* Bug? luminous pkg missing ceph-osd ceph-mon 32bit
@ 2017-08-25 15:35 Two Spirit
2017-08-25 15:40 ` Two Spirit
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Two Spirit @ 2017-08-25 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ceph-devel
I built 64 bit ubuntu 16.04 and 14.04 (using crush tunables legacy)
systems, and I tried to build a 32 bit system, and it complained
about missing packages so if there is such a thing, I think it might
be related to 32 bit repository. ubuntu 15.04 doesn't work either, but
I'm not sure if it is supported.
adminhost$ ceph-deploy install --release luminous vm143
[vm143][DEBUG ] Get:2 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu
xenial-updates InRelease [102 kB]
[vm143][DEBUG ] Get:3 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu
xenial-security InRelease [102 kB]
[vm143][DEBUG ] Get:4 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu
xenial-backports InRelease [102 kB]
[vm143][DEBUG ] Hit:5 https://download.ceph.com/debian-luminous xenial InRelease
[vm143][DEBUG ] Fetched 306 kB in 1s (172 kB/s)
[vm143][DEBUG ] Reading package lists...
[vm143][INFO ] Running command: sudo env
DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical apt-get
--assume-yes -q --no-install-recommends install -o
Dpkg::Options::=--force-confnew ceph ceph-osd ceph-mds ceph-mon
radosgw
[vm143][DEBUG ] Reading package lists...
[vm143][DEBUG ] Building dependency tree...
[vm143][DEBUG ] Reading state information...
[vm143][WARNING] E: Unable to locate package ceph-osd
[vm143][WARNING] E: Unable to locate package ceph-mon
[vm143][ERROR ] RuntimeError: command returned non-zero exit status: 100
[ceph_deploy][ERROR ] RuntimeError: Failed to execute command: env
DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical apt-get
--assume-yes -q --no-install-recommends install -o
Dpkg::Options::=--force-confnew ceph ceph-osd ceph-mds ceph-mon
radosgw
<div id="DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2"><br />
<table style="border-top: 1px solid #D3D4DE;">
<tr>
<td style="width: 55px; padding-top: 13px;"><a
href="http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail"
target="_blank"><img
src="https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-v1.png"
alt="" width="46" height="29" style="width: 46px; height: 29px;"
/></a></td>
<td style="width: 470px; padding-top: 12px; color: #41424e;
font-size: 13px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
line-height: 18px;">Virus-free. <a
href="http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail"
target="_blank" style="color: #4453ea;">www.avg.com</a>
</td>
</tr>
</table><a href="#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2" width="1"
height="1"></a></div>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: Bug? luminous pkg missing ceph-osd ceph-mon 32bit 2017-08-25 15:35 Bug? luminous pkg missing ceph-osd ceph-mon 32bit Two Spirit @ 2017-08-25 15:40 ` Two Spirit 2017-08-28 12:11 ` Alfredo Deza 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Two Spirit @ 2017-08-25 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ceph-devel the target osd was a ubuntu 16.04 x32 On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Two Spirit <twospirit6905@gmail.com> wrote: > I built 64 bit ubuntu 16.04 and 14.04 (using crush tunables legacy) > systems, and I tried to build a 32 bit system, and it complained > about missing packages so if there is such a thing, I think it might > be related to 32 bit repository. ubuntu 15.04 doesn't work either, but > I'm not sure if it is supported. > > adminhost$ ceph-deploy install --release luminous vm143 > > [vm143][DEBUG ] Get:2 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu > xenial-updates InRelease [102 kB] > [vm143][DEBUG ] Get:3 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu > xenial-security InRelease [102 kB] > [vm143][DEBUG ] Get:4 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu > xenial-backports InRelease [102 kB] > [vm143][DEBUG ] Hit:5 https://download.ceph.com/debian-luminous xenial InRelease > [vm143][DEBUG ] Fetched 306 kB in 1s (172 kB/s) > [vm143][DEBUG ] Reading package lists... > [vm143][INFO ] Running command: sudo env > DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical apt-get > --assume-yes -q --no-install-recommends install -o > Dpkg::Options::=--force-confnew ceph ceph-osd ceph-mds ceph-mon > radosgw > [vm143][DEBUG ] Reading package lists... > [vm143][DEBUG ] Building dependency tree... > [vm143][DEBUG ] Reading state information... > [vm143][WARNING] E: Unable to locate package ceph-osd > [vm143][WARNING] E: Unable to locate package ceph-mon > [vm143][ERROR ] RuntimeError: command returned non-zero exit status: 100 > [ceph_deploy][ERROR ] RuntimeError: Failed to execute command: env > DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical apt-get > --assume-yes -q --no-install-recommends install -o > Dpkg::Options::=--force-confnew ceph ceph-osd ceph-mds ceph-mon > radosgw > <div id="DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2"><br /> > <table style="border-top: 1px