From: Javier Martinez Canillas <martinez.javier@gmail.com>
To: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
grant.likely@secretlab.ca,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetbo@gmail.com>,
Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>,
Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@googlemail.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: omap3-igep: remove VSIM regulator
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 10:31:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAwP0s2oJCcvCgQ6UrcnLJpt7K7AdHhVWGOthhgc4v9AgmaHEQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1355532740-5956-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
<javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> wrote:
> commit 5a8095e9 ARM: dts: Add omap3-beagle.dts
>
> moved the VSIM regulator definition to the twl4030.dtsi to avoid
> duplication. A definition for the VSIM regulator was also present
> on omap3-igep.dtsi which leads to the following build error:
>
> DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-igep0020.dtb
> DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-igep0030.dtb
> ERROR (duplicate_label): Duplicate label 'vsim' on /ocp/i2c@48070000/twl@48/regulator-vsim and /ocp/i2c@48070000/twl@48/regulator@10
> ERROR: Input tree has errors, aborting (use -f to force output)
> ERROR (duplicate_label): Duplicate label 'vsim' on /ocp/i2c@48070000/twl@48/regulator-vsim and /ocp/i2c@48070000/twl@48/regulator@10
> ERROR: Input tree has errors, aborting (use -f to force output)
> make[1]: *** [arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-igep0020.dtb] Error 2
> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make[1]: *** [arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-igep0030.dtb] Error 2
> make: *** [dtbs] Error 2
>
> Since IGEP devices uses the same PMIC as Beagle boards, the VSIM
> definition from twl4030.dtsi can be used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-igep.dtsi | 6 ------
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-igep.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-igep.dtsi
> index 125fe00..de708ca 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-igep.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-igep.dtsi
> @@ -43,12 +43,6 @@
> interrupts = <7>; /* SYS_NIRQ cascaded to intc */
> interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
>
> - vsim: regulator@10 {
> - compatible = "ti,twl4030-vsim";
> - regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> - regulator-max-microvolt = <3000000>;
> - };
> -
> twl_audio: audio {
> compatible = "ti,twl4030-audio";
> codec {
Hi Benoit,
It is ok for you that I send delta patches for the IGEP DT initial
support [1] such as this patch and the MMC device node mux pins setup
[2] or should I merge these changes and resend a new patch-set?
Thanks a lot and best regards,
Javier
[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/3/142
[2]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1882991/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: martinez.javier@gmail.com (Javier Martinez Canillas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: omap3-igep: remove VSIM regulator
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 10:31:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAwP0s2oJCcvCgQ6UrcnLJpt7K7AdHhVWGOthhgc4v9AgmaHEQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1355532740-5956-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
<javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> wrote:
> commit 5a8095e9 ARM: dts: Add omap3-beagle.dts
>
> moved the VSIM regulator definition to the twl4030.dtsi to avoid
> duplication. A definition for the VSIM regulator was also present
> on omap3-igep.dtsi which leads to the following build error:
>
> DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-igep0020.dtb
> DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-igep0030.dtb
> ERROR (duplicate_label): Duplicate label 'vsim' on /ocp/i2c at 48070000/twl at 48/regulator-vsim and /ocp/i2c at 48070000/twl at 48/regulator at 10
> ERROR: Input tree has errors, aborting (use -f to force output)
> ERROR (duplicate_label): Duplicate label 'vsim' on /ocp/i2c at 48070000/twl at 48/regulator-vsim and /ocp/i2c at 48070000/twl at 48/regulator at 10
> ERROR: Input tree has errors, aborting (use -f to force output)
> make[1]: *** [arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-igep0020.dtb] Error 2
> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make[1]: *** [arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-igep0030.dtb] Error 2
> make: *** [dtbs] Error 2
>
> Since IGEP devices uses the same PMIC as Beagle boards, the VSIM
> definition from twl4030.dtsi can be used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-igep.dtsi | 6 ------
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-igep.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-igep.dtsi
> index 125fe00..de708ca 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-igep.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-igep.dtsi
> @@ -43,12 +43,6 @@
> interrupts = <7>; /* SYS_NIRQ cascaded to intc */
> interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
>
> - vsim: regulator at 10 {
> - compatible = "ti,twl4030-vsim";
> - regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> - regulator-max-microvolt = <3000000>;
> - };
> -
> twl_audio: audio {
> compatible = "ti,twl4030-audio";
> codec {
Hi Benoit,
It is ok for you that I send delta patches for the IGEP DT initial
support [1] such as this patch and the MMC device node mux pins setup
[2] or should I merge these changes and resend a new patch-set?
Thanks a lot and best regards,
Javier
[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/3/142
[2]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1882991/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-19 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-15 0:52 [PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: omap3-igep: remove VSIM regulator Javier Martinez Canillas
2012-12-15 0:52 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2012-12-19 9:31 ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message]
2012-12-19 9:31 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2012-12-19 12:36 ` Benoit Cousson
2012-12-19 12:36 ` Benoit Cousson
2012-12-19 12:53 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2012-12-19 12:53 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAAwP0s2oJCcvCgQ6UrcnLJpt7K7AdHhVWGOthhgc4v9AgmaHEQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=martinez.javier@gmail.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=eballetbo@gmail.com \
--cc=elezegarcia@gmail.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk \
--cc=jon-hunter@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@googlemail.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.