* [PATCH] vp_vdpa: fix the method of calculating vectors
@ 2024-03-18 3:01 gavin.liu
2024-03-18 4:06 ` Jason Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: gavin.liu @ 2024-03-18 3:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jasowang, mst; +Cc: xuanzhuo, virtualization, angus.chen, yuxue.liu
From: Yuxue Liu <yuxue.liu@jaguarmicro.com>
When there is a ctlq and it doesn't require interrupt
callbacks,the original method of calculating vectors
wastes hardware MSI or MSI-X resources as well as system
IRQ resources. Referencing the per_vq_vectors mode in the
vp_find_vqs_msix function, calculate the required number
of vectors based on whether the callback is set.
Signed-off-by: Yuxue Liu <yuxue.liu@jaguarmicro.com>
---
drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c | 14 ++++++++++----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c b/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c
index 281287fae89f..5066970b2570 100644
--- a/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c
+++ b/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c
@@ -160,7 +160,13 @@ static int vp_vdpa_request_irq(struct vp_vdpa *vp_vdpa)
struct pci_dev *pdev = mdev->pci_dev;
int i, ret, irq;
int queues = vp_vdpa->queues;
- int vectors = queues + 1;
+ int vectors = 0;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
+ if (vp_vdpa->vring[i].cb.callback != NULL)
+ vectors++;
+ }
+ vectors = vectors + 1;
ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, vectors, vectors, PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
if (ret != vectors) {
@@ -172,7 +178,7 @@ static int vp_vdpa_request_irq(struct vp_vdpa *vp_vdpa)
vp_vdpa->vectors = vectors;
- for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < vectors - 1; i++) {
snprintf(vp_vdpa->vring[i].msix_name, VP_VDPA_NAME_SIZE,
"vp-vdpa[%s]-%d\n", pci_name(pdev), i);
irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, i);
@@ -191,7 +197,7 @@ static int vp_vdpa_request_irq(struct vp_vdpa *vp_vdpa)
snprintf(vp_vdpa->msix_name, VP_VDPA_NAME_SIZE, "vp-vdpa[%s]-config\n",
pci_name(pdev));
- irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, queues);
+ irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vectors - 1);
ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, vp_vdpa_config_handler, 0,
vp_vdpa->msix_name, vp_vdpa);
if (ret) {
@@ -199,7 +205,7 @@ static int vp_vdpa_request_irq(struct vp_vdpa *vp_vdpa)
"vp_vdpa: fail to request irq for vq %d\n", i);
goto err;
}
- vp_modern_config_vector(mdev, queues);
+ vp_modern_config_vector(mdev, vectors - 1);
vp_vdpa->config_irq = irq;
return 0;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] vp_vdpa: fix the method of calculating vectors
2024-03-18 3:01 [PATCH] vp_vdpa: fix the method of calculating vectors gavin.liu
@ 2024-03-18 4:06 ` Jason Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2024-03-18 4:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gavin.liu; +Cc: mst, xuanzhuo, virtualization, angus.chen, yuxue.liu
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 11:01 AM gavin.liu <gavin.liu@jaguarmicro.com> wrote:
>
> From: Yuxue Liu <yuxue.liu@jaguarmicro.com>
>
> When there is a ctlq and it doesn't require interrupt
> callbacks,the original method of calculating vectors
> wastes hardware MSI or MSI-X resources as well as system
> IRQ resources. Referencing the per_vq_vectors mode in the
> vp_find_vqs_msix function, calculate the required number
> of vectors based on whether the callback is set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuxue Liu <yuxue.liu@jaguarmicro.com>
> ---
> drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c | 14 ++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c b/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c
> index 281287fae89f..5066970b2570 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c
> @@ -160,7 +160,13 @@ static int vp_vdpa_request_irq(struct vp_vdpa *vp_vdpa)
> struct pci_dev *pdev = mdev->pci_dev;
> int i, ret, irq;
> int queues = vp_vdpa->queues;
> - int vectors = queues + 1;
> + int vectors = 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
> + if (vp_vdpa->vring[i].cb.callback != NULL)
> + vectors++;
> + }
> + vectors = vectors + 1;
>
> ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, vectors, vectors, PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
> if (ret != vectors) {
> @@ -172,7 +178,7 @@ static int vp_vdpa_request_irq(struct vp_vdpa *vp_vdpa)
>
> vp_vdpa->vectors = vectors;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < vectors - 1; i++) {
This seems to be buggy. You didn't scan all queues so you will miss
the IRQ for the last queue.
Thanks
> snprintf(vp_vdpa->vring[i].msix_name, VP_VDPA_NAME_SIZE,
> "vp-vdpa[%s]-%d\n", pci_name(pdev), i);
> irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, i);
> @@ -191,7 +197,7 @@ static int vp_vdpa_request_irq(struct vp_vdpa *vp_vdpa)
>
> snprintf(vp_vdpa->msix_name, VP_VDPA_NAME_SIZE, "vp-vdpa[%s]-config\n",
> pci_name(pdev));
> - irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, queues);
> + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vectors - 1);
> ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, vp_vdpa_config_handler, 0,
> vp_vdpa->msix_name, vp_vdpa);
> if (ret) {
> @@ -199,7 +205,7 @@ static int vp_vdpa_request_irq(struct vp_vdpa *vp_vdpa)
> "vp_vdpa: fail to request irq for vq %d\n", i);
> goto err;
> }
> - vp_modern_config_vector(mdev, queues);
> + vp_modern_config_vector(mdev, vectors - 1);
> vp_vdpa->config_irq = irq;
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.43.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-03-18 4:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-03-18 3:01 [PATCH] vp_vdpa: fix the method of calculating vectors gavin.liu
2024-03-18 4:06 ` Jason Wang
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.