solid #D3D4DE;"> > <tr> > <td style="width: 55px; padding-top: 13px;"><a > href="http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail" > target="_blank"><img > src="https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-v1.png" > alt="" width="46" height="29" style="width: 46px; height: 29px;" > /></a></td> > <td style="width: 470px; padding-top: 12px; color: #41424e; > font-size: 13px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; > line-height: 18px;">Virus-free. <a > href="http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail" > target="_blank" style="color: #4453ea;">www.avg.com</a> > </td> > </tr> > </table><a href="#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2" width="1" > height="1"></a></div> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug? luminous pkg missing ceph-osd ceph-mon 32bit 2017-08-25 15:40 ` Two Spirit @ 2017-08-28 12:11 ` Alfredo Deza 2017-08-29 21:36 ` Two Spirit 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Alfredo Deza @ 2017-08-28 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Two Spirit; +Cc: ceph-devel On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Two Spirit <twospirit6905@gmail.com> wrote: > the target osd was a ubuntu 16.04 x32 > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Two Spirit <twospirit6905@gmail.com> wrote: >> I built 64 bit ubuntu 16.04 and 14.04 (using crush tunables legacy) >> systems, and I tried to build a 32 bit system, and it complained >> about missing packages so if there is such a thing, I think it might >> be related to 32 bit repository. ubuntu 15.04 doesn't work either, but >> I'm not sure if it is supported. We haven't built any 32bit binaries in a while although the repos might exist (although they are empty). >> >> adminhost$ ceph-deploy install --release luminous vm143 >> >> [vm143][DEBUG ] Get:2 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu >> xenial-updates InRelease [102 kB] >> [vm143][DEBUG ] Get:3 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu >> xenial-security InRelease [102 kB] >> [vm143][DEBUG ] Get:4 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu >> xenial-backports InRelease [102 kB] >> [vm143][DEBUG ] Hit:5 https://download.ceph.com/debian-luminous xenial InRelease >> [vm143][DEBUG ] Fetched 306 kB in 1s (172 kB/s) >> [vm143][DEBUG ] Reading package lists... >> [vm143][INFO ] Running command: sudo env >> DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical apt-get >> --assume-yes -q --no-install-recommends install -o >> Dpkg::Options::=--force-confnew ceph ceph-osd ceph-mds ceph-mon >> radosgw >> [vm143][DEBUG ] Reading package lists... >> [vm143][DEBUG ] Building dependency tree... >> [vm143][DEBUG ] Reading state information... >> [vm143][WARNING] E: Unable to locate package ceph-osd >> [vm143][WARNING] E: Unable to locate package ceph-mon >> [vm143][ERROR ] RuntimeError: command returned non-zero exit status: 100 >> [ceph_deploy][ERROR ] RuntimeError: Failed to execute command: env >> DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical apt-get >> --assume-yes -q --no-install-recommends install -o >> Dpkg::Options::=--force-confnew ceph ceph-osd ceph-mds ceph-mon >> radosgw >> <div id="DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2"><br /> >> <table style="border-top: 1px solid #D3D4DE;"> >> <tr> >> <td style="width: 55px; padding-top: 13px;"><a >> href="http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail" >> target="_blank"><img >> src="https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-v1.png" >> alt="" width="46" height="29" style="width: 46px; height: 29px;" >> /></a></td> >> <td style="width: 470px; padding-top: 12px; color: #41424e; >> font-size: 13px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; >> line-height: 18px;">Virus-free. <a >> href="http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail" >> target="_blank" style="color: #4453ea;">www.avg.com</a> >> </td> >> </tr> >> </table><a href="#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2" width="1" >> height="1"></a></div> > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug? luminous pkg missing ceph-osd ceph-mon 32bit 2017-08-28 12:11 ` Alfredo Deza @ 2017-08-29 21:36 ` Two Spirit 2017-08-29 21:41 ` Sage Weil 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Two Spirit @ 2017-08-29 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alfredo Deza; +Cc: ceph-devel is it the plan to eventually support 32 bit, or is it only supported on 64 bit? On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:11 AM, Alfredo Deza <adeza@redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Two Spirit <twospirit6905@gmail.com> wrote: >> the target osd was a ubuntu 16.04 x32 >> >> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Two Spirit <twospirit6905@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I built 64 bit ubuntu 16.04 and 14.04 (using crush tunables legacy) >>> systems, and I tried to build a 32 bit system, and it complained >>> about missing packages so if there is such a thing, I think it might >>> be related