* [PATCH] overlay: support timestamp range check
@ 2019-11-11 7:40 Amir Goldstein
2019-11-11 22:32 ` Deepa Dinamani
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Amir Goldstein @ 2019-11-11 7:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eryu Guan; +Cc: Miklos Szeredi, Deepa Dinamani, linux-unionfs, fstests
Overlayfs timestamp range is the same as base fs timestamp range
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
---
Eryu,
This change will cause the test to start running and failing on upstream
kernel with overlayfs over some fs (e.g. xfs/ext4).
The kernel fix is posted:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20191111073000.2957-1-amir73il@gmail.com/T/#u
Thanks,
Amir.
common/rc | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
index b988e912..e5535279 100644
--- a/common/rc
+++ b/common/rc
@@ -1978,13 +1978,14 @@ _require_timestamp_range()
_filesystem_timestamp_range()
{
local device=${1:-$TEST_DEV}
+ local fstyp=${2:-$FSTYP}
u32max=$(((1<<32)-1))
s32min=-$((1<<31))
s32max=$(((1<<31)-1))
s64max=$(((1<<63)-1))
s64min=$((1<<63))
- case $FSTYP in
+ case $fstyp in
ext2)
echo "$s32min $s32max"
;;
@@ -2005,6 +2006,13 @@ _filesystem_timestamp_range()
btrfs)
echo "$s64min $s64max"
;;
+ overlay)
+ if [ ! -z $OVL_BASE_FSTYP -a $OVL_BASE_FSTYP != "overlay" ]; then
+ _filesystem_timestamp_range $OVL_BASE_TEST_DEV $OVL_BASE_FSTYP
+ else
+ echo "-1 -1"
+ fi
+ ;;
*)
echo "-1 -1"
;;
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-11-11 22:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-11-11 7:40 [PATCH] overlay: support timestamp range check Amir Goldstein
2019-11-11 22:32 ` Deepa Dinamani
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.