[PATCH v3 1/4] gpio: dwapb: Call acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts() on GPIO chip de-registration

[PATCH v3 1/4] gpio: dwapb: Call acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts() on GPIO chip de-registration

[Andy Shevchenko]

Add missed acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts() call when unregistering ports.

While at it, drop extra check to call acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupts().
There is no need to have an additional check to call
acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupts(). Even without any interrupts available
the registered ACPI Event handlers can be useful for debugging purposes.

Fixes: e6cb3486f5a1 ("gpio: dwapb: add gpio-signaled acpi event support")
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
---
v3: appended tags (Serge)
 drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
index 8639c4a7f469..e5d844304f8d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
@@ -505,26 +505,33 @@ static int dwapb_gpio_add_port(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio,
 		dwapb_configure_irqs(gpio, port, pp);
 
 	err = gpiochip_add_data(&port->gc, port);
-	if (err)
+	if (err) {
 		dev_err(gpio->dev, "failed to register gpiochip for port%d\n",
 			port->idx);
-	else
-		port->is_registered = true;
+		return err;
+	}
 
 	/* Add GPIO-signaled ACPI event support */
-	if (pp->has_irq)
-		acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupts(&port->gc);
+	acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupts(&port->gc);
 
-	return err;
+	port->is_registered = true;
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static void dwapb_gpio_unregister(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio)
 {
 	unsigned int m;
 
-	for (m = 0; m < gpio->nr_ports; ++m)
-		if (gpio->ports[m].is_registered)
-			gpiochip_remove(&gpio->ports[m].gc);
+	for (m = 0; m < gpio->nr_ports; ++m) {
+		struct dwapb_gpio_port *port = &gpio->ports[m];
+
+		if (!port->is_registered)
+			continue;
+
+		acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts(&port->gc);
+		gpiochip_remove(&port->gc);
+	}
 }
 
 static void dwapb_get_irq(struct device *dev, struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
-- 
2.26.2

[PATCH v3 2/4] gpio: dwapb: avoid error message for optional IRQ

[Andy Shevchenko]

platform_get_irq() will generate an error message if the requested IRQ
is not present. Use platform_get_irq_optional() to avoid the error message
being generated.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
---
v3: appended tags (Serge)

 drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
index e5d844304f8d..944dae80d687 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
@@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ static void dwapb_get_irq(struct device *dev, struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
 		if (np)
 			pp->irq[j] = of_irq_get(np, j);
 		else if (has_acpi_companion(dev))
-			pp->irq[j] = platform_get_irq(to_platform_device(dev), j);
+			pp->irq[j] = platform_get_irq_optional(to_platform_device(dev), j);
 
 		if (pp->irq[j] >= 0)
 			pp->has_irq = true;
-- 
2.26.2

[PATCH v3 3/4] gpio: dwapb: Don't use IRQ 0 as valid Linux interrupt

[Andy Shevchenko]

IRQ 0 is not valid in Linux interrupt number space.
Refactor the code with this kept in mind.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
---
v3: appended tags (Serge)

 drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
index 944dae80d687..d3765672c42b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
@@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ static void dwapb_configure_irqs(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio,
 		int i;
 
 		for (i = 0; i < pp->ngpio; i++) {
-			if (pp->irq[i] >= 0)
+			if (pp->irq[i])
 				irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(pp->irq[i],
 						dwapb_irq_handler, gpio);
 		}
@@ -538,20 +538,20 @@ static void dwapb_get_irq(struct device *dev, struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
 			  struct dwapb_port_property *pp)
 {
 	struct device_node *np = NULL;
-	int j;
+	int irq = -ENXIO, j;
 
 	if (fwnode_property_read_bool(fwnode, "interrupt-controller"))
 		np = to_of_node(fwnode);
 
 	for (j = 0; j < pp->ngpio; j++) {
-		pp->irq[j] = -ENXIO;
-
 		if (np)
-			pp->irq[j] = of_irq_get(np, j);
+			irq = of_irq_get(np, j);
 		else if (has_acpi_companion(dev))
-			pp->irq[j] = platform_get_irq_optional(to_platform_device(dev), j);
+			irq = platform_get_irq_optional(to_platform_device(dev), j);
+		if (irq > 0)
+			pp->irq[j] = irq;
 
-		if (pp->irq[j] >= 0)
+		if (pp->irq[j])
 			pp->has_irq = true;
 	}
 
-- 
2.26.2

[PATCH v3 4/4] gpio: dwapb: Remove unneeded has_irq member in struct dwapb_port_property

[Andy Shevchenko]

has_irq member of struct dwapb_port_property is used only in one place,
so, make it local test instead and remove from the structure.
This local test is using memchr_inv() which is quite efficient in comparison
to the original loop and possible little overhead can be neglected.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
---
v3: appended tags (Serge, Lee)

 drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c                | 14 +++++++-------
 drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c       |  1 -
 include/linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h |  1 -
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
index d3765672c42b..1d8d55bd63aa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
@@ -366,6 +366,11 @@ static void dwapb_configure_irqs(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio,
 	irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
 	int err, i;
 
+	if (memchr_inv(pp->irq, 0, sizeof(pp->irq)) == NULL) {
+		dev_warn(gpio->dev, "no IRQ for port%d\n", pp->idx);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	gpio->domain = irq_domain_create_linear(fwnode, ngpio,
 						 &irq_generic_chip_ops, gpio);
 	if (!gpio->domain)
@@ -501,7 +506,8 @@ static int dwapb_gpio_add_port(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio,
 	if (pp->idx == 0)
 		port->gc.set_config = dwapb_gpio_set_config;
 
-	if (pp->has_irq)
+	/* Only port A can provide interrupts in all configurations of the IP */
+	if (pp->idx == 0)
 		dwapb_configure_irqs(gpio, port, pp);
 
 	err = gpiochip_add_data(&port->gc, port);
@@ -550,13 +556,7 @@ static void dwapb_get_irq(struct device *dev, struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
 			irq = platform_get_irq_optional(to_platform_device(dev), j);
 		if (irq > 0)
 			pp->irq[j] = irq;
-
-		if (pp->irq[j])
-			pp->has_irq = true;
 	}
-
-	if (!pp->has_irq)
-		dev_warn(dev, "no irq for port%d\n", pp->idx);
 }
 
 static struct dwapb_platform_data *dwapb_gpio_get_pdata(struct device *dev)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c b/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c
index 41326b48da55..84ca7902e1df 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c
@@ -216,7 +216,6 @@ static int intel_quark_gpio_setup(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct mfd_cell *cell)
 	pdata->properties->ngpio	= INTEL_QUARK_MFD_NGPIO;
 	pdata->properties->gpio_base	= INTEL_QUARK_MFD_GPIO_BASE;
 	pdata->properties->irq[0]	= pdev->irq;
-	pdata->properties->has_irq	= true;
 	pdata->properties->irq_shared	= true;
 
 	cell->platform_data = pdata;
diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h b/include/linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h
index 3c606c450d05..ff1be737bad6 100644
--- a/include/linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h
+++ b/include/linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h
@@ -12,7 +12,6 @@ struct dwapb_port_property {
 	unsigned int	ngpio;
 	unsigned int	gpio_base;
 	int		irq[32];
-	bool		has_irq;
 	bool		irq_shared;
 };
 
-- 
2.26.2

Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] gpio: dwapb: Call acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts() on GPIO chip de-registration

[Linus Walleij]

On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 3:12 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> Add missed acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts() call when unregistering ports.
>
> While at it, drop extra check to call acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupts().
> There is no need to have an additional check to call
> acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupts(). Even without any interrupts available
> the registered ACPI Event handlers can be useful for debugging purposes.
>
> Fixes: e6cb3486f5a1 ("gpio: dwapb: add gpio-signaled acpi event support")
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
> ---
> v3: appended tags (Serge)

All four patches applied, thanks!

Yours,
Linus Walleij