[PATCH -next] pinctrl: pinctrl-microchip-sgpio: Mark some symbols with static keyword

* [PATCH -next] pinctrl: pinctrl-microchip-sgpio: Mark some symbols with static keyword
@ 2020-11-24 11:42 ` Zou Wei
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Zou Wei @ 2020-11-24 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lars.povlsen, Steen.Hegelund, UNGLinuxDriver, linus.walleij
  Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, Zou Wei

Fix the following sparse warnings:

drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-microchip-sgpio.c:63:31: warning: symbol 'properties_luton' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-microchip-sgpio.c:68:31: warning: symbol 'properties_ocelot' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-microchip-sgpio.c:73:31: warning: symbol 'properties_sparx5' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <zou_wei@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-microchip-sgpio.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-microchip-sgpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-microchip-sgpio.c
index d6c31cc..e182419 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-microchip-sgpio.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-microchip-sgpio.c
@@ -60,17 +60,17 @@ struct sgpio_properties {
 #define SGPIO_SPARX5_CLK_FREQ    GENMASK(19, 8)
 #define SGPIO_SPARX5_BIT_SOURCE  GENMASK(23, 12)
 
-const struct sgpio_properties properties_luton = {
+static const struct sgpio_properties properties_luton = {
 	.arch   = SGPIO_ARCH_LUTON,
 	.regoff = { 0x00, 0x09, 0x29, 0x2a, 0x2b },
 };
 
-const struct sgpio_properties properties_ocelot = {
+static const struct sgpio_properties properties_ocelot = {
 	.arch   = SGPIO_ARCH_OCELOT,
 	.regoff = { 0x00, 0x06, 0x26, 0x04, 0x05 },
 };
 
-const struct sgpio_properties properties_sparx5 = {
+static const struct sgpio_properties properties_sparx5 = {
 	.arch   = SGPIO_ARCH_SPARX5,
 	.regoff = { 0x00, 0x06, 0x26, 0x04, 0x05 },
 };
-- 
2.6.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread