All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Cc: "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nadav Haklai <nadavh@marvell.com>, Victor Gu <xigu@marvell.com>,
	Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com>,
	Wilson Ding <dingwei@marvell.com>, Hua Jing <jinghua@marvell.com>,
	Neta Zur Hershkovits <neta@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] pinctrl: aramda-37xx: Add irqchip support
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 14:14:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZ=mVXBbVf1iHg8nQ6pYUkvpB+egH+stoMrkD8V_vaYpg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <70ffe3343c13d01737bf74e5de4898d0c0be07a0.1491405475.git-series.gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>

On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Gregory CLEMENT
<gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> wrote:

> The Armada 37xx SoCs can handle interrupt through GPIO. However it can
> only manage the edge ones.
>
> The way the interrupt are managed are classical so we can use the generic
> interrupt chip model.
>
> The only unusual "feature" is that many interrupts are connected to the
> parent interrupt controller. But we do not take advantage of this and use
> the chained irq with all of them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>

There are some issues with this patch.

First:
You need to add
select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
to the Kconfig entry. It's only working in your setup
because something else is selecting this for you, probably.

At all places like this:

> +       u32 mask = d->mask;
(...)
> +       if (on)
> +               val |= mask;
> +       else
> +               val &= ~mask;

Isn't it simpler to just use d->mask directly in the code and skip the local
variable?

if (on)
  val |= d->mask;
(...)

> +static void armada_37xx_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> +       struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> +       struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> +       struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> +       struct irq_domain *d = gc->irqdomain;
> +       int i;
> +
> +       chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> +       for (i = 0; i <= d->revmap_size / GPIO_PER_REG; i++) {
> +               u32 status;
> +               unsigned long flags;
> +
> +               spin_lock_irqsave(&info->irq_lock, flags);
> +               status = readl_relaxed(info->base + IRQ_STATUS + 4 * i);
> +               /* Manage only the interrupt that was enabled */
> +               status &= readl_relaxed(info->base + IRQ_EN + 4 * i);
> +               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->irq_lock, flags);
> +               while (status) {
> +                       u32 hwirq = ffs(status) - 1;
> +                       u32 virq = irq_find_mapping(d, hwirq +
> +                                                    i * GPIO_PER_REG);
> +
> +                       generic_handle_irq(virq);
> +                       status &= ~BIT(hwirq);
> +               }

You hae a problem here is a new IRQ appears while you are inside
of this loop. You need to re-read the status register for each iteration
(and &= with the IRQ_EN I guess).

> +static int armada_37xx_irqchip_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +                                       struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info)
> +{
> +       struct device_node *np = info->dev->of_node;
> +       int nrirqs = info->data->nr_pins;
> +       struct gpio_chip *gc = &info->gpio_chip;
> +       struct irq_chip *irqchip = &info->irq_chip;
> +       struct resource res;
> +       int ret = -ENODEV, i, nr_irq_parent;
> +

This warrants a comment:
/* Check if we have at least one gpio-controller child node */

> +       for_each_child_of_node(info->dev->of_node, np) {
> +               if (of_find_property(np, "gpio-controller", NULL)) {
> +                       ret = 0;
> +                       break;
> +               }

Rewrite:

if (of_property_read_bool(np, "gpio-controller"))

> +       };
> +       if (ret)
> +               return ret;


> +
> +       nr_irq_parent = of_irq_count(np);
> +       spin_lock_init(&info->irq_lock);
> +
> +       if (!nr_irq_parent) {
> +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Invalid or no IRQ\n");
> +               return 0;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (of_address_to_resource(info->dev->of_node, 1, &res)) {
> +               dev_err(info->dev, "cannot find IO resource\n");
> +               return -ENOENT;
> +       }
> +
> +       info->base = devm_ioremap_resource(info->dev, &res);
> +       if (IS_ERR(info->base))
> +               return PTR_ERR(info->base);
> +
> +       irqchip->irq_ack = armada_37xx_irq_ack;
> +       irqchip->irq_mask = armada_37xx_irq_mask;
> +       irqchip->irq_unmask = armada_37xx_irq_unmask;
> +       irqchip->irq_set_wake = armada_37xx_irq_set_wake;
> +       irqchip->irq_set_type = armada_37xx_irq_set_type;
> +       irqchip->name = info->data->name;
> +
> +       ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add(gc, irqchip, 0,
> +                                  handle_edge_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
> +       if (ret) {
> +               dev_info(&pdev->dev, "could not add irqchip\n");
> +               return ret;
> +       }
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Many interrupts are connected to the parent interrupt
> +        * controller. But we do not take advantage of this and use
> +        * the chained irq with all of them.
> +        */
> +       for (i = 0; i < nrirqs; i++) {
> +               struct irq_data *d = irq_get_irq_data(gc->irq_base + i);
> +
> +               /*
> +                * The mask field is a "precomputed bitmask for
> +                * accessing the chip registers" which was introduced
> +                * for the generic irqchip framework. As we don't use
> +                * this framework, we can reuse this field for our own
> +                * usage.
> +                */
> +               d->mask = BIT(i % GPIO_PER_REG);
> +       }
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < nr_irq_parent; i++) {
> +               int irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, i);
> +
> +               if (irq < 0)
> +                       continue;
> +
> +               gpiochip_set_chained_irqchip(gc, irqchip, irq,
> +                                            armada_37xx_irq_handler);
> +       }
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int armada_37xx_gpiochip_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
>                                         struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info)
>  {
> @@ -496,6 +714,9 @@ static int armada_37xx_gpiochip_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
>         ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, gc, info);
>         if (ret)
>                 return ret;
> +       ret = armada_37xx_irqchip_register(pdev, info);
> +       if (ret)
> +               return ret;
>
>         return 0;
>  }
> --
> git-series 0.9.1

