[RFC PATCH 0/4] can: bxcan: add support for ST bxCAN controller

[RFC PATCH 0/4] can: bxcan: add support for ST bxCAN controller

[Dario Binacchi]

The series adds support for the basic extended CAN controller (bxCAN)
found in many low- to middle-end STM32 SoCs.

The driver has been tested on the stm32f469i-discovery board with a
kernel version 5.19.0-rc2 in loopback + silent mode:

ip link set can0 type can bitrate 125000 loopback on listen-only on
ip link set up can0
candump can0 -L &
cansend can0 300#AC.AB.AD.AE.75.49.AD.D1

For uboot and kernel compilation, as well as for rootfs creation I used
buildroot:

make stm32f469_disco_sd_defconfig
make

but I had to patch can-utils and busybox as can-utils and iproute are
not compiled for MMU-less microcotrollers. In the case of can-utils,
replacing the calls to fork() with vfork(), I was able to compile the
package with working candump and cansend applications, while in the
case of iproute, I ran into more than one problem and finally I decided
to extend busybox's ip link command for CAN-type devices. I'm still
wondering if it was really necessary, but this way I was able to test
the driver.


Dario Binacchi (4):
  dt-bindings: net: can: add STM32 bxcan DT bindings
  ARM: dts: stm32: add CAN support on stm32f429
  ARM: dts: stm32: add pin map for CAN controller on stm32f4
  can: bxcan: add support for ST bxCAN controller

 .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml | 139 +++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f4-pinctrl.dtsi        |  32 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi              |  30 +
 drivers/net/can/Kconfig                       |   1 +
 drivers/net/can/Makefile                      |   1 +
 drivers/net/can/bxcan/Kconfig                 |  34 +
 drivers/net/can/bxcan/Makefile                |   4 +
 drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-core.c            | 201 ++++
 drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-core.h            |  33 +
 drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c             | 980 ++++++++++++++++++
 10 files changed, 1455 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/bxcan/Kconfig
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/bxcan/Makefile
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-core.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-core.h
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c

-- 
2.32.0

[RFC PATCH 0/4] can: bxcan: add support for ST bxCAN controller

[Dario Binacchi]

The series adds support for the basic extended CAN controller (bxCAN)
found in many low- to middle-end STM32 SoCs.

The driver has been tested on the stm32f469i-discovery board with a
kernel version 5.19.0-rc2 in loopback + silent mode:

ip link set can0 type can bitrate 125000 loopback on listen-only on
ip link set up can0
candump can0 -L &
cansend can0 300#AC.AB.AD.AE.75.49.AD.D1

For uboot and kernel compilation, as well as for rootfs creation I used
buildroot:

make stm32f469_disco_sd_defconfig
make

but I had to patch can-utils and busybox as can-utils and iproute are
not compiled for MMU-less microcotrollers. In the case of can-utils,
replacing the calls to fork() with vfork(), I was able to compile the
package with working candump and cansend applications, while in the
case of iproute, I ran into more than one problem and finally I decided
to extend busybox's ip link command for CAN-type devices. I'm still
wondering if it was really necessary, but this way I was able to test
the driver.


Dario Binacchi (4):
  dt-bindings: net: can: add STM32 bxcan DT bindings
  ARM: dts: stm32: add CAN support on stm32f429
  ARM: dts: stm32: add pin map for CAN controller on stm32f4
  can: bxcan: add support for ST bxCAN controller

 .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml | 139 +++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f4-pinctrl.dtsi        |  32 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi              |  30 +
 drivers/net/can/Kconfig                       |   1 +
 drivers/net/can/Makefile                      |   1 +
 drivers/net/can/bxcan/Kconfig                 |  34 +
 drivers/net/can/bxcan/Makefile                |   4 +
 drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-core.c            | 201 ++++
 drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-core.h            |  33 +
 drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c             | 980 ++++++++++++++++++
 10 files changed, 1455 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/bxcan/Kconfig
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/bxcan/Makefile
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-core.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-core.h
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c

-- 
2.32.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[RFC PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: net: can: add STM32 bxcan DT bindings

[Dario Binacchi]

Add documentation of device tree bindings for the STM32 basic extended
CAN (bxcan) controller.

Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dariobin@libero.it>
Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>
---

 .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml | 139 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 139 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f4cfd26e4785
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: STMicroelectronics bxCAN controller Device Tree Bindings
+
+description: STMicroelectronics BxCAN controller for CAN bus
+
+maintainers:
+  - Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>
+
+allOf:
+  - $ref: can-controller.yaml#
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    enum:
+      - st,stm32-bxcan-core
+
+  reg:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  resets:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  clocks:
+    description:
+      Input clock for registers access
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  '#address-cells':
+    const: 1
+
+  '#size-cells':
+    const: 0
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - resets
+  - clocks
+  - '#address-cells'
+  - '#size-cells'
+
+additionalProperties: false
+
+patternProperties:
+  "^can@[0-9]+$":
+    type: object
+    description:
+      A CAN block node contains two subnodes, representing each one a CAN
+      instance available on the machine.
+
+    properties:
+      compatible:
+        enum:
+          - st,stm32-bxcan
+
+      master:
+        description:
+          Master and slave mode of the bxCAN peripheral is only relevant
+          if the chip has two CAN peripherals. In that case they share
+          some of the required logic, and that means you cannot use the
+          slave CAN without the master CAN.
+        type: boolean
+
+      reg:
+        description: |
+          Offset of CAN instance in CAN block. Valid values are:
+            - 0x0:   CAN1
+            - 0x400: CAN2
+        maxItems: 1
+
+      interrupts:
+        items:
+          - description: transmit interrupt
+          - description: FIFO 0 receive interrupt
+          - description: FIFO 1 receive interrupt
+          - description: status change error interrupt
+
+      interrupt-names:
+        items:
+          - const: tx
+          - const: rx0
+          - const: rx1
+          - const: sce
+
+      resets:
+        maxItems: 1
+
+      clocks:
+        description:
+          Input clock for registers access
+        maxItems: 1
+
+    additionalProperties: false
+
+    required:
+      - compatible
+      - reg
+      - interrupts
+      - resets
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    #include <dt-bindings/clock/stm32fx-clock.h>
+    #include <dt-bindings/mfd/stm32f4-rcc.h>
+
+    can: can@40006400 {
+        compatible = "st,stm32-bxcan-core";
+        reg = <0x40006400 0x800>;
+        resets = <&rcc STM32F4_APB1_RESET(CAN1)>;
+        clocks = <&rcc 0 STM32F4_APB1_CLOCK(CAN1)>;
+        #address-cells = <1>;
+        #size-cells = <0>;
+        status = "disabled";
+
+        can1: can@0 {
+            compatible = "st,stm32-bxcan";
+            reg = <0x0>;
+            interrupts = <19>, <20>, <21>, <22>;
+            interrupt-names = "tx", "rx0", "rx1", "sce";
+            resets = <&rcc STM32F4_APB1_RESET(CAN1)>;
+            master;
+            status = "disabled";
+        };
+
+        can2: can@400 {
+            compatible = "st,stm32-bxcan";
+            reg = <0x400>;
+            interrupts = <63>, <64>, <65>, <66>;
+            interrupt-names = "tx", "rx0", "rx1", "sce";
+            resets = <&rcc STM32F4_APB1_RESET(CAN2)>;
+            clocks = <&rcc 0 STM32F4_APB1_CLOCK(CAN2)>;
+            status = "disabled";
+        };
+    };
-- 
2.32.0

[RFC PATCH 2/4] ARM: dts: stm32: add CAN support on stm32f429

[Dario Binacchi]

Add support for bxcan (Basic eXtended CAN controller) to STM32F429. The
chip contains two CAN peripherals, CAN1 the master and CAN2 the slave,
that share some of the required logic like clock and filters. This means
that the slave CAN can't be used without the master CAN.

Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dariobin@libero.it>
Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>
---

 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
index c31ceb821231..28db387ad5e8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
@@ -362,6 +362,36 @@ i2c3: i2c@40005c00 {
 			status = "disabled";
 		};
 
+		can: can@40006400 {
+			compatible = "st,stm32-bxcan-core";
+			reg = <0x40006400 0x800>;
+			resets = <&rcc STM32F4_APB1_RESET(CAN1)>;
+			clocks = <&rcc 0 STM32F4_APB1_CLOCK(CAN1)>;
+			#address-cells = <1>;
+			#size-cells = <0>;
+			status = "disabled";
+
+			can1: can@0 {
+				compatible = "st,stm32-bxcan";
+				reg = <0x0>;
+				interrupts = <19>, <20>, <21>, <22>;
+				interrupt-names = "tx", "rx0", "rx1", "sce";
+				resets = <&rcc STM32F4_APB1_RESET(CAN1)>;
+				master;
+				status = "disabled";
+			};
+
+			can2: can@400 {
+				compatible = "st,stm32-bxcan";
+				reg = <0x400>;
+				interrupts = <63>, <64>, <65>, <66>;
+				interrupt-names = "tx", "rx0", "rx1", "sce";
+				resets = <&rcc STM32F4_APB1_RESET(CAN2)>;
+				clocks = <&rcc 0 STM32F4_APB1_CLOCK(CAN2)>;
+				status = "disabled";
+			};
+		};
+
 		dac: dac@40007400 {
 			compatible = "st,stm32f4-dac-core";
 			reg = <0x40007400 0x400>;
-- 
2.32.0

[RFC PATCH 2/4] ARM: dts: stm32: add CAN support on stm32f429

[Dario Binacchi]

Add support for bxcan (Basic eXtended CAN controller) to STM32F429. The
chip contains two CAN peripherals, CAN1 the master and CAN2 the slave,
that share some of the required logic like clock and filters. This means
that the slave CAN can't be used without the master CAN.

Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dariobin@libero.it>
Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>
---

 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
index c31ceb821231..28db387ad5e8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
@@ -362,6 +362,36 @@ i2c3: i2c@40005c00 {
 			status = "disabled";
 		};
 
+		can: can@40006400 {
+			compatible = "st,stm32-bxcan-core";
+			reg = <0x40006400 0x800>;
+			resets = <&rcc STM32F4_APB1_RESET(CAN1)>;
+			clocks = <&rcc 0 STM32F4_APB1_CLOCK(CAN1)>;
+			#address-cells = <1>;
+			#size-cells = <0>;
+			status = "disabled";
+
+			can1: can@0 {
+				compatible = "st,stm32-bxcan";
+				reg = <0x0>;
+				interrupts = <19>, <20>, <21>, <22>;
+				interrupt-names = "tx", "rx0", "rx1", "sce";
+				resets = <&rcc STM32F4_APB1_RESET(CAN1)>;
+				master;
+				status = "disabled";
+			};
+
+			can2: can@400 {
+				compatible = "st,stm32-bxcan";
+				reg = <0x400>;
+				interrupts = <63>, <64>, <65>, <66>;
+				interrupt-names = "tx", "rx0", "rx1", "sce";
+				resets = <&rcc STM32F4_APB1_RESET(CAN2)>;
+				clocks = <&rcc 0 STM32F4_APB1_CLOCK(CAN2)>;
+				status = "disabled";
+			};
+		};
+
 		dac: dac@40007400 {
 			compatible = "st,stm32f4-dac-core";
 			reg = <0x40007400 0x400>;
-- 
2.32.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[RFC PATCH 3/4] ARM: dts: stm32: add pin map for CAN controller on stm32f4

[Dario Binacchi]

Add pin configurations for using CAN controller on stm32f469-disco
board. They are located on the Arduino compatible connector CN5 (CAN1)
and on the extension connector CN12 (CAN2).

Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dariobin@libero.it>
Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>
---

 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f4-pinctrl.dtsi | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f4-pinctrl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f4-pinctrl.dtsi
index 500bcc302d42..a8709363898a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f4-pinctrl.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f4-pinctrl.dtsi
@@ -448,6 +448,38 @@ pins2 {
 					slew-rate = <2>;
 				};
 			};
+
+			can1_pins_a: can1-0 {
+				pins1 {
+					pinmux = <STM32_PINMUX('B', 9, AF9)>; /* CAN1_TX */
+				};
+				pins2 {
+					pinmux = <STM32_PINMUX('B', 8, AF9)>; /* CAN1_RX */
+					bias-pull-up;
+				};
+			};
+
+			can2_pins_a: can2-0 {
+				pins1 {
+					pinmux = <STM32_PINMUX('B', 13, AF9)>; /* CAN2_TX */
+				};
+				pins2 {
+					pinmux = <STM32_PINMUX('B', 5, AF9)>; /* CAN2_RX */
+					bias-pull-up;
+				};
+			};
+
+			can2_pins_b: can2-1 {
+				pins1 {
+					pinmux = <STM32_PINMUX('B', 13, AF9)>; /* CAN2_TX */
+
+				};
+				pins2 {
+					pinmux = <STM32_PINMUX('B', 12, AF9)>; /* CAN2_RX */
+					bias-pull-up;
+				};
+			};
+
 		};
 	};
 };
-- 
2.32.0

[RFC PATCH 3/4] ARM: dts: stm32: add pin map for CAN controller on stm32f4

[Dario Binacchi]

Add pin configurations for using CAN controller on stm32f469-disco
board. They are located on the Arduino compatible connector CN5 (CAN1)
and on the extension connector CN12 (CAN2).

Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dariobin@libero.it>
Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>
---

 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f4-pinctrl.dtsi | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f4-pinctrl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f4-pinctrl.dtsi
index 500bcc302d42..a8709363898a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f4-pinctrl.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f4-pinctrl.dtsi
@@ -448,6 +448,38 @@ pins2 {
 					slew-rate = <2>;
 				};
 			};
+
+			can1_pins_a: can1-0 {
+				pins1 {
+					pinmux = <STM32_PINMUX('B', 9, AF9)>; /* CAN1_TX */
+				};
+				pins2 {
+					pinmux = <STM32_PINMUX('B', 8, AF9)>; /* CAN1_RX */
+					bias-pull-up;
+				};
+			};
+
+			can2_pins_a: can2-0 {
+				pins1 {
+					pinmux = <STM32_PINMUX('B', 13, AF9)>; /* CAN2_TX */
+				};
+				pins2 {
+					pinmux = <STM32_PINMUX('B', 5, AF9)>; /* CAN2_RX */
+					bias-pull-up;
+				};
+			};
+
+			can2_pins_b: can2-1 {
+				pins1 {
+					pinmux = <STM32_PINMUX('B', 13, AF9)>; /* CAN2_TX */
+
+				};
+				pins2 {
+					pinmux = <STM32_PINMUX('B', 12, AF9)>; /* CAN2_RX */
+					bias-pull-up;
+				};
+			};
+
 		};
 	};
 };
-- 
2.32.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[RFC PATCH 4/4] can: bxcan: add support for ST bxCAN controller

[Dario Binacchi]

Add support for the basic extended CAN controller (bxCAN) found in many
low- to middle-end STM32 SoCs. It supports the Basic Extended CAN
protocol versions 2.0A and B with a maximum bit rate of 1 Mbit/s.

The controller supports two channels (CAN1 as master and CAN2 as slave)
and the driver can enable either or both of the channels. They share
some of the required logic (e. g. clocks and filters), and that means
you cannot use the slave CAN without enabling some hardware resources
managed by the master CAN.

Each channel has 3 transmit mailboxes, 2 receive FIFOs with 3 stages and
28 scalable filter banks.
It also manages 4 dedicated interrupt vectors:
- transmit interrupt
- FIFO 0 receive interrupt
- FIFO 1 receive interrupt
- status change error interrupt

Driver uses all 3 available mailboxes for transmission and FIFO 0 for
reception. Rx filter rules are configured to the minimum. They accept
all messages and assign filter 0 to CAN1 and filter 14 to CAN2 in
identifier mask mode with 32 bits width. It enables and uses transmit,
receive buffers for FIFO 0 and error and status change interrupts.

Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dariobin@libero.it>
Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>

---

 drivers/net/can/Kconfig            |   1 +
 drivers/net/can/Makefile           |   1 +
 drivers/net/can/bxcan/Kconfig      |  34 +
 drivers/net/can/bxcan/Makefile     |   4 +
 drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-core.c | 201 ++++++
 drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-core.h |  33 +
 drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c  | 980 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 7 files changed, 1254 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/bxcan/Kconfig
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/bxcan/Makefile
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-core.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-core.h
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/Kconfig b/drivers/net/can/Kconfig
index 3048ad77edb3..d55355a0e583 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/net/can/Kconfig
@@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ config PCH_CAN
 	  is an IOH for x86 embedded processor (Intel Atom E6xx series).
 	  This driver can access CAN bus.
 
