[PATCH] of: address: Don't fail a lookup just because a node has no reg property

[PATCH] of: address: Don't fail a lookup just because a node has no reg property

[Lee Jones]

Sometimes it doesn't make any sense for a node to have an address.
In this case device lookup will always be unsuccessful because we
currently assume every node will have a reg property. This patch
changes the semantics so that the resource address and the lookup
address will only be compared if one exists.

Things like AUXDATA() rely on of_dev_lookup to return the lookup
entry of a particular device in order to do things like apply
platform_data to a device. However, this is currently broken for
nodes which do not have a reg property, meaning that platform_data
can not be passed in those cases.

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/of/platform.c |    7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
index 343ad29..9600480 100644
--- a/drivers/of/platform.c
+++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
@@ -317,10 +317,9 @@ static const struct of_dev_auxdata *of_dev_lookup(const struct of_dev_auxdata *l
 	for(; lookup->compatible != NULL; lookup++) {
 		if (!of_device_is_compatible(np, lookup->compatible))
 			continue;
-		if (of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &res))
-			continue;
-		if (res.start != lookup->phys_addr)
-			continue;
+		if (!of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &res))
+			if (res.start != lookup->phys_addr)
+				continue;
 		pr_debug("%s: devname=%s\n", np->full_name, lookup->name);
 		return lookup;
 	}
-- 
1.7.9.5

[PATCH] of: address: Don't fail a lookup just because a node has no reg property

[Lee Jones]

Sometimes it doesn't make any sense for a node to have an address.
In this case device lookup will always be unsuccessful because we
currently assume every node will have a reg property. This patch
changes the semantics so that the resource address and the lookup
address will only be compared if one exists.

Things like AUXDATA() rely on of_dev_lookup to return the lookup
entry of a particular device in order to do things like apply
platform_data to a device. However, this is currently broken for
nodes which do not have a reg property, meaning that platform_data
can not be passed in those cases.

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/of/platform.c |    7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
index 343ad29..9600480 100644
--- a/drivers/of/platform.c
+++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
@@ -317,10 +317,9 @@ static const struct of_dev_auxdata *of_dev_lookup(const struct of_dev_auxdata *l
 	for(; lookup->compatible != NULL; lookup++) {
 		if (!of_device_is_compatible(np, lookup->compatible))
 			continue;
-		if (of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &res))
-			continue;
-		if (res.start != lookup->phys_addr)
-			continue;
+		if (!of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &res))
+			if (res.start != lookup->phys_addr)
+				continue;
 		pr_debug("%s: devname=%s\n", np->full_name, lookup->name);
 		return lookup;
 	}
-- 
1.7.9.5

Re: [PATCH] of: address: Don't fail a lookup just because a node has no reg property

[Linus Walleij]

On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:

> Sometimes it doesn't make any sense for a node to have an address.
> In this case device lookup will always be unsuccessful because we
> currently assume every node will have a reg property. This patch
> changes the semantics so that the resource address and the lookup
> address will only be compared if one exists.
>
> Things like AUXDATA() rely on of_dev_lookup to return the lookup
> entry of a particular device in order to do things like apply
> platform_data to a device. However, this is currently broken for
> nodes which do not have a reg property, meaning that platform_data
> can not be passed in those cases.
>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>

I sure see the problem!
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

[PATCH] of: address: Don't fail a lookup just because a node has no reg property

[Linus Walleij]

On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:

> Sometimes it doesn't make any sense for a node to have an address.
> In this case device lookup will always be unsuccessful because we
> currently assume every node will have a reg property. This patch
> changes the semantics so that the resource address and the lookup
> address will only be compared if one exists.
>
> Things like AUXDATA() rely on of_dev_lookup to return the lookup
> entry of a particular device in order to do things like apply
> platform_data to a device. However, this is currently broken for
> nodes which do not have a reg property, meaning that platform_data
> can not be passed in those cases.
>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>

I sure see the problem!
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH] of: address: Don't fail a lookup just because a node has no reg property

[Rob Herring]

On 07/05/2012 09:32 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> Sometimes it doesn't make any sense for a node to have an address.
> In this case device lookup will always be unsuccessful because we
> currently assume every node will have a reg property. This patch
> changes the semantics so that the resource address and the lookup
> address will only be compared if one exists.
> 
> Things like AUXDATA() rely on of_dev_lookup to return the lookup
> entry of a particular device in order to do things like apply
> platform_data to a device. However, this is currently broken for
> nodes which do not have a reg property, meaning that platform_data
> can not be passed in those cases.
> 
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> ---

Acked-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>

Do you have something dependent on this or want me to apply?

