From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> To: "Álvaro Fernández Rojas" <noltari@gmail.com> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>, Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>, bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>, Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@gmail.com>, Necip Fazil Yildiran <fazilyildiran@gmail.com>, "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>, devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/15] pinctrl: bcm: add bcm63xx base code Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 00:59:11 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CACRpkdbP7kAVR9ORQuj7W9iT3EDE1S3iZ-1q+kBoQ8R0TUVMJA@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <EC7F8938-63CB-43D9-AE75-644B2E647360@gmail.com> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 8:25 AM Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com> wrote: > > // for now, since we have not an analogue (yet) > > node ==> to_of_node(fwnode) > > So you want me to convert everything to fwnode, but then I would need to use of_node here… > It makes more sense to me to use of_node for now and convert it to fwnode in the future… > @Linus, what do you think? I am aware of the ambition to use fwnode more to more things. To me it is most important on things that will potentially run with both OF and ACPI. Typical example: ARM Qualcomm SoCs. New drivers for Aarch64 platforms. This is a legacy MIPS platform, and we have tons of legacy platforms for ARM etc which will never get converted to fwnode, sadly. Is it realistic that these MIPS platforms will run ACPI in addition to OF? Is ACPI even available on MIPS? Isn't OF the preferred HW description language for anything MIPS? Yours, Linus Walleij
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> To: "Álvaro Fernández Rojas" <noltari@gmail.com> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>, Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>, bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>, Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@gmail.com>, Necip Fazil Yildiran <fazilyildiran@gmail.com>, "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>, devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/15] pinctrl: bcm: add bcm63xx base code Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 00:59:11 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CACRpkdbP7kAVR9ORQuj7W9iT3EDE1S3iZ-1q+kBoQ8R0TUVMJA@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <EC7F8938-63CB-43D9-AE75-644B2E647360@gmail.com> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 8:25 AM Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com> wrote: > > // for now, since we have not an analogue (yet) > > node ==> to_of_node(fwnode) > > So you want me to convert everything to fwnode, but then I would need to use of_node here… > It makes more sense to me to use of_node for now and convert it to fwnode in the future… > @Linus, what do you think? I am aware of the ambition to use fwnode more to more things. To me it is most important on things that will potentially run with both OF and ACPI. Typical example: ARM Qualcomm SoCs. New drivers for Aarch64 platforms. This is a legacy MIPS platform, and we have tons of legacy platforms for ARM etc which will never get converted to fwnode, sadly. Is it realistic that these MIPS platforms will run ACPI in addition to OF? Is ACPI even available on MIPS? Isn't OF the preferred HW description language for anything MIPS? Yours, Linus Walleij _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-11 0:00 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-03-06 15:56 [PATCH v5 00/15] pinctrl: add BCM63XX pincontrol support Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-06 15:56 ` Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-06 15:56 ` [PATCH v5 01/15] gpio: guard gpiochip_irqchip_add_domain() with GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-06 15:56 ` Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-09 23:08 ` Michael Walle 2021-03-09 23:08 ` Michael Walle 2021-03-06 15:56 ` [PATCH v5 02/15] gpio: regmap: set gpio_chip of_node Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-06 15:56 ` Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-06 16:26 ` Andy Shevchenko 2021-03-06 16:26 ` Andy Shevchenko 2021-03-20 1:47 ` kernel test robot 2021-03-06 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 03/15] pinctrl: bcm: add bcm63xx base code Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-06 15:57 ` Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-07 19:05 ` Andy Shevchenko 2021-03-07 19:05 ` Andy Shevchenko 2021-03-10 7:25 ` Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-10 7:25 ` Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-10 23:59 ` Linus Walleij [this message] 2021-03-10 23:59 ` Linus Walleij 2021-03-06 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 04/15] dt-bindings: add BCM6328 pincontroller binding documentation Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-06 15:57 ` Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-08 22:44 ` Rob Herring 2021-03-08 22:44 ` Rob Herring 2021-03-06 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 05/15] pinctrl: add a pincontrol driver for BCM6328 Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-06 15:57 ` Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-06 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 06/15] dt-bindings: add BCM6358 pincontroller binding documentation Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-06 15:57 ` Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-06 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 07/15] pinctrl: add a pincontrol driver for BCM6358 Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-06 15:57 ` Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-06 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 08/15] dt-bindings: add BCM6362 pincontroller binding documentation Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-06 15:57 ` Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-06 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 09/15] pinctrl: add a pincontrol driver for BCM6362 Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-06 15:57 ` Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-06 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 10/15] dt-bindings: add BCM6368 pincontroller binding documentation Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-06 15:57 ` Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-06 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 11/15] pinctrl: add a pincontrol driver for BCM6368 Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-06 15:57 ` Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-06 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 12/15] dt-bindings: add BCM63268 pincontroller binding documentation Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-06 15:57 ` Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-06 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 13/15] pinctrl: add a pincontrol driver for BCM63268 Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-06 15:57 ` Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-06 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 14/15] dt-bindings: add BCM6318 pincontroller binding documentation Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-06 15:57 ` Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-08 22:50 ` Rob Herring 2021-03-08 22:50 ` Rob Herring 2021-03-06 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 15/15] pinctrl: add a pincontrol driver for BCM6318 Álvaro Fernández Rojas 2021-03-06 15:57 ` Álvaro Fernández Rojas
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=CACRpkdbP7kAVR9ORQuj7W9iT3EDE1S3iZ-1q+kBoQ8R0TUVMJA@mail.gmail.com \ --to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \ --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \ --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \ --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \ --cc=fazilyildiran@gmail.com \ --cc=jonas.gorski@gmail.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=michael@walle.cc \ --cc=noltari@gmail.com \ --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.