+source "drivers/net/can/bxcan/Kconfig"
 source "drivers/net/can/c_can/Kconfig"
 source "drivers/net/can/cc770/Kconfig"
 source "drivers/net/can/ctucanfd/Kconfig"
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/Makefile b/drivers/net/can/Makefile
index 61c75ce9d500..373f2c99689a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/net/can/Makefile
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ obj-y				+= usb/
 obj-y				+= softing/
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_CAN_AT91)		+= at91_can.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_CAN_BXCAN)		+= bxcan/
 obj-$(CONFIG_CAN_CAN327)	+= can327.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_CAN_CC770)		+= cc770/
 obj-$(CONFIG_CAN_C_CAN)		+= c_can/
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/bxcan/Kconfig b/drivers/net/can/bxcan/Kconfig
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..df34c212bf51
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/net/can/bxcan/Kconfig
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+#
+# bxCAN driver configuration
+#
+menuconfig CAN_BXCAN
+	tristate "STMicroelectronics STM32 Basic Extended CAN (bxCAN) devices"
+	depends on ARCH_STM32 || COMPILE_TEST
+	depends on OF
+	depends on HAS_IOMEM
+	help
+	  Say Y here if you want support for ST bxCAN controller framework.
+	  This is common support for devices that embed the ST bxCAN IP.
+
+if CAN_BXCAN
+
+config CAN_BXCAN_CORE
+	tristate "STMicroelectronics STM32 bxCAN core"
+	  help
+	  Select this option to enable the core driver for STMicroelectronics
+	  STM32 basic extended CAN controller (bxCAN).
+
+	  This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
+	  will be called bxcan-core.
+
+config CAN_BXCAN_DRV
+	tristate "STMicroelectronics STM32 bxCAN driver"
+	depends on CAN_BXCAN_CORE
+	  help
+	  Say yes here to build support for the STMicroelectronics STM32 basic
+	  extended CAN Controller (bxCAN).
+
+	  This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
+	  will be called bxcan-drv.
+endif
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/bxcan/Makefile b/drivers/net/can/bxcan/Makefile
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..60350f055271
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/net/can/bxcan/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+
+obj-$(CONFIG_CAN_BXCAN_CORE) += bxcan-core.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_CAN_BXCAN_DRV) += bxcan-drv.o
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-core.c b/drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-core.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..16cbc8faf583
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-core.c
@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* bxcan-core.c - STM32 Basic Extended CAN core controller driver
+ *
+ * This file is part of STM32 bxcan driver
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2022 Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>
+ */
+
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
+
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
+
+#include "bxcan-core.h"
+
+#define BXCAN_FILTER_ID(master)       (master ? 0 : 14)
+
+/* Filter master register (FMR) bits */
+#define BXCAN_FMR_CANSB_MASK	GENMASK(13, 8)
+#define BXCAN_FMR_CANSB(x)	(((x) & 0x3f) << 8)
+#define BXCAN_FMR_FINIT		BIT(0)
+
+/* Structure of the filter bank */
+struct bxcan_fb {
+	u32 fr1;		/* filter 1 */
+	u32 fr2;		/* filter 2 */
+};
+
+/* Structure of the hardware filter registers */
+struct bxcan_fregs {
+	u32 fmr;		/* 0x00 - filter master */
+	u32 fm1r;		/* 0x04 - filter mode */
+	u32 reserved2;		/* 0x08 */
+	u32 fs1r;		/* 0x0c - filter scale */
+	u32 reserved3;		/* 0x10 */
+	u32 ffa1r;		/* 0x14 - filter FIFO assignment */
+	u32 reserved4;		/* 0x18 */
+	u32 fa1r;		/* 0x1c - filter activation */
+	u32 reserved5[8];	/* 0x20 */
+	struct bxcan_fb fb[28];	/* 0x40 - filter banks */
+};
+
+struct bxcan_core_priv {
+	void __iomem *base;
+	struct bxcan_fregs __iomem *fregs;
+	struct clk *clk_master;
+	unsigned int clk_master_ref;
+};
+
+void bxcan_disable_filters(struct device *dev, bool master)
+{
+	struct bxcan_core_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	unsigned int fid = BXCAN_FILTER_ID(master);
+	u32 fmask = BIT(fid);
+
+	bxcan_rmw(&priv->fregs->fa1r, fmask, 0);
+}
+
+void bxcan_enable_filters(struct device *dev, bool master)
+{
+	struct bxcan_core_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	unsigned int fid = BXCAN_FILTER_ID(master);
+	u32 fmask = BIT(fid);
+
+	/* Filter settings:
+	 *
+	 * Accept all messages.
+	 * Assign filter 0 to CAN1 and filter 14 to CAN2 in identifier
+	 * mask mode with 32 bits width.
+	 */
+
+	/* Enter filter initialization mode and assing filters to CAN
+	 * controllers.
+	 */
+	bxcan_rmw(&priv->fregs->fmr, BXCAN_FMR_CANSB_MASK,
+		  BXCAN_FMR_CANSB(14) | BXCAN_FMR_FINIT);
+
+	/* Deactivate filter */
+	bxcan_rmw(&priv->fregs->fa1r, fmask, 0);
+
+	/* Two 32-bit registers in identifier mask mode */
+	bxcan_rmw(&priv->fregs->fm1r, fmask, 0);
+
+	/* Single 32-bit scale configuration */
+	bxcan_rmw(&priv->fregs->fs1r, 0, fmask);
+
+	/* Assign filter to FIFO 0 */
+	bxcan_rmw(&priv->fregs->ffa1r, fmask, 0);
+
+	/* Accept all messages */
+	writel(0, &priv->fregs->fb[fid].fr1);
+	writel(0, &priv->fregs->fb[fid].fr2);
+
+	/* Activate filter */
+	bxcan_rmw(&priv->fregs->fa1r, 0, fmask);
+
+	/* Exit filter initialization mode */
+	bxcan_rmw(&priv->fregs->fmr, BXCAN_FMR_FINIT, 0);
+}
+
+int bxcan_enable_master_clk(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct bxcan_core_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	int err;
+
+	if (priv->clk_master_ref == 0) {
+		err = clk_prepare_enable(priv->clk_master);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+	}
+
+	priv->clk_master_ref++;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+void bxcan_disable_master_clk(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct bxcan_core_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	if (priv->clk_master_ref == 0)
+		return;
+
+	if (priv->clk_master_ref == 1)
+		clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk_master);
+
+	priv->clk_master_ref--;
+}
+
+unsigned long bxcan_get_master_clk_rate(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct bxcan_core_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	return clk_get_rate(priv->clk_master);
+}
+
+void __iomem *bxcan_get_base_addr(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct bxcan_core_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	return priv->base;
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id bxcan_core_of_match[] = {
+	{.compatible = "st,stm32-bxcan-core"},
+	{ /* sentinel */ },
+};
+
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, bxcan_core_of_match);
+
+static int bxcan_core_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct bxcan_core_priv *priv;
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
+	void __iomem *regs;
+	struct clk *clk;
+	int ret;
+
+	priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!priv)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
+	regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
+	if (IS_ERR(regs))
+		return PTR_ERR(regs);
+
+	clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
+	if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to get clock\n");
+		return PTR_ERR(clk);
+	}
+
+	priv->base = regs;
+	priv->fregs = regs + 0x200;
+	priv->clk_master = clk;
+
+	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "regs: %px\n", priv->base);
+	ret = of_platform_populate(np, NULL, NULL, dev);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to populate DT children\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct platform_driver bxcan_core_driver = {
+	.driver = {
+		.name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
+		.of_match_table = bxcan_core_of_match,
+	},
+	.probe = bxcan_core_probe,
+};
+
+module_platform_driver(bxcan_core_driver);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMicroelectronics Basic Extended CAN core driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-core.h b/drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-core.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..51846b1ae698
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-core.h
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+ *
+ * bxcan-core - STM32 Basic Extended CAN core controller driver
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2022 Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>
+ */
+
+#ifndef __BXCAN_CORE_H
+#define __BXCAN_CORE_H
+
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+
+int bxcan_enable_master_clk(struct device *dev);
+void bxcan_disable_master_clk(struct device *dev);
+unsigned long bxcan_get_master_clk_rate(struct device *dev);
+void __iomem *bxcan_get_base_addr(struct device *dev);
+void bxcan_enable_filters(struct device *dev, bool master);
+void bxcan_disable_filters(struct device *dev, bool master);
+
+static inline void bxcan_rmw(volatile void __iomem *addr, u32 clear, u32 set)
+{
+	u32 old, val;
+
+	old = readl(addr);
+	val = (old & ~clear) | set;
+	if (val != old)
+		writel(val, addr);
+
+	pr_debug("rmw 0x%08x @ 0x%08x\n", val, (u32)addr);
+}
+
+#endif
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c b/drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5fbb0327d104
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c
@@ -0,0 +1,980 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+//
+// bxcan-drv.c - STM32 Basic Extended CAN controller driver
+//
+// Copyright (c) 2022 Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>
+//
+
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
+
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+#include <linux/can.h>
+#include <linux/can/dev.h>
+#include <linux/can/error.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+
+#include "bxcan-core.h"
+
+#define BXCAN_NAPI_WEIGHT		3
+#define BXCAN_TIMEOUT_US		10000
+
+#define BXCAN_TX_MB_NUM			3
+
+/* Master control register (MCR) bits */
+#define BXCAN_MCR_DBF			BIT(16)
+#define BXCAN_MCR_RESET			BIT(15)
+#define BXCAN_MCR_TTCM			BIT(7)
+#define BXCAN_MCR_ABOM			BIT(6)
+#define BXCAN_MCR_AWUM			BIT(5)
+#define BXCAN_MCR_NART			BIT(4)
+#define BXCAN_MCR_RFLM			BIT(3)
+#define BXCAN_MCR_TXFP			BIT(2)
+#define BXCAN_MCR_SLEEP			BIT(1)
+#define BXCAN_MCR_INRQ			BIT(0)
+
+/* Master status register (MSR) bits */
+#define BXCAN_MSR_RX			BIT(11)
+#define BXCAN_MSR_SAMP			BIT(10)
+#define BXCAN_MSR_RXM			BIT(9)
+#define BXCAN_MSR_TXM			BIT(8)
+#define BXCAN_MSR_SLAKI			BIT(4)
+#define BXCAN_MSR_WKUI			BIT(3)
+#define BXCAN_MSR_ERRI			BIT(2)
+#define BXCAN_MSR_SLAK			BIT(1)
+#define BXCAN_MSR_INAK			BIT(0)
+
+/* Transmit status register (TSR) bits */
+#define BXCAN_TSR_LOW2			BIT(31)
+#define BXCAN_TSR_LOW1			BIT(30)
+#define BXCAN_TSR_LOW0			BIT(29)
+#define BXCAN_TSR_TME			GENMASK(28, 26)
+#define BXCAN_TSR_TME_SHIFT		(26)
+#define BXCAN_TSR_TME2			BIT(28)
+#define BXCAN_TSR_TME1			BIT(27)
+#define BXCAN_TSR_TME0			BIT(26)
+#define BXCAN_TSR_CODE			GENMASK(25, 24)
+#define BXCAN_TSR_ABRQ2			BIT(23)
+#define BXCAN_TSR_TERR2			BIT(19)
+#define BXCAN_TSR_ALST2			BIT(18)
+#define BXCAN_TSR_TXOK2			BIT(17)
+#define BXCAN_TSR_RQCP2			BIT(16)
+#define BXCAN_TSR_ABRQ1			BIT(15)
+#define BXCAN_TSR_TERR1			BIT(11)
+#define BXCAN_TSR_ALST1			BIT(10)
+#define BXCAN_TSR_TXOK1			BIT(9)
+#define BXCAN_TSR_RQCP1			BIT(8)
+#define BXCAN_TSR_ABRQ0			BIT(7)
+#define BXCAN_TSR_TERR0			BIT(3)
+#define BXCAN_TSR_ALST0			BIT(2)
+#define BXCAN_TSR_TXOK0			BIT(1)
+#define BXCAN_TSR_RQCP0			BIT(0)
+
+/* Receive FIFO 0 register (RF0R) bits */
+#define BXCAN_RF0R_RFOM0		BIT(5)
+#define BXCAN_RF0R_FOVR0		BIT(4)
+#define BXCAN_RF0R_FULL0		BIT(3)
+#define BXCAN_RF0R_FMP0			GENMASK(1, 0)
+
+/* Interrupt enable register (IER) bits */
+#define BXCAN_IER_SLKIE			BIT(17)
+#define BXCAN_IER_WKUIE			BIT(16)
+#define BXCAN_IER_ERRIE			BIT(15)
+#define BXCAN_IER_LECIE			BIT(11)
+#define BXCAN_IER_BOFIE			BIT(10)
+#define BXCAN_IER_EPVIE			BIT(9)
+#define BXCAN_IER_EWGIE			BIT(8)
+#define BXCAN_IER_FOVIE1		BIT(6)
+#define BXCAN_IER_FFIE1			BIT(5)