to 32 bit repository. ubuntu 15.04 doesn't work either, but >>> I'm not sure if it is supported. > > We haven't built any 32bit binaries in a while although the repos > might exist (although they are empty). > >>> >>> adminhost$ ceph-deploy install --release luminous vm143 >>> >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Get:2 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu >>> xenial-updates InRelease [102 kB] >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Get:3 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu >>> xenial-security InRelease [102 kB] >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Get:4 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu >>> xenial-backports InRelease [102 kB] >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Hit:5 https://download.ceph.com/debian-luminous xenial InRelease >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Fetched 306 kB in 1s (172 kB/s) >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Reading package lists... >>> [vm143][INFO ] Running command: sudo env >>> DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical apt-get >>> --assume-yes -q --no-install-recommends install -o >>> Dpkg::Options::=--force-confnew ceph ceph-osd ceph-mds ceph-mon >>> radosgw >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Reading package lists... >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Building dependency tree... >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Reading state information... >>> [vm143][WARNING] E: Unable to locate package ceph-osd >>> [vm143][WARNING] E: Unable to locate package ceph-mon >>> [vm143][ERROR ] RuntimeError: command returned non-zero exit status: 100 >>> [ceph_deploy][ERROR ] RuntimeError: Failed to execute command: env >>> DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical apt-get >>> --assume-yes -q --no-install-recommends install -o >>> Dpkg::Options::=--force-confnew ceph ceph-osd ceph-mds ceph-mon >>> radosgw >>> <div id="DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2"><br /> >>> <table style="border-top: 1px solid #D3D4DE;"> >>> <tr> >>> <td style="width: 55px; padding-top: 13px;"><a >>> href="http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail" >>> target="_blank"><img >>> src="https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-v1.png" >>> alt="" width="46" height="29" style="width: 46px; height: 29px;" >>> /></a></td> >>> <td style="width: 470px; padding-top: 12px; color: #41424e; >>> font-size: 13px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; >>> line-height: 18px;">Virus-free. <a >>> href="http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail" >>> target="_blank" style="color: #4453ea;">www.avg.com</a> >>> </td> >>> </tr> >>> </table><a href="#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2" width="1" >>> height="1"></a></div> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug? luminous pkg missing ceph-osd ceph-mon 32bit 2017-08-29 21:36 ` Two Spirit @ 2017-08-29 21:41 ` Sage Weil 2017-08-30 15:38 ` Two Spirit 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Sage Weil @ 2017-08-29 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Two Spirit; +Cc: Alfredo Deza, ceph-devel On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Two Spirit wrote: > is it the plan to eventually support 32 bit, or is it only supported on > 64 bit? It depends on whether someone is willing to fix the 32-bit build issues and get a 32-bit jenkins builder set up (so that new build problems aren't introduced). There isn't much interest among the current devs, but nobody is opposed! Actually producing release artifacts for 32-bit is a bit more work; that depends on how slow and/or reliable the 32-bit build is. There has never been (and likely won't ever be?) any real QA done on the 32-bit builds. sage > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:11 AM, Alfredo Deza <adeza@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Two Spirit <twospirit6905@gmail.com> wrote: > >> the target osd was a ubuntu 16.04 x32 > >> > >> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Two Spirit <twospirit6905@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> I built 64 bit ubuntu 16.04 and 14.04 (using crush tunables legacy) > >>> systems, and I tried to build a 32 bit system, and it complained > >>> about missing packages so if there is such a thing, I think it might > >>> be related to 32 bit repository. ubuntu 15.04 doesn't work either, but > >>> I'm not sure if it is supported. > > > > We haven't built any 32bit binaries in a while although the repos > > might exist (although they are empty). > > > >>> > >>> adminhost$ ceph-deploy install --release luminous vm143 > >>> > >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Get:2 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu > >>> xenial-updates InRelease [102 kB] > >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Get:3 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu > >>> xenial-security InRelease [102 kB] > >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Get:4 