All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Antony Yu <swpenim@gmail.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
	Pen-Yung Yu <swpenim@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND,PATCH] ARM: fix __div64_32() error when compiling with clang
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 18:14:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAC5oF3W+RkcO-dSiKXGxVvhBGb0n7fQ-KvdjbPNJJVadv6qNBw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201124074211.GA26157@penyung-VirtualBox>

Antony Yu <swpenim@gmail.com> 於 2020年11月24日 週二 下午3:43寫道:
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 11:16:02AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 03:36:32PM +0800, Antony Yu wrote:
> > > __do_div64 clobbers the input register r0 in little endian system.
> > > According to the inline assembly document, if an input operand is
> > > modified, it should be tied to a output operand. This patch can
> > > prevent compilers from reusing r0 register after asm statements.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Antony Yu <swpenim@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h | 5 +++--
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h
> > > index 898e9c78a7e7..809efc51e90f 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h
> > > @@ -39,9 +39,10 @@ static inline uint32_t __div64_32(uint64_t *n, uint32_t base)
> > >     asm(    __asmeq("%0", __xh)
> > >             __asmeq("%1", "r2")
> > >             __asmeq("%2", "r0")
> > > -           __asmeq("%3", "r4")
> > > +           __asmeq("%3", "r0")
> > > +           __asmeq("%4", "r4")
> > >             "bl     __do_div64"
> > > -           : "=r" (__rem), "=r" (__res)
> > > +           : "=r" (__rem), "=r" (__res), "=r" (__n)
> > >             : "r" (__n), "r" (__base)
> > >             : "ip", "lr", "cc");
> > >     *n = __res;
> > > --
> > > 2.23.0
> > >
> >
> > I am not sure that I am qualified to review this (my assembly knowledge
> > is not the best) but your commit title mentions an error when compiling
> > with clang. What is the exact error, what configuration generates it,
> > and what version of clang? We have done fairly decent testing for
> > 32-bit ARM, I would like to know what we are missing.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Nathan
>
> We have run fail on android R vts vts_libsnapshot_test with kernel 4.14.
> This bug is triggered accidently by a workaround patch in our code base.
> It is fine on a pure clean 4.14 branch since __do_div64 may not be
> executed in skip_metadata.
>
> The attachment are .i and generated .s file. .s file can be reproduced
> with clang -target arm-linux-eabi -march=armv8.2-a -O2.
>
> In function skip_metadata, it loads some value to r0, calls __do_div64,
> adds 1 to r0 and stores it to [r5]. It gets wrong value since __do_div64
> clobbers r0 register.
>
> We have tried clang-10, clang-11 and android prebuilt clang-r383902b. All
> of them have the same problem.

Sorry for the large attachment.
I put .i and .s files on
https://gist.github.com/penyung/274b0c697062a1c776994bb40243cfff

Antony Yu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Antony Yu <swpenim@gmail.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Cc: Pen-Yung Yu <swpenim@gmail.com>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND, PATCH] ARM: fix __div64_32() error when compiling with clang
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 18:14:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAC5oF3W+RkcO-dSiKXGxVvhBGb0n7fQ-KvdjbPNJJVadv6qNBw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201124074211.GA26157@penyung-VirtualBox>

