All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Melnichenko <andrew@daynix.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: davem <davem@davemloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	mst <mst@redhat.com>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Yan Vugenfirer <yan@daynix.com>,
	Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@daynix.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] TUN/VirtioNet USO features support.
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 15:18:46 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABcq3pFzzSHA3pqbKFEsLaFg7FkFZkdxs+N_ET_n_XLBaWVnHA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEtaigzuwy25rE-7N40TQGvXVmJVQivavmuwrCuw0Z=LUQ@mail.gmail.com>

I'll check it, thank you!

On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 9:56 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 7:07 PM Andrew Melnichenko <andrew@daynix.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The issue is that host segments packets between guests on the same host.
> > Tests show that it happens because SKB_GSO_DODGY skb offload in
> > virtio_net_hdr_from_skb().
> > To do segmentation you need to remove SKB_GSO_DODGY or add SKB_GSO_PARTIAL
> > The solution with DODGY/PARTIAL offload looks like a dirty hack, so
> > for now, I've lived it as it is for further investigation.
>
> Ok, I managed to find the previous discussion. It looks to me the
> reason is that __udp_gso_segment will segment dodgy packets
> unconditionally.
>
> I wonder if the attached patch works? (compile test only).
>
> Thanks
>
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 9:32 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 7:33 PM Andrew Melnychenko <andrew@daynix.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Added new offloads for TUN devices TUN_F_USO4 and TUN_F_USO6.
> > > > Technically they enable NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4
> > > > (and only if USO4 & USO6 are set simultaneously).
> > > > It allows to transmission of large UDP packets.
> > > >
> > > > Different features USO4 and USO6 are required for qemu where Windows guests can
> > > > enable disable USO receives for IPv4 and IPv6 separately.
> > > > On the other side, Linux can't really differentiate USO4 and USO6, for now.
> > > > For now, to enable USO for TUN it requires enabling USO4 and USO6 together.
> > > > In the future, there would be a mechanism to control UDP_L4 GSO separately.
> > > >
> > > > Test it WIP Qemu https://github.com/daynix/qemu/tree/Dev_USOv2
> > > >
> > > > New types for VirtioNet already on mailing:
> > > > https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202110/msg00010.html
> > > >
> > > > Also, there is a known issue with transmitting packages between two guests.
> > >
> > > Could you explain this more? It looks like a bug. (Or any pointer to
> > > the discussion)
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > > Without hacks with skb's GSO - packages are still segmented on the host's postrouting.
> > > >
> > > > Andrew (5):
> > > >   uapi/linux/if_tun.h: Added new offload types for USO4/6.
> > > >   driver/net/tun: Added features for USO.
> > > >   uapi/linux/virtio_net.h: Added USO types.
> > > >   linux/virtio_net.h: Support USO offload in vnet header.
> > > >   drivers/net/virtio_net.c: Added USO support.
> > > >
> > > >  drivers/net/tap.c               | 10 ++++++++--
> > > >  drivers/net/tun.c               |  8 +++++++-
> > > >  drivers/net/virtio_net.c        | 19 +++++++++++++++----
> > > >  include/linux/virtio_net.h      |  9 +++++++++
> > > >  include/uapi/linux/if_tun.h     |  2 ++
> > > >  include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h |  4 ++++
> > > >  6 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.35.1
> > > >
> > >
> >

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Melnichenko <andrew@daynix.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: mst <mst@redhat.com>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@daynix.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Yan Vugenfirer <yan@daynix.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, davem <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] TUN/VirtioNet USO features support.
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 15:18:46 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABcq3pFzzSHA3pqbKFEsLaFg7FkFZkdxs+N_ET_n_XLBaWVnHA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEtaigzuwy25rE-7N40TQGvXVmJVQivavmuwrCuw0Z=LUQ@mail.gmail.com>

I'll check it, thank you!