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu > >>> xenial-backports InRelease [102 kB] > >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Hit:5 https://download.ceph.com/debian-luminous xenial InRelease > >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Fetched 306 kB in 1s (172 kB/s) > >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Reading package lists... > >>> [vm143][INFO ] Running command: sudo env > >>> DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical apt-get > >>> --assume-yes -q --no-install-recommends install -o > >>> Dpkg::Options::=--force-confnew ceph ceph-osd ceph-mds ceph-mon > >>> radosgw > >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Reading package lists... > >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Building dependency tree... > >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Reading state information... > >>> [vm143][WARNING] E: Unable to locate package ceph-osd > >>> [vm143][WARNING] E: Unable to locate package ceph-mon > >>> [vm143][ERROR ] RuntimeError: command returned non-zero exit status: 100 > >>> [ceph_deploy][ERROR ] RuntimeError: Failed to execute command: env > >>> DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical apt-get > >>> --assume-yes -q --no-install-recommends install -o > >>> Dpkg::Options::=--force-confnew ceph ceph-osd ceph-mds ceph-mon > >>> radosgw > >>> <div id="DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2"><br /> > >>> <table style="border-top: 1px solid #D3D4DE;"> > >>> <tr> > >>> <td style="width: 55px; padding-top: 13px;"><a > >>> href="http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail" > >>> target="_blank"><img > >>> src="https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-v1.png" > >>> alt="" width="46" height="29" style="width: 46px; height: 29px;" > >>> /></a></td> > >>> <td style="width: 470px; padding-top: 12px; color: #41424e; > >>> font-size: 13px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; > >>> line-height: 18px;">Virus-free. <a > >>> href="http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail" > >>> target="_blank" style="color: #4453ea;">www.avg.com</a> > >>> </td> > >>> </tr> > >>> </table><a href="#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2" width="1" > >>> height="1"></a></div> > >> -- > >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug? luminous pkg missing ceph-osd ceph-mon 32bit 2017-08-29 21:41 ` Sage Weil @ 2017-08-30 15:38 ` Two Spirit 2017-08-30 16:58 ` Two Spirit 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Two Spirit @ 2017-08-30 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sage Weil; +Cc: Alfredo Deza, ceph-devel Thanks for the reply. I totally understand the limited resource thing. I'd totally would do it, but my skills in configuration management is out of date. If you guys can build a 32 bit version, I will add equipment to test it. From my perspective, the cost of doing large scale simulated testing is lower with the 32 bit support. The same goes for support for Ubuntu's non LTS releases. I support a lot of heterogeneous networks. The sell is harder to get clients to give a lot of money to setup a whole new unproven file system and R&D time. It's got to work on existing equipment. I see two environments. One that needs stable production environment, and one that needs the latest and greatest(for it's time), and that equipment is not running LTS releases. If I can't install it, I can't test it. On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Sage Weil <sweil@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Two Spirit wrote: >> is it the plan to eventually support 32 bit, or is it only supported on >> 64 bit? > > It depends on whether someone is willing to fix the 32-bit build issues > and get a 32-bit jenkins builder set up (so that new build problems aren't > introduced). There isn't much interest among the current devs, but nobody > is opposed! > > Actually producing release artifacts for 32-bit is a bit more work; that > depends on how slow and/or reliable the 32-bit build is. > > There has never been (and likely won't ever be?) any real QA done on the > 32-bit builds. > > sage > > >> >> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:11 AM, Alfredo Deza <adeza@redhat.com> wrote: >> > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Two Spirit <twospirit6905@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> the target osd was a ubuntu 16.04 x32 >> >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Two Spirit <twospirit6905@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I built 64 bit ubuntu 16.04 and 14.04 (using crush tunables legacy) >> >>> systems, and I tried to build a 32 bit system, and it complained >> >>> about missing packages so if there is such a thing, I think it might >> >>> be related to 32 bit repository. ubuntu 15.04 doesn't work either, but >> >>> I'm not sure if it is supported. >> > >> > We haven't built any 32bit binaries in a while although the repos >> > might exist (although they are