a thunderbolt dock. > > > > > > > It forces the discrete GPU to be on leading to higher thermal pressure > > > and power consumption of the system. Lower battery runtime or higher > > > fan noise is the result. Not everybody wants to use an AC simply just > > > because they attach an external display. > > > > The system is designed in this way. > > > > ?!? This makes no sense. If the discrete GPU is turned on, it means > the system has to cool away more heat, because it consumes more power. > It then causes louder fans. No idea how a "system design" can just go > around simple physics... The spec from HP [1] says: Multi Display Support Without HP Thunderbolt™ Dock G2 UMA Graphics: Unit supports up to 4 independent displays. Any combination of displays outputs may be used except one of Thunderbolt™ 4 and HDMI. Hybrid Graphics: Unit supports up 5 simultaneous displays (4 from dGPU + 1 from iGPU). Any combination of displays outputs may be used except when using one USBC and HDMI are exclusive With HP Thunderbolt™ Dock G2 UMA Graphics: Unit supports up to 4 simultaneous displays. Any combination of displays outputs may be used except one of Thunderbolt™ 4 and HDMI. Hybrid Graphics (NVIDIA): Unit supports up to 5 simultaneous displays (4 from dGPU + 1 from iGPU). Any combination of displays outputs may be used except when using one USBC and HDMI are exclusive Hybrid Graphics (AMD): Unit supports up to 5 simultaneous displays (5 from dGPU + 1 from iGPU). Any combination of displays outputs may be used except when using one USBC and HDMI are exclusive So it's "designed" to use dGPU on the hybrid configs. Let's hope the copper tubes have can dissipate the heat fast enough. > > Even the CPU consumes more power, because on some systems it prevents > deeper package sleeping modes due to the active PCIe bridge > controller. > > But if you have certain systems where you want to enable this behavior > despite the drawbacks, maybe maintain a list of systems where to apply > this method? The behavior will be enabled only when _DSM function 20 is present. So it's already a selected few. > > > And many (if not all) gaming laptops and mobile workstations use > > discrete GPU for external monitors. > > We just recently found out we have to use a switch to make it work. > > > > yeah some do, and if people buy those, they already deal with loud > fans and just accept this fact. > > Others might want silent fans... and why do you have to switch? Out of > the box Intel GPUs support 3 4K displays. I want to see the general > use case for 4 4K displays. It's not for us to decide. When a user buys a laptop according to the spec, the expectation is to have those supported. > > So what systems are actually affected and do users have the option to > disable it, if they prefer a more silent system? Maybe adding a new i915 option to override the default behavior? But it depends on i915 maintainers' opinion. > > > > > > > If the problem is "we run out of displays" then can we have something > > > more dynamic, where we are doing this only and only if we run out of > > > resources to drive as that many displays. > > > > This is a boot-time switch, so it's not possible to switch it dynamically. > > > > This makes it even worse. > > > > > > > Most users will be fine with ports being driven by the iGPU. Why hurt > > > most users, because of some weird special case with mostly only > > > drawbacks? > > > > This is a use case that hardware vendor never bother to test. > > And this is not a special case - the system is designed to use dGPU > > for external monitors. > > > > Kai-Heng > > > > so instead of hard wiring, they added a software switch to do the same thing? I think it's a TGL-H thing, to provide a way so discrete GPU can use the generic TCSS. I don't know the reason though. > > And then don't bother to test both possibilities? That's ODM and hardware vendors :) > > Anyway.. it doesn't make any sense and this opens up more questions > than I initially had. > > I honestly still don't see the point here and still doubt that > pleasing a handful of users is worth accepting the drawbacks. Users may purchase the system based on the number of external monitors it can support. Besides, the drawbacks (if any) will only happen on systems with this design (i.e. with _DSM function 20 supported). > > I also have no say if it comes to the i915 driver, but from a user > perspective none of this makes much