+#define BXCAN_IER_FMPIE1		BIT(4)
+#define BXCAN_IER_FOVIE0		BIT(3)
+#define BXCAN_IER_FFIE0			BIT(2)
+#define BXCAN_IER_FMPIE0		BIT(1)
+#define BXCAN_IER_TMEIE			BIT(0)
+
+/* Error status register (ESR) bits */
+#define BXCAN_ESR_REC_SHIFT		(24)
+#define BXCAN_ESR_REC			GENMASK(31, 24)
+#define BXCAN_ESR_TEC_SHIFT		(16)
+#define BXCAN_ESR_TEC			GENMASK(23, 16)
+#define BXCAN_ESR_LEC_SHIFT		(4)
+#define BXCAN_ESR_LEC			GENMASK(6, 4)
+#define BXCAN_ESR_BOFF			BIT(1)
+#define BXCAN_ESR_EPVF			BIT(1)
+#define BXCAN_ESR_EWGF			BIT(0)
+#define BXCAN_TEC(esr)			(((esr) & BXCAN_ESR_TEC) >> \
+					 BXCAN_ESR_TEC_SHIFT)
+#define BXCAN_REC(esr)			(((esr) & BXCAN_ESR_REC) >> \
+					 BXCAN_ESR_REC_SHIFT)
+
+/* Bit timing register (BTR) bits */
+#define BXCAN_BTR_SILM			BIT(31)
+#define BXCAN_BTR_LBKM			BIT(30)
+#define BXCAN_BTR_SJW_MASK		GENMASK(25, 24)
+#define BXCAN_BTR_SJW(x)		(((x) & 0x03) << 24)
+#define BXCAN_BTR_TS2_MASK		GENMASK(22, 20)
+#define BXCAN_BTR_TS2(x)		(((x) & 0x07) << 20)
+#define BXCAN_BTR_TS1_MASK		GENMASK(19, 16)
+#define BXCAN_BTR_TS1(x)		(((x) & 0x0f) << 16)
+#define BXCAN_BTR_BRP_MASK		GENMASK(9, 0)
+#define BXCAN_BTR_BRP(x)		((x) & 0x3ff)
+
+/* TX mailbox identifier register (TIxR, x = 0..2) bits */
+#define BXCAN_TIxR_STID(x)		(((x) & 0x7ff) << 21)
+#define BXCAN_TIxR_EXID(x)		((x) << 3)
+#define BXCAN_TIxR_IDE			BIT(2)
+#define BXCAN_TIxR_RTR			BIT(1)
+#define BXCAN_TIxR_TXRQ			BIT(0)
+
+/* TX mailbox data length and time stamp register (TDTxR, x = 0..2 bits */
+#define BXCAN_TDTxR_TIME(x)		(((x) & 0x0f) << 16)
+#define BXCAN_TDTxR_TGT			BIT(8)
+#define BXCAN_TDTxR_DLC_MASK		GENMASK(3, 0)
+#define BXCAN_TDTxR_DLC(x)		((x) & 0x0f)
+
+/* RX FIFO mailbox identifier register (RIxR, x = 0..1 */
+#define BXCAN_RIxR_STID_SHIFT		(21)
+#define BXCAN_RIxR_EXID_SHIFT		(3)
+#define BXCAN_RIxR_IDE			BIT(2)
+#define BXCAN_RIxR_RTR			BIT(1)
+
+/* RX FIFO mailbox data length and timestamp register (RDTxR, x = 0..1) bits */
+#define BXCAN_RDTxR_TIME		GENMASK(31, 16)
+#define BXCAN_RDTxR_FMI			GENMASK(15, 8)
+#define BXCAN_RDTxR_DLC			GENMASK(3, 0)
+
+enum bxcan_lec_code {
+	LEC_NO_ERROR = 0,
+	LEC_STUFF_ERROR,
+	LEC_FORM_ERROR,
+	LEC_ACK_ERROR,
+	LEC_BIT1_ERROR,
+	LEC_BIT0_ERROR,
+	LEC_CRC_ERROR,
+	LEC_UNUSED
+};
+
+/* Structure of the message buffer */
+struct bxcan_mb {
+	u32 id;			/* can identifier */
+	u32 dlc;		/* data length control and timestamp */
+	u32 data[2];		/* data */
+};
+
+/* Structure of the hardware registers */
+struct bxcan_regs {
+	u32 mcr;			/* 0x00 - master control */
+	u32 msr;			/* 0x04 - master status */
+	u32 tsr;			/* 0x08 - transmit status */
+	u32 rf0r;			/* 0x0c - FIFO 0 */
+	u32 rf1r;			/* 0x10 - FIFO 1 */
+	u32 ier;			/* 0x14 - interrupt enable */
+	u32 esr;			/* 0x18 - error status */
+	u32 btr;			/* 0x1c - bit timing*/
+	u32 reserved0[88];		/* 0x20 */
+	struct bxcan_mb tx_mb[BXCAN_TX_MB_NUM];	/* 0x180 - tx mailbox */
+	struct bxcan_mb rx_mb[2];	/* 0x1b0 - rx mailbox */
+};
+
+struct bxcan_priv {
+	struct can_priv can;
+	struct device *dev;
+	struct napi_struct napi;
+
+	struct bxcan_regs __iomem *regs;
+	int tx_irq;
+	int sce_irq;
+	u8 tx_dlc[BXCAN_TX_MB_NUM];
+	bool master;
+	struct clk *clk;
+};
+
+static const struct can_bittiming_const bxcan_bittiming_const = {
+	.name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
+	.tseg1_min = 1,
+	.tseg1_max = 16,
+	.tseg2_min = 1,
+	.tseg2_max = 8,
+	.sjw_max = 4,
+	.brp_min = 1,
+	.brp_max = 1024,
+	.brp_inc = 1,
+};
+
+static int bxcan_chip_softreset(struct bxcan_priv *priv)
+{
+	struct bxcan_regs __iomem *regs = priv->regs;
+	unsigned int timeout = BXCAN_TIMEOUT_US / 10;
+
+	bxcan_rmw(&regs->mcr, 0, BXCAN_MCR_RESET);
+	while (timeout-- && !(readl(&regs->msr) & BXCAN_MSR_SLAK))
+		udelay(10);
+
+	if (!(readl(&regs->msr) & BXCAN_MSR_SLAK))
+		return -ETIMEDOUT;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int bxcan_enter_init_mode(struct bxcan_priv *priv)
+{
+	struct bxcan_regs __iomem *regs = priv->regs;
+	unsigned int timeout = BXCAN_TIMEOUT_US / 10;
+
+	bxcan_rmw(&regs->mcr, 0, BXCAN_MCR_INRQ);
+	while (timeout-- && !(readl(&regs->msr) & BXCAN_MSR_INAK))
+		udelay(100);
+
+	if (!(readl(&regs->msr) & BXCAN_MSR_INAK))
+		return -ETIMEDOUT;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int bxcan_leave_init_mode(struct bxcan_priv *priv)
+{
+	struct bxcan_regs __iomem *regs = priv->regs;
+	unsigned int timeout = BXCAN_TIMEOUT_US / 10;
+
+	bxcan_rmw(&regs->mcr, BXCAN_MCR_INRQ, 0);
+	while (timeout-- && (readl(&regs->msr) & BXCAN_MSR_INAK))
+		udelay(100);
+
+	if (readl(&regs->msr) & BXCAN_MSR_INAK)
+		return -ETIMEDOUT;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int bxcan_leave_sleep_mode(struct bxcan_priv *priv)
+{
+	struct bxcan_regs __iomem *regs = priv->regs;
+	unsigned int timeout = BXCAN_TIMEOUT_US / 10;
+
+	bxcan_rmw(&regs->mcr, BXCAN_MCR_SLEEP, 0);
+	while (timeout-- && (readl(&regs->msr) & BXCAN_MSR_SLAK))
+		udelay(100);
+
+	if (readl(&regs->msr) & BXCAN_MSR_SLAK)
+		return -ETIMEDOUT;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int bxcan_enter_sleep_mode(struct bxcan_priv *priv)
+{
+	struct bxcan_regs __iomem *regs = priv->regs;
+	unsigned int timeout = BXCAN_TIMEOUT_US / 10;
+
+	bxcan_rmw(&regs->mcr, 0, BXCAN_MCR_SLEEP);
+	while (timeout-- && !(readl(&regs->msr) & BXCAN_MSR_SLAK))
+		udelay(100);
+
+	if (!(readl(&regs->msr) & BXCAN_MSR_SLAK))
+		return -ETIMEDOUT;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t bxcan_rx_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
+{
+	struct net_device *ndev = dev_id;
+	struct bxcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
+	struct bxcan_regs __iomem *regs = priv->regs;
+
+	if (napi_schedule_prep(&priv->napi)) {
+		/* Disable Rx FIFO message pending interrupt */
+		bxcan_rmw(&regs->ier, BXCAN_IER_FMPIE0, 0);
+		__napi_schedule(&priv->napi);
+	}
+
+	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t bxcan_tx_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
+{
+	struct net_device *ndev = dev_id;
+	struct bxcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
+	struct bxcan_regs __iomem *regs = priv->regs;
+	struct net_device_stats *stats = &ndev->stats;
+	u32 tsr, rqcp_bit = BXCAN_TSR_RQCP0;
+	int i;
+
+	tsr = readl(&regs->tsr);
+	for (i = 0; i < BXCAN_TX_MB_NUM; rqcp_bit <<= 8, i++) {
+		if (!(tsr & rqcp_bit))
+			continue;
+
+		stats->tx_packets++;
+		stats->tx_bytes += priv->tx_dlc[i];
+	}
+
+	writel(tsr, &regs->tsr);
+
+	if (netif_queue_stopped(ndev))
+		netif_wake_queue(ndev);
+
+	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static void bxcan_handle_state_change(struct net_device *ndev, u32 esr)
+{
+	struct bxcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
+	struct net_device_stats *stats = &ndev->stats;
+	enum can_state new_state = priv->can.state;
+	struct can_berr_counter bec;
+	enum can_state rx_state, tx_state;
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+	struct can_frame *cf;
+
+	/* Early exit if no error flag is set */
+	if (!(esr & (BXCAN_ESR_EWGF | BXCAN_ESR_EPVF | BXCAN_ESR_BOFF)))
+		return;
+
+	bec.txerr = BXCAN_TEC(esr);
+	bec.rxerr = BXCAN_REC(esr);
+
+	if (esr & BXCAN_ESR_BOFF)
+		new_state = CAN_STATE_BUS_OFF;
+	else if (esr & BXCAN_ESR_EPVF)
+		new_state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE;
+	else if (esr & BXCAN_ESR_EWGF)
+		new_state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING;
+
+	/* state hasn't changed */
+	if (unlikely(new_state == priv->can.state))
+		return;
+
+	skb = alloc_can_err_skb(ndev, &cf);
+	if (unlikely(!skb))
+		return;
+
+	tx_state = bec.txerr >= bec.rxerr ? new_state : 0;
+	rx_state = bec.txerr <= bec.rxerr ? new_state : 0;
+	can_change_state(ndev, cf, tx_state, rx_state);
+
+	if (new_state == CAN_STATE_BUS_OFF)
+		can_bus_off(ndev);
+
+	stats->rx_bytes += cf->len;
+	stats->rx_packets++;
+	netif_rx(skb);
+}
+
+static void bxcan_handle_bus_err(struct net_device *ndev, u32 esr)
+{
+	struct bxcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
+	enum bxcan_lec_code lec_code;
+	struct can_frame *cf;
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+
+	lec_code = (esr & BXCAN_ESR_LEC_SHIFT) >> BXCAN_ESR_LEC_SHIFT;
+
+	/* Early exit if no lec update or no error.
+	 * No lec update means that no CAN bus event has been detected
+	 * since CPU wrote LEC_UNUSED value to status reg.
+	 */
+	if (lec_code == LEC_UNUSED || lec_code == LEC_NO_ERROR)
+		return;
+
+	if (!(priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_BERR_REPORTING))
+		return;
+
+	/* Common for all type of bus errors */
+	priv->can.can_stats.bus_error++;
+
+	/* Propagate the error condition to the CAN stack */
+	skb = alloc_can_err_skb(ndev, &cf);
+	if (unlikely(!skb))
+		return;
+
+	ndev->stats.rx_bytes += cf->len;
+
+	/* Check for 'last error code' which tells us the
+	 * type of the last error to occur on the CAN bus
+	 */
+	cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_PROT | CAN_ERR_BUSERROR;
+
+	switch (lec_code) {
+	case LEC_STUFF_ERROR:
+		netdev_dbg(ndev, "Stuff error\n");
+		ndev->stats.rx_errors++;
+		cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_STUFF;
+		break;
+	case LEC_FORM_ERROR:
+		netdev_dbg(ndev, "Form error\n");
+		ndev->stats.rx_errors++;
+		cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_FORM;
+		break;
+	case LEC_ACK_ERROR:
+		netdev_dbg(ndev, "Ack error\n");
+		ndev->stats.tx_errors++;
+		cf->data[3] = CAN_ERR_PROT_LOC_ACK;
+		break;
+	case LEC_BIT1_ERROR:
+		netdev_dbg(ndev, "Bit error (recessive)\n");
+		ndev->stats.tx_errors++;
+		cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_BIT1;
+		break;
+	case LEC_BIT0_ERROR:
+		netdev_dbg(ndev, "Bit error (dominant)\n");
+		ndev->stats.tx_errors++;
+		cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_BIT0;
+		break;
+	case LEC_CRC_ERROR:
+		netdev_dbg(ndev, "CRC error\n");
+		ndev->stats.rx_errors++;
+		cf->data[3] = CAN_ERR_PROT_LOC_CRC_SEQ;
+		break;
+	default:
+		break;
+	}
+
+	netif_rx(skb);
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t bxcan_state_change_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
+{
+	struct net_device *ndev = dev_id;
+	struct bxcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
+	struct bxcan_regs __iomem *regs = priv->regs;
+	u32 msr, esr;
+
+	msr = readl(&regs->msr);
+	if (!(msr & BXCAN_MSR_ERRI))
+		return IRQ_NONE;
+
+	esr = readl(&regs->esr);
+	bxcan_handle_state_change(ndev, esr);
+	bxcan_handle_bus_err(ndev, esr);
+
+	msr |= BXCAN_MSR_ERRI;
+	writel(msr, &regs->msr);
+	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static int bxcan_start(struct net_device *ndev)
+{
+	struct bxcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
+	struct bxcan_regs __iomem *regs = priv->regs;
+	struct can_bittiming *bt = &priv->can.bittiming;
+	u32 set;
+	int err;
+
+	err = bxcan_chip_softreset(priv);
+	if (err) {
+		netdev_err(ndev, "failed to reset chip, error %d\n", err);
+		return err;
+	}
+
+	err = bxcan_leave_sleep_mode(priv);
+	if (err) {
+		netdev_err(ndev, "failed to leave sleep mode, error %d\n", err);
+		goto failed_leave_sleep;
+	}
+
+	err = bxcan_enter_init_mode(priv);
+	if (err) {
+		netdev_err(ndev, "failed to enter init mode, error %d\n", err);
+		goto failed_enter_init;
+	}
+
+	/* MCR
+	 *
+	 * select request order priority
+	 * disable time triggered mode
+	 * bus-off state left on sw request
+	 * sleep mode left on sw request
+	 * retransmit automatically on error
+	 * do not lock RX FIFO on overrun
+	 */
+	bxcan_rmw(&regs->mcr, BXCAN_MCR_TTCM | BXCAN_MCR_ABOM | BXCAN_MCR_AWUM |
+		  BXCAN_MCR_NART | BXCAN_MCR_RFLM, BXCAN_MCR_TXFP);
+
+	/* Bit timing register settings */
+	set = BXCAN_BTR_BRP(bt->brp - 1) |
+		BXCAN_BTR_TS1(bt->phase_seg1 + bt->prop_seg - 1) |
+		BXCAN_BTR_TS2(bt->phase_seg2 - 1) | BXCAN_BTR_SJW(bt->sjw - 1);
+
+	/* loopback + silent mode put the controller in test mode,
+	 * useful for hot self-test
+	 */
+	if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_LOOPBACK)
+		set |= BXCAN_BTR_LBKM;
+
+	if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_LISTENONLY)
+		set |= BXCAN_BTR_SILM;
+
+	netdev_dbg(ndev,
+		   "TQ[ns]: %d, PrS: %d, PhS1: %d, PhS2: %d, SJW: %d, BRP: %d, CAN_BTR: 0x%08x\n",
+		   bt->tq, bt->prop_seg, bt->phase_seg1, bt->phase_seg2,
+		   bt->sjw, bt->brp, set);
