From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> To: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>, Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>, Anmar Oueja <anmar.oueja@linaro.org>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl/nomadik: use irq_create_mapping() Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:31:45 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CACRpkdZLgnEHAKiyZBT1FTQPdp69rTOQ9ba9ZQ0y4eLODw4zeA@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <5085A7CA.3070001@wwwdotorg.org> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> wrote: > On 10/22/2012 02:14 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: >> It's an IRQ handler so it should be robust to spurious IRQs due to >> transient hardware states etc I believe. >> >> So if there is a transient IRQ before gpio_to_irq() is called -> boom. > > I wonder though (a) why it would be unmasked in HW, and (b) why the > software would even look at the status bit if no handler were registered? That's true of course ... OK I'll update the patch. Still I'm not feeling good about the irq_create_mapping/irq_find_mapping separation, I think a lot of drivers just get this wrong and it's causing bugs... it'd be way better if there was just one of them and we could count on descriptors being allocated after adding any kind of irqdomain but I have no clue how hard it would be to achieve this. Yours, Linus Walleij
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: linus.walleij@linaro.org (Linus Walleij) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl/nomadik: use irq_create_mapping() Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:31:45 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CACRpkdZLgnEHAKiyZBT1FTQPdp69rTOQ9ba9ZQ0y4eLODw4zeA@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <5085A7CA.3070001@wwwdotorg.org> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> wrote: > On 10/22/2012 02:14 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: >> It's an IRQ handler so it should be robust to spurious IRQs due to >> transient hardware states etc I believe. >> >> So if there is a transient IRQ before gpio_to_irq() is called -> boom. > > I wonder though (a) why it would be unmasked in HW, and (b) why the > software would even look at the status bit if no handler were registered? That's true of course ... OK I'll update the patch. Still I'm not feeling good about the irq_create_mapping/irq_find_mapping separation, I think a lot of drivers just get this wrong and it's causing bugs... it'd be way better if there was just one of them and we could count on descriptors being allocated after adding any kind of irqdomain but I have no clue how hard it would be to achieve this. Yours, Linus Walleij
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-23 8:31 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-10-19 15:09 [PATCH] pinctrl/nomadik: use irq_create_mapping() Linus Walleij 2012-10-19 15:09 ` Linus Walleij 2012-10-19 16:22 ` Stephen Warren 2012-10-19 16:22 ` Stephen Warren 2012-10-22 8:14 ` Linus Walleij 2012-10-22 8:14 ` Linus Walleij 2012-10-22 20:08 ` Stephen Warren 2012-10-22 20:08 ` Stephen Warren 2012-10-23 8:31 ` Linus Walleij [this message] 2012-10-23 8:31 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=CACRpkdZLgnEHAKiyZBT1FTQPdp69rTOQ9ba9ZQ0y4eLODw4zeA@mail.gmail.com \ --to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \ --cc=anmar.oueja@linaro.org \ --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \ --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \ --cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \ --cc=swarren@nvidia.com \ --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.