sense tbh. It makes much sense for users that need more monitors. [1] https://h20195.www2.hp.com/v2/GetDocument.aspx?docname=c07606964 Kai-Heng > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > index e78430001f077..3bd5930e2769b 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c > > > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid = > > > > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c); > > > > > > > > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED 0 /* No args */ > > > > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX 20 /* No args */ > > > > > > > > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 = > > > > GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260, > > > > @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev); > > > > acpi_handle dhandle; > > > > union acpi_object *obj; > > > > + int supported = 0; > > > > > > > > dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > > > > if (!dhandle) > > > > @@ -194,8 +196,22 @@ void intel_dsm_get_bios_data_funcs_supported(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > > > > > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED, NULL); > > > > - if (obj) > > > > + if (obj) { > > > > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > > > + supported = obj->integer.value; > > > > + > > > > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > + /* Tiger Lake H DP-IN Boot Time Switching from iGfx to dGfx */ > > > > + if (supported & BIT(20)) { > > > > + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, > > > > + INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, > > > > + INTEL_DSM_FN_DP_IN_SWITCH_TO_DGFX, > > > > + NULL); > > > > + if (obj) > > > > + ACPI_FREE(obj); > > > > + } > > > > } > > > > > > > > /* > > > > -- > > > > 2.36.1 > > > > > > > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported 2022-08-17 3:04 ` Kai-Heng Feng @ 2022-08-17 11:59 ` Ville Syrjälä -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2022-08-17 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kai-Heng Feng Cc: Karol Herbst, Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu, Imre Deak On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 11:04:21AM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 9:49 AM Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 3:18 AM Kai-Heng Feng > > <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:50 AM Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:53 AM Kai-Heng Feng > > > > <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > > > supported as result. > > > > > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we please not do things like this just because? > > > > > > I there's a very good reason to support more external monitors, > > > especially when eDP is already 4K so iGPU don't have enough buffer for > > > more displays. > > > > > > > well.. they do have it. What's the limit? 3 or 4 4K displays with gen > > 11th+? I find conflicting information, but 3 4K displays are no > > problem. It might be if you get to higher refresh rates or something. > > > > I know that 2 work quite reliably and I know I can put even more on > > the Intel GPU. > > More monitors can be supported via a thunderbolt dock. > > > > > > > > > > > It forces the discrete GPU to be on leading to higher thermal pressure > > > > and power consumption of the system. Lower battery runtime or higher > > > > fan noise is the result. Not everybody wants to use an AC simply just > > > > because they attach an external display. > > > > > > The system is designed in this way. > > > > > > > ?!? This makes no sense. If the discrete GPU is turned on, it means > > the system has to cool away more heat, because it consumes more power. > > It then causes louder fans. No idea how a "system design" can just go > > around simple physics... > > The spec from HP [1] says: > Multi Display Support > Without HP Thunderbolt™ Dock G2 > UMA Graphics: Unit supports up to 4 independent displays. Any > combination of displays outputs may be used except one of > Thunderbolt™ 4 and HDMI. > Hybrid Graphics: Unit supports up 5 simultaneous displays (4 from dGPU > + 1 from iGPU). Any combination of displays outputs may > be used except when using one USBC and HDMI are exclusive > > With HP Thunderbolt™ Dock G2 > UMA Graphics: Unit supports up to 4 simultaneous displays. Any > combination of displays outputs may be used except one of > Thunderbolt™ 4 and HDMI. > Hybrid Graphics (NVIDIA): Unit supports up to 5 simultaneous displays > (4 from dGPU + 1 from iGPU). Any combination of displays > outputs may be used except when using one USBC and HDMI are exclusive > Hybrid Graphics (AMD): Unit supports up to 5 simultaneous displays (5 > from dGPU + 1 from iGPU). Any combination of displays > outputs may be used except when using one USBC and HDMI are exclusive > > So it's "designed" to use dGPU on the hybrid configs. > > Let's hope the copper tubes have can dissipate the heat fast enough. > > > > > Even the CPU consumes more power, because on some systems it prevents > > deeper package sleeping modes due to the active PCIe bridge > > controller. > > > > But if you have certain systems where you want to enable this behavior > > despite the drawbacks, maybe maintain a list of systems where to apply > > this method? > > The behavior will be enabled only when _DSM function 20 is present. > So it's already a selected few. I had a quick trawl through some Windows stuff for this and it does seem to do a few extra checks: - platform must be TGL-H (nothing else has the DPin stuff I guess) - OpRegion header must indicate dGPU presence Otherwise it does call this DSM uncoditionally on boot/S4 resume so seems like that is the only really validated configuration. Although it does seem to explicitly turn off displays prior to the DSM so that does perhaps indicate that those ports might have also been enabled via the iGPU by the BIOS. Not sure if disabling the ports would work correctly after the DSM or not. If not then the DSM call would need to happen after state readout/sanitization so that we can shut things down gracefully. Additionally after the DSM call it scans the FIA TC live state bits to check for DPin usage. Looks like its trying to make sure the driver stops poking at the relevant power wells once in DPin mode. i915 doesn't check that stuff atm so we might end up mangling something while the dGPU is driving the port. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-17 11:59 ` Ville Syrjälä 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2022-08-17 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kai-Heng Feng Cc: Heikki Krogerus, Karol Herbst, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 11:04:21AM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 9:49 AM Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 3:18 AM Kai-Heng Feng > > <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:50 AM Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:53 AM Kai-Heng Feng > > > > <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On mobile workstations like HP ZBook Fury G8, iGFX's DP-IN can switch to > > > > > dGFX so external monitors are routed to dGFX, and more monitors can be > > > > > supported as result. > > > > > > > > > > To switch the DP-IN to dGFX, the driver needs to invoke _DSM function 20 > > > > > on intel_dsm_guid2. This method is described in Intel document 632107. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we please not do things like this just because? > > > > > > I there's a very good reason to support more external monitors, > > > especially when eDP is already 4K so iGPU don't have enough buffer for > > > more displays. > > > > > > > well.. they do have it. What's the limit? 3 or 4 4K displays with gen > > 11th+? I find conflicting information, but 3 4K displays are no > > problem. It might be if you get to higher refresh rates or something. > > > > I know that 2 work quite reliably and I know I can put even more on > > the Intel GPU. > > More monitors can be supported via a thunderbolt dock. > > > > > > > > > > > It forces the discrete GPU to be on leading to higher thermal pressure > > > > and power consumption of the system. Lower battery runtime or higher > > > > fan noise is the result. Not everybody wants to use an AC simply just > > > > because they attach an external display. > > > > > > The system is designed in this way. > > > > > > > ?!? This makes no sense. If the discrete GPU is turned on, it means > > the system has to cool away more heat, because it consumes more power. > > It then causes louder fans. No idea how a "system design" can just go > > around simple physics... > > The spec from HP [1] says: > Multi Display Support > Without HP Thunderbolt™ Dock G2 > UMA Graphics: Unit supports up to 4 independent displays. Any > combination of displays outputs