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: linus.walleij@linaro.org (Linus Walleij)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 5/7] pinctrl: aramda-37xx: Add irqchip support
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 14:14:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZ=mVXBbVf1iHg8nQ6pYUkvpB+egH+stoMrkD8V_vaYpg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <70ffe3343c13d01737bf74e5de4898d0c0be07a0.1491405475.git-series.gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>

On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Gregory CLEMENT
<gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> wrote:

> The Armada 37xx SoCs can handle interrupt through GPIO. However it can
> only manage the edge ones.
>
> The way the interrupt are managed are classical so we can use the generic
> interrupt chip model.
>
> The only unusual "feature" is that many interrupts are connected to the
> parent interrupt controller. But we do not take advantage of this and use
> the chained irq with all of them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>

There are some issues with this patch.

First:
You need to add
select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
to the Kconfig entry. It's only working in your setup
because something else is selecting this for you, probably.

At all places like this:

> +       u32 mask = d->mask;
(...)
> +       if (on)
> +               val |= mask;
> +       else
> +               val &= ~mask;

Isn't it simpler to just use d->mask directly in the code and skip the local
variable?

if (on)
  val |= d->mask;
(...)

> +static void armada_37xx_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> +       struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> +       struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> +       struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> +       struct irq_domain *d = gc->irqdomain;
> +       int i;
> +
> +       chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> +       for (i = 0; i <= d->revmap_size / GPIO_PER_REG; i++) {
> +               u32 status;
> +               unsigned long flags;
> +
> +               spin_lock_irqsave(&info->irq_lock, flags);
> +               status = readl_relaxed(info->base + IRQ_STATUS + 4 * i);
> +               /* Manage only the interrupt that was enabled */
> +               status &= readl_relaxed(info->base + IRQ_EN + 4 * i);
> +               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->irq_lock, flags);
> +               while (status) {
> +                       u32 hwirq = ffs(status) - 1;
> +                       u32 virq = irq_find_mapping(d, hwirq +
> +                                                    i * GPIO_PER_REG);
> +
> +                       generic_handle_irq(virq);
> +                       status &= ~BIT(hwirq);
> +               }

You hae a problem here is a new IRQ appears while you are inside
of this loop. You need to re-read the status register for each iteration
(and &= with the IRQ_EN I guess).

> +static int armada_37xx_irqchip_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +                                       struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info)
> +{
> +       struct device_node *np = info->dev->of_node;
> +       int nrirqs = info->data->nr_pins;
> +       struct gpio_chip *gc = &info->gpio_chip;
> +       struct irq_chip *irqchip = &info->irq_chip;
> +       struct resource res;
> +       int ret = -ENODEV, i, nr_irq_parent;
> +

This warrants a comment:
/* Check if we have at least one gpio-controller child node */

> +       for_each_child_of_node(info->dev->of_node, np) {
> +               if (of_find_property(np, "gpio-controller", NULL)) {
> +                       ret = 0;
> +                       break;
> +               }

Rewrite:

if (of_property_read_bool(np, "gpio-controller"))

> +       };
> +       if (ret)
> +               return ret;