+	bxcan_rmw(&regs->btr, BXCAN_BTR_SILM | BXCAN_BTR_LBKM |
+		  BXCAN_BTR_BRP_MASK | BXCAN_BTR_TS1_MASK | BXCAN_BTR_TS2_MASK |
+		  BXCAN_BTR_SJW_MASK, set);
+
+	bxcan_enable_filters(priv->dev->parent, priv->master);
+
+	err = bxcan_leave_init_mode(priv);
+	if (err) {
+		netdev_err(ndev, "failed to leave init mode, error %d\n", err);
+		goto failed_leave_init;
+	}
+
+	/* Set a `lec` value so that we can check for updates later */
+	bxcan_rmw(&regs->esr, BXCAN_ESR_LEC, LEC_UNUSED << BXCAN_ESR_LEC_SHIFT);
+
+	/* IER
+	 *
+	 * Enable interrupt for:
+	 * bus-off
+	 * passive error
+	 * warning error
+	 * last error code
+	 * RX FIFO pending message
+	 * TX mailbox empty
+	 */
+	bxcan_rmw(&regs->ier, BXCAN_IER_WKUIE | BXCAN_IER_SLKIE |
+		  BXCAN_IER_FOVIE1 | BXCAN_IER_FFIE1 | BXCAN_IER_FMPIE1 |
+		  BXCAN_IER_FOVIE0 | BXCAN_IER_FFIE0,
+		  BXCAN_IER_ERRIE | BXCAN_IER_LECIE | BXCAN_IER_BOFIE |
+		  BXCAN_IER_EPVIE | BXCAN_IER_EWGIE | BXCAN_IER_FMPIE0 |
+		  BXCAN_IER_TMEIE);
+
+	priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE;
+	return 0;
+
+failed_leave_init:
+failed_enter_init:
+failed_leave_sleep:
+	bxcan_chip_softreset(priv);
+	return err;
+}
+
+static int bxcan_open(struct net_device *ndev)
+{
+	struct bxcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
+	int err;
+
+	err = open_candev(ndev);
+	if (err) {
+		netdev_err(ndev, "open_candev() failed, error %d\n", err);
+		goto failed_open;
+	}
+
+	napi_enable(&priv->napi);
+	err = request_irq(ndev->irq, bxcan_rx_isr, IRQF_SHARED, ndev->name,
+			  ndev);
+	if (err) {
+		netdev_err(ndev, "failed to register rx irq(%d), error %d\n",
+			   ndev->irq, err);
+		goto failed_rx_irq_request;
+	}
+
+	err = request_irq(priv->tx_irq, bxcan_tx_isr, IRQF_SHARED, ndev->name,
+			  ndev);
+	if (err) {
+		netdev_err(ndev, "failed to register tx irq(%d), error %d\n",
+			   priv->tx_irq, err);
+		goto failed_tx_irq_request;
+	}
+
+	err = request_irq(priv->sce_irq, bxcan_state_change_isr, IRQF_SHARED,
+			  ndev->name, ndev);
+	if (err) {
+		netdev_err(ndev, "failed to register sce irq(%d), error %d\n",
+			   priv->sce_irq, err);
+		goto failed_sce_irq_request;
+	}
+
+	err = bxcan_start(ndev);
+	if (err)
+		goto failed_start;
+
+	netif_start_queue(ndev);
+	return 0;
+
+failed_start:
+failed_sce_irq_request:
+	free_irq(priv->tx_irq, ndev);
+failed_tx_irq_request:
+	free_irq(ndev->irq, ndev);
+failed_rx_irq_request:
+	napi_disable(&priv->napi);
+	close_candev(ndev);
+failed_open:
+	return err;
+}
+
+static void bxcan_stop(struct net_device *ndev)
+{
+	struct bxcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
+
+	bxcan_disable_filters(priv->dev->parent, priv->master);
+	bxcan_enter_sleep_mode(priv);
+	priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_STOPPED;
+}
+
+static int bxcan_close(struct net_device *ndev)
+{
+	struct bxcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
+
+	netif_stop_queue(ndev);
+	bxcan_stop(ndev);
+	free_irq(ndev->irq, ndev);
+	free_irq(priv->tx_irq, ndev);
+	free_irq(priv->sce_irq, ndev);
+	napi_disable(&priv->napi);
+	close_candev(ndev);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static netdev_tx_t bxcan_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
+				    struct net_device *ndev)
+{
+	struct bxcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
+	struct can_frame *cf = (struct can_frame *)skb->data;
+	struct bxcan_regs *regs = priv->regs;
+	struct bxcan_mb *mb_regs;
+	unsigned int mb_id;
+	u32 id, tsr;
+	int i, j;
+
+	if (can_dropped_invalid_skb(ndev, skb))
+		return NETDEV_TX_OK;
+
+	tsr = readl(&regs->tsr);
+	mb_id = ffs((tsr & BXCAN_TSR_TME) >> BXCAN_TSR_TME_SHIFT);
+	if (mb_id == 0)
+		return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
+
+	mb_id -= 1;
+	mb_regs = &regs->tx_mb[mb_id];
+
+	if (cf->can_id & CAN_EFF_FLAG)
+		id = BXCAN_TIxR_EXID(cf->can_id & CAN_EFF_MASK) |
+			BXCAN_TIxR_IDE;
+	else
+		id = BXCAN_TIxR_STID(cf->can_id & CAN_SFF_MASK);
+
+	if (cf->can_id & CAN_RTR_FLAG)
+		id |= BXCAN_TIxR_RTR;
+
+	bxcan_rmw(&mb_regs->dlc, BXCAN_TDTxR_DLC_MASK,
+		  BXCAN_TDTxR_DLC(cf->len));
+	priv->tx_dlc[mb_id] = cf->len;
+
+	for (i = 0, j = 0; i < cf->len; i += 4, j++)
+		writel(*(u32 *)(cf->data + i), &mb_regs->data[j]);
+
+	/* Start transmission */
+	writel(id | BXCAN_TIxR_TXRQ, &mb_regs->id);
+	/* Stop the queue if we've filled all mailbox entries */
+	if (!(readl(&regs->tsr) & BXCAN_TSR_TME))
+		netif_stop_queue(ndev);
+
+	return NETDEV_TX_OK;
+}
+
+static const struct net_device_ops bxcan_netdev_ops = {
+	.ndo_open = bxcan_open,
+	.ndo_stop = bxcan_close,
+	.ndo_start_xmit = bxcan_start_xmit,
+	.ndo_change_mtu = can_change_mtu,
+};
+
+static void bxcan_rx_pkt(struct net_device *ndev, struct bxcan_mb *mb_regs)
+{
+	struct net_device_stats *stats = &ndev->stats;
+	struct can_frame *cf;
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+	u32 id, dlc;
+
+	skb = alloc_can_skb(ndev, &cf);
+	if (!skb) {
+		stats->rx_dropped++;
+		return;
+	}
+
+	id = readl(&mb_regs->id);
+	if (id & BXCAN_RIxR_IDE)
+		cf->can_id = (id >> BXCAN_RIxR_EXID_SHIFT) | CAN_EFF_FLAG;
+	else
+		cf->can_id = (id >> BXCAN_RIxR_STID_SHIFT) & CAN_SFF_MASK;
+
+	dlc = readl(&mb_regs->dlc) & BXCAN_RDTxR_DLC;
+	cf->len = can_cc_dlc2len(dlc);
+
+	if (id & BXCAN_RIxR_RTR) {
+		cf->can_id |= CAN_RTR_FLAG;
+	} else {
+		int i, j;
+
+		for (i = 0, j = 0; i < cf->len; i += 4, j++)
+			*(u32 *)(cf->data + i) = readl(&mb_regs->data[j]);
+	}
+
+	stats->rx_bytes += cf->len;
+	stats->rx_packets++;
+	netif_receive_skb(skb);
+}
+
+static int bxcan_rx_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int quota)
+{
+	struct net_device *ndev = napi->dev;
+	struct bxcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
+	struct bxcan_regs *regs = priv->regs;
+	int num_pkts;
+	u32 rf0r;
+
+	for (num_pkts = 0; num_pkts < quota; num_pkts++) {
+		rf0r = readl(&regs->rf0r);
+		if (!(rf0r & BXCAN_RF0R_FMP0))
+			break;
+
+		bxcan_rx_pkt(ndev, &regs->rx_mb[0]);
+
+		rf0r |= BXCAN_RF0R_RFOM0;
+		writel(rf0r, &regs->rf0r);
+	}
+
+	if (num_pkts < quota) {
+		napi_complete_done(napi, num_pkts);
+		bxcan_rmw(&regs->ier, 0, BXCAN_IER_FMPIE0);
+	}
+
+	return num_pkts;
+}
+
+static int bxcan_do_set_mode(struct net_device *ndev, enum can_mode mode)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	switch (mode) {
+	case CAN_MODE_START:
+		err = bxcan_start(ndev);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+
+		netif_wake_queue(ndev);
+		break;
+	default:
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int bxcan_disable_clks(struct bxcan_priv *priv)
+{
+	if (priv->clk)
+		clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
+
+	bxcan_disable_master_clk(priv->dev->parent);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int bxcan_enable_clks(struct bxcan_priv *priv)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	err = bxcan_enable_master_clk(priv->dev->parent);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	if (priv->clk) {
+		err = clk_prepare_enable(priv->clk);
+		if (err)
+			bxcan_disable_master_clk(priv->dev->parent);
+	}
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+static int bxcan_get_berr_counter(const struct net_device *ndev,
+				  struct can_berr_counter *bec)
+{
+	struct bxcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
+	struct bxcan_regs *regs = priv->regs;
+	u32 esr;
+	int err;
+
+	err = bxcan_enable_clks(priv);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	esr = readl(&regs->esr);
+	bec->txerr = BXCAN_TEC(esr);
+	bec->rxerr = BXCAN_REC(esr);
+	err = bxcan_disable_clks(priv);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int bxcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct net_device *ndev;
+	struct bxcan_priv *priv;
+	struct clk *clk = NULL;
+	bool master;
+	u32 offset;
+	int err, rx_irq, tx_irq, sce_irq;
+
+	master = of_property_read_bool(np, "master");
+	if (!master) {
+		clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
+		if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
+			dev_err(dev, "failed to get clock\n");
+			return PTR_ERR(clk);
+		}
+	}
+
+	rx_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "rx0");
+	if (rx_irq < 0) {
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to get rx0 irq\n");
+		return rx_irq;
+	}
+
+	tx_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "tx");
+	if (tx_irq < 0) {
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to get tx irq\n");
+		return tx_irq;
+	}
+
+	sce_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "sce");
+	if (sce_irq < 0) {
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to get sce irq\n");
+		return sce_irq;
+	}
+
+	err = of_property_read_u32(np, "reg", &offset);
+	if (err) {
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to get reg property\n");
+		return err;
+	}
+
+	ndev = alloc_candev(sizeof(struct bxcan_priv), 1);
+	if (!ndev) {
+		dev_err(dev, "alloc_candev() failed\n");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ndev);
+	SET_NETDEV_DEV(ndev, dev);
+	ndev->netdev_ops = &bxcan_netdev_ops;
+	ndev->irq = rx_irq;
+
+	priv->dev = dev;
+	priv->regs = bxcan_get_base_addr(dev->parent) + offset;
+	priv->clk = clk;
+	priv->tx_irq = tx_irq;
+	priv->sce_irq = sce_irq;
+	priv->master = master;
+	priv->can.clock.freq =
+		master ? bxcan_get_master_clk_rate(dev->parent) :
+		clk_get_rate(clk);
+	priv->can.bittiming_const = &bxcan_bittiming_const;
+	priv->can.do_set_mode = bxcan_do_set_mode;
+	priv->can.do_get_berr_counter = bxcan_get_berr_counter;
+	priv->can.ctrlmode_supported = CAN_CTRLMODE_LOOPBACK |
+		CAN_CTRLMODE_LISTENONLY	| CAN_CTRLMODE_BERR_REPORTING;
+	netif_napi_add(ndev, &priv->napi, bxcan_rx_poll, BXCAN_NAPI_WEIGHT);
+
+	err = bxcan_enable_clks(priv);
+	if (err) {
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to enable clocks\n");
+		return err;
+	}
+
+	err = register_candev(ndev);
+	if (err) {
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to register netdev\n");
+		goto failed_register;
+	}
+
+	dev_info(dev, "regs: %px, clk: %d Hz, IRQs: %d, %d, %d\n",
+		 priv->regs, priv->can.clock.freq, tx_irq, rx_irq,
+		 sce_irq);
+	return 0;
+
+failed_register:
+	netif_napi_del(&priv->napi);
+	free_candev(ndev);
+	return err;
+}
+
+static int bxcan_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct net_device *ndev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+	struct bxcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
+
+	unregister_candev(ndev);
+	bxcan_disable_clks(priv);
+	netif_napi_del(&priv->napi);
+	free_candev(ndev);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int __maybe_unused bxcan_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct net_device *ndev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	struct bxcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
+
+	if (!netif_running(ndev))
+		return 0;
+
+	netif_stop_queue(ndev);
+	netif_device_detach(ndev);
+
+	bxcan_enter_sleep_mode(priv);
+	priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_SLEEPING;
+	bxcan_disable_clks(priv);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int __maybe_unused bxcan_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct net_device *ndev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	struct bxcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
+
+	if (!netif_running(ndev))
+		return 0;
+
+	bxcan_enable_clks(priv);
+	bxcan_leave_sleep_mode(priv);
+	priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE;
+
+	netif_device_attach(ndev);
+	netif_start_queue(ndev);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(bxcan_pm_ops, bxcan_suspend, bxcan_resume);
+
+static const struct of_device_id bxcan_of_match[] = {
+	{.compatible = "st,stm32-bxcan"},
+	{ /* sentinel */ },
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, bxcan_of_match);
+
+static struct platform_driver bxcan_driver = {
+	.driver = {
+		.name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
+		.pm = &bxcan_pm_ops,
+		.of_match_table = bxcan_of_match,
+	},
+	.probe = bxcan_probe,
+	.remove = bxcan_remove,
+};
+
+module_platform_driver(bxcan_driver);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMicroelectronics Basic Extended CAN controller driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
-- 
2.32.0