Antony Yu <swpenim@gmail.com> 於 2020年11月24日 週二 下午3:43寫道:
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 11:16:02AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 03:36:32PM +0800, Antony Yu wrote:
> > > __do_div64 clobbers the input register r0 in little endian system.
> > > According to the inline assembly document, if an input operand is
> > > modified, it should be tied to a output operand. This patch can
> > > prevent compilers from reusing r0 register after asm statements.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Antony Yu <swpenim@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h | 5 +++--
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h
> > > index 898e9c78a7e7..809efc51e90f 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h
> > > @@ -39,9 +39,10 @@ static inline uint32_t __div64_32(uint64_t *n, uint32_t base)
> > >     asm(    __asmeq("%0", __xh)
> > >             __asmeq("%1", "r2")
> > >             __asmeq("%2", "r0")
> > > -           __asmeq("%3", "r4")
> > > +           __asmeq("%3", "r0")
> > > +           __asmeq("%4", "r4")
> > >             "bl     __do_div64"
> > > -           : "=r" (__rem), "=r" (__res)
> > > +           : "=r" (__rem), "=r" (__res), "=r" (__n)
> > >             : "r" (__n), "r" (__base)
> > >             : "ip", "lr", "cc");
> > >     *n = __res;
> > > --
> > > 2.23.0
> > >
> >
> > I am not sure that I am qualified to review this (my assembly knowledge
> > is not the best) but your commit title mentions an error when compiling
> > with clang. What is the exact error, what configuration generates it,
> > and what version of clang? We have done fairly decent testing for
> > 32-bit ARM, I would like to know what we are missing.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Nathan
>
> We have run fail on android R vts vts_libsnapshot_test with kernel 4.14.
> This bug is triggered accidently by a workaround patch in our code base.
> It is fine on a pure clean 4.14 branch since __do_div64 may not be
> executed in skip_metadata.
>
> The attachment are .i and generated .s file. .s file can be reproduced
> with clang -target arm-linux-eabi -march=armv8.2-a -O2.
>
> In function skip_metadata, it loads some value to r0, calls __do_div64,
> adds 1 to r0 and stores it to [r5]. It gets wrong value since __do_div64
> clobbers r0 register.
>
> We have tried clang-10, clang-11 and android prebuilt clang-r383902b. All
> of them have the same problem.

Sorry for the large attachment.
I put .i and .s files on
https://gist.github.com/penyung/274b0c697062a1c776994bb40243cfff

Antony Yu

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-24 10:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-23  7:36 [RESEND,PATCH] ARM: fix __div64_32() error when compiling with clang Antony Yu
2020-11-23  7:36 ` Antony Yu
2020-11-23 18:16 ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-11-23 18:16   ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-11-24  7:42   ` Antony Yu
2020-11-24 10:14     ` Antony Yu [this message]
2020-11-24 10:14       ` [RESEND, PATCH] " Antony Yu
2020-11-24 21:06       ` [RESEND,PATCH] " Nick Desaulniers
2020-11-24 21:06         ` [RESEND, PATCH] " Nick Desaulniers
2020-11-30  8:20         ` [PATCH v2] " Antony Yu
2020-11-30  8:20           ` Antony Yu
2020-11-24 23:16 ` [RESEND,PATCH] " kernel test robot
2020-11-24 23:16   ` [RESEND, PATCH] " kernel test robot
2020-11-24 23:16   ` [RESEND,PATCH] " kernel test robot
2020-11-30 10:11 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-11-30 10:11   ` [RESEND, PATCH] " Ard Biesheuvel
2020-11-30 10:12   ` [RESEND,PATCH] " Ard Biesheuvel
2020-11-30 10:12     ` [RESEND, PATCH] " Ard Biesheuvel
2020-11-30 10:21     ` [RESEND,PATCH] " Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-11-30 10:21       ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-11-30 10:40       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-11-30 10:40         ` [RESEND, PATCH] " Ard Biesheuvel
2020-11-30 13:58         ` [RESEND,PATCH] " David Laight
2020-11-30 13:58           ` David Laight
2020-11-30 14:18           ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-11-30 14:18             ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-11-30 15:50     ` Nicolas Pitre
2020-11-30 15:50       ` Nicolas Pitre
2020-11-30 17:18       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-11-30 17:18         ` [RESEND, PATCH] " Ard Biesheuvel
2020-11-30 17:52         ` [RESEND,PATCH] " Nicolas Pitre
2020-11-30 17:52           ` Nicolas Pitre
2020-11-30 18:08           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-11-30 18:08             ` [RESEND, PATCH] " Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAC5oF3W+RkcO-dSiKXGxVvhBGb0n7fQ-KvdjbPNJJVadv6qNBw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=swpenim@gmail.com \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.