All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] pinctrl: implement pinctrl deferred probing
@ 2012-04-10  8:04 ` Linus Walleij
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2012-04-10  8:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Stephen Warren, Shawn Guo, Thomas Abraham, Dong Aisheng,
	Rajendra Nayak, Haojian Zhuang, Linus Walleij, Mark Brown,
	Arnd Bergmann

From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

If drivers try to obtain pinctrl handles for a pin controller that
has not yet registered to the subsystem, we need to be able to
back out and retry with deferred probing. So let's return
-EPROBE_DEFER whenever this location fails.

Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 Documentation/pinctrl.txt    |    5 +++++
 drivers/pinctrl/core.c       |    7 +++++--
 drivers/pinctrl/devicetree.c |    4 ++--
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/pinctrl.txt b/Documentation/pinctrl.txt
index eb46b1c..4431c3e7 100644
--- a/Documentation/pinctrl.txt
+++ b/Documentation/pinctrl.txt
@@ -1043,6 +1043,11 @@ quickly poking some registers.
 The pins are allocated for your device when you issue the pinctrl_get() call,
 after this you should be able to see this in the debugfs listing of all pins.
 
+NOTE: the pinctrl system will return -EPROBE_DEFER if it cannot find the
+requested pinctrl handles, for example if the pinctrl driver has not yet
+registered. Thus make sure that the error path in your driver gracefully
+cleans up and is ready to retry the probing later in the startup process.
+
 
 System pin control hogging
 ==========================
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
index 7ff8690..3ae00ab 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
@@ -521,8 +521,11 @@ static int add_setting(struct pinctrl *p, struct pinctrl_map const *map)
 		dev_err(p->dev, "unknown pinctrl device %s in map entry",
 			map->ctrl_dev_name);
 		kfree(setting);
-		/* Eventually, this should trigger deferred probe */
-		return -ENODEV;
+		/*
+		 * OK let us guess that the driver is not there yet, and
+		 * let's defer obtaining this pinctrl handle to later...
+		 */
+		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
 	}
 
 	switch (map->type) {
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/devicetree.c b/drivers/pinctrl/devicetree.c
index 5ef2feb..8833538 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/devicetree.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/devicetree.c
@@ -124,8 +124,8 @@ static int dt_to_map_one_config(struct pinctrl *p, const char *statename,
 			dev_err(p->dev, "could not find pctldev for node %s\n",
 				np_config->full_name);
 			of_node_put(np_pctldev);
-			/* FIXME: This should trigger deferrered probe */
-			return -ENODEV;
+			/* OK let's just assume this will appear later then */
+			return -EPROBE_DEFER;
 		}
 		pctldev = find_pinctrl_by_of_node(np_pctldev);
 		if (pctldev)
-- 
1.7.9.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] pinctrl: implement pinctrl deferred probing
@ 2012-04-10  8:04 ` Linus Walleij
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2012-04-10  8:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

If drivers try to obtain pinctrl handles for a pin controller that
has not yet registered to the subsystem, we need to be able to
back out and retry with deferred probing. So let's return
-EPROBE_DEFER whenever this location fails.

Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 Documentation/pinctrl.txt    |    5 +++++
 drivers/pinctrl/core.c       |    7 +++++--
 drivers/pinctrl/devicetree.c |    4 ++--
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/pinctrl.txt b/Documentation/pinctrl.txt
index eb46b1c..4431c3e7 100644
--- a/Documentation/pinctrl.txt
+++ b/Documentation/pinctrl.txt
@@ -1043,6 +1043,11 @@ quickly poking some registers.
 The pins are allocated for your device when you issue the pinctrl_get() call,
 after this you should be able to see this in the debugfs listing of all pins.
 
+NOTE: the pinctrl system will return -EPROBE_DEFER if it cannot find the
+requested pinctrl handles, for example if the pinctrl driver has not yet
+registered. Thus make sure that the error path in your driver gracefully
+cleans up and is ready to retry the probing later in the startup process.
+
 
 System pin control hogging
 ==========================
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
index 7ff8690..3ae00ab 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
@@ -521,8 +521,11 @@ static int add_setting(struct pinctrl *p, struct pinctrl_map const *map)
 		dev_err(p->dev, "unknown pinctrl device %s in map entry",
 			map->ctrl_dev_name);
 		kfree(setting);
-		/* Eventually, this should trigger deferred probe */
-		return -ENODEV;
+		/*
+		 * OK let us guess that the driver is not there yet, and
+		 * let's defer obtaining this pinctrl handle to later...
+		 */
+		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
 	}
 
 	switch (map->type) {
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/devicetree.c b/drivers/pinctrl/devicetree.c
index 5ef2feb..8833538 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/devicetree.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/devicetree.c
@@ -124,8 +124,8 @@ static int dt_to_map_one_config(struct pinctrl *p, const char *statename,
 			dev_err(p->dev, "could not find pctldev for node %s\n",
 				np_config->full_name);
 			of_node_put(np_pctldev);
-			/* FIXME: This should trigger deferrered probe */
-			return -ENODEV;
+			/* OK let's just assume this will appear later then */
+			return -EPROBE_DEFER;
 		}
 		pctldev = find_pinctrl_by_of_node(np_pctldev);
 		if (pctldev)
-- 
1.7.9.2

