* [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: Don't override the error code in probe error handling
@ 2013-05-19 5:58 Axel Lin
2013-05-19 6:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpio: " Axel Lin
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Axel Lin @ 2013-05-19 5:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Walleij; +Cc: Maxime Ripard, Tony Prisk, linux-kernel
Otherwise, we return 0 in probe error paths when gpiochip_remove() returns 0.
Also show error message if gpiochip_remove() fails.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Tony Prisk <linux@prisktech.co.nz>
---
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-coh901.c | 3 ++-
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sunxi.c | 3 ++-
drivers/pinctrl/vt8500/pinctrl-wmt.c | 3 +--
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-coh901.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-coh901.c
index 20da215..ea98df9 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-coh901.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-coh901.c
@@ -830,7 +830,8 @@ static int __init u300_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return 0;
err_no_range:
- err = gpiochip_remove(&gpio->chip);
+ if (gpiochip_remove(&gpio->chip))
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to remove gpio chip\n");
err_no_chip:
err_no_domain:
err_no_port:
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sunxi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sunxi.c
index c52fc2c..c058529 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sunxi.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sunxi.c
@@ -2000,7 +2000,8 @@ static int sunxi_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return 0;
gpiochip_error:
- ret = gpiochip_remove(pctl->chip);
+ if (gpiochip_remove(pctl->chip))
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to remove gpio chip\n");
pinctrl_error:
pinctrl_unregister(pctl->pctl_dev);
return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/vt8500/pinctrl-wmt.c b/drivers/pinctrl/vt8500/pinctrl-wmt.c
index e877082..fb30edf3 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/vt8500/pinctrl-wmt.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/vt8500/pinctrl-wmt.c
@@ -609,8 +609,7 @@ int wmt_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
return 0;
fail_range:
- err = gpiochip_remove(&data->gpio_chip);
- if (err)
+ if (gpiochip_remove(&data->gpio_chip))
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to remove gpio chip\n");
fail_gpio:
pinctrl_unregister(data->pctl_dev);
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] gpio: Don't override the error code in probe error handling
2013-05-19 5:58 [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: Don't override the error code in probe error handling Axel Lin
@ 2013-05-19 6:00 ` Axel Lin
2013-05-20 18:28 ` Linus Walleij
2013-05-19 7:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: " Tony Prisk
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Axel Lin @ 2013-05-19 6:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Walleij, Grant Likely
Cc: Tomoya MORINAGA, Denis Turischev, Lars Poeschel, linux-kernel
Otherwise, we return 0 in probe error paths when gpiochip_remove() returns 0.
Also show error message if gpiochip_remove() fails.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Cc: Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya.rohm@gmail.com>
Cc: Denis Turischev <denis@compulab.co.il>
Cc: Lars Poeschel <poeschel@lemonage.de>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-ml-ioh.c | 3 +--
drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c | 3 +--
drivers/gpio/gpio-sch.c | 6 ++----
drivers/gpio/gpio-viperboard.c | 3 ++-
4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-ml-ioh.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-ml-ioh.c
index b733665..0966f26 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-ml-ioh.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-ml-ioh.c
@@ -496,8 +496,7 @@ err_irq_alloc_descs:
err_gpiochip_add:
while (--i >= 0) {
chip--;
- ret = gpiochip_remove(&chip->gpio);
- if (ret)
+ if (gpiochip_remove(&chip->gpio))
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed gpiochip_remove(%d)\n", i);
}
kfree(chip_save);
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c
index cdf5996..0fec097 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c
@@ -424,8 +424,7 @@ end:
err_request_irq:
irq_free_descs(irq_base, gpio_pins[chip->ioh]);
- ret = gpiochip_remove(&chip->gpio);
- if (ret)
+ if (gpiochip_remove(&chip->gpio))
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s gpiochip_remove failed\n", __func__);
err_gpiochip_add:
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sch.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sch.c
index 1e4de16..5af6571 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sch.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sch.c
@@ -272,10 +272,8 @@ static int sch_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return 0;
err_sch_gpio_resume:
- err = gpiochip_remove(&sch_gpio_core);
- if (err)
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s failed, %d\n",
- "gpiochip_remove()", err);
+ if (gpiochip_remove(&sch_gpio_core))
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s gpiochip_remove failed\n", __func__);
err_sch_gpio_core:
release_region(res->start, resource_size(res));
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-viperboard.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-viperboard.c
index 095ab14..5ac2919 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-viperboard.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-viperboard.c
@@ -446,7 +446,8 @@ static int vprbrd_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return ret;
err_gpiob:
- ret = gpiochip_remove(&vb_gpio->gpioa);
+ if (gpiochip_remove(&vb_gpio->gpioa))
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s gpiochip_remove failed\n", __func__);
err_gpioa:
return ret;
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: Don't override the error code in probe error handling
2013-05-19 5:58 [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: Don't override the error code in probe error handling Axel Lin
2013-05-19 6:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpio: " Axel Lin
@ 2013-05-19 7:54 ` Tony Prisk
2013-05-21 7:31 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-21 11:31 ` Linus Walleij
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tony Prisk @ 2013-05-19 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Axel Lin; +Cc: Linus Walleij, Maxime Ripard, linux-kernel
On 19/05/13 17:58, Axel Lin wrote:
> Otherwise, we return 0 in probe error paths when gpiochip_remove() returns 0.
