From: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> To: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de> Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>, Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>, Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, KVM General <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] RISC-V: KVM: Mark the existing SBI implementation as v01 Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 19:29:58 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAAhSdy0J7WVJO5vbz1JeHChitbJpagyuE1nF8XHfY-K=DnySGg@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <8323751.1mJVJdxAKN@diego> On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 6:57 PM Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 4. Januar 2022, 14:19:41 CET schrieb Heiko Stübner: > > Hi Atish, > > > > Am Donnerstag, 18. November 2021, 09:39:08 CET schrieb Atish Patra: > > > From: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> > > > > > > The existing SBI specification impelementation follows v0.1 > > > specification. The latest specification allows more > > > scalability and performance improvements. > > > > > > Rename the existing implementation as v01 and provide a way to allow > > > future extensions. > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com> > > > --- > > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c > > > index eb3c045edf11..32376906ff20 100644 > > > --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c > > > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > > > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > > -/** > > > +/* > > > * Copyright (c) 2019 Western Digital Corporation or its affiliates. > > > * > > > * Authors: > > > > This got already fixed by [0] > > commit 0e2e64192100 ("riscv: kvm: fix non-kernel-doc comment block") > > so this patch doesn't apply cleanly anymore. > > hmm, just found Anup's "I've queued this..." message after > writing my reply, so scratch the above ;-) . > > @Anup: I've looked at git.kernel.org but didn't find a tree > there, can you tell me where this did go to? All queued patches are in riscv_kvm_queue branch of the KVM RISC-V tree at https://github.com/kvm-riscv/linux.git Regards, Anup > > Thanks > Heiko > >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> To: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de> Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>, Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>, Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, KVM General <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] RISC-V: KVM: Mark the existing SBI implementation as v01 Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 19:29:58 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAAhSdy0J7WVJO5vbz1JeHChitbJpagyuE1nF8XHfY-K=DnySGg@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <8323751.1mJVJdxAKN@diego> On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 6:57 PM Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 4. Januar 2022, 14:19:41 CET schrieb Heiko Stübner: > > Hi Atish, > > > > Am Donnerstag, 18. November 2021, 09:39:08 CET schrieb Atish Patra: > > > From: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> > > > > > > The existing SBI specification impelementation follows v0.1 > > > specification. The latest specification allows more > > > scalability and performance improvements. > > > > > > Rename the existing implementation as v01 and provide a way to allow > > > future extensions. > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com> > > > --- > > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c > > > index eb3c045edf11..32376906ff20 100644 > > > --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c > > > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > > > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > > -/** > > > +/* > > > * Copyright (c) 2019 Western Digital Corporation or its affiliates. > > > * > > > * Authors: > > > > This got already fixed by [0] > > commit 0e2e64192100 ("riscv: kvm: fix non-kernel-doc comment block") > > so this patch doesn't apply cleanly anymore. > > hmm, just found Anup's "I've queued this..." message after > writing my reply, so scratch the above ;-) . > > @Anup: I've looked at git.kernel.org but didn't find a tree > there, can you tell me where this did go to? All queued patches are in riscv_kvm_queue branch of the KVM RISC-V tree at https://github.com/kvm-riscv/linux.git Regards, Anup > > Thanks > Heiko > > _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-04 14:00 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-11-18 8:39 [PATCH v5 0/5] Add SBI v0.2 support for KVM Atish Patra 2021-11-18 8:39 ` Atish Patra 2021-11-18 8:39 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] RISC-V: KVM: Mark the existing SBI implementation as v01 Atish Patra 2021-11-18 8:39 ` Atish Patra 2021-11-23 8:02 ` Anup Patel 2021-11-23 8:02 ` Anup Patel 2022-01-04 13:19 ` Heiko Stübner 2022-01-04 13:19 ` Heiko Stübner 2022-01-04 13:27 ` Heiko Stübner 2022-01-04 13:27 ` Heiko Stübner 2022-01-04 13:59 ` Anup Patel [this message] 2022-01-04 13:59 ` Anup Patel 2021-11-18 8:39 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] RISC-V: KVM: Reorganize SBI code by moving SBI v0.1 to its own file Atish Patra 2021-11-18 8:39 ` Atish Patra 2021-11-23 8:02 ` Anup Patel 2021-11-23 8:02 ` Anup Patel 2021-11-18 8:39 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] RISC-V: KVM: Add SBI v0.2 base extension Atish Patra 2021-11-18 8:39 ` Atish Patra 2021-11-23 8:03 ` Anup Patel 2021-11-23 8:03 ` Anup Patel 2021-11-18 8:39 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] RISC-V: KVM: Add v0.1 replacement SBI extensions defined in v02 Atish Patra 2021-11-18 8:39 ` Atish Patra 2021-11-23 8:03 ` Anup Patel 2021-11-23 8:03 ` Anup Patel 2021-11-18 8:39 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] RISC-V: KVM: Add SBI HSM extension in KVM Atish Patra 2021-11-18 8:39 ` Atish Patra 2021-11-23 8:06 ` Anup Patel 2021-11-23 8:06 ` Anup Patel
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to='CAAhSdy0J7WVJO5vbz1JeHChitbJpagyuE1nF8XHfY-K=DnySGg@mail.gmail.com' \ --to=anup@brainfault.org \ --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \ --cc=atishp@rivosinc.com \ --cc=heiko@sntech.de \ --cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \ --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \ --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \ --cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.