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] can: bxcan: add support for ST bxCAN controller

[Marc Kleine-Budde]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6096 bytes --]

I've stripped down the Cc list a bit...

On 17.08.2022 16:35:25, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> The series adds support for the basic extended CAN controller (bxCAN)
> found in many low- to middle-end STM32 SoCs.
>
> The driver has been tested on the stm32f469i-discovery board with a
> kernel version 5.19.0-rc2 in loopback + silent mode:

I've had no time for a in depth review, but here are some warnings by
the standard checker tools:

Please fix these sparse errors:

| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:641:39: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:641:39:    expected struct bxcan_regs *regs
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:641:39:    got struct bxcan_regs [noderef] __iomem *regs
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:650:15: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:650:15:    expected void const volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:650:15:    got unsigned int *
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:667:20: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:667:20:    expected void volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:667:20:    got unsigned int *
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:672:17: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:672:17:    expected void volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:672:17:    got unsigned int *
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:675:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:675:9:    expected void volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:675:9:    got unsigned int *
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:677:15: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:677:15:    expected void const volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:677:15:    got unsigned int *
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:703:14: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:703:14:    expected void const volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:703:14:    got unsigned int *
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:709:15: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:709:15:    expected void const volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:709:15:    got unsigned int *
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:718:50: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:718:50:    expected void const volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:718:50:    got unsigned int *
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:730:39: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:730:39:    expected struct bxcan_regs *regs
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:730:39:    got struct bxcan_regs [noderef] __iomem *regs
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:735:24: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:735:24:    expected void const volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:735:24:    got unsigned int *
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:742:17: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:742:17:    expected void volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:742:17:    got unsigned int *
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:747:28: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:747:28:    expected void volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:747:28:    got unsigned int *
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:802:39: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:802:39:    expected struct bxcan_regs *regs
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:802:39:    got struct bxcan_regs [noderef] __iomem *regs
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:810:15: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:810:15:    expected void const volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:810:15:    got unsigned int *

(To enable sparse checking, do a "make C=1" to compile.)

Please fix these checkpatch warnings:

| WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
| #74:
| new file mode 100644

Please create a MAINTAINERS entry.

| WARNING: Using vsprintf specifier '%px' potentially exposes the kernel memory layout, if you don't really need the address please consider using '%p'.
| #307: FILE: drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-core.c:179:
| +       dev_info(&pdev->dev, "regs: %px\n", priv->base);

Please remove the print of the base address.

| WARNING: Use of volatile is usually wrong: see Documentation/process/volatile-considered-harmful.rst
| #356: FILE: drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-core.h:21:
| +static inline void bxcan_rmw(volatile void __iomem *addr, u32 clear, u32 set)

remove the volatile.

| WARNING: Using vsprintf specifier '%px' potentially exposes the kernel memory layout, if you don't really need the address please consider using '%p'.
| #1273: FILE: drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:899:
| +       }
| +
| +       dev_info(dev, "regs: %px, clk: %d Hz, IRQs: %d, %d, %d\n",
| +                priv->regs, priv->can.clock.freq, tx_irq, rx_irq,
| +                sce_irq);

Remote the print of the regs.

regards,
Marc

--
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] can: bxcan: add support for ST bxCAN controller

[Marc Kleine-Budde]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6096 bytes --]

I've stripped down the Cc list a bit...

On 17.08.2022 16:35:25, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> The series adds support for the basic extended CAN controller (bxCAN)
> found in many low- to middle-end STM32 SoCs.
>
> The driver has been tested on the stm32f469i-discovery board with a
> kernel version 5.19.0-rc2 in loopback + silent mode:

I've had no time for a in depth review, but here are some warnings by
the standard checker tools:

Please fix these sparse errors:

| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:641:39: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:641:39:    expected struct bxcan_regs *regs
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:641:39:    got struct bxcan_regs [noderef] __iomem *regs
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:650:15: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:650:15:    expected void const volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:650:15:    got unsigned int *
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:667:20: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:667:20:    expected void volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:667:20:    got unsigned int *
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:672:17: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:672:17:    expected void volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:672:17:    got unsigned int *
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:675:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:675:9:    expected void volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:675:9:    got unsigned int *
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:677:15: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:677:15:    expected void const volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:677:15:    got unsigned int *
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:703:14: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:703:14:    expected void const volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:703:14:    got unsigned int *
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:709:15: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:709:15:    expected void const volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:709:15:    got unsigned int *
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:718:50: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:718:50:    expected void const volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:718:50:    got unsigned int *
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:730:39: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:730:39:    expected struct bxcan_regs *regs
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:730:39:    got struct bxcan_regs [noderef] __iomem *regs
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:735:24: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:735:24:    expected void const volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:735:24:    got unsigned int *
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:742:17: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:742:17:    expected void volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:742:17:    got unsigned int *
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:747:28: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:747:28:    expected void volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:747:28:    got unsigned int *
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:802:39: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:802:39:    expected struct bxcan_regs *regs
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:802:39:    got struct bxcan_regs [noderef] __iomem *regs
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:810:15: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:810:15:    expected void const volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
| drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:810:15:    got unsigned int *

(To enable sparse checking, do a "make C=1" to compile.)

Please fix these checkpatch warnings:

| WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
| #74:
| new file mode 100644

Please create a MAINTAINERS entry.

| WARNING: Using vsprintf specifier '%px' potentially exposes the kernel memory layout, if you don't really need the address please consider using '%p'.
| #307: FILE: drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-core.c:179:
| +       dev_info(&pdev->dev, "regs: %px\n", priv->base);

Please remove the print of the base address.

| WARNING: Use of volatile is usually wrong: see Documentation/process/volatile-considered-harmful.rst
| #356: FILE: drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-core.h:21:
| +static inline void bxcan_rmw(volatile void __iomem *addr, u32 clear, u32 set)

remove the volatile.

| WARNING: Using vsprintf specifier '%px' potentially exposes the kernel memory layout, if you don't really need the address please consider using '%p'.
| #1273: FILE: drivers/net/can/bxcan/bxcan-drv.c:899:
| +       }
| +
| +       dev_info(dev, "regs: %px, clk: %d Hz, IRQs: %d, %d, %d\n",
| +                priv->regs, priv->can.clock.freq, tx_irq, rx_irq,
| +                sce_irq);

Remote the print of the regs.

regards,
Marc

--
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: net: can: add STM32 bxcan DT bindings

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 17/08/2022 17:35, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> Add documentation of device tree bindings for the STM32 basic extended
> CAN (bxcan) controller.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dariobin@libero.it>
> Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>

You do not need two SoBs. Keep only one, matching the From field.

> ---
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml | 139 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 139 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..f4cfd26e4785
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml

File name like compatible, so st,stm32-bxcan-core.yaml (or some other
name, see comment later)

> @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: STMicroelectronics bxCAN controller Device Tree Bindings

s/Device Tree Bindings//

> +
> +description: STMicroelectronics BxCAN controller for CAN bus
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>
> +
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: can-controller.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    enum:
> +      - st,stm32-bxcan-core

compatibles are supposed to be specific. If this is some type of
micro-SoC, then it should have its name/number. If it is dedicated
device, is the final name bxcan core? Google says  the first is true, so
you miss specific device part.
	
> +
> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  resets:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  clocks:
> +    description:
> +      Input clock for registers access
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  '#address-cells':
> +    const: 1
> +
> +  '#size-cells':
> +    const: 0
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +  - resets
> +  - clocks
> +  - '#address-cells'
> +  - '#size-cells'
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +patternProperties:

This goes after "properties: in top level (before "required").

> +  "^can@[0-9]+$":
> +    type: object
> +    description:
> +      A CAN block node contains two subnodes, representing each one a CAN
> +      instance available on the machine.
> +
> +    properties:
> +      compatible:
> +        enum:
> +          - st,stm32-bxcan

Why exactly do you need compatible for the child? Is it an entierly
separate device?

Comments about specific part are applied here as well.

> +
> +      master:

Is this a standard property? I don't see it anywhere else. Non-standard
properties require vendor prefix.

