All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* boost monthly download limits
@ 2020-03-31 18:26 geissonator
  2020-03-31 19:34 ` [yocto] " Alexander Kanavin
  2020-03-31 22:53 ` Ross Burton
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: geissonator @ 2020-03-31 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: yocto

Greetings,

Recently, the OpenBMC project started to hit
https://github.com/boostorg/boost/issues/299#issuecomment-593064251. Basically
the site that hosts the boost packages has a monthly download limit and once
hit, starts to fail.

There was a commit last year,
https://github.com/openembedded/openembedded-core/commit/810aded01fc2ae2c27c2573135c20947453e50c6
which moved from using sourceforge to dl.bintray.com. I don't see a reason in
the commit message but I suspect it was because sourceforge for some reason did
not mirror 1.71.0. They have 1.70.0 and 1.72.0 but not 1.71.0. I opened
https://sourceforge.net/p/boost/discussion/23622/thread/4fe1cce13b/?limit=25#7d3e
to try and understand why this was.

Given the download limitations of dl.bintray.com, does it make sense to try
and move back to sourceforge? Someone also had recommended we just grab
from github (i.e. https://github.com/boostorg/boost/archive/boost-1.71.0.tar.gz)

This issue will reset on the first of the month but could come back and bite
us again in the future. Anyone else hit this or looking into it?

Andrew

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [yocto] boost monthly download limits
  2020-03-31 18:26 boost monthly download limits geissonator
@ 2020-03-31 19:34 ` Alexander Kanavin
  2020-03-31 22:29   ` Yann Dirson
  2020-03-31 22:53 ` Ross Burton
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Kanavin @ 2020-03-31 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Geissler; +Cc: yocto

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1495 bytes --]

I wouldn't be super concerned about that, as Yocto servers carry copies of
oe-core tarballs, and there is a fallback for that scenario. If it does
occur, we should explore alternatives, but there's no need to panic.

Alex

On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 21:07, Andrew Geissler <geissonator@gmail.com> wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> Recently, the OpenBMC project started to hit
> https://github.com/boostorg/boost/issues/299#issuecomment-593064251.
> Basically
> the site that hosts the boost packages has a monthly download limit and
> once
> hit, starts to fail.
>
> There was a commit last year,
>
> https://github.com/openembedded/openembedded-core/commit/810aded01fc2ae2c27c2573135c20947453e50c6
> which moved from using sourceforge to dl.bintray.com. I don't see a
> reason in
> the commit message but I suspect it was because sourceforge for some
> reason did
> not mirror 1.71.0. They have 1.70.0 and 1.72.0 but not 1.71.0. I opened
>
> https://sourceforge.net/p/boost/discussion/23622/thread/4fe1cce13b/?limit=25#7d3e
> to try and understand why this was.
>
> Given the download limitations of dl.bintray.com, does it make sense to
> try
> and move back to sourceforge? Someone also had recommended we just grab
> from github (i.e.
> https://github.com/boostorg/boost/archive/boost-1.71.0.tar.gz)
>
> This issue will reset on the first of the month but could come back and
> bite
> us again in the future. Anyone else hit this or looking into it?
>
> Andrew
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2476 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [yocto] boost monthly download limits
  2020-03-31 19:34 ` [yocto] " Alexander Kanavin
@ 2020-03-31 22:29   ` Yann Dirson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yann Dirson @ 2020-03-31 22:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexander Kanavin; +Cc: Andrew Geissler, yocto

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1880 bytes --]

That may be not a problem to us, but we could still avoid to contribute to
them hitting this limitation,
I guess that was part of the original point :)

Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 21:34, Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com> a
écrit :

> I wouldn't be super concerned about that, as Yocto servers carry copies of
> oe-core tarballs, and there is a fallback for that scenario. If it does
> occur, we should explore alternatives, but there's no need to panic.
>
> Alex
>
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 21:07, Andrew Geissler <geissonator@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Recently, the OpenBMC project started to hit
>> https://github.com/boostorg/boost/issues/299#issuecomment-593064251.
>> Basically
>> the site that hosts the boost packages has a monthly download limit and
>> once
>> hit, starts to fail.
>>
>> There was a commit last year,
>>
>> https://github.com/openembedded/openembedded-core/commit/810aded01fc2ae2c27c2573135c20947453e50c6
>> which moved from using sourceforge to dl.bintray.com. I don't see a
>> reason in
>> the commit message but I suspect it was because sourceforge for some
>> reason did
>> not mirror 1.71.0. They have 1.70.0 and 1.72.0 but not 1.71.0. I opened
>>
>> https://sourceforge.net/p/boost/discussion/23622/thread/4fe1cce13b/?limit=25#7d3e
>> to try and understand why this was.
>>
>> Given the download limitations of dl.bintray.com, does it make sense to
>> try
>> and move back to sourceforge? Someone also had recommended we just grab
>> from github (i.e.
>> https://github.com/boostorg/boost/archive/boost-1.71.0.tar.gz)
>>
>> This issue will reset on the first of the month but could come back and
>> bite
>> us again in the future. Anyone else hit this or looking into it?
>>
>> Andrew
>>
> 
>


-- 
Yann Dirson <yann@blade-group.com>
Blade / Shadow -- http://shadow.tech

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3310 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [yocto] boost monthly download limits
  2020-03-31 18:26 boost monthly download limits geissonator
  2020-03-31 19:34 ` [yocto] " Alexander Kanavin
@ 2020-03-31 22:53 ` Ross Burton
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ross Burton @ 2020-03-31 22:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Geissler; +Cc: yocto

On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 20:07, Andrew Geissler <geissonator@gmail.com> wrote:
> Given the download limitations of dl.bintray.com, does it make sense to try
> and move back to sourceforge? Someone also had recommended we just grab
> from github (i.e. https://github.com/boostorg/boost/archive/boost-1.71.0.tar.gz)

That's a dynamically generated tarball that can't be relied upon, so
isn't an option.  As there's a known limitation with bintray.com I see
no reason not to move back to SF.

Patches welcome!

Ross

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-31 22:53 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-31 18:26 boost monthly download limits geissonator
2020-03-31 19:34 ` [yocto] " Alexander Kanavin
2020-03-31 22:29   ` Yann Dirson
2020-03-31 22:53 ` Ross Burton

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.