[PATCH 0/1] bitbake-diffsigs: consider the situation where sigdata and siginfo files having the same hash values

[PATCH 0/1] bitbake-diffsigs: consider the situation where sigdata and siginfo files having the same hash values

[Chen Qi]

The following changes since commit 8ce2f2c3549248b2aa1259ceb28ed03be166ac6f:

  maintainers.inc: Became maintainer of python2 and python3 (2015-03-09 16:01:08 +0000)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib ChenQi/bitbake-diffsigs-duplicates
  http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=ChenQi/bitbake-diffsigs-duplicates

Chen Qi (1):
  bitbake-diffsigs: consider the situation where sigdata and siginfo
    files having the same hash values

 bitbake/bin/bitbake-diffsigs | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
1.9.1

[PATCH 1/1] bitbake-diffsigs: consider the situation where sigdata and siginfo files having the same hash values

[Chen Qi]

For now, `bitbake-diffsigs -t <recipe> <task>' doesn't work. It always outputs
nothing.

The problem is that bitbake-diffsigs are comparing sigdata and siginfo files
that have the same hash value. This is not what we want. These two files are
actually duplicates considering the purpose of bitbake-diffsigs. So we need
to remove one of them so that bitbake-diffsigs could actually compare the
correct signature files.

Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
---
 bitbake/bin/bitbake-diffsigs | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/bitbake/bin/bitbake-diffsigs b/bitbake/bin/bitbake-diffsigs
index 08ae00d..196f0b7 100755
--- a/bitbake/bin/bitbake-diffsigs
+++ b/bitbake/bin/bitbake-diffsigs
@@ -46,6 +46,12 @@ logger = logger_create('bitbake-diffsigs')
 def find_compare_task(bbhandler, pn, taskname):
     """ Find the most recent signature files for the specified PN/task and compare them """
 
+    def get_hashval(siginfo):
+        if siginfo.endswith('.siginfo'):
+            return siginfo.rpartition(':')[2].partition('_')[0]
+        else:
+            return siginfo.rpartition('.')[2]
+
     if not hasattr(bb.siggen, 'find_siginfo'):
         logger.error('Metadata does not support finding signature data files')
         sys.exit(1)
@@ -54,7 +60,7 @@ def find_compare_task(bbhandler, pn, taskname):
         taskname = 'do_%s' % taskname
 
     filedates = bb.siggen.find_siginfo(pn, taskname, None, bbhandler.config_data)
-    latestfiles = sorted(filedates.keys(), key=lambda f: filedates[f])[-2:]
+    latestfiles = sorted(filedates.keys(), key=lambda f: filedates[f])[-3:]
     if not latestfiles:
         logger.error('No sigdata files found matching %s %s' % (pn, taskname))
         sys.exit(1)
@@ -62,6 +68,16 @@ def find_compare_task(bbhandler, pn, taskname):
         logger.error('Only one matching sigdata file found for the specified task (%s %s)' % (pn, taskname))
         sys.exit(1)
     else:
+        # It's possible that latestfiles contain 3 elements and the first two have the same hash value.
+        # In this case, we delete the second element.
+        # The above case is actually the most common one. Because we may have sigdata file and siginfo
+        # file having the same hash value. Comparing such two files makes no sense.
+        if len(latestfiles) == 3:
+            hash0 = get_hashval(latestfiles[0])
+            hash1 = get_hashval(latestfiles[1])
+            if hash0 == hash1:
+                latestfiles.pop(1)
+
         # Define recursion callback
         def recursecb(key, hash1, hash2):
             hashes = [hash1, hash2]
-- 
1.9.1

[PATCH 0/1] bitbake-diffsigs: consider the situation where sigdata and siginfo files having the same hash values

[Chen Qi]

The following changes since commit 8ce2f2c3549248b2aa1259ceb28ed03be166ac6f:

  maintainers.inc: Became maintainer of python2 and python3 (2015-03-09 16:01:08 +0000)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib ChenQi/bitbake-diffsigs-duplicates
  http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=ChenQi/bitbake-diffsigs-duplicates

Chen Qi (1):
  bitbake-diffsigs: consider the situation where sigdata and siginfo
    files having the same hash values

 bitbake/bin/bitbake-diffsigs | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
1.9.1

[PATCH 1/1] bitbake-diffsigs: consider the situation where sigdata and siginfo files having the same hash values

[Chen Qi]

For now, `bitbake-diffsigs -t <recipe> <task>' doesn't work. It always outputs
nothing.

The problem is that bitbake-diffsigs are comparing sigdata and siginfo files
that have the same hash value. This is not what we want. These two files are
actually duplicates considering the purpose of bitbake-diffsigs. So we need
to remove one of them so that bitbake-diffsigs could actually compare the
correct signature files.

Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
---
 bitbake/bin/bitbake-diffsigs | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/bitbake/bin/bitbake-diffsigs b/bitbake/bin/bitbake-diffsigs
index 08ae00d..196f0b7 100755
--- a/bitbake/bin/bitbake-diffsigs
+++ b/bitbake/bin/bitbake-diffsigs
@@ -46,6 +46,12 @@ logger = logger_create('bitbake-diffsigs')
 def find_compare_task(bbhandler, pn, taskname):
     """ Find the most recent signature files for the specified PN/task and compare them """
 
+    def get_hashval(siginfo):
+        if siginfo.endswith('.siginfo'):
+            return siginfo.rpartition(':')[2].partition('_')[0]
+        else:
+            return siginfo.rpartition('.')[2]
+
     if not hasattr(bb.siggen, 'find_siginfo'):
         logger.error('Metadata does not support finding signature data files')
         sys.exit(1)
@@ -54,7 +60,7 @@ def find_compare_task(bbhandler, pn, taskname):
         taskname = 'do_%s' % taskname
 
     filedates = bb.siggen.find_siginfo(pn, taskname, None, bbhandler.config_data)
-    latestfiles = sorted(filedates.keys(), key=lambda f: filedates[f])[-2:]
+    latestfiles = sorted(filedates.keys(), key=lambda f: filedates[f])[-3:]
     if not latestfiles:
         logger.error('No sigdata files found matching %s %s' % (pn, taskname))
         sys.exit(1)
@@ -62,6 +68,16 @@ def find_compare_task(bbhandler, pn, taskname):
         logger.error('Only one matching sigdata file found for the specified task (%s %s)' % (pn, taskname))
         sys.exit(1)
     else:
+        # It's possible that latestfiles contain 3 elements and the first two have the same hash value.
+        # In this case, we delete the second element.
+        # The above case is actually the most common one. Because we may have sigdata file and siginfo
+        # file having the same hash value. Comparing such two files makes no sense.
+        if len(latestfiles) == 3:
+            hash0 = get_hashval(latestfiles[0])
+            hash1 = get_hashval(latestfiles[1])
+            if hash0 == hash1:
+                latestfiles.pop(1)
+
         # Define recursion callback
         def recursecb(key, hash1, hash2):
             hashes = [hash1, hash2]
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH 1/1] bitbake-diffsigs: consider the situation where sigdata and siginfo files having the same hash values

[ChenQi]

ping

Any comment on this one?

Best Regards,
Chen Qi

On 03/11/2015 11:21 AM, Chen Qi wrote:
> For now, `bitbake-diffsigs -t <recipe> <task>' doesn't work. It always outputs
> nothing.
>
> The problem is that bitbake-diffsigs are comparing sigdata and siginfo files
> that have the same hash value. This is not what we want. These two files are
> actually duplicates considering the purpose of bitbake-diffsigs. So we need
> to remove one of them so that bitbake-diffsigs could actually compare the
> correct signature files.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
> ---
>   bitbake/bin/bitbake-diffsigs | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/bitbake/bin/bitbake-diffsigs b/bitbake/bin/bitbake-diffsigs
> index 08ae00d..196f0b7 100755
> --- a/bitbake/bin/bitbake-diffsigs
> +++ b/bitbake/bin/bitbake-diffsigs
> @@ -46,6 +46,12 @@ logger = logger_create('bitbake-diffsigs')
>   def find_compare_task(bbhandler, pn, taskname):
>       """ Find the most recent signature files for the specified PN/task and compare them """
>   
> +    def get_hashval(siginfo):
> +        if siginfo.endswith('.siginfo'):
> +            return siginfo.rpartition(':')[2].partition('_')[0]
> +        else:
> +            return siginfo.rpartition('.')[2]
> +
>       if not hasattr(bb.siggen, 'find_siginfo'):
>           logger.error('Metadata does not support finding signature data files')
>           sys.exit(1)
> @@ -54,7 +60,7 @@ def find_compare_task(bbhandler, pn, taskname):
>           taskname = 'do_%s' % taskname
>   
>       filedates = bb.siggen.find_siginfo(pn, taskname, None, bbhandler.config_data)
> -    latestfiles = sorted(filedates.keys(), key=lambda f: filedates[f])[-2:]
> +    latestfiles = sorted(filedates.keys(), key=lambda f: filedates[f])[-3:]
>       if not latestfiles:
>           logger.error('No sigdata files found matching %s %s' % (pn, taskname))
>           sys.exit(1)
> @@ -62,6 +68,16 @@ def find_compare_task(bbhandler, pn, taskname):
>           logger.error('Only one matching sigdata file found for the specified task (%s %s)' % (pn, taskname))
>           sys.exit(1)
>       else:
> +        # It's possible that latestfiles contain 3 elements and the first two have the same hash value.
> +        # In this case, we delete the second element.
> +        # The above case is actually the most common one. Because we may have sigdata file and siginfo
> +        # file having the same hash value. Comparing such two files makes no sense.
> +        if len(latestfiles) == 3:
> +            hash0 = get_hashval(latestfiles[0])
> +            hash1 = get_hashval(latestfiles[1])
> +            if hash0 == hash1:
> +                latestfiles.pop(1)
> +
>           # Define recursion callback
>           def recursecb(key, hash1, hash2):
>               hashes = [hash1, hash2]

Re: [PATCH 1/1] bitbake-diffsigs: consider the situation where sigdata and siginfo files having the same hash values

[Christopher Larson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 455 bytes --]

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 2:25 AM, ChenQi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com> wrote:

> ping
>
> Any comment on this one?
>
> Best Regards,
> Chen Qi
>

Seems like this would be an important fix to have, from my perspective..
Honestly I didn't even know about the -t argument until I saw this :)
-- 
Christopher Larson
clarson at kergoth dot com
Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus
Maintainer - Tslib
Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 861 bytes --]