> +
> +       nr_irq_parent = of_irq_count(np);
> +       spin_lock_init(&info->irq_lock);
> +
> +       if (!nr_irq_parent) {
> +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Invalid or no IRQ\n");
> +               return 0;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (of_address_to_resource(info->dev->of_node, 1, &res)) {
> +               dev_err(info->dev, "cannot find IO resource\n");
> +               return -ENOENT;
> +       }
> +
> +       info->base = devm_ioremap_resource(info->dev, &res);
> +       if (IS_ERR(info->base))
> +               return PTR_ERR(info->base);
> +
> +       irqchip->irq_ack = armada_37xx_irq_ack;
> +       irqchip->irq_mask = armada_37xx_irq_mask;
> +       irqchip->irq_unmask = armada_37xx_irq_unmask;
> +       irqchip->irq_set_wake = armada_37xx_irq_set_wake;
> +       irqchip->irq_set_type = armada_37xx_irq_set_type;
> +       irqchip->name = info->data->name;
> +
> +       ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add(gc, irqchip, 0,
> +                                  handle_edge_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
> +       if (ret) {
> +               dev_info(&pdev->dev, "could not add irqchip\n");
> +               return ret;
> +       }
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Many interrupts are connected to the parent interrupt
> +        * controller. But we do not take advantage of this and use
> +        * the chained irq with all of them.
> +        */
> +       for (i = 0; i < nrirqs; i++) {
> +               struct irq_data *d = irq_get_irq_data(gc->irq_base + i);
> +
> +               /*
> +                * The mask field is a "precomputed bitmask for
> +                * accessing the chip registers" which was introduced
> +                * for the generic irqchip framework. As we don't use
> +                * this framework, we can reuse this field for our own
> +                * usage.
> +                */
> +               d->mask = BIT(i % GPIO_PER_REG);
> +       }
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < nr_irq_parent; i++) {
> +               int irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, i);
> +
> +               if (irq < 0)
> +                       continue;
> +
> +               gpiochip_set_chained_irqchip(gc, irqchip, irq,
> +                                            armada_37xx_irq_handler);
> +       }
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int armada_37xx_gpiochip_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
>                                         struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info)
>  {
> @@ -496,6 +714,9 @@ static int armada_37xx_gpiochip_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
>         ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, gc, info);
>         if (ret)
>                 return ret;
> +       ret = armada_37xx_irqchip_register(pdev, info);
> +       if (ret)
> +               return ret;
>
>         return 0;
>  }
> --
> git-series 0.9.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-24 12:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-05 15:18 [PATCH v4 0/7] Add support for pinctrl/gpio on Armada 37xx Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-05 15:18 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-05 15:18 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-05 15:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] pinctrl: dt-bindings: Add documentation for Armada 37xx pin controllers Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-05 15:18   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-05 15:18   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-10 18:15   ` Rob Herring
2017-04-10 18:15     ` Rob Herring
2017-04-11 16:09     ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-11 16:09       ` Gregory CLEMENT
     [not found]   ` <941d03c9a3bdfd5e789aada29b35184ec9fed9fe.1491405475.git-series.gregory.clement-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-24  9:29     ` Linus Walleij
2017-04-24  9:29       ` Linus Walleij
2017-04-24  9:29       ` Linus Walleij
2017-04-05 15:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] arm64: marvell: enable the Armada 37xx pinctrl driver Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-05 15:18   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-05 15:18   ` Gregory CLEMENT
     [not found]   ` <d5015ded3a76ae4b1d2d1ef43ab4cc2e51050a03.1491405475.git-series.gregory.clement-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-26 10:26     ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-26 10:26       ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-26 10:26       ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-05 15:18 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] pinctrl: armada-37xx: Add pin controller support for Armada 37xx Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-05 15:18   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-05 15:18 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] pinctrl: armada-37xx: Add gpio support Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-05 15:18   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-24 11:48   ` Linus Walleij
2017-04-24 11:48     ` Linus Walleij
2017-04-24 11:48     ` Linus Walleij
2017-04-05 15:18 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] pinctrl: aramda-37xx: Add irqchip support Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-05 15:18   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-05 16:03   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-05 16:03     ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-05 16:03     ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-24 12:14   ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2017-04-24 12:14     ` Linus Walleij
2017-04-24 12:14     ` Linus Walleij
     [not found]     ` <CACRpkdZ=mVXBbVf1iHg8nQ6pYUkvpB+egH+stoMrkD8V_vaYpg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-24 12:16       ` Linus Walleij
2017-04-24 12:16         ` Linus Walleij
2017-04-24 12:16         ` Linus Walleij
2017-04-26  9:23     ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-26  9:23       ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-26  9:23       ` Gregory CLEMENT
     [not found]       ` <87zif38qu2.fsf-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-26 12:03         ` Linus Walleij
2017-04-26 12:03           ` Linus Walleij
2017-04-26 12:03           ` Linus Walleij
2017-04-26 13:12           ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-26 13:12             ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-26 13:12             ` Gregory CLEMENT
     [not found] ` <cover.65d0e6796fecf1fe6c5d07b981160b54dc9b4acd.1491405475.git-series.gregory.clement-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-05 15:18   ` [PATCH v4 6/7] ARM64: dts: marvell: Add pinctrl nodes for Armada 3700 Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-05 15:18     ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-05 15:18     ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-26 10:27     ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-26 10:27       ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-05 15:18 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] ARM64: dts: marvell: armada37xx: add pinctrl definition Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-05 15:18   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-26 10:28   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-26 10:28     ` Gregory CLEMENT

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACRpkdZ=mVXBbVf1iHg8nQ6pYUkvpB+egH+stoMrkD8V_vaYpg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dingwei@marvell.com \
    --cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=jinghua@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mw@semihalf.com \
    --cc=nadavh@marvell.com \
    --cc=neta@marvell.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=xigu@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.