All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/13] perf/hw_breakpoint: Optimize list of per-task breakpoints
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 15:08:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+bh06ZF5s4Mfq+CJ8RJ+Fm41NeXt=C8Kkx11t9hgABpYQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220628095833.2579903-4-elver@google.com>

 On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 at 11:59, Marco Elver <elver@google.com> wrote:
>
> On a machine with 256 CPUs, running the recently added perf breakpoint
> benchmark results in:
>
>  | $> perf bench -r 30 breakpoint thread -b 4 -p 64 -t 64
>  | # Running 'breakpoint/thread' benchmark:
>  | # Created/joined 30 threads with 4 breakpoints and 64 parallelism
>  |      Total time: 236.418 [sec]
>  |
>  |   123134.794271 usecs/op
>  |  7880626.833333 usecs/op/cpu
>
> The benchmark tests inherited breakpoint perf events across many
> threads.
>
> Looking at a perf profile, we can see that the majority of the time is
> spent in various hw_breakpoint.c functions, which execute within the
> 'nr_bp_mutex' critical sections which then results in contention on that
> mutex as well:
>
>     37.27%  [kernel]       [k] osq_lock
>     34.92%  [kernel]       [k] mutex_spin_on_owner
>     12.15%  [kernel]       [k] toggle_bp_slot
>     11.90%  [kernel]       [k] __reserve_bp_slot
>
> The culprit here is task_bp_pinned(), which has a runtime complexity of
> O(#tasks) due to storing all task breakpoints in the same list and
> iterating through that list looking for a matching task. Clearly, this
> does not scale to thousands of tasks.
>
> Instead, make use of the "rhashtable" variant "rhltable" which stores
> multiple items with the same key in a list. This results in average
> runtime complexity of O(1) for task_bp_pinned().
>
> With the optimization, the benchmark shows:
>
>  | $> perf bench -r 30 breakpoint thread -b 4 -p 64 -t 64
>  | # Running 'breakpoint/thread' benchmark:
>  | # Created/joined 30 threads with 4 breakpoints and 64 parallelism
>  |      Total time: 0.208 [sec]
>  |
>  |      108.422396 usecs/op
>  |     6939.033333 usecs/op/cpu
>
> On this particular setup that's a speedup of ~1135x.
>
> While one option would be to make task_struct a breakpoint list node,
> this would only further bloat task_struct for infrequently used data.
> Furthermore, after all optimizations in this series, there's no evidence
> it would result in better performance: later optimizations make the time
> spent looking up entries in the hash table negligible (we'll reach the
> theoretical ideal performance i.e. no constraints).
>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> ---
> v2:
> * Commit message tweaks.
> ---
>  include/linux/perf_event.h    |  3 +-
>  kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index 01231f1d976c..e27360436dc6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ struct perf_guest_info_callbacks {
>  };
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
> +#include <linux/rhashtable-types.h>
>  #include <asm/hw_breakpoint.h>
>  #endif
>
> @@ -178,7 +179,7 @@ struct hw_perf_event {
>                          * creation and event initalization.
>                          */
>                         struct arch_hw_breakpoint       info;
> -                       struct list_head                bp_list;
> +                       struct rhlist_head              bp_list;
>                 };
>  #endif
>                 struct { /* amd_iommu */
> diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
> index 1b013968b395..add1b9c59631 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
> @@ -26,10 +26,10 @@
>  #include <linux/irqflags.h>
>  #include <linux/kdebug.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> -#include <linux/list.h>
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
>  #include <linux/notifier.h>
>  #include <linux/percpu.h>
> +#include <linux/rhashtable.h>
>  #include <linux/sched.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>
> @@ -54,7 +54,13 @@ static struct bp_cpuinfo *get_bp_info(int cpu, enum bp_type_idx type)
>  }
>
>  /* Keep track of the breakpoints attached to tasks */
> -static LIST_HEAD(bp_task_head);
> +static struct rhltable task_bps_ht;
> +static const struct rhashtable_params task_bps_ht_params = {
> +       .head_offset = offsetof(struct hw_perf_event, bp_list),
> +       .key_offset = offsetof(struct hw_perf_event, target),
> +       .key_len = sizeof_field(struct hw_perf_event, target),
> +       .automatic_shrinking = true,
> +};
>
>  static int constraints_initialized;
>
> @@ -103,17 +109,23 @@ static unsigned int max_task_bp_pinned(int cpu, enum bp_type_idx type)
>   */
>  static int task_bp_pinned(int cpu, struct perf_event *bp, enum bp_type_idx type)
>  {
> -       struct task_struct *tsk = bp->hw.target;
> +       struct rhlist_head *head, *pos;
>         struct perf_event *iter;
>         int count = 0;
>
> -       list_for_each_entry(iter, &bp_task_head, hw.bp_list) {
> -               if (iter->hw.target == tsk &&
> -                   find_slot_idx(iter->attr.bp_type) == type &&
> +       rcu_read_lock();
> +       head = rhltable_lookup(&task_bps_ht, &bp->hw.target, task_bps_ht_params);
> +       if (!head)
> +               goto out;
> +
> +       rhl_for_each_entry_rcu(iter, pos, head, hw.bp_list) {
> +               if (find_slot_idx(iter->attr.bp_type) == type &&
>                     (iter->cpu < 0 || cpu == iter->cpu))
>                         count += hw_breakpoint_weight(iter);
>         }
>
> +out:
> +       rcu_read_unlock();
>         return count;
>  }
>
> @@ -186,7 +198,7 @@ static void toggle_bp_task_slot(struct perf_event *bp, int cpu,
>  /*
>   * Add/remove the given breakpoint in our constraint table
>   */
> -static void
> +static int
>  toggle_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, bool enable, enum bp_type_idx type,
>                int weight)
>  {
> @@ -199,7 +211,7 @@ toggle_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, bool enable, enum bp_type_idx type,
>         /* Pinned counter cpu profiling */
>         if (!bp->hw.target) {
>                 get_bp_info(bp->cpu, type)->cpu_pinned += weight;
> -               return;
> +               return 0;
>         }
>
>         /* Pinned counter task profiling */
> @@ -207,9 +219,9 @@ toggle_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, bool enable, enum bp_type_idx type,
>                 toggle_bp_task_slot(bp, cpu, type, weight);
>
>         if (enable)
> -               list_add_tail(&bp->hw.bp_list, &bp_task_head);
> +               return rhltable_insert(&task_bps_ht, &bp->hw.bp_list, task_bps_ht_params);
>         else
> -               list_del(&bp->hw.bp_list);
> +               return rhltable_remove(&task_bps_ht, &bp->hw.bp_list, task_bps_ht_params);
>  }
>
>  __weak int arch_reserve_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp)
> @@ -307,9 +319,7 @@ static int __reserve_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, u64 bp_type)
>         if (ret)
>                 return ret;
>
> -       toggle_bp_slot(bp, true, type, weight);
> -
> -       return 0;
> +       return toggle_bp_slot(bp, true, type, weight);
>  }
>
>  int reserve_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp)
> @@ -334,7 +344,7 @@ static void __release_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, u64 bp_type)
>
>         type = find_slot_idx(bp_type);
>         weight = hw_breakpoint_weight(bp);
> -       toggle_bp_slot(bp, false, type, weight);
> +       WARN_ON(toggle_bp_slot(bp, false, type, weight));
>  }
>
>  void release_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp)
> @@ -678,7 +688,7 @@ static struct pmu perf_breakpoint = {
>  int __init init_hw_breakpoint(void)
>  {
>         int cpu, err_cpu;
> -       int i;
> +       int i, ret;
>
>         for (i = 0; i < TYPE_MAX; i++)
>                 nr_slots[i] = hw_breakpoint_slots(i);
> @@ -689,18 +699,24 @@ int __init init_hw_breakpoint(void)
>
>                         info->tsk_pinned = kcalloc(nr_slots[i], sizeof(int),
>                                                         GFP_KERNEL);
> -                       if (!info->tsk_pinned)
> -                               goto err_alloc;
> +                       if (!info->tsk_pinned) {
> +                               ret = -ENOMEM;
> +                               goto err;
> +                       }
>                 }
>         }
>
> +       ret = rhltable_init(&task_bps_ht, &task_bps_ht_params);
> +       if (ret)
> +               goto err;
> +
>         constraints_initialized = 1;
>
>         perf_pmu_register(&perf_breakpoint, "breakpoint", PERF_TYPE_BREAKPOINT);
>
>         return register_die_notifier(&hw_breakpoint_exceptions_nb);

It seems there is a latent bug here:
if register_die_notifier() fails we also need to execute the err: label code.

Otherwise the patch looks good.

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>

> - err_alloc:
> +err:
>         for_each_possible_cpu(err_cpu) {
>                 for (i = 0; i < TYPE_MAX; i++)
>                         kfree(get_bp_info(err_cpu, i)->tsk_pinned);
> @@ -708,7 +724,5 @@ int __init init_hw_breakpoint(void)
>                         break;
>         }
>
> -       return -ENOMEM;
> +       return ret;
>  }
> -
> -
> --
> 2.37.0.rc0.161.g10f37bed90-goog
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/13] perf/hw_breakpoint: Optimize list of per-task breakpoints
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 15:08:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+bh06ZF5s4Mfq+CJ8RJ+Fm41NeXt=C8Kkx11t9hgABpYQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220628095833.2579903-4-elver@google.com>

 On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 at 11:59, Marco Elver <elver@google.com> wrote:
>
> On a machine with 256 CPUs, running the recently added perf breakpoint
> benchmark results in:
>
>  | $> perf bench -r 30 breakpoint thread -b 4 -p 64 -t 64
>  | # Running 'breakpoint/thread' benchmark:
>  | # Created/joined 30 threads with 4 breakpoints and 64 parallelism
>  |      Total time: 236.418 [sec]
>  |
>  |   123134.794271 usecs/op
>  |  7880626.833333 usecs/op/cpu
>
> The benchmark tests inherited breakpoint perf events across many
> threads.
>
> Looking at a perf profile, we can see that the majority of the time is
> spent in various hw_breakpoint.c functions, which execute within the
> 'nr_bp_mutex' critical sections which then results in contention on that
> mutex as well:
>
>     37.27%  [kernel]       [k] osq_lock
>     34.92%  [kernel]       [k] mutex_spin_on_owner
>     12.15%  [kernel]       [k] toggle_bp_slot
>     11.90%  [kernel]       [k] __reserve_bp_slot
>
> The culprit here is task_bp_pinned(), which has a runtime complexity of
> O(#tasks) due to storing all task breakpoints in the same list and
> iterating through that list looking for a matching task. Clearly, this
> does not scale to thousands of tasks.
>
> Instead, make use of the "rhashtable" variant "rhltable" which stores
> multiple items with the same key in a list. This results in average
> runtime complexity of O(1) for task_bp_pinned().
>
> With the optimization, the benchmark shows:
>
>  | $> perf bench -r 30 breakpoint thread -b 4 -p 64 -t 64
>  | # Running 'breakpoint/thread' benchmark:
>  | # Created/joined 30 threads with 4 breakpoints and 64 parallelism
>  |      Total time: 0.208 [sec]
>  |
>  |      108.422396 usecs/op
>  |     6939.033333 usecs/op/cpu
>
> On this particular setup that's a speedup of ~1135x.
>
> While one option would be to make task_struct a breakpoint list node,
> this would only further bloat task_struct for infrequently used data.
> Furthermore, after all optimizations in this series, there's no evidence
> it would result in better performance: later optimizations make the time
> spent looking up entries in the hash table negligible (we'll reach the
> theoretical ideal performance i.e. no constraints).
>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> ---
> v2:
> * Commit message tweaks.
> ---
>  include/linux/perf_event.h    |  3 +-
>  kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index 01231f1d976c..e27360436dc6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ struct perf_guest_info_callbacks {
>  };
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
> +#include <linux/rhashtable-types.h>
>  #include <asm/hw_breakpoint.h>
>  #endif
>
> @@ -178,7 +179,7 @@ struct hw_perf_event {
>                          * creation and event initalization.
>                          */
>                         struct arch_hw_breakpoint       info;
> -                       struct list_head                bp_list;
> +                       struct rhlist_head              bp_list;
>                 };
>  #endif
>                 struct { /* amd_iommu */
> diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
> index 1b013968b395..add1b9c59631 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
> @@ -26,10 +26,10 @@
>  #include <linux/irqflags.h>
>  #include <linux/kdebug.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> -#include <linux/list.h>
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
>  #include <linux/notifier.h>
>  #include <linux/percpu.h>
> +#include <linux/rhashtable.h>
>  #include <linux/sched.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>
> @@ -54,7 +54,13 @@ static struct bp_cpuinfo *get_bp_info(int cpu, enum bp_type_idx type)
>  }
>
>  /* Keep track of the breakpoints attached to tasks */
> -static LIST_HEAD(bp_task_head);
> +static struct rhltable task_bps_ht;
> +static const struct rhashtable_params task_bps_ht_params = {
> +       .head_offset = offsetof(struct hw_perf_event, bp_list),
> +       .key_offset = offsetof(struct hw_perf_event, target),
> +       .key_len = sizeof_field(struct hw_perf_event, target),
> +       .automatic_shrinking = true,
> +};
>
>  static int constraints_initialized;
>
> @@ -103,17 +109,23 @@ static unsigned int max_task_bp_pinned(int cpu, enum bp_type_idx type)
>   */
>  static int task_bp_pinned(int cpu, struct perf_event *bp, enum bp_type_idx type)
>  {
> -       struct task_struct *tsk = bp->hw.target;
> +       struct rhlist_head *head, *pos;
>         struct perf_event *iter;
>         int count = 0;
>
> -       list_for_each_entry(iter, &bp_task_head, hw.bp_list) {
> -               if (iter->hw.target == tsk &&
> -                   find_slot_idx(iter->attr.bp_type) == type &&
> +       rcu_read_lock();
> +       head = rhltable_lookup(&task_bps_ht, &bp->hw.target, task_bps_ht_params);
> +       if (!head)
> +               goto out;
> +
> +       rhl_for_each_entry_rcu(iter, pos, head, hw.bp_list) {
> +               if (find_slot_idx(iter->attr.bp_type) == type &&
>                     (iter->cpu < 0 || cpu == iter->cpu))
>                         count += hw_breakpoint_weight(iter);
>         }
>
> +out:
> +       rcu_read_unlock();
>         return count;
>  }
>
> @@ -186,7 +198,7 @@ static void toggle_bp_task_slot(struct perf_event *bp, int cpu,
>  /*
>   * Add/remove the given breakpoint in our constraint table
>   */
> -static void
> +static int
>  toggle_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, bool enable, enum bp_type_idx type,
>                int weight)
>  {
> @@ -199,7 +211,7 @@ toggle_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, bool enable, enum bp_type_idx type,
>         /* Pinned counter cpu profiling */
>         if (!bp->hw.target) {
>                 get_bp_info(bp->cpu, type)->cpu_pinned += weight;
> -               return;
> +               return 0;
>         }
>
>         /* Pinned counter task profiling */
> @@ -207,9 +219,9 @@ toggle_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, bool enable, enum bp_type_idx type,
>                 toggle_bp_task_slot(bp, cpu, type, weight);
>
>         if (enable)
> -               list_add_tail(&bp->hw.bp_list, &bp_task_head);
> +               return rhltable_insert(&task_bps_ht, &bp->hw.bp_list, task_bps_ht_params);
>         else
> -               list_del(&bp->hw.bp_list);
> +               return rhltable_remove(&task_bps_ht, &bp->hw.bp_list, task_bps_ht_params);
>  }
>
>  __weak int arch_reserve_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp)
> @@ -307,9 +319,7 @@ static int __reserve_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, u64 bp_type)
>         if (ret)
>                 return ret;
>
> -       toggle_bp_slot(bp, true, type, weight);
> -
> -       return 0;
> +       return toggle_bp_slot(bp, true, type, weight);
>  }
>
>  int reserve_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp)
> @@ -334,7 +344,7 @@ static void __release_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, u64 bp_type)
>
>         type = find_slot_idx(bp_type);
>         weight = hw_breakpoint_weight(bp);
> -       toggle_bp_slot(bp, false, type, weight);
> +       WARN_ON(toggle_bp_slot(bp, false, type, weight));
>  }
>
>  void release_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp)
> @@ -678,7 +688,7 @@ static struct pmu perf_breakpoint = {
>  int __init init_hw_breakpoint(void)
>  {
>         int cpu, err_cpu;
> -       int i;
> +       int i, ret;
>
>         for (i = 0; i < TYPE_MAX; i++)
>                 nr_slots[i] = hw_breakpoint_slots(i);
> @@ -689,18 +699,24 @@ int __init init_hw_breakpoint(void)
>
>                         info->tsk_pinned = kcalloc(nr_slots[i], sizeof(int),
>                                                         GFP_KERNEL);
> -                       if (!info->tsk_pinned)
> -                               goto err_alloc;
> +                       if (!info->tsk_pinned) {
> +                               ret = -ENOMEM;
> +                               goto err;
> +                       }
>                 }
>         }
>
> +       ret = rhltable_init(&task_bps_ht, &task_bps_ht_params);
> +       if (ret)
> +               goto err;
> +
>         constraints_initialized = 1;
>
>         perf_pmu_register(&perf_breakpoint, "breakpoint", PERF_TYPE_BREAKPOINT);
>
>         return register_die_notifier(&hw_breakpoint_exceptions_nb);

It seems there is a latent bug here:
if register_die_notifier() fails we also need to execute the err: label code.

