From: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com> To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> Cc: Siva Reddy Kallam <siva.kallam@broadcom.com>, Prashant Sreedharan <prashant@broadcom.com>, Michael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: tg3: tidy up loop, remove need to compute off with a multiply Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 16:04:50 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CACKFLinpQFupdmq63RH527sDrAj4nrV4vcR+eDy5zh4KqLh8Dg@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200508225301.484094-1-colin.king@canonical.com> On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 3:53 PM Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote: > > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > > Currently the value for 'off' is computed using a multiplication and > a couple of statements later off is being incremented by len and > this value is never read. Clean up the code by removing the > multiplication and just increment off by len on each iteration. Also > use len instead of TG3_OCIR_LEN. > > Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value") > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/tg3.c | 8 +++----- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/tg3.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/tg3.c > index ff98a82b7bc4..9dd9bd506bcc 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/tg3.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/tg3.c > @@ -10798,16 +10798,14 @@ static int tg3_init_hw(struct tg3 *tp, bool reset_phy) > static void tg3_sd_scan_scratchpad(struct tg3 *tp, struct tg3_ocir *ocir) > { > int i; > + u32 off, len = TG3_OCIR_LEN; Please use reverse X-mas tree style variable declarations. Other than that, it looks good. Thanks. > > - for (i = 0; i < TG3_SD_NUM_RECS; i++, ocir++) { > - u32 off = i * TG3_OCIR_LEN, len = TG3_OCIR_LEN; > - > + for (i = 0, off = 0; i < TG3_SD_NUM_RECS; i++, ocir++, off += len) { > tg3_ape_scratchpad_read(tp, (u32 *) ocir, off, len); > - off += len; > > if (ocir->signature != TG3_OCIR_SIG_MAGIC || > !(ocir->version_flags & TG3_OCIR_FLAG_ACTIVE)) > - memset(ocir, 0, TG3_OCIR_LEN); > + memset(ocir, 0, len); > } > } > > -- > 2.25.1 >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com> To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> Cc: Siva Reddy Kallam <siva.kallam@broadcom.com>, Prashant Sreedharan <prashant@broadcom.com>, Michael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: tg3: tidy up loop, remove need to compute off with a multiply Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 23:04:50 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CACKFLinpQFupdmq63RH527sDrAj4nrV4vcR+eDy5zh4KqLh8Dg@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200508225301.484094-1-colin.king@canonical.com> On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 3:53 PM Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote: > > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > > Currently the value for 'off' is computed using a multiplication and > a couple of statements later off is being incremented by len and > this value is never read. Clean up the code by removing the > multiplication and just increment off by len on each iteration. Also > use len instead of TG3_OCIR_LEN. > > Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value") > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/tg3.c | 8 +++----- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/tg3.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/tg3.c > index ff98a82b7bc4..9dd9bd506bcc 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/tg3.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/tg3.c > @@ -10798,16 +10798,14 @@ static int tg3_init_hw(struct tg3 *tp, bool reset_phy) > static void tg3_sd_scan_scratchpad(struct tg3 *tp, struct tg3_ocir *ocir) > { > int i; > + u32 off, len = TG3_OCIR_LEN; Please use reverse X-mas tree style variable declarations. Other than that, it looks good. Thanks. > > - for (i = 0; i < TG3_SD_NUM_RECS; i++, ocir++) { > - u32 off = i * TG3_OCIR_LEN, len = TG3_OCIR_LEN; > - > + for (i = 0, off = 0; i < TG3_SD_NUM_RECS; i++, ocir++, off += len) { > tg3_ape_scratchpad_read(tp, (u32 *) ocir, off, len); > - off += len; > > if (ocir->signature != TG3_OCIR_SIG_MAGIC || > !(ocir->version_flags & TG3_OCIR_FLAG_ACTIVE)) > - memset(ocir, 0, TG3_OCIR_LEN); > + memset(ocir, 0, len); > } > } > > -- > 2.25.1 >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-08 23:05 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-05-08 22:53 [PATCH] net: tg3: tidy up loop, remove need to compute off with a multiply Colin King 2020-05-08 22:53 ` Colin King 2020-05-08 23:04 ` Michael Chan [this message] 2020-05-08 23:04 ` Michael Chan 2020-05-08 23:21 ` Joe Perches 2020-05-08 23:21 ` Joe Perches 2020-05-08 23:31 ` Colin Ian King 2020-05-08 23:31 ` Colin Ian King 2020-05-09 1:48 ` Jakub Kicinski 2020-05-09 1:48 ` Jakub Kicinski 2020-05-09 2:31 ` Joe Perches 2020-05-09 2:31 ` Joe Perches 2020-05-09 4:48 ` Michael Chan 2020-05-09 4:48 ` Michael Chan
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=CACKFLinpQFupdmq63RH527sDrAj4nrV4vcR+eDy5zh4KqLh8Dg@mail.gmail.com \ --to=michael.chan@broadcom.com \ --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mchan@broadcom.com \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=prashant@broadcom.com \ --cc=siva.kallam@broadcom.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.