All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>,
	bhelgaas@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	ACPI Devel Mailing List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] PCIe: Add PCIe runtime D3cold support
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:13:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAC=cRTMXNnZQ_bDes9JFp9yreGC63b_i9fUX6apQzWrUHw2a0Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201204162330.12178.rjw@sisk.pl>

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>> >> +     return 0;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static int pcie_port_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>> >> +{
>> >> +     struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>> >> +
>> >> +     pci_restore_state(pdev);
>> >> +     if (pdev->runtime_d3cold)
>> >> +             msleep(100);
>> >
>> > What's _that_ supposed to do?
>>
>> When resume from d3cold, PCIe main link will be powered on again, it
>> will take quite some time before the main link go into L0 state.
>> Otherwise, accessing devices under the port may return wrong result.
>
> OK, but this is generic code and as per the standard the link should have been
> reestablished at this point already.
>
> Please don't put some nonstandard-platform-specific quirks like this into
> code that's supposed to handle _every_ PCIe system.

After checking PCIe spec, I found that the 100ms here has its standard origin :)

In PCI Express Base Specification Revision 2.0:

Section 6.6.1 Conventional Reset

"
To allow components to perform internal initialization, system
software must wait for at least
100 ms from the end of a Conventional Reset of one or more devices
before it is permitted to
issue Configuration Requests to those devices
"

But I think we should move the 100ms delay here to PCIe bus code or
PCIe/ACPI code, because that is needed by all PCIe devices for D3cold
support.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>,
	bhelgaas@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	ACPI Devel Mailing List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] PCIe: Add PCIe runtime D3cold support
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:13:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAC=cRTMXNnZQ_bDes9JFp9yreGC63b_i9fUX6apQzWrUHw2a0Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201204162330.12178.rjw@sisk.pl>

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>> >> +     return 0;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static int pcie_port_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>> >> +{
>> >> +     struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>> >> +
>> >> +     pci_restore_state(pdev);
>> >> +     if (pdev->runtime_d3cold)
>> >> +             msleep(100);
>> >
>> > What's _that_ supposed to do?
>>
>> When resume from d3cold, PCIe main link will be powered on again, it
>> will take quite some time before the main link go into L0 state.
>> Otherwise, accessing devices under the port may return wrong result.
>
> OK, but this is generic code and as per the standard the link should have been
> reestablished at this point already.
>
> Please don't put some nonstandard-platform-specific quirks like this into
> code that's supposed to handle _every_ PCIe system.

After checking PCIe spec, I found that the 100ms here has its standard origin :)

In PCI Express Base Specification Revision 2.0:

Section 6.6.1 Conventional Reset

"
To allow components to perform internal initialization, system
software must wait for at least
100 ms from the end of a Conventional Reset of one or more devices
before it is permitted to
issue Configuration Requests to those devices
"

But I think we should move the 100ms delay here to PCIe bus code or
PCIe/ACPI code, because that is needed by all PCIe devices for D3cold
support.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-04-17  5:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-13  2:35 [RFC PATCH] PCIe: Add PCIe runtime D3cold support Yan, Zheng
2012-04-13  6:06 ` Alex He
2012-04-13  6:28   ` Yan, Zheng
2012-04-16  8:15   ` huang ying
2012-04-13 19:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-16  0:48   ` Lin Ming
2012-04-16 16:26     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-16  2:23   ` Yan, Zheng
2012-04-16 17:07     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-17  2:07       ` huang ying
2012-04-17  2:07         ` huang ying
2012-04-17 20:20         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-18  1:19           ` huang ying
2012-04-18 19:51             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-17  2:12       ` Yan, Zheng
2012-04-17  5:32         ` huang ying
2012-04-17 20:43           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-18  1:22             ` huang ying
2012-04-18 19:52               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-17 20:35         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-16  7:49   ` Yan, Zheng
2012-04-16 21:11     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-16  8:58   ` huang ying
2012-04-16  8:58     ` huang ying
2012-04-16 21:30     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-17  2:02       ` huang ying
2012-04-17  2:02         ` huang ying
2012-04-17 21:03         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-18  1:45           ` huang ying
2012-04-18 21:00             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-19  2:47               ` huang ying
2012-04-19  2:47                 ` huang ying
2012-04-19 12:31                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-20  0:48                   ` huang ying
2012-04-20  0:48                     ` huang ying
2012-04-17  5:13       ` huang ying [this message]
2012-04-17  5:13         ` huang ying
2012-04-17 21:10         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-18  2:01           ` huang ying
2012-04-18 20:51             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-19  2:08               ` huang ying
2012-04-19  2:08                 ` huang ying
2012-04-19 12:36                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-20  0:53                   ` huang ying

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAC=cRTMXNnZQ_bDes9JFp9yreGC63b_i9fUX6apQzWrUHw2a0Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=zheng.z.yan@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.