* PASS: stable-rc/linux-5.10.y (v5.10.29-rc1)
@ 2021-04-10 5:18 Patrick Mccormick
2021-04-10 9:25 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Mccormick @ 2021-04-10 5:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable, Greg KH
We ran tests on this kernel:
commit 18f507c37f338c5d30f58839060d3af0d8504162 (HEAD ->
rc/linux-5.10.y, stable_rc/linux-5.10.y)
Author: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri Apr 9 11:53:03 2021 +0200
Linux 5.10.29-rc1
32/32 test passed, 0 failed, 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Specific tests run:
(01/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_nptl: PASS (6.52 s)
(02/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_math: PASS (2.13 s)
(03/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_hugetlb: PASS (0.08 s)
(04/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_ipc: PASS (20.09 s)
(05/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_uevent: PASS (0.05 s)
(06/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_containers: PASS (36.76 s)
(07/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_filecaps: PASS (0.11 s)
(08/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_hyperthreading: PASS (71.19 s)
(09/32) kpatch.sh: PASS (11.64 s)
(10/32) perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_help: PASS (0.08 s)
(11/32) perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_version: PASS (0.06 s)
(12/32) perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_list: PASS (0.40 s)
(13/32) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_record: PASS (4.74 s)
(14/32) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_kallsyms: PASS (0.26 s)
(15/32) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_annotate: PASS (5.15 s)
(16/32) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_evlist: PASS (0.07 s)
(17/32) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_script: PASS (0.50 s)
(18/32) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_stat: PASS (3.22 s)
(19/32) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_bench: PASS (0.07 s)
(20/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sysctl: PASS (0.03 s)
(21/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_size: PASS (0.02 s)
(22/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sync: PASS (0.46 s)
(23/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_capabilities: PASS (0.03 s)
(24/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_x86: PASS (0.26 s)
(25/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_pidfd: PASS (13.06 s)
(26/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_membarrier: PASS (0.18 s)
(27/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sigaltstack: PASS (0.03 s)
(28/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_tmpfs: PASS (0.02 s)
(29/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_user: PASS (0.02 s)
(30/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sched: PASS (0.03 s)
(31/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_timens: PASS (0.09 s)
(32/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_timers: PASS (554.44 s)
RESULTS : PASS 32 | ERROR 0 | FAIL 0 | SKIP 0 | WARN 0 | INTERRUPT
0 | CANCEL 0
Tested-by: pmccormick@digitalocean.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: PASS: stable-rc/linux-5.10.y (v5.10.29-rc1)
2021-04-10 5:18 PASS: stable-rc/linux-5.10.y (v5.10.29-rc1) Patrick Mccormick
@ 2021-04-10 9:25 ` Greg KH
2021-04-12 20:03 ` Patrick Mccormick
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2021-04-10 9:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patrick Mccormick; +Cc: stable
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 10:18:21PM -0700, Patrick Mccormick wrote:
> We ran tests on this kernel:
>
> commit 18f507c37f338c5d30f58839060d3af0d8504162 (HEAD ->
> rc/linux-5.10.y, stable_rc/linux-5.10.y)
> Author: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Date: Fri Apr 9 11:53:03 2021 +0200
>
> Linux 5.10.29-rc1
>
> 32/32 test passed, 0 failed, 0 errors, 0 warnings.