may be used except one of > Thunderbolt™ 4 and HDMI. > Hybrid Graphics: Unit supports up 5 simultaneous displays (4 from dGPU > + 1 from iGPU). Any combination of displays outputs may > be used except when using one USBC and HDMI are exclusive > > With HP Thunderbolt™ Dock G2 > UMA Graphics: Unit supports up to 4 simultaneous displays. Any > combination of displays outputs may be used except one of > Thunderbolt™ 4 and HDMI. > Hybrid Graphics (NVIDIA): Unit supports up to 5 simultaneous displays > (4 from dGPU + 1 from iGPU). Any combination of displays > outputs may be used except when using one USBC and HDMI are exclusive > Hybrid Graphics (AMD): Unit supports up to 5 simultaneous displays (5 > from dGPU + 1 from iGPU). Any combination of displays > outputs may be used except when using one USBC and HDMI are exclusive > > So it's "designed" to use dGPU on the hybrid configs. > > Let's hope the copper tubes have can dissipate the heat fast enough. > > > > > Even the CPU consumes more power, because on some systems it prevents > > deeper package sleeping modes due to the active PCIe bridge > > controller. > > > > But if you have certain systems where you want to enable this behavior > > despite the drawbacks, maybe maintain a list of systems where to apply > > this method? > > The behavior will be enabled only when _DSM function 20 is present. > So it's already a selected few. I had a quick trawl through some Windows stuff for this and it does seem to do a few extra checks: - platform must be TGL-H (nothing else has the DPin stuff I guess) - OpRegion header must indicate dGPU presence Otherwise it does call this DSM uncoditionally on boot/S4 resume so seems like that is the only really validated configuration. Although it does seem to explicitly turn off displays prior to the DSM so that does perhaps indicate that those ports might have also been enabled via the iGPU by the BIOS. Not sure if disabling the ports would work correctly after the DSM or not. If not then the DSM call would need to happen after state readout/sanitization so that we can shut things down gracefully. Additionally after the DSM call it scans the FIA TC live state bits to check for DPin usage. Looks like its trying to make sure the driver stops poking at the relevant power wells once in DPin mode. i915 doesn't check that stuff atm so we might end up mangling something while the dGPU is driving the port. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported 2022-08-17 11:59 ` Ville Syrjälä @ 2022-08-17 12:15 ` Kai-Heng Feng -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Kai-Heng Feng @ 2022-08-17 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ville Syrjälä Cc: Karol Herbst, Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu, Imre Deak On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 7:59 PM Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote: [snipped] > I had a quick trawl through some Windows stuff for this and > it does seem to do a few extra checks: > - platform must be TGL-H (nothing else has the DPin stuff I guess) > - OpRegion header must indicate dGPU presence Is the dGPU presence denoted by the return bitmask of INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED? IIUC the mask 20 won't be set when dGPU is not present. > > Otherwise it does call this DSM uncoditionally on boot/S4 resume > so seems like that is the only really validated configuration. > Although it does seem to explicitly turn off displays prior to > the DSM so that does perhaps indicate that those ports might have > also been enabled via the iGPU by the BIOS. Not sure if disabling > the ports would work correctly after the DSM or not. If not then > the DSM call would need to happen after state readout/sanitization > so that we can shut things down gracefully. > > Additionally after the DSM call it scans the FIA TC live state > bits to check for DPin usage. Looks like its trying to make sure > the driver stops poking at the relevant power wells once in DPin > mode. i915 doesn't check that stuff atm so we might end up > mangling something while the dGPU is driving the port. Thanks for investigating this. I am not really familiar with other stuffs you mentioned, but I am happy to test any follow-up patch. Kai-Heng > > -- > Ville Syrjälä > Intel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-17 12:15 ` Kai-Heng Feng 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Kai-Heng