empty). >> > >> >>> >> >>> adminhost$ ceph-deploy install --release luminous vm143 >> >>> >> >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Get:2 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu >> >>> xenial-updates InRelease [102 kB] >> >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Get:3 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu >> >>> xenial-security InRelease [102 kB] >> >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Get:4 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu >> >>> xenial-backports InRelease [102 kB] >> >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Hit:5 https://download.ceph.com/debian-luminous xenial InRelease >> >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Fetched 306 kB in 1s (172 kB/s) >> >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Reading package lists... >> >>> [vm143][INFO ] Running command: sudo env >> >>> DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical apt-get >> >>> --assume-yes -q --no-install-recommends install -o >> >>> Dpkg::Options::=--force-confnew ceph ceph-osd ceph-mds ceph-mon >> >>> radosgw >> >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Reading package lists... >> >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Building dependency tree... >> >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Reading state information... >> >>> [vm143][WARNING] E: Unable to locate package ceph-osd >> >>> [vm143][WARNING] E: Unable to locate package ceph-mon >> >>> [vm143][ERROR ] RuntimeError: command returned non-zero exit status: 100 >> >>> [ceph_deploy][ERROR ] RuntimeError: Failed to execute command: env >> >>> DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical apt-get >> >>> --assume-yes -q --no-install-recommends install -o >> >>> Dpkg::Options::=--force-confnew ceph ceph-osd ceph-mds ceph-mon >> >>> radosgw >> >>> <div id="DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2"><br /> >> >>> <table style="border-top: 1px solid #D3D4DE;"> >> >>> <tr> >> >>> <td style="width: 55px; padding-top: 13px;"><a >> >>> href="http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail" >> >>> target="_blank"><img >> >>> src="https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-v1.png" >> >>> alt="" width="46" height="29" style="width: 46px; height: 29px;" >> >>> /></a></td> >> >>> <td style="width: 470px; padding-top: 12px; color: #41424e; >> >>> font-size: 13px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; >> >>> line-height: 18px;">Virus-free. <a >> >>> href="http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail" >> >>> target="_blank" style="color: #4453ea;">www.avg.com</a> >> >>> </td> >> >>> </tr> >> >>> </table><a href="#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2" width="1" >> >>> height="1"></a></div> >> >> -- >> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> >> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug? luminous pkg missing ceph-osd ceph-mon 32bit 2017-08-30 15:38 ` Two Spirit @ 2017-08-30 16:58 ` Two Spirit 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Two Spirit @ 2017-08-30 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sage Weil; +Cc: Alfredo Deza, ceph-devel Consider updating docs. remove reference to supporting 32 bit http://docs.ceph.com/docs/luminous/start/hardware-recommendations/ <div id="DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2"><br /> <table style="border-top: 1px solid #D3D4DE;"> <tr> <td style="width: 55px; padding-top: 13px;"><a href="http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail" target="_blank"><img src="https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-v1.png" alt="" width="46" height="29" style="width: 46px; height: 29px;" /></a></td> <td style="width: 470px; padding-top: 12px; color: #41424e; font-size: 13px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 18px;">Virus-free. <a href="http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail" target="_blank" style="color: #4453ea;">www.avg.com</a> </td> </tr> </table><a href="#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2" width="1" height="1"></a></div> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Two Spirit <twospirit6905@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the reply. I totally understand the limited resource thing. > I'd totally would do it, but my skills in configuration management is > out of date. > > If you guys can build a 32 bit version, I will add equipment to test it. > > From my perspective, the cost of doing large scale simulated testing > is lower with the 32 bit support. > > The same goes for support for Ubuntu's non LTS releases. > > I support a lot of heterogeneous networks. The sell is harder to get > clients to give a lot of money to setup a whole new unproven file > system and R&D time. It's got to work on existing equipment. I see two > environments. One that needs stable production environment, and one > that needs the latest and greatest(for it's time), and that equipment > is not running LTS releases. > > If I can't install it, I can't test it. > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Sage Weil <sweil@redhat.com> wrote: >> On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Two Spirit wrote: >>> is it the plan to eventually support 32 bit, or is it only supported on >>> 64 bit? >> >> It depends on whether someone is willing to fix the 32-bit build issues >> and get a 32-bit jenkins builder set up (so that new build problems aren't >> introduced). There isn't much interest among the current devs, but nobody >> is opposed! >> >> Actually producing release artifacts for 32-bit is a bit more work; that >> depends on how slow and/or reliable the 32-bit build is. >> >> There has never been (and likely won't ever be?) any real QA done on the >> 32-bit builds. >> >> sage >> >> >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:11 AM, Alfredo Deza <adeza@redhat.com> wrote: >>> > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Two Spirit <twospirit6905@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> the target osd was a ubuntu 16.04 x32 >>> >> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Two Spirit <twospirit6905@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I built 64 bit ubuntu 16.04 and 14.04 (using crush tunables legacy) >>> >>> systems, and I tried to build a 32 bit system, and it complained >>> >>> about missing packages so if there is such a thing, I think it might >>> >>> be related to 32 bit repository. ubuntu 15.04 doesn't work either, but >>> >>> I'm not sure if it is supported. >>> > >>> > We haven't built any 32bit binaries in a while although the repos >>> > might exist (although they are empty). >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> adminhost$ ceph-deploy install --release luminous vm143 >>> >>> >>> >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Get:2 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu >>> >>> xenial-updates InRelease [102 kB] >>> >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Get:3 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu >>> >>> xenial-security InRelease [102 kB] >>> >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Get:4 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu >>> >>> xenial-backports InRelease [102 kB] >>> >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Hit:5 https://download.ceph.com/debian-luminous xenial InRelease >>> >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Fetched 306 kB in 1s (172 kB/s) >>> >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Reading package lists... >>> >>> [vm143][INFO ] Running command: sudo env >>> >>> DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical apt-get >>> >>> --assume-yes -q --no-install-recommends install -o >>> >>> Dpkg::Options::=--force-confnew ceph ceph-osd ceph-mds ceph-mon >>> >>> radosgw >>> >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Reading package lists... >>> >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Building dependency tree... >>> >>> [vm143][DEBUG ] Reading state information... >>> >>> [vm143][WARNING] E: Unable to locate package ceph-osd >>> >>> [vm143][WARNING] E: Unable to locate package ceph-mon >>> >>> [vm143][ERROR ] RuntimeError: command returned non-zero exit status: 100 >>> >>> [ceph_deploy][ERROR ] RuntimeError: Failed to execute command: env >>> >>> DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical apt-get >>> >>> --assume-yes -q --no-install-recommends install -o >>> >>> Dpkg::Options::=--force-confnew ceph ceph-osd ceph-mds ceph-mon >>> >>> radosgw >>> >>> <div id="DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2"><br /> >>> >>> <table style="border-top: 1px solid #D3D4DE;"> >>> >>> <tr> >>> >>> <td style="width: 55px; padding-top: 13px;"><a >>> >>> href="http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail" >>> >>> target="_blank"><img >>> >>> src="https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-v1.png" >>> >>> alt="" width="46" height="29" style="width: 46px; height: 29px;" >>> >>> /></a></td> >>> >>> <td style="width: 470px; padding-top: 12px; color: #41424e; >>> >>> font-size: 13px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; >>> >>> line-height: 18px;">Virus-free. <a >>> >>> href="http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail" >>> >>> target="_blank" style="color: #4453ea;">www.avg.com</a> >>> >>> </td> >>> >>> </tr> >>> >>> </table><a href="#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2" width="1" >>> >>> height="1"></a></div> >>> >> -- >>> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >>> >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>> >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>> >>> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-08-30 16:58 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2017-08-25 15:35 Bug? luminous pkg missing ceph-osd ceph-mon 32bit Two Spirit 2017-08-25 15:40 ` Two Spirit 2017-08-28 12:11 ` Alfredo Deza 2017-08-29 21:36 ` Two Spirit 2017-08-29 21:41 ` Sage Weil 2017-08-30 15:38 ` Two Spirit 2017-08-30 16:58 ` Two Spirit
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.