>
> Specific tests run:
>
> (01/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_nptl: PASS (6.52 s)
> (02/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_math: PASS (2.13 s)
> (03/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_hugetlb: PASS (0.08 s)
> (04/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_ipc: PASS (20.09 s)
> (05/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_uevent: PASS (0.05 s)
> (06/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_containers: PASS (36.76 s)
> (07/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_filecaps: PASS (0.11 s)
> (08/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_hyperthreading: PASS (71.19 s)
> (09/32) kpatch.sh: PASS (11.64 s)
> (10/32) perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_help: PASS (0.08 s)
> (11/32) perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_version: PASS (0.06 s)
> (12/32) perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_list: PASS (0.40 s)
> (13/32) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_record: PASS (4.74 s)
> (14/32) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_kallsyms: PASS (0.26 s)
> (15/32) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_annotate: PASS (5.15 s)
> (16/32) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_evlist: PASS (0.07 s)
> (17/32) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_script: PASS (0.50 s)
> (18/32) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_stat: PASS (3.22 s)
> (19/32) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_bench: PASS (0.07 s)
> (20/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sysctl: PASS (0.03 s)
> (21/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_size: PASS (0.02 s)
> (22/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sync: PASS (0.46 s)
> (23/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_capabilities: PASS (0.03 s)
> (24/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_x86: PASS (0.26 s)
> (25/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_pidfd: PASS (13.06 s)
> (26/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_membarrier: PASS (0.18 s)
> (27/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sigaltstack: PASS (0.03 s)
> (28/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_tmpfs: PASS (0.02 s)
> (29/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_user: PASS (0.02 s)
> (30/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sched: PASS (0.03 s)
> (31/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_timens: PASS (0.09 s)
> (32/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_timers: PASS (554.44 s)
> RESULTS : PASS 32 | ERROR 0 | FAIL 0 | SKIP 0 | WARN 0 | INTERRUPT
> 0 | CANCEL 0
>
> Tested-by: pmccormick@digitalocean.com
Any chance you can make this a response to the -rc release announcement
and provide the name correctly for the tested-by: line in the future so
that I can include it in the release commit?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: PASS: stable-rc/linux-5.10.y (v5.10.29-rc1)
2021-04-10 9:25 ` Greg KH
@ 2021-04-12 20:03 ` Patrick Mccormick
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Mccormick @ 2021-04-12 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH; +Cc: stable
No problem.
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 2:25 AM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 10:18:21PM -0700, Patrick Mccormick wrote:
> > We ran tests on this kernel:
> >
> > commit 18f507c37f338c5d30f58839060d3af0d8504162 (HEAD ->
> > rc/linux-5.10.y, stable_rc/linux-5.10.y)
> > Author: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > Date: Fri Apr 9 11:53:03 2021 +0200
> >
> > Linux 5.10.29-rc1
> >
> > 32/32 test passed, 0 failed, 0 errors, 0 warnings.
> >
> > Specific tests run:
> >
> > (01/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_nptl: PASS (6.52 s)
> > (02/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_math: PASS (2.13 s)
> > (03/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_hugetlb: PASS (0.08 s)
> > (04/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_ipc: PASS (20.09 s)
> > (05/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_uevent: PASS (0.05 s)
> > (06/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_containers: PASS (36.76 s)
> > (07/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_filecaps: PASS (0.11 s)
> > (08/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_hyperthreading: PASS (71.19 s)
> > (09/32) kpatch.sh: PASS (11.64 s)
> > (10/32) perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_help: PASS (0.08 s)
> > (11/32) perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_version: PASS (0.06 s)
> > (12/32) perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_list: PASS (0.40 s)
> > (13/32) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_record: PASS (4.74 s)
> > (14/32) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_kallsyms: PASS (0.26 s)
> > (15/32) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_annotate: PASS (5.15 s)
> > (16/32) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_evlist: PASS (0.07 s)
> > (17/32) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_script: PASS (0.50 s)
> > (18/32) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_stat: PASS (3.22 s)
> > (19/32) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_bench: PASS (0.07 s)
> > (20/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sysctl: PASS (0.03 s)
> > (21/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_size: PASS (0.02 s)
> > (22/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sync: PASS (0.46 s)
> > (23/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_capabilities: PASS (0.03 s)
> > (24/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_x86: PASS (0.26 s)
> > (25/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_pidfd: PASS (13.06 s)
> > (26/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_membarrier: PASS (0.18 s)
> > (27/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sigaltstack: PASS (0.03 s)
> > (28/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_tmpfs: PASS (0.02 s)
> > (29/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_user: PASS (0.02 s)
> > (30/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sched: PASS (0.03 s)
> > (31/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_timens: PASS (0.09 s)
> > (32/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_timers: PASS (554.44 s)
> > RESULTS : PASS 32 | ERROR 0 | FAIL 0 | SKIP 0 | WARN 0 | INTERRUPT
> > 0 | CANCEL 0
> >
> > Tested-by: pmccormick@digitalocean.com
>
> Any chance you can make this a response to the -rc release announcement
> and provide the name correctly for the tested-by: line in the future so
> that I can include it in the release commit?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-04-12 20:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-04-10 5:18 PASS: stable-rc/linux-5.10.y (v5.10.29-rc1) Patrick Mccormick
2021-04-10 9:25 ` Greg KH
2021-04-12 20:03 ` Patrick Mccormick
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.