All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	ming.m.lin@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Zheng Yan <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/5] PM, Runtime, Add power_must_be_on flag
Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 13:15:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAC=cRTOpbbHCSXN3=JKZkpy753G0-Vgbu0DkbV-v_coVMM7Qzw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201205042137.16425.rjw@sisk.pl>

On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 3:37 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Friday, May 04, 2012, Huang Ying wrote:
>> The extreme way to save device power in runtime is to turn off power
>> of device.  For example, D3cold for PCIe bus and ZPODD (Zero Power
>> Optical Disk Drive) for SATA bus will do that.
>>
>> But sometimes power off is not expected, some possible reason is as
>> follow
>>
>> - power off device usually incurs longer resume latency, if it exceeds
>>   power QoS requirement, power off should be disabled.
>>
>> - For some buses, device in power off state can not support remote
>>   wakeup.  If remote wakeup is desired, power off should be disabled.
>>
>> In general, whether to put a device into power off state should be
>> decided by the driver of the device, but for some buses, whether to
>> put a device into power off state may be done by the parent of the
>> device.  For example, a PCIe end point device may be put into power
>> off state by the PCIe port connected to it.
>>
>> So a flag is introduced for the children devices to tell the parent
>> device, whether it should be put into power off state.
>>
>> This flag is also used for device driver to tell bus layer whether it
>> is OK to be powered off.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
>
> I would be almost fine with this patch, if [2/5] were not present.
>
> However, if you introduce a flag like this, you need to put checks
> against it into all places where power may be removed from devices,
> like the generic PM domains framework (but not only there).

Yes.  At least this flag will be needed by other buses, like ZPODD
support from Lin Ming:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/28/23

So my original plan is to introduce this flag firstly, then to add
checking for this flag in various places need it.  Do you suggest to
put PCIe D3cold support, ZPODD support, power domain related checking
into one patchset.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-05  5:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-04  8:13 [RFC v2 0/5] PCIe, Add PCIe runtime D3cold support Huang Ying
2012-05-04  8:13 ` [RFC v2 1/5] PM, Runtime, Add power_must_be_on flag Huang Ying
2012-05-04 19:37   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-05  5:15     ` huang ying [this message]
2012-05-07 20:33       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-04 19:50   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-05-05  5:59     ` huang ying
2012-05-07 20:37       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-04  8:13 ` [RFC v2 2/5] PM, Add sysfs file power_off to control device power off policy Huang Ying
2012-05-04 19:33   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-05  6:29     ` huang ying
2012-05-07 20:53       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-08  1:44         ` Huang Ying
2012-05-08 21:34           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-09  6:46             ` Huang Ying
2012-05-09 10:38               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-10  0:55                 ` Huang Ying
2012-05-10 14:48                   ` Alan Stern
2012-05-10 19:03                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-04 19:50   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-05-04 21:00     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-05  6:36     ` huang ying
2012-05-04  8:13 ` [RFC v2 3/5] PCIe, Add runtime PM support to PCIe port Huang Ying
2012-05-04 19:43   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-05  6:46     ` huang ying
2012-05-07 21:00       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-11  7:57         ` Huang Ying
2012-05-11 18:44           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-04 19:50   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-05-04 20:55     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-05  6:54       ` huang ying
2012-05-07 21:06         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-05  6:53     ` huang ying
2012-05-04  8:13 ` [RFC v2 4/5] ACPI, PM, Specify lowest allowed state for device sleep state Huang Ying
2012-05-04 20:10   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-05  7:25     ` huang ying
2012-05-07 21:15       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-08  1:49         ` Huang Ying
2012-05-04  8:13 ` [RFC v2 5/5] PCIe, Add PCIe runtime D3cold support Huang Ying
2012-05-04 19:51   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-05-05  7:34     ` huang ying
2012-05-04 20:50   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-05  8:08     ` huang ying
2012-05-07 21:22       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-08  2:22         ` Huang Ying
2012-05-08  8:34           ` Huang Ying
2012-05-10 19:28             ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAC=cRTOpbbHCSXN3=JKZkpy753G0-Vgbu0DkbV-v_coVMM7Qzw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=zheng.z.yan@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.