[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] net: sh-eth: Add support R7S72100 of rmobile

[Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu@nigauri.org>]

Hi,

2014-06-12 9:30 GMT+09:00 Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger@gmail.com>:
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Tom Rini <trini@ti.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 06:58:46AM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
>> > Hi, Tom.
>> >
>> > 2014-06-06 22:37 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>:
>> > > On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 11:44:20AM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> ping.
>> > >>
>> > >> 2014-01-23 7:52 GMT+09:00 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
>> > >> <nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@renesas.com>:
>> > >> > The R7S72100 of ARM SoC that Renesas manufactured has one Ether
>> > >> > port.
>> > >> > This has the same IP SH-Ether. This patch adds support of the
>> > >> > R7S72100
>> > >> > in SH-Ether.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@renesas.com>
>> > >
>> > > I'm fine with this series coming via the sh tree.
>> > >
>> > Thank you. I will work.
>> > BTW, Joe(net custodian) does not have time of maintain net tree?
>> > How do we patch for net from now ?
>>
>> I don't want to put words in his mouth, but, at least for driver rather
>> than core changes (and this applies to more than just net), there's a
>> good deal of relevant experience outside of the custodians likely
>> background anyhow.
>
> Agreed... for drivers running on boards that I don't have, I won't be able
> to comment beyond how the driver interacts with the net stack.  I think it
> can be appropriate to go through the board tree.

I see. I was mistaken about the handling of the net tree.
Sorry about this.

>
> I'll be back to it fairly soon.

:)

>
> Cheers,
> -Joe

Best regards,
  Nobuhiro

-- 
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
   iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
   GPG ID: 40AD1FA6