> +        description:
> +          Master and slave mode of the bxCAN peripheral is only relevant
> +          if the chip has two CAN peripherals. In that case they share
> +          some of the required logic, and that means you cannot use the
> +          slave CAN without the master CAN.
> +        type: boolean
> +
> +      reg:
> +        description: |
> +          Offset of CAN instance in CAN block. Valid values are:
> +            - 0x0:   CAN1
> +            - 0x400: CAN2
> +        maxItems: 1
> +
> +      interrupts:
> +        items:
> +          - description: transmit interrupt
> +          - description: FIFO 0 receive interrupt
> +          - description: FIFO 1 receive interrupt
> +          - description: status change error interrupt
> +
> +      interrupt-names:
> +        items:
> +          - const: tx
> +          - const: rx0
> +          - const: rx1
> +          - const: sce
> +
> +      resets:
> +        maxItems: 1
> +
> +      clocks:
> +        description:
> +          Input clock for registers access
> +        maxItems: 1
> +
> +    additionalProperties: false
> +
> +    required:
> +      - compatible
> +      - reg
> +      - interrupts
> +      - resets
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    #include <dt-bindings/clock/stm32fx-clock.h>
> +    #include <dt-bindings/mfd/stm32f4-rcc.h>
> +
> +    can: can@40006400 {
> +        compatible = "st,stm32-bxcan-core";
> +        reg = <0x40006400 0x800>;
> +        resets = <&rcc STM32F4_APB1_RESET(CAN1)>;
> +        clocks = <&rcc 0 STM32F4_APB1_CLOCK(CAN1)>;
> +        #address-cells = <1>;
> +        #size-cells = <0>;
> +        status = "disabled";

No status in examples.

> +
> +        can1: can@0 {
> +            compatible = "st,stm32-bxcan";
> +            reg = <0x0>;
> +            interrupts = <19>, <20>, <21>, <22>;
> +            interrupt-names = "tx", "rx0", "rx1", "sce";
> +            resets = <&rcc STM32F4_APB1_RESET(CAN1)>;
> +            master;
> +            status = "disabled";

No status in examples.


> +        };
> +
> +        can2: can@400 {
> +            compatible = "st,stm32-bxcan";
> +            reg = <0x400>;
> +            interrupts = <63>, <64>, <65>, <66>;
> +            interrupt-names = "tx", "rx0", "rx1", "sce";
> +            resets = <&rcc STM32F4_APB1_RESET(CAN2)>;
> +            clocks = <&rcc 0 STM32F4_APB1_CLOCK(CAN2)>;
> +            status = "disabled";

No status in examples.

> +        };
> +    };


Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] ARM: dts: stm32: add pin map for CAN controller on stm32f4

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 17/08/2022 17:35, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> Add pin configurations for using CAN controller on stm32f469-disco
> board. They are located on the Arduino compatible connector CN5 (CAN1)
> and on the extension connector CN12 (CAN2).
> 


> +
> +			can2_pins_b: can2-1 {
> +				pins1 {
> +					pinmux = <STM32_PINMUX('B', 13, AF9)>; /* CAN2_TX */
> +
> +				};
> +				pins2 {
> +					pinmux = <STM32_PINMUX('B', 12, AF9)>; /* CAN2_RX */
> +					bias-pull-up;
> +				};
> +			};
> +

No need for blank line.



Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] ARM: dts: stm32: add pin map for CAN controller on stm32f4

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 17/08/2022 17:35, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> Add pin configurations for using CAN controller on stm32f469-disco
> board. They are located on the Arduino compatible connector CN5 (CAN1)
> and on the extension connector CN12 (CAN2).
> 


> +
> +			can2_pins_b: can2-1 {
> +				pins1 {
> +					pinmux = <STM32_PINMUX('B', 13, AF9)>; /* CAN2_TX */
> +
> +				};
> +				pins2 {
> +					pinmux = <STM32_PINMUX('B', 12, AF9)>; /* CAN2_RX */
> +					bias-pull-up;
> +				};
> +			};
> +

No need for blank line.



Best regards,
Krzysztof

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] can: bxcan: add support for ST bxCAN controller

[Marc Kleine-Budde]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4133 bytes --]

One step at a time, let's look at the TX path:

On 17.08.2022 16:35:29, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> +static netdev_tx_t bxcan_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> +				    struct net_device *ndev)
> +{
> +	struct bxcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> +	struct can_frame *cf = (struct can_frame *)skb->data;
> +	struct bxcan_regs *regs = priv->regs;
> +	struct bxcan_mb *mb_regs;

__iomem?

> +	unsigned int mb_id;
> +	u32 id, tsr;
> +	int i, j;
> +
> +	if (can_dropped_invalid_skb(ndev, skb))
> +		return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> +
> +	tsr = readl(&regs->tsr);
> +	mb_id = ffs((tsr & BXCAN_TSR_TME) >> BXCAN_TSR_TME_SHIFT);

We want to send the CAN frames in the exact order they are pushed into
the driver, so don't pick the first free mailbox you find. How a
priorities for the TX mailboxes handled?

Is the mailbox with the lowest number send first? Is there a priority
field in the mailbox?

If the mail with the lowest number is transmitted first, it's best to
have a tx_head and tx_tail counter, e.g:

struct bxcan_priv {
        ...
        unsigned int tx_head;
        unsigned int tx_tail;
        ...
};

They both start with 0. The xmit function pushes the CAN frame into the
"priv->tx_head % 3" mailbox. Before triggering the xmit in hardware the
tx_head is incremented.

In your TX complete ISR look at priv->tx_tail % 3 for completion,
increment tx_tail, loop.

> +	if (mb_id == 0)
> +		return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
> +
> +	mb_id -= 1;
> +	mb_regs = &regs->tx_mb[mb_id];
> +
> +	if (cf->can_id & CAN_EFF_FLAG)
> +		id = BXCAN_TIxR_EXID(cf->can_id & CAN_EFF_MASK) |
> +			BXCAN_TIxR_IDE;
> +	else
> +		id = BXCAN_TIxR_STID(cf->can_id & CAN_SFF_MASK);
> +
> +	if (cf->can_id & CAN_RTR_FLAG)
> +		id |= BXCAN_TIxR_RTR;
> +
> +	bxcan_rmw(&mb_regs->dlc, BXCAN_TDTxR_DLC_MASK,
> +		  BXCAN_TDTxR_DLC(cf->len));
> +	priv->tx_dlc[mb_id] = cf->len;

Please use can_put_echo_skb() for this.

> +
> +	for (i = 0, j = 0; i < cf->len; i += 4, j++)
> +		writel(*(u32 *)(cf->data + i), &mb_regs->data[j]);
> +
> +	/* Start transmission */
> +	writel(id | BXCAN_TIxR_TXRQ, &mb_regs->id);
> +	/* Stop the queue if we've filled all mailbox entries */
> +	if (!(readl(&regs->tsr) & BXCAN_TSR_TME))
> +		netif_stop_queue(ndev);

This is racy. You have to stop the queue before triggering the
transmission.

Have a look at the mcp251xfd driver:

| https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-tx.c#L187

The check for NETDEV_TX_BUSY is a bit more complicated, too:

| https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-tx.c#L178

The mcp251xfd has a proper hardware FIFO ring buffer for TX, the bxcan
probably doesn't. The get_tx_free() check is a bit different. Look at
c_can_get_tx_free() in:

| https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=28e86e9ab522e65b08545e5008d0f1ac5b19dad1

This patch is a good example for the relevant changes.

> +
> +	return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> +}

[...]

> +static irqreturn_t bxcan_tx_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> +	struct net_device *ndev = dev_id;
> +	struct bxcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> +	struct bxcan_regs __iomem *regs = priv->regs;
> +	struct net_device_stats *stats = &ndev->stats;
> +	u32 tsr, rqcp_bit = BXCAN_TSR_RQCP0;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	tsr = readl(&regs->tsr);
> +	for (i = 0; i < BXCAN_TX_MB_NUM; rqcp_bit <<= 8, i++) {

This might break the order of TX completion CAN frames.

> +		if (!(tsr & rqcp_bit))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		stats->tx_packets++;
> +		stats->tx_bytes += priv->tx_dlc[i];

Use can_get_echo_skb() here.

> +	}
> +
> +	writel(tsr, &regs->tsr);
> +
> +	if (netif_queue_stopped(ndev))
> +		netif_wake_queue(ndev);

With tx_head and tx_tail this should look like this:

| https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.19/source/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-tef.c#L251

> +
> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}

Marc

--
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] can: bxcan: add support for ST bxCAN controller

[Marc Kleine-Budde]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2010 bytes --]

On 18.08.2022 12:30:31, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> One step at a time, let's look at the TX path:
> 
> On 17.08.2022 16:35:29, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> > +static netdev_tx_t bxcan_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > +				    struct net_device *ndev)
> > +{
> > +	struct bxcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > +	struct can_frame *cf = (struct can_frame *)skb->data;
> > +	struct bxcan_regs *regs = priv->regs;
> > +	struct bxcan_mb *mb_regs;
> 
> __iomem?
> 
> > +	unsigned int mb_id;
> > +	u32 id, tsr;
> > +	int i, j;
> > +
> > +	if (can_dropped_invalid_skb(ndev, skb))
> > +		return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> > +
> > +	tsr = readl(&regs->tsr);
> > +	mb_id = ffs((tsr & BXCAN_TSR_TME) >> BXCAN_TSR_TME_SHIFT);
> 
> We want to send the CAN frames in the exact order they are pushed into
> the driver, so don't pick the first free mailbox you find. How a
                                                                 are
> priorities for the TX mailboxes handled?
> 
> Is the mailbox with the lowest number send first? Is there a priority
> field in the mailbox?

I just had a look into the data sheet and it says that the TX mailboxes
are handled in transmit request order. This is good.

[...]

> The mcp251xfd has a proper hardware FIFO ring buffer for TX, the bxcan
> probably doesn't. The get_tx_free() check is a bit different. Look at
> c_can_get_tx_free() in:

This means you can use the simpler get_tx_free from the mcp251xfd driver.
> 
> | https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=28e86e9ab522e65b08545e5008d0f1ac5b19dad1
> 
> This patch is a good example for the relevant changes.

This patch is non the less a good example for the TX path.

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: net: can: add STM32 bxcan DT bindings

[Dario Binacchi]

Hi Krzysztof,

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 10:22 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 17/08/2022 17:35, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> > Add documentation of device tree bindings for the STM32 basic extended
> > CAN (bxcan) controller.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dariobin@libero.it>
> > Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>
>
> You do not need two SoBs. Keep only one, matching the From field.

I started implementing this driver in my spare time, so my intention
was to keep track of it.

>
> > ---
> >
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml | 139 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 139 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..f4cfd26e4785
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml
>
> File name like compatible, so st,stm32-bxcan-core.yaml (or some other
> name, see comment later)

>
> > @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: STMicroelectronics bxCAN controller Device Tree Bindings
>
> s/Device Tree Bindings//

>
> > +
> > +description: STMicroelectronics BxCAN controller for CAN bus
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > +  - Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>
> > +
> > +allOf:
> > +  - $ref: can-controller.yaml#
> > +
> > +properties:
> > +  compatible:
> > +    enum:
> > +      - st,stm32-bxcan-core
>
> compatibles are supposed to be specific. If this is some type of
> micro-SoC, then it should have its name/number. If it is dedicated
> device, is the final name bxcan core? Google says  the first is true, so
> you miss specific device part.

I don't know if I understand correctly, I hope the change in version 2
is what you requested.

>
> > +
> > +  reg:
> > +    maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +  resets:
> > +    maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +  clocks:
> > +    description:
> > +      Input clock for registers access
> > +    maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +  '#address-cells':
> > +    const: 1
> > +
> > +  '#size-cells':
> > +    const: 0
> > +
> > +required:
> > +  - compatible
> > +  - reg
> > +  - resets
> > +  - clocks
> > +  - '#address-cells'
> > +  - '#size-cells'
> > +
> > +additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > +patternProperties:
>
> This goes after "properties: in top level (before "required").
>
> > +  "^can@[0-9]+$":
> > +    type: object
> > +    description:
> > +      A CAN block node contains two subnodes, representing each one a CAN
> > +      instance available on the machine.
> > +
> > +    properties:
> > +      compatible:
> > +        enum:
> > +          - st,stm32-bxcan
>
> Why exactly do you need compatible for the child? Is it an entierly
> separate device?

I took inspiration from other drivers for ST microcontroller
peripherals (e. g. drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c,
drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c) where
some resources are shared between the peripheral instances. In the
case of CAN, master (CAN1) and slave (CAN2) share the registers for
configuring the filters and the clock.
In the core module you can find the functions about the shared
resources, while the childrens implement the driver.

>
> Comments about specific part are applied here as well.
>
> > +
> > +      master:
>
> Is this a standard property?

no

> I don't see it anywhere else. Non-standard
> properties require vendor prefix.

ok, you'll find it in V2.

Thanks and regards,
Dario

>
> > +        description:
> > +          Master and slave mode of the bxCAN peripheral is only relevant
> > +          if the chip has two CAN peripherals. In that case they share
> > +          some of the required logic, and that means you cannot use the
> > +          slave CAN without the master CAN.
> > +        type: boolean
> > +
> > +      reg:
> > +        description: |
> > +          Offset of CAN instance in CAN block. Valid values are:
> > +            - 0x0:   CAN1
> > +            - 0x400: CAN2
> > +        maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +      interrupts:
> > +        items:
> > +          - description: transmit interrupt
> > +          - description: FIFO 0 receive interrupt
> > +          - description: FIFO 1 receive interrupt
> > +          - description: status change error interrupt
> > +
> > +      interrupt-names:
> > +        items:
> > +          - const: tx
> > +          - const: rx0
> > +          - const: rx1
> > +          - const: sce
> > +
> > +      resets:
> > +        maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +      clocks:
> > +        description:
> > +          Input clock for registers access
> > +        maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +    additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > +    required:
> > +      - compatible
> > +      - reg
> > +      - interrupts
> > +      - resets
> > +
> > +examples:
> > +  - |
> > +    #include <dt-bindings/clock/stm32fx-clock.h>
> > +    #include <dt-bindings/mfd/stm32f4-rcc.h>
> > +
> > +    can: can@40006400 {
> > +        compatible = "st,stm32-bxcan-core";
> > +        reg = <0x40006400 0x800>;
> > +        resets = <&rcc STM32F4_APB1_RESET(CAN1)>;
> > +        clocks = <&rcc 0 STM32F4_APB1_CLOCK(CAN1)>;
> > +        #address-cells = <1>;
> > +        #size-cells = <0>;
> > +        status = "disabled";
>
> No status in examples.
>
> > +
> > +        can1: can@0 {
> > +            compatible = "st,stm32-bxcan";
> > +            reg = <0x0>;
> > +            interrupts = <19>, <20>, <21>, <22>;
> > +            interrupt-names = "tx", "rx0", "rx1", "sce";
> > +            resets = <&rcc STM32F4_APB1_RESET(CAN1)>;
> > +            master;
> > +            status = "disabled";
>
> No status in examples.
>
>
> > +        };
> > +
> > +        can2: can@400 {
> > +            compatible = "st,stm32-bxcan";
> > +            reg = <0x400>;
> > +            interrupts = <63>, <64>, <65>, <66>;
> > +            interrupt-names = "tx", "rx0", "rx1", "sce";
> > +            resets = <&rcc STM32F4_APB1_RESET(CAN2)>;
> > +            clocks = <&rcc 0 STM32F4_APB1_CLOCK(CAN2)>;
> > +            status = "disabled";
>
> No status in examples.
>
> > +        };
> > +    };
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof



-- 

Dario Binacchi

Embedded Linux Developer

dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com

__________________________________


Amarula Solutions SRL

Via Le Canevare 30, 31100 Treviso, Veneto, IT

T. +39 042 243 5310
info@amarulasolutions.com

www.amarulasolutions.com

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: net: can: add STM32 bxcan DT bindings

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 20/08/2022 11:08, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 10:22 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 17/08/2022 17:35, Dario Binacchi wrote:
>>> Add documentation of device tree bindings for the STM32 basic extended
>>> CAN (bxcan) controller.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dariobin@libero.it>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>
>>
>> You do not need two SoBs. Keep only one, matching the From field.
> 
> I started implementing this driver in my spare time, so my intention
> was to keep track of it.

SoB is not related to copyrights. Keep personal copyrights (with/next to
work ones), but SoB is coming from a person and that's only one. Choose
one "person".

> 
>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml | 139 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 139 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..f4cfd26e4785
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml
>>
>> File name like compatible, so st,stm32-bxcan-core.yaml (or some other
>> name, see comment later)
> 
>>
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml#
>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +title: STMicroelectronics bxCAN controller Device Tree Bindings
>>
>> s/Device Tree Bindings//
> 
>>
>>> +
>>> +description: STMicroelectronics BxCAN controller for CAN bus
>>> +
>>> +maintainers:
>>> +  - Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>
>>> +
>>> +allOf:
>>> +  - $ref: can-controller.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> +  compatible:
>>> +    enum:
>>> +      - st,stm32-bxcan-core
>>
>> compatibles are supposed to be specific. If this is some type of
>> micro-SoC, then it should have its name/number. If it is dedicated
>> device, is the final name bxcan core? Google says  the first is true, so
>> you miss specific device part.
> 
> I don't know if I understand correctly, I hope the change in version 2
> is what you requested.

What is the name of the SoC, where this is in?

> 
>>
>>> +
>>> +  reg:
>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> +  resets:
>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> +  clocks:
>>> +    description:
>>> +      Input clock for registers access
>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> +  '#address-cells':
>>> +    const: 1
>>> +
>>> +  '#size-cells':
>>> +    const: 0
>>> +
>>> +required:
>>> +  - compatible
>>> +  - reg
>>> +  - resets
>>> +  - clocks
>>> +  - '#address-cells'
>>> +  - '#size-cells'
>>> +
>>> +additionalProperties: false
>>> +
>>> +patternProperties:
>>
>> This goes after "properties: in top level (before "required").
>>
>>> +  "^can@[0-9]+$":
>>> +    type: object
>>> +    description:
>>> +      A CAN block node contains two subnodes, representing each one a CAN
>>> +      instance available on the machine.
>>> +
>>> +    properties:
>>> +      compatible:
>>> +        enum:
>>> +          - st,stm32-bxcan
>>
>> Why exactly do you need compatible for the child? Is it an entierly
>> separate device?
> 
> I took inspiration from other drivers for ST microcontroller
> peripherals (e. g. drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c,
> drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c) where
> some resources are shared between the peripheral instances. In the
> case of CAN, master (CAN1) and slave (CAN2) share the registers for
> configuring the filters and the clock.
> In the core module you can find the functions about the shared
> resources, while the childrens implement the driver.

In both cases you refer to the driver, but we talk here about bindings
which are rather not related. So I repeat the question - is the child
entirely separate device which can be used in other devices?


Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: net: can: add STM32 bxcan DT bindings

[Dario Binacchi]

Hi Krzysztof,

On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 7:39 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 20/08/2022 11:08, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 10:22 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 17/08/2022 17:35, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> >>> Add documentation of device tree bindings for the STM32 basic extended
> >>> CAN (bxcan) controller.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dariobin@libero.it>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>
> >>
> >> You do not need two SoBs. Keep only one, matching the From field.
> >
> > I started implementing this driver in my spare time, so my intention
> > was to keep track of it.
>
> SoB is not related to copyrights. Keep personal copyrights (with/next to
> work ones), but SoB is coming from a person and that's only one. Choose
> one "person".

Ok, I got it.

>
> >
> >>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml | 139 ++++++++++++++++++
> >>>  1 file changed, 139 insertions(+)
> >>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml
> >>> new file mode 100644
> >>> index 000000000000..f4cfd26e4785
> >>> --- /dev/null
> >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml
> >>
> >> File name like compatible, so st,stm32-bxcan-core.yaml (or some other
> >> name, see comment later)
> >
> >>
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
> >>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> >>> +%YAML 1.2
> >>> +---
> >>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/net/can/st,bxcan.yaml#
> >>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> >>> +
> >>> +title: STMicroelectronics bxCAN controller Device Tree Bindings
> >>
> >> s/Device Tree Bindings//
> >
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> +description: STMicroelectronics BxCAN controller for CAN bus
> >>> +
> >>> +maintainers:
> >>> +  - Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>
> >>> +
> >>> +allOf:
> >>> +  - $ref: can-controller.yaml#
> >>> +
> >>> +properties:
> >>> +  compatible:
> >>> +    enum:
> >>> +      - st,stm32-bxcan-core
> >>
> >> compatibles are supposed to be specific. If this is some type of
> >> micro-SoC, then it should have its name/number. If it is dedicated
> >> device, is the final name bxcan core? Google says  the first is true, so
> >> you miss specific device part.
> >
> > I don't know if I understand correctly, I hope the change in version 2
> > is what you requested.
>
> What is the name of the SoC, where this is in?

STM32F4

>
> >
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> +  reg:
> >>> +    maxItems: 1
> >>> +
> >>> +  resets:
> >>> +    maxItems: 1
> >>> +
> >>> +  clocks:
> >>> +    description:
> >>> +      Input clock for registers access
> >>> +    maxItems: 1
> >>> +
> >>> +  '#address-cells':
> >>> +    const: 1
> >>> +
> >>> +  '#size-cells':
> >>> +    const: 0
> >>> +
> >>> +required:
> >>> +  - compatible
> >>> +  - reg
> >>> +  - resets
> >>> +  - clocks
> >>> +  - '#address-cells'
> >>> +  - '#size-cells'
> >>> +
> >>> +additionalProperties: false
> >>> +
> >>> +patternProperties:
> >>
> >> This goes after "properties: in top level (before "required").
> >>
> >>> +  "^can@[0-9]+$":
> >>> +    type: object
> >>> +    description:
> >>> +      A CAN block node contains two subnodes, representing each one a CAN
> >>> +      instance available on the machine.
> >>> +
> >>> +    properties:
> >>> +      compatible:
> >>> +        enum:
> >>> +          - st,stm32-bxcan
> >>
> >> Why exactly do you need compatible for the child? Is it an entierly
> >> separate device?
> >
> > I took inspiration from other drivers for ST microcontroller
> > peripherals (e. g. drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c,
> > drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c) where
> > some resources are shared between the peripheral instances. In the
> > case of CAN, master (CAN1) and slave (CAN2) share the registers for
> > configuring the filters and the clock.
> > In the core module you can find the functions about the shared
> > resources, while the childrens implement the driver.
>
> In both cases you refer to the driver, but we talk here about bindings
> which are rather not related. So I repeat the question - is the child
> entirely separate device which can be used in other devices?

IMHO, I think so.

Thanks and regards,
Dario
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof



-- 

Dario Binacchi

Embedded Linux Developer

dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com

__________________________________


Amarula Solutions SRL

Via Le Canevare 30, 31100 Treviso, Veneto, IT

T. +39 042 243 5310
info@amarulasolutions.com

www.amarulasolutions.com