Rob

>  drivers/of/platform.c |    7 +++----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
> index 343ad29..9600480 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
> @@ -317,10 +317,9 @@ static const struct of_dev_auxdata *of_dev_lookup(const struct of_dev_auxdata *l
>  	for(; lookup->compatible != NULL; lookup++) {
>  		if (!of_device_is_compatible(np, lookup->compatible))
>  			continue;
> -		if (of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &res))
> -			continue;
> -		if (res.start != lookup->phys_addr)
> -			continue;
> +		if (!of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &res))
> +			if (res.start != lookup->phys_addr)
> +				continue;
>  		pr_debug("%s: devname=%s\n", np->full_name, lookup->name);
>  		return lookup;
>  	}
> 

[PATCH] of: address: Don't fail a lookup just because a node has no reg property

[Rob Herring]

On 07/05/2012 09:32 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> Sometimes it doesn't make any sense for a node to have an address.
> In this case device lookup will always be unsuccessful because we
> currently assume every node will have a reg property. This patch
> changes the semantics so that the resource address and the lookup
> address will only be compared if one exists.
> 
> Things like AUXDATA() rely on of_dev_lookup to return the lookup
> entry of a particular device in order to do things like apply
> platform_data to a device. However, this is currently broken for
> nodes which do not have a reg property, meaning that platform_data
> can not be passed in those cases.
> 
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> ---

Acked-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>

Do you have something dependent on this or want me to apply?

Rob

>  drivers/of/platform.c |    7 +++----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
> index 343ad29..9600480 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
> @@ -317,10 +317,9 @@ static const struct of_dev_auxdata *of_dev_lookup(const struct of_dev_auxdata *l
>  	for(; lookup->compatible != NULL; lookup++) {
>  		if (!of_device_is_compatible(np, lookup->compatible))
>  			continue;
> -		if (of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &res))
> -			continue;
> -		if (res.start != lookup->phys_addr)
> -			continue;
> +		if (!of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &res))
> +			if (res.start != lookup->phys_addr)
> +				continue;
>  		pr_debug("%s: devname=%s\n", np->full_name, lookup->name);
>  		return lookup;
>  	}
> 

Re: [PATCH] of: address: Don't fail a lookup just because a node has no reg property

[Lee Jones]

On 05/07/12 15:57, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 07/05/2012 09:32 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> Sometimes it doesn't make any sense for a node to have an address.
>> In this case device lookup will always be unsuccessful because we
>> currently assume every node will have a reg property. This patch
>> changes the semantics so that the resource address and the lookup
>> address will only be compared if one exists.
>>
>> Things like AUXDATA() rely on of_dev_lookup to return the lookup
>> entry of a particular device in order to do things like apply
>> platform_data to a device. However, this is currently broken for
>> nodes which do not have a reg property, meaning that platform_data
>> can not be passed in those cases.
>>
>> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>> ---
>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>
> Do you have something dependent on this or want me to apply?

I have things that require this patch yes. Please apply.

Thanks Rob.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
M: +44 77 88 633 515
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

[PATCH] of: address: Don't fail a lookup just because a node has no reg property

[Lee Jones]

On 05/07/12 15:57, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 07/05/2012 09:32 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> Sometimes it doesn't make any sense for a node to have an address.
>> In this case device lookup will always be unsuccessful because we
>> currently assume every node will have a reg property. This patch
>> changes the semantics so that the resource address and the lookup
>> address will only be compared if one exists.
>>
>> Things like AUXDATA() rely on of_dev_lookup to return the lookup
>> entry of a particular device in order to do things like apply
>> platform_data to a device. However, this is currently broken for
>> nodes which do not have a reg property, meaning that platform_data
>> can not be passed in those cases.
>>
>> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>> ---
>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>
> Do you have something dependent on this or want me to apply?

I have things that require this patch yes. Please apply.

Thanks Rob.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
M: +44 77 88 633 515
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Re: [PATCH] of: address: Don't fail a lookup just because a node has no reg property

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Thursday 05 July 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> >
> > Do you have something dependent on this or want me to apply?
> 
> I have things that require this patch yes. Please apply.

I guess Rob's question was whether you want to keep this together
with the patch that depends on it rather than him applying just
the one patch.

	Arnd

Re: [PATCH] of: address: Don't fail a lookup just because a node has no reg property

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Thursday 05 July 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> >
> > Do you have something dependent on this or want me to apply?
> 
> I have things that require this patch yes. Please apply.

I guess Rob's question was whether you want to keep this together
with the patch that depends on it rather than him applying just
the one patch.

	Arnd

[PATCH] of: address: Don't fail a lookup just because a node has no reg property

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Thursday 05 July 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> >
> > Do you have something dependent on this or want me to apply?
> 
> I have things that require this patch yes. Please apply.

I guess Rob's question was whether you want to keep this together
with the patch that depends on it rather than him applying just
the one patch.

	Arnd

Re: [PATCH] of: address: Don't fail a lookup just because a node has no reg property

[Lee Jones]

On 05/07/12 16:38, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 05 July 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>>>
>>> Do you have something dependent on this or want me to apply?
>>
>> I have things that require this patch yes. Please apply.
>
> I guess Rob's question was whether you want to keep this together
> with the patch that depends on it rather than him applying just
> the one patch.

No, it's not important.

I'll send you the other patch as part of my DT pull-request.

I'm just waiting on Linus' Ack on a few patches and it'll be ready.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
M: +44 77 88 633 515
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

[PATCH] of: address: Don't fail a lookup just because a node has no reg property

[Lee Jones]

On 05/07/12 16:38, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 05 July 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>>>
>>> Do you have something dependent on this or want me to apply?
>>
>> I have things that require this patch yes. Please apply.
>
> I guess Rob's question was whether you want to keep this together
> with the patch that depends on it rather than him applying just
> the one patch.

No, it's not important.

I'll send you the other patch as part of my DT pull-request.

I'm just waiting on Linus' Ack on a few patches and it'll be ready.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
M: +44 77 88 633 515
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog