All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Imre Kaloz <kaloz@openwrt.org>,
	Krzysztof Halasa <khalasa@piap.pl>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bus: ixp4xx: Add DT bindings for the IXP4xx expansion bus
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 00:48:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbmdd9TuVD-Lanme77-0XKg0up3jrXeisYNR4p9EL=9kQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210719151833.GA1908766@robh.at.kernel.org>

On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 5:18 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:

> > +patternProperties:
> > +  "^.*@[0-7],[0-9a-f]+$":
> > +    description: Devices attached to chip selects are represented as
> > +      subnodes.
> > +    type: object
> > +
> > +    properties:
> > +      intel,ixp4xx-eb-t1:
> > +        description: Address timing, extend address phase with n cycles.
> > +        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > +        maximum: 3

(...)

> > +    unevaluatedProperties: false
>
> This will cause failures when implemented. The problem is this won't
> allow any other child node properties as this schema and the device
> schema are evaluated independently. The only way I see to solve this is
> the child node schemas have to include some 'bus properties' schema
> which includes all possible bus controller properties. There's been a
> recent patch set doing this for SPI. At least here, I think the number
> of different child devices on parallel expansion buses are limited.
>
> So spliting this to 2 schema files would be the first step. Minimally,
> just drop unevaluatedProperties.

SPI upstream simply uses

additionalProperties: true

is that acceptable for now?

Yours,
Linus Walleij

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Imre Kaloz <kaloz@openwrt.org>,
	 Krzysztof Halasa <khalasa@piap.pl>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	 "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bus: ixp4xx: Add DT bindings for the IXP4xx expansion bus
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 00:48:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbmdd9TuVD-Lanme77-0XKg0up3jrXeisYNR4p9EL=9kQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210719151833.GA1908766@robh.at.kernel.org>

On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 5:18 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:

> > +patternProperties:
> > +  "^.*@[0-7],[0-9a-f]+$":
> > +    description: Devices attached to chip selects are represented as
> > +      subnodes.
> > +    type: object
> > +
> > +    properties:
> > +      intel,ixp4xx-eb-t1:
> > +        description: Address timing, extend address phase with n cycles.
> > +        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > +        maximum: 3

(...)

> > +    unevaluatedProperties: false
>
> This will cause failures when implemented. The problem is this won't
> allow any other child node properties as this schema and the device
> schema are evaluated independently. The only way I see to solve this is
> the child node schemas have to include some 'bus properties' schema
> which includes all possible bus controller properties. There's been a
> recent patch set doing this for SPI. At least here, I think the number
> of different child devices on parallel expansion buses are limited.
>
> So spliting this to 2 schema files would be the first step. Minimally,
> just drop unevaluatedProperties.

SPI upstream simply uses

additionalProperties: true

is that acceptable for now?

Yours,
Linus Walleij

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-20  0:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-17  0:16 [PATCH 1/2] bus: ixp4xx: Add DT bindings for the IXP4xx expansion bus Linus Walleij
2021-07-17  0:16 ` Linus Walleij
2021-07-17  0:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] bus: ixp4xx: Add a driver for " Linus Walleij
2021-07-19 13:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] bus: ixp4xx: Add DT bindings for the " Rob Herring
2021-07-19 13:47   ` Rob Herring
2021-07-19 14:10   ` Linus Walleij
2021-07-19 14:10     ` Linus Walleij
2021-07-19 15:18 ` Rob Herring
2021-07-19 15:18   ` Rob Herring
2021-07-19 22:48   ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2021-07-19 22:48     ` Linus Walleij
2021-07-20 16:39     ` Rob Herring
2021-07-20 16:39       ` Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACRpkdbmdd9TuVD-Lanme77-0XKg0up3jrXeisYNR4p9EL=9kQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kaloz@openwrt.org \
    --cc=khalasa@piap.pl \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.