On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 9:56 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 7:07 PM Andrew Melnichenko <andrew@daynix.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The issue is that host segments packets between guests on the same host.
> > Tests show that it happens because SKB_GSO_DODGY skb offload in
> > virtio_net_hdr_from_skb().
> > To do segmentation you need to remove SKB_GSO_DODGY or add SKB_GSO_PARTIAL
> > The solution with DODGY/PARTIAL offload looks like a dirty hack, so
> > for now, I've lived it as it is for further investigation.
>
> Ok, I managed to find the previous discussion. It looks to me the
> reason is that __udp_gso_segment will segment dodgy packets
> unconditionally.
>
> I wonder if the attached patch works? (compile test only).
>
> Thanks
>
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 9:32 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 7:33 PM Andrew Melnychenko <andrew@daynix.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Added new offloads for TUN devices TUN_F_USO4 and TUN_F_USO6.
> > > > Technically they enable NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4
> > > > (and only if USO4 & USO6 are set simultaneously).
> > > > It allows to transmission of large UDP packets.
> > > >
> > > > Different features USO4 and USO6 are required for qemu where Windows guests can
> > > > enable disable USO receives for IPv4 and IPv6 separately.
> > > > On the other side, Linux can't really differentiate USO4 and USO6, for now.
> > > > For now, to enable USO for TUN it requires enabling USO4 and USO6 together.
> > > > In the future, there would be a mechanism to control UDP_L4 GSO separately.
> > > >
> > > > Test it WIP Qemu https://github.com/daynix/qemu/tree/Dev_USOv2
> > > >
> > > > New types for VirtioNet already on mailing:
> > > > https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202110/msg00010.html
> > > >
> > > > Also, there is a known issue with transmitting packages between two guests.
> > >
> > > Could you explain this more? It looks like a bug. (Or any pointer to
> > > the discussion)
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > > Without hacks with skb's GSO - packages are still segmented on the host's postrouting.
> > > >
> > > > Andrew (5):
> > > >   uapi/linux/if_tun.h: Added new offload types for USO4/6.
> > > >   driver/net/tun: Added features for USO.
> > > >   uapi/linux/virtio_net.h: Added USO types.
> > > >   linux/virtio_net.h: Support USO offload in vnet header.
> > > >   drivers/net/virtio_net.c: Added USO support.
> > > >
> > > >  drivers/net/tap.c               | 10 ++++++++--
> > > >  drivers/net/tun.c               |  8 +++++++-
> > > >  drivers/net/virtio_net.c        | 19 +++++++++++++++----
> > > >  include/linux/virtio_net.h      |  9 +++++++++
> > > >  include/uapi/linux/if_tun.h     |  2 ++
> > > >  include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h |  4 ++++
> > > >  6 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.35.1
> > > >
> > >
> >
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-26 12:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-12 11:23 [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] TUN/VirtioNet USO features support Andrew Melnychenko
2022-05-12 11:23 ` Andrew Melnychenko
2022-05-12 11:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] uapi/linux/if_tun.h: Added new offload types for USO4/6 Andrew Melnychenko
2022-05-12 11:23   ` Andrew Melnychenko
2022-05-12 11:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] driver/net/tun: Added features for USO Andrew Melnychenko
2022-05-12 11:23   ` Andrew Melnychenko
2022-05-12 11:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] uapi/linux/virtio_net.h: Added USO types Andrew Melnychenko
2022-05-12 11:23   ` Andrew Melnychenko
2022-05-12 11:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] linux/virtio_net.h: Support USO offload in vnet header Andrew Melnychenko
2022-05-12 11:23   ` Andrew Melnychenko
2022-05-12 11:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] drivers/net/virtio_net.c: Added USO support Andrew Melnychenko
2022-05-12 11:23   ` Andrew Melnychenko
2022-05-17  6:32 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] TUN/VirtioNet USO features support Jason Wang
2022-05-17  6:32   ` Jason Wang
2022-05-24 11:06   ` Andrew Melnichenko
2022-05-24 11:06     ` Andrew Melnichenko
2022-05-26  6:56     ` Jason Wang
2022-05-26  6:56       ` Jason Wang
2022-05-26 12:18       ` Andrew Melnichenko [this message]
2022-05-26 12:18         ` Andrew Melnichenko
2022-06-16 11:59         ` Andrew Melnichenko
2022-06-16 11:59           ` Andrew Melnichenko
2022-06-17  1:30           ` Jason Wang
2022-06-17  1:30             ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CABcq3pFzzSHA3pqbKFEsLaFg7FkFZkdxs+N_ET_n_XLBaWVnHA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=andrew@daynix.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yan@daynix.com \
    --cc=yuri.benditovich@daynix.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.