From: Marcelo Roberto Jimenez <marcelo.jimenez@gmail.com> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>, regressions@lists.linux.dev, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>, Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Cristian Birsan <cristian.birsan@microchip.com>, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>, Jonas Bonn <jonas@norrbonn.se> Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: atmel: Revert regression in USB Gadget (atmel_usba_udc) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 10:43:17 -0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CACjc_5pmqLAo5X-Yj6Om9vvktR-0FN5SYgDxn=GvCn-yxcee+w@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CACjc_5o9eO5YTVt4jE7v1E9nirCwFMc1=Ub-jXSFCg1_8A2M-A@mail.gmail.com> Hi Greg, On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 9:20 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 10:48:14AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > [TLDR: adding this regression to regzbot; most of this mail is compiled > > from a few templates paragraphs some of you might have seen already.] > > > > Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker speaking. > > > > Top-posting for once, to make this easy accessible to everyone. > > > > Thanks for the report. BTW, if anyone like me wonders what the included > > patch is about: it afaics is the revert of the patch causing the > > problem. Anyway: > > > > To be sure this issue doesn't fall through the cracks unnoticed, I'm > > adding it to regzbot, my Linux kernel regression tracking bot: > > > > #regzbot ^introduced 70a7f8be8598 > > #regzbot title usb: gadget: atmel: ethernet over USB Gadget not > > recognized anymore after disconnect and reconnect > > #regzbot ignore-activity > > How do I say "this isn't a regression, it's a broken board > configuration" and get regzbot to stop tracking this? I sent the logs to Cristian on Jan, 14, but I don't know if they were helpful. The problem is pretty much reproducible here. I understand that from the previously quoted specification sentence, the hardware must perform VBUS sensing, and this is something I can confirm the hardware is not capable of. But if Cristian cannot reproduce it in a different SOC configured without a VBUS sensing pin, I can only hope Microchip/Atmel will look into the issue. On my side, it seems like I will have to maintain a patched kernel for this hardware. So, let's move on. > thanks, > > greg k-h Best regards, Marcelo.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marcelo Roberto Jimenez <marcelo.jimenez@gmail.com> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>, regressions@lists.linux.dev, Jonas Bonn <jonas@norrbonn.se>, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>, Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>, Cristian Birsan <cristian.birsan@microchip.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: atmel: Revert regression in USB Gadget (atmel_usba_udc) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 10:43:17 -0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CACjc_5pmqLAo5X-Yj6Om9vvktR-0FN5SYgDxn=GvCn-yxcee+w@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CACjc_5o9eO5YTVt4jE7v1E9nirCwFMc1=Ub-jXSFCg1_8A2M-A@mail.gmail.com> Hi Greg, On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 9:20 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 10:48:14AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > [TLDR: adding this regression to regzbot; most of this mail is compiled > > from a few templates paragraphs some of you might have seen already.] > > > > Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker speaking. > > > > Top-posting for once, to make this easy accessible to everyone. > > > > Thanks for the report. BTW, if anyone like me wonders what the included > > patch is about: it afaics is the revert of the patch causing the > > problem. Anyway: > > > > To be sure this issue doesn't fall through the cracks unnoticed, I'm > > adding it to regzbot, my Linux kernel regression tracking bot: > > > > #regzbot ^introduced 70a7f8be8598 > > #regzbot title usb: gadget: atmel: ethernet over USB Gadget not > > recognized anymore after disconnect and reconnect > > #regzbot ignore-activity > > How do I say "this isn't a regression, it's a broken board > configuration" and get regzbot to stop tracking this? I sent the logs to Cristian on Jan, 14, but I don't know if they were helpful. The problem is pretty much reproducible here. I understand that from the previously quoted specification sentence, the hardware must perform VBUS sensing, and this is something I can confirm the hardware is not capable of. But if Cristian cannot reproduce it in a different SOC configured without a VBUS sensing pin, I can only hope Microchip/Atmel will look into the issue. On my side, it seems like I will have to maintain a patched kernel for this hardware. So, let's move on. > thanks, > > greg k-h Best regards, Marcelo. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-26 13:43 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-12-11 18:36 [PATCH] usb: gadget: atmel: Revert regression in USB Gadget (atmel_usba_udc) Marcelo Roberto Jimenez 2021-12-11 18:36 ` Marcelo Roberto Jimenez 2021-12-12 9:48 ` Thorsten Leemhuis 2021-12-12 9:48 ` Thorsten Leemhuis 2022-01-26 12:20 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2022-01-26 12:20 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2022-01-26 12:54 ` Thorsten Leemhuis 2022-01-26 12:54 ` Thorsten Leemhuis [not found] ` <CACjc_5o9eO5YTVt4jE7v1E9nirCwFMc1=Ub-jXSFCg1_8A2M-A@mail.gmail.com> 2022-01-26 13:43 ` Marcelo Roberto Jimenez [this message] 2022-01-26 13:43 ` Marcelo Roberto Jimenez 2021-12-13 10:02 ` Jonas Bonn 2021-12-13 10:02 ` Jonas Bonn [not found] ` <CACjc_5pHbLStniQnOVLDW5iLbKn8ovePuQsFFqeEnQPSSYxJoQ@mail.gmail.com> 2021-12-13 14:37 ` Fwd: " Marcelo Roberto Jimenez 2021-12-13 14:37 ` Marcelo Roberto Jimenez 2021-12-15 13:04 ` Cristian.Birsan 2021-12-15 13:04 ` Cristian.Birsan 2021-12-15 15:54 ` Marcelo Roberto Jimenez 2021-12-15 15:54 ` Marcelo Roberto Jimenez 2021-12-20 14:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2021-12-20 14:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2021-12-22 18:33 ` Cristian.Birsan 2021-12-22 18:33 ` Cristian.Birsan
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to='CACjc_5pmqLAo5X-Yj6Om9vvktR-0FN5SYgDxn=GvCn-yxcee+w@mail.gmail.com' \ --to=marcelo.jimenez@gmail.com \ --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \ --cc=balbi@kernel.org \ --cc=cristian.birsan@microchip.com \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=jonas@norrbonn.se \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=ludovic.desroches@microchip.com \ --cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \ --cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \ --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.