Otherwise the patch looks good.

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>

> - err_alloc:
> +err:
>         for_each_possible_cpu(err_cpu) {
>                 for (i = 0; i < TYPE_MAX; i++)
>                         kfree(get_bp_info(err_cpu, i)->tsk_pinned);
> @@ -708,7 +724,5 @@ int __init init_hw_breakpoint(void)
>                         break;
>         }
>
> -       return -ENOMEM;
> +       return ret;
>  }
> -
> -
> --
> 2.37.0.rc0.161.g10f37bed90-goog
>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-28 13:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-28  9:58 [PATCH v2 00/13] perf/hw_breakpoint: Optimize for thousands of tasks Marco Elver
2022-06-28  9:58 ` Marco Elver
2022-06-28  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] perf/hw_breakpoint: Add KUnit test for constraints accounting Marco Elver
2022-06-28  9:58   ` Marco Elver
2022-06-28 12:53   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-06-28 12:53     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-06-28 13:26     ` Marco Elver
2022-06-28 13:26       ` Marco Elver
2022-06-28  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] perf/hw_breakpoint: Clean up headers Marco Elver
2022-06-28  9:58   ` Marco Elver
2022-06-28  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] perf/hw_breakpoint: Optimize list of per-task breakpoints Marco Elver
2022-06-28  9:58   ` Marco Elver
2022-06-28 13:08   ` Dmitry Vyukov [this message]
2022-06-28 13:08     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-06-28 14:53     ` Marco Elver
2022-06-28 14:53       ` Marco Elver
2022-06-28 15:27       ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-06-28 15:27         ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-06-28  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] perf/hw_breakpoint: Mark data __ro_after_init Marco Elver
2022-06-28  9:58   ` Marco Elver
2022-06-28  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] perf/hw_breakpoint: Optimize constant number of breakpoint slots Marco Elver
2022-06-28  9:58   ` Marco Elver
2022-06-28  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] perf/hw_breakpoint: Make hw_breakpoint_weight() inlinable Marco Elver
2022-06-28  9:58   ` Marco Elver
2022-06-28 13:16   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-06-28 13:16     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-06-28  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] perf/hw_breakpoint: Remove useless code related to flexible breakpoints Marco Elver
2022-06-28  9:58   ` Marco Elver
2022-06-28 13:18   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-06-28 13:18     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-06-28  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] powerpc/hw_breakpoint: Avoid relying on caller synchronization Marco Elver
2022-06-28  9:58   ` Marco Elver
2022-06-28 13:21   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-06-28 13:21     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-07-01  8:54   ` Christophe Leroy
2022-07-01  8:54     ` Christophe Leroy
2022-07-01  9:41     ` Marco Elver
2022-07-01  9:41       ` Marco Elver
2022-07-01 10:15       ` Christophe Leroy
2022-07-01 10:15         ` Christophe Leroy
2022-06-28  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] locking/percpu-rwsem: Add percpu_is_write_locked() and percpu_is_read_locked() Marco Elver
2022-06-28  9:58   ` Marco Elver
2022-06-28 14:44   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-06-28 14:44     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-06-28  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] perf/hw_breakpoint: Reduce contention with large number of tasks Marco Elver
2022-06-28  9:58   ` Marco Elver
2022-06-28 14:45   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-06-28 14:45     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-06-28  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] perf/hw_breakpoint: Introduce bp_slots_histogram Marco Elver
2022-06-28  9:58   ` Marco Elver
2022-06-28 14:52   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-06-28 14:52     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-06-28  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] perf/hw_breakpoint: Optimize max_bp_pinned_slots() for CPU-independent task targets Marco Elver
2022-06-28  9:58   ` Marco Elver
2022-06-28 15:41   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-06-28 15:41     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-06-28  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] perf/hw_breakpoint: Optimize toggle_bp_slot() " Marco Elver
2022-06-28  9:58   ` Marco Elver
2022-06-28 10:54   ` Marco Elver
2022-06-28 10:54     ` Marco Elver
2022-06-28 15:45   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-06-28 15:45     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-06-28 16:00     ` Marco Elver
2022-06-28 16:00       ` Marco Elver

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACT4Y+bh06ZF5s4Mfq+CJ8RJ+Fm41NeXt=C8Kkx11t9hgABpYQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.