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: implement pinctrl deferred probing
  2012-04-10  8:04 ` Linus Walleij
@ 2012-04-10 15:36   ` Stephen Warren
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Warren @ 2012-04-10 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linus Walleij
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, Shawn Guo, Thomas Abraham,
	Dong Aisheng, Rajendra Nayak, Haojian Zhuang, Linus Walleij,
	Mark Brown, Arnd Bergmann

On 04/10/2012 02:04 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> 
> If drivers try to obtain pinctrl handles for a pin controller that
> has not yet registered to the subsystem, we need to be able to
> back out and retry with deferred probing. So let's return
> -EPROBE_DEFER whenever this location fails.
> 
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

This looks fine, except:

> @@ -521,8 +521,11 @@ static int add_setting(struct pinctrl *p, struct pinctrl_map const *map)
>  		dev_err(p->dev, "unknown pinctrl device %s in map entry",
>  			map->ctrl_dev_name);

Perhaps this dev_err (and the one in the other hunk) should be
downgraded to warn/info/debug?

> +		/*
> +		 * OK let us guess that the driver is not there yet, and
> +		 * let's defer obtaining this pinctrl handle to later...
> +		 */
> +		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>  	}

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] pinctrl: implement pinctrl deferred probing
@ 2012-04-10 15:36   ` Stephen Warren
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Warren @ 2012-04-10 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On 04/10/2012 02:04 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> 
> If drivers try to obtain pinctrl handles for a pin controller that
> has not yet registered to the subsystem, we need to be able to
> back out and retry with deferred probing. So let's return
> -EPROBE_DEFER whenever this location fails.
> 
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

This looks fine, except:

> @@ -521,8 +521,11 @@ static int add_setting(struct pinctrl *p, struct pinctrl_map const *map)
>  		dev_err(p->dev, "unknown pinctrl device %s in map entry",
>  			map->ctrl_dev_name);

Perhaps this dev_err (and the one in the other hunk) should be
downgraded to warn/info/debug?

> +		/*
> +		 * OK let us guess that the driver is not there yet, and
> +		 * let's defer obtaining this pinctrl handle to later...
> +		 */
> +		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>  	}

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: implement pinctrl deferred probing
  2012-04-10 15:36   ` Stephen Warren
@ 2012-04-11  8:35     ` Linus Walleij
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2012-04-11  8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Warren
  Cc: Linus Walleij, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, Shawn Guo,
	Thomas Abraham, Dong Aisheng, Rajendra Nayak, Haojian Zhuang,
	Mark Brown, Arnd Bergmann

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> wrote:

>> @@ -521,8 +521,11 @@ static int add_setting(struct pinctrl *p, struct pinctrl_map const *map)
>>               dev_err(p->dev, "unknown pinctrl device %s in map entry",
>>                       map->ctrl_dev_name);
>
> Perhaps this dev_err (and the one in the other hunk) should be
> downgraded to warn/info/debug?

I've downgraded to dev_info() for now (see v2), I suspect people may have some
problems with deferred probing ATM so better log something for them. Later we
may set it to dev_dbg() if it looks too noisy...

Thanks,
Linus Walleij

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] pinctrl: implement pinctrl deferred probing
@ 2012-04-11  8:35     ` Linus Walleij
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2012-04-11  8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> wrote:

>> @@ -521,8 +521,11 @@ static int add_setting(struct pinctrl *p, struct pinctrl_map const *map)
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? dev_err(p->dev, "unknown pinctrl device %s in map entry",
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? map->ctrl_dev_name);
>
> Perhaps this dev_err (and the one in the other hunk) should be
> downgraded to warn/info/debug?

I've downgraded to dev_info() for now (see v2), I suspect people may have some
problems with deferred probing ATM so better log something for them. Later we
may set it to dev_dbg() if it looks too noisy...

Thanks,
Linus Walleij

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-04-11  8:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-04-10  8:04 [PATCH] pinctrl: implement pinctrl deferred probing Linus Walleij
2012-04-10  8:04 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-10 15:36 ` Stephen Warren
2012-04-10 15:36   ` Stephen Warren
2012-04-11  8:35   ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-11  8:35     ` Linus Walleij

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.