Feng @ 2022-08-17 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ville Syrjälä Cc: Heikki Krogerus, Karol Herbst, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 7:59 PM Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote: [snipped] > I had a quick trawl through some Windows stuff for this and > it does seem to do a few extra checks: > - platform must be TGL-H (nothing else has the DPin stuff I guess) > - OpRegion header must indicate dGPU presence Is the dGPU presence denoted by the return bitmask of INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED? IIUC the mask 20 won't be set when dGPU is not present. > > Otherwise it does call this DSM uncoditionally on boot/S4 resume > so seems like that is the only really validated configuration. > Although it does seem to explicitly turn off displays prior to > the DSM so that does perhaps indicate that those ports might have > also been enabled via the iGPU by the BIOS. Not sure if disabling > the ports would work correctly after the DSM or not. If not then > the DSM call would need to happen after state readout/sanitization > so that we can shut things down gracefully. > > Additionally after the DSM call it scans the FIA TC live state > bits to check for DPin usage. Looks like its trying to make sure > the driver stops poking at the relevant power wells once in DPin > mode. i915 doesn't check that stuff atm so we might end up > mangling something while the dGPU is driving the port. Thanks for investigating this. I am not really familiar with other stuffs you mentioned, but I am happy to test any follow-up patch. Kai-Heng > > -- > Ville Syrjälä > Intel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported 2022-08-17 12:15 ` Kai-Heng Feng @ 2022-08-17 13:05 ` Ville Syrjälä -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2022-08-17 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kai-Heng Feng Cc: Heikki Krogerus, Karol Herbst, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 08:15:58PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 7:59 PM Ville Syrjälä > <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > [snipped] > > > I had a quick trawl through some Windows stuff for this and > > it does seem to do a few extra checks: > > - platform must be TGL-H (nothing else has the DPin stuff I guess) > > - OpRegion header must indicate dGPU presence > > Is the dGPU presence denoted by the return bitmask of > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED No, there are apparently some extra bits in the OpRegion header which we're not currently even decoding. > > IIUC the mask 20 won't be set when dGPU is not present. Not sure whether that bit would change depending on the dGPU presence or not. Windows doesn't seem trust it alone, so either it won't change or someone was just extra paranoid. > > > > > Otherwise it does call this DSM uncoditionally on boot/S4 resume > > so seems like that is the only really validated configuration. > > Although it does seem to explicitly turn off displays prior to > > the DSM so that does perhaps indicate that those ports might have > > also been enabled via the iGPU by the BIOS. Not sure if disabling > > the ports would work correctly after the DSM or not. If not then > > the DSM call would need to happen after state readout/sanitization > > so that we can shut things down gracefully. > > > > Additionally after the DSM call it scans the FIA TC live state > > bits to check for DPin usage. Looks like its trying to make sure > > the driver stops poking at the relevant power wells once in DPin > > mode. i915 doesn't check that stuff atm so we might end up > > mangling something while the dGPU is driving the port. > > Thanks for investigating this. I am not really familiar with other > stuffs you mentioned, but I am happy to test any follow-up patch. > > Kai-Heng > > > > > -- > > Ville Syrjälä > > Intel -- Ville Syrjälä Intel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported @ 2022-08-17 13:05 ` Ville Syrjälä 0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2022-08-17 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kai-Heng Feng Cc: Karol Herbst, Heikki Krogerus, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, rodrigo.vivi, Zenghui Yu, Imre Deak On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 08:15:58PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 7:59 PM Ville Syrjälä > <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > [snipped] > > > I had a quick trawl through some Windows stuff for this and > > it does seem to do a few extra checks: > > - platform must be TGL-H (nothing else has the DPin stuff I guess) > > - OpRegion header must indicate dGPU presence > > Is the dGPU presence denoted by the return bitmask of > INTEL_DSM_FN_GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED No, there are apparently some extra bits in the OpRegion header which we're not currently even decoding. > > IIUC the mask 20 won't be set when dGPU is not present. Not sure whether that bit would change depending on the dGPU presence or not. Windows doesn't seem trust it alone, so either it won't change or someone was just extra paranoid. > > > > > Otherwise it does call this DSM uncoditionally on boot/S4 resume > > so seems like that is the only really validated configuration. > > Although it does seem to explicitly turn off displays prior to > > the DSM so that does perhaps indicate that those ports might have > > also been enabled via the iGPU by the BIOS. Not sure if disabling > > the ports would work correctly after the DSM or not. If not then > > the DSM call would need to happen after state readout/sanitization > > so that we can shut things down gracefully. > > > > Additionally after the DSM call it scans the FIA TC live state > > bits to check for DPin usage. Looks like its trying to make sure > > the driver stops poking at the relevant power wells once in DPin > > mode. i915 doesn't check that stuff atm so we might end up > > mangling something while the dGPU is driving the port. > > Thanks for investigating this. I am not really familiar with other > stuffs you mentioned, but I am happy to test any follow-up patch. > > Kai-Heng > > > > > -- > > Ville Syrjälä > > Intel -- Ville Syrjälä Intel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-08-25 10:36 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 58+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-08-16 2:52 [PATCH] drm/i915: Switch TGL-H DP-IN to dGFX when it's supported Kai-Heng Feng 2022-08-16 2:52 ` Kai-Heng Feng 2022-08-16 2:52 ` [Intel-gfx] " Kai-Heng Feng 2022-08-16 3:52 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork 2022-08-16 8:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Jani Nikula 2022-08-16 8:06 ` Jani Nikula 2022-08-16 8:06 ` Jani Nikula 2022-08-16 11:29 ` [Intel-gfx] " Kai-Heng Feng 2022-08-16 11:29 ` Kai-Heng Feng 2022-08-16 11:29 ` Kai-Heng Feng 2022-08-16 18:24 ` Lyude Paul 2022-08-16 18:24 ` [Intel-gfx] " Lyude Paul 2022-08-16 18:24 ` Lyude Paul 2022-08-16 18:36 ` Lyude Paul 2022-08-16 18:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Lyude Paul 2022-08-16 18:36 ` Lyude Paul 2022-08-17 1:08 ` Kai-Heng Feng 2022-08-17 1:08 ` [Intel-gfx] " Kai-Heng Feng 2022-08-17 1:08 ` Kai-Heng Feng 2022-08-17 1:02 ` Kai-Heng Feng 2022-08-17 1:02 ` Kai-Heng Feng 2022-08-17 1:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Kai-Heng Feng 2022-08-17 17:56 ` Lyude Paul 2022-08-17 17:56 ` Lyude Paul 2022-08-17 17:56 ` [Intel-gfx] " Lyude Paul 2022-08-18 20:26 ` [External] " Mark Pearson 2022-08-18 20:26 ` [Intel-gfx] " Mark Pearson 2022-08-18 20:26 ` Mark Pearson 2022-08-24 18:33 ` Karol Herbst 2022-08-24 18:33 ` [Intel-gfx] " Karol Herbst 2022-08-24 18:33 ` Karol Herbst 2022-08-18 11:53 ` Lukas Wunner 2022-08-18 11:53 ` [Intel-gfx] " Lukas Wunner 2022-08-18 11:53 ` Lukas Wunner 2022-08-19 17:01 ` Karol Herbst 2022-08-19 17:01 ` Karol Herbst 2022-08-19 17:01 ` [Intel-gfx] " Karol Herbst 2022-08-24 14:22 ` Kai-Heng Feng 2022-08-24 14:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Kai-Heng Feng 2022-08-24 14:22 ` Kai-Heng Feng 2022-08-16 18:49 ` Karol Herbst 2022-08-16 18:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Karol Herbst 2022-08-16 18:49 ` Karol Herbst 2022-08-17 1:18 ` Kai-Heng Feng 2022-08-17 1:18 ` [Intel-gfx] " Kai-Heng Feng 2022-08-17 1:18 ` Kai-Heng Feng 2022-08-17 1:48 ` Karol Herbst 2022-08-17 1:48 ` [Intel-gfx] " Karol Herbst 2022-08-17 1:48 ` Karol Herbst 2022-08-17 3:04 ` Kai-Heng Feng 2022-08-17 3:04 ` [Intel-gfx] " Kai-Heng Feng 2022-08-17 3:04 ` Kai-Heng Feng 2022-08-17 11:59 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä 2022-08-17 11:59 ` Ville Syrjälä 2022-08-17 12:15 ` Kai-Heng Feng 2022-08-17 12:15 ` Kai-Heng Feng 2022-08-17 13:05 ` Ville Syrjälä 2022-08-17 13:05 ` Ville Syrjälä
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.