> Also show error message if gpiochip_remove() fails.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
> Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> Cc: Tony Prisk <linux@prisktech.co.nz>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-coh901.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sunxi.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/pinctrl/vt8500/pinctrl-wmt.c | 3 +--
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-coh901.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-coh901.c
> index 20da215..ea98df9 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-coh901.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-coh901.c
> @@ -830,7 +830,8 @@ static int __init u300_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
>
> err_no_range:
> - err = gpiochip_remove(&gpio->chip);
> + if (gpiochip_remove(&gpio->chip))
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to remove gpio chip\n");
> err_no_chip:
> err_no_domain:
> err_no_port:
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sunxi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> index c52fc2c..c058529 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> @@ -2000,7 +2000,8 @@ static int sunxi_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
>
> gpiochip_error:
> - ret = gpiochip_remove(pctl->chip);
> + if (gpiochip_remove(pctl->chip))
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to remove gpio chip\n");
> pinctrl_error:
> pinctrl_unregister(pctl->pctl_dev);
> return ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/vt8500/pinctrl-wmt.c b/drivers/pinctrl/vt8500/pinctrl-wmt.c
> index e877082..fb30edf3 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/vt8500/pinctrl-wmt.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/vt8500/pinctrl-wmt.c
> @@ -609,8 +609,7 @@ int wmt_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> return 0;
>
> fail_range:
> - err = gpiochip_remove(&data->gpio_chip);
> - if (err)
> + if (gpiochip_remove(&data->gpio_chip))
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to remove gpio chip\n");
> fail_gpio:
> pinctrl_unregister(data->pctl_dev);
Good catch.
for pinctrl-wmt
Acked-by: Tony Prisk <linux@prisktech.co.nz>
Regards
Tony P
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: Don't override the error code in probe error handling
2013-05-19 6:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpio: " Axel Lin
@ 2013-05-20 18:28 ` Linus Walleij
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2013-05-20 18:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Axel Lin
Cc: Linus Walleij, Grant Likely, Tomoya MORINAGA, Denis Turischev,
Lars Poeschel, linux-kernel
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> wrote:
> Otherwise, we return 0 in probe error paths when gpiochip_remove() returns 0.
> Also show error message if gpiochip_remove() fails.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
> Cc: Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya.rohm@gmail.com>
> Cc: Denis Turischev <denis@compulab.co.il>
> Cc: Lars Poeschel <poeschel@lemonage.de>
Good spot Axel!
Patch applied for rc-fixes.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: Don't override the error code in probe error handling
2013-05-19 5:58 [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: Don't override the error code in probe error handling Axel Lin
2013-05-19 6:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpio: " Axel Lin
2013-05-19 7:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: " Tony Prisk
@ 2013-05-21 7:31 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-21 11:31 ` Linus Walleij
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2013-05-21 7:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Axel Lin; +Cc: Linus Walleij, Tony Prisk, linux-kernel
Hi Axel,
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 01:58:37PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> Otherwise, we return 0 in probe error paths when gpiochip_remove() returns 0.
> Also show error message if gpiochip_remove() fails.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
> Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> Cc: Tony Prisk <linux@prisktech.co.nz>
For the sunxi part
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Thanks!
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: Don't override the error code in probe error handling
2013-05-19 5:58 [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: Don't override the error code in probe error handling Axel Lin
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-21 7:31 ` Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-21 11:31 ` Linus Walleij
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2013-05-21 11:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Axel Lin; +Cc: Linus Walleij, Maxime Ripard, Tony Prisk, linux-kernel
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> wrote:
> Otherwise, we return 0 in probe error paths when gpiochip_remove() returns 0.
> Also show error message if gpiochip_remove() fails.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
> Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> Cc: Tony Prisk <linux@prisktech.co.nz>
Patch applied for fixes, with ACKs.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-05-21 11:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-05-19 5:58 [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: Don't override the error code in probe error handling Axel Lin
2013-05-19 6:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpio: " Axel Lin
2013-05-20 18:28 ` Linus Walleij
2013-05-19 7:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: " Tony Prisk
2013-05-21 7:31 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-21 11